Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

BODY POLITICS BY ROBERTA SASSA TELLI - The rationalization of society is a concept that

was created by Max Weber.Rationalization refers


Intro: to the process by which modern society has
increasingly become concerned with: Efficiency:
- Sociology has questioned the epistemological status achieving the maximum results with a minimum
of the scientific study of the body amount of effort

Rather than formulating - Weber, bureaucracy is the basis for the systematic
encompassing body typologies (Turner 1984; O'Neill 1985), formation of any organisation and is designed to
sociological theory ensure efficiency and economic effectiveness. It is
has questioned the epistemological assumptions involved in an ideal model for management and its
the production of administration to bring an organisation's power
natural facts, decentering the physical body of the bio- structure into focus.
medical sciences and - Rationalization = development
exploring the political implications of body representations - SOCIAL LIFE IS MORE AND MORE SUBJECTED
and practices TO CALCULATION AND PREDICITON.
2. The body is the paramount symbol of the subject’s
- There is a need to explore the political implications self-possession and degree of civilization
of bodily representations and practices

They have
become political not only because they are shaped by - Elias: work on body rationalization (Civilizing
productive requirements or constrained by moral rules, but Proces)
also because their ``naturality'' is traced back to claims to
truth reflecting power differences. Body government is explicitly linked to the political by
Norbert Elias

What contributed to the concept - as nations stabilized in the Wests after the 1500s,
power was centralized and became the preserve of a
1. The body is seen as transformed into an instrument small number of people

- Marx: labor as a corporeal process - these people were no longer revered for their
physical strength, but for their social standing
What is Corporeality? reflected in their courtly manners

-something that has physical form, it is physical, it is bodily - to be identified with power, people are encouraged
or bodied.. to display the same “civilized behaviour” as a
nation’s governing elite
- having a material or substance
- people and nations lacking the right behaviour are
Marx’s lament on the “loss of corporeality seen as inferior and need “civilizing” into following
the rules of the powerful.
Capitalism thus
steals corporeality its meaning: the worker ``only feels - Elias in his book “The Civilizing Process”
himself freely active in his concludes that the way in which Western society
animal function ± eating, drinking, procreating, or at most believes itself to be superior to others is summed
in his dwelling and up by the concept of civilization.
dressing-up, etc.; in his human functions he no longer feels
himself to be anything but an animal'' - It can refer to all sorts of facts about nations: from
general ones such as lifestyles, values, customs,
religions.. to eprosnal ones, levels of bodily hygiene,
- Weber: on Discipline ways of preparing food,

“rational conditioning of work performances” - The rise of manners and etiquettes

- Weber considers the modern factory as an - TRANSFORMATION in attitudes toward bodily


example of the rational conditioning of work behaviours was key to this sense of civilization
performances.
- Bureaucracy :

- Weber s interest in the nature of power and - CONDUCT


authority and his realisation of the inevitability of
rationalisation in the operation of large scale An unconsciously
modern organisation -led home to establish a operating ``repulsion of the vulgar'' an ``increasing
theory on Bureaucracy. sensibility to anything
corresponding to a lesser sensibility of lower-ranking
- He felt that the operation of modern organisation in classes'' permeates
any field would be impossible without Bureaucracy. the conduct of life of the courtly upper class, and this ``good
It's the coordination of activities of modern era. taste'' also represents
1
a prestige value for such circles Habitus is one of Bourdieu’s most influential yet ambiguous
concepts. It refers to the physical embodiment of cultural
- a particular ``civilized'' bodily conduct has become capital, to the deeply ingrained habits, skills, and
widespread dispositions that we possess due to our life experiences.

HOWEVER, HABITUS are the resources or the combination of the


amount and type of capital the individual has. Not only
The rules about what constitutes “good manners” have economic,
always been dictated by the upper classes so as civilization
moves forward, it is furthering the interests of the powerful Social – who u know social networks
elites
Cultural capital – knowing the right cultural codes, knowing
- Goffman: symbolic functions of bodily how to behave and what works in various settings and
comportment (The Performative Body) contexts

- No true self All these forms of capital are transformed into symbolic
capital, the indiv brings these with him whe he enters into
- All the world’s a stage and all the men and women the society
merely play..
Each field has its own rules/DOX.
- On human interactions he argued that people
display series of masks to others, controlling and Bourdieu proposes that those with a high volume of cultural
staging how we appear based on the situation adn capital — non-financial social assets, such as education,
who we are interacting with which promote social mobility beyond economic means —
are most likely to be able to determine what
- “we play diff parts determined by the situations we constitutes taste within society.
take ourselves in”

- "dramaturgy" to portray people as actors, whose


actions are shaped by the type of interaction they - That is, the naturalization of this distinction of
make with others. taste and its misrecognition as necessary denies
the dominated classes the means of defining their
- challenged common assumptions about the nature own world, which leads to the disadvantage of
of identity. By conceptualising the most mundane those with less overall capital
social interactions in terms of theatrical
performances, Goffman shows how even the most - In sociology, taste is an individual's personal and
sincere presentations of the self are marked by cultural patterns of choice and preference. Taste is
affectation and posturing, which are both habitual drawing distinctions between things such as styles,
and quite deliberate at the same time. manners, consumer goods, and works of art and
relating to these. Social inquiry of taste is about the
- In daily interaction, actors skilfully craft their human ability to judge what is beautiful, good, and
performances in ways that conceal undesirable proper.
aspects, while accentuating favourable ones,
tailored to the particular audience and context.

- Identity, then, emerges from the contrasts between (Post-structuralist)


the many roles that are acted out and the self that
experiences them: the self is ‘situationally defined’ - Foucault’s poststructuralist conceptions of
(Elliott, 2014: 44). In this way, Goffman’s theory of discipline, (governmentality), surveillance,
identity challenges what is still a dominant view, medicalization, and confession
which is that identity is somehow innate, formed
prior to social experiences, and that individuals are
guided by their ‘true’ identity throughout social life.
For Goffman, the reverse is true, with identity being DISCIPLINE
the effect of particular social interactions rather by Foucault's description of discipline as coordinating
than their cause. people's movements and functions through time and space.

- Bourdieu: theory of embodiment and mimesis BIOPOWER


(“power over life”)
Mimesis: habitually practicing, process of imitation -refers to new mechanisms and tactics of power
focused in controlling life itself
Bourdieu’s concept of cultural capital refers to the - extended political control and power over all major
collection of symbolic elements such as skills, tastes, processes of life itself, through a transferral of
posture, clothing, mannerisms, material belongings, sovereign power into “biopower”- that is,
credentials, etc. that one acquires through being part of a technologies and techniques which govern human
particular social class. social and biological processes.

2
- biopolitics can be understood as a political “Gender is the repeated stylisation of the body, a set of
rationality which takes the administration of life repeated acts within a highly rigid regulatory frame that
and populations as its subject: ‘to ensure, sustain, congeal over time to produce the appearance of substance”
and multiply life, to put this life in
order’.9 Biopower thus names the way in which proposes to deconstruct the system of signs
biopolitics is put to work in society through which feminine identity has been linked to the
- a practice of governing as focused on population heterosexual matrix
control
- control norms, body size, gender presentations, Butler argues that masculinity and feminity are not
stats, infant mortality rates inherent.

gender is not the


cultural representation of biological sex, but rather the
SURVEILLANCE process that produces
- the penal system, the policing and surveillance the possibility of two distinct sexes.
exists not to prevent crime but to defend the power
of the ruling class
- the concept of panopticon by bentham
- regardless if the prisoners are being watched or Nobody is born one gender or the other, says the
not, the mere visibility or appearance of the tower is philosopher. "We act and walk and speak and talk in ways
enough to control the behaviour of the prisoners that consolidate an impression of being a man or being a
- whips and chains are not needed woman.
- Foucault said we can make a panoptic school,
panoptic hospital, or even a panoptic country PERFORMATIVE – means it produces a series of effects. We
- Surveillance serves the purpose of expanding power act and walk and speak in ways that consolidate an
- impression of being a man or a woman

MEDICALIZATION Bec we act as if being a man or a woman is an internal


reality. But actually it is phenomenon that is ebing
- medical dominance produced and reproduced all the time.
- an analysis on the ways where key features of
medicine shows that there is capacity to control Nobody is a gender from the start
their work which gave doctors enormous power in
relation to health and illness. GENDER IS PERFORMATIVE which means that it is real
only to the extent that it is performed. If we choose not to
medical truths implicated in a network of power perform the gender script then gender ceases to exist.
relations

ex: medical
``gaze that dominates'' the body by rendering its depth a
visible object, with the
anatomy lesson becoming itself a powerful representation of Notes:
political power
The body has been a central theme of the world, it has been
GOVERNMENTALITY seen and used as a STRUCTURE - and has been exploited to
- the way in which people are instructed to govern evoke “notions’ to standardized and normalize the difference
themselves within the society. Where it is not seen as a mere biological
-power is distributed among the people structure, but a sociological one, surrounded with norms
- people conduct themselves and codes. From time to time this particular aspect has
Neoliberalism taught to govern themselves dominated the worldly politics of empires and kingdoms.
People control their actions for the benefit of the state The body has remained a pivotal point of gender difference.
- willing participation of the government which
consist the consent of the populace

The Body Politique is a performance art comprising


- Judith Butler’s “gender as performative” :*Note: actuated body monologues. Springing from Marx’s lament
use the vid for ppt on the “loss of corporeality” and Weber’s “rational
Gender: is a set of expectations or standards that society conditioning of work performances” to Bourdieu’s
defines for you “embodiment and mimesis,” Foucault’s poststructuralist
conceptions of discipline, governmentality, surveillance,
Ex: women and men are supposed to act this way medicalization, and Judith Butler’s “gender as
performative”, the presentation aims to problematize the
There is an assumption that if you are born female, you are deep-seated concepts and “truths” that people have come to
going to be a woman. And so u will be feminine and u will assume and accept about the human body.
get attracted to the opposite sex.

But this is how Judith Butler defines GENDER: The human body is more than just the material
flesh, -- it is a political arena and a landscape of the
struggles and conflicts of power, subjugation and
3
domination in varied forms. The human body is a text upon Militaries and insurgents groups there is a brutalizing
which is written the histories of resistance, and voices of process. There is a standard process to brutalize children
dissent muffled they maybe by legitimization and who then became child soldiers. By traumatizing people,
pacification, yet nevertheless existent as scars, bruises and you enable them to do violence. The link between trauma
fractures aching for articulation and recognition. and violence is a continuous cycle.

Through acted embodiments the Body Politique RH BILL and Biopower


Performance brings to fore and dramatizes the present day
forms and instances of the encroachment of society and
politics upon the body, -- the false consciousness of the
society of the spectacle, the delights of slow sweet death, the When a group is enmeshed in it’s own Habitus it sees no
plasticity of cyborg kind of life, the banality of evil, and the reason to change. If it encounters people who do not share
hyperrealities of power play as they operate in contemporary the Habitus, it will marginalize or exclude them.
society.
If the others are sufficiently powerful and/or numerous,
It is hoped that the presentation will not only give they can trigger change in the original group. This may
voice to these deep silent social human issues but also shed require economic and political upheaval, even revolution.
light towards possible alternatives and ways for deeper
understanding of the complexities of contemporary political
life, and then perhaps advocate for a life that is “fully
human, fully alive,” not just for oneself, but for others and
the greater common good.
The Panopticon was a metaphor that allowed Foucaultto
explore the relationship between 1.) systems of social
control and people in a disciplinary situation and, 2.) the
According to Foucault, the human body is the targeted power-knowledge concept.
object of modern power systems. In his genealogical studies,
Foucault describes the manner in which these power Panoptic power is a process of social regulation and
systems leave an imprint on the body and utilize knowledge organizations.
of the body as an indirect means of exercising subtle forms
of control. In recent years, several researchers have claimed
that the status of the body, subsumed as it is by modern
power networks, has become a means for conducting a
unique political critique in which the human being is viewed
as an agent of oppression and freedom. This article takes a
fresh look at Foucault’s notions of life and death that
underpin the critical understanding the body–power
relationship. While this approach recognizes the
completeness of subjective structuring processes, it also
enables the formulation of new insights regarding the status
of the modern individual as the subject of separate and
independent modes of speech and action.

EXAMPLES AND APPLICATIONS

Gender Difference

Communication scholar Julia Wood (2005) noted that while


biological differences between men and women exist, there
are far more similarities between the two groups than there
are differences. Why, then, do cultures around the world
persist in marking and performing gender difference and
constructing rigid divisions between the categories of men
and women? Why are third gender people so demonized and
erased? What social, political, and economic purposes are
served by constructing and performing differences between
men and women and reinforcing a two-gender system?
Lorber and Farrell (1991) stated the following: The reason
for gender categories and the constant construction and
reconstruction of differences between them is that gender is
an integral part of any social group’s structure of
domination and subordination and division of labor in the
family and the economy. (p. 2)

Child Soldiers

Rights of the Child – Rites of the Child?


4

You might also like