Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pacific Rehouse Corporation vs. Ngo PDF
Pacific Rehouse Corporation vs. Ngo PDF
Pacific Rehouse Corporation vs. Ngo PDF
_______________
* FIRST DIVISION.
309
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168f9fbdc98fe6b9317003600fb002c009e/p/ATP184/?username=Guest Page 1 of 17
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 789 17/02/2019, 1)46 PM
310
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168f9fbdc98fe6b9317003600fb002c009e/p/ATP184/?username=Guest Page 2 of 17
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 789 17/02/2019, 1)46 PM
PERLAS-BERNABE, J.:
The Facts
_______________
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168f9fbdc98fe6b9317003600fb002c009e/p/ATP184/?username=Guest Page 3 of 17
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 789 17/02/2019, 1)46 PM
311
_______________
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168f9fbdc98fe6b9317003600fb002c009e/p/ATP184/?username=Guest Page 4 of 17
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 789 17/02/2019, 1)46 PM
312
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168f9fbdc98fe6b9317003600fb002c009e/p/ATP184/?username=Guest Page 5 of 17
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 789 17/02/2019, 1)46 PM
_______________
313
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168f9fbdc98fe6b9317003600fb002c009e/p/ATP184/?username=Guest Page 6 of 17
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 789 17/02/2019, 1)46 PM
annotation.
In its opposition to LRC Case No. 1117-09,30 petitioner
countered that respondent was not a mortgagee in good
faith, having knowledge of the sale of the subject property
to petitioner as early as November 2007 or even prior to the
foreclosure proceedings.31 Likewise, asserting that the
petition for cancellation of the notice of lis pendens should
have been filed instead in Civil Case No. 2031-08 and not
in a land registration case where the RTC exercised limited
jurisdiction, petitioner moved for the consolidation of Civil
Case No. 2031-08 and LRC Case No. 1117-09.32
_______________
25 Id., at p. 284.
26 Id., at p. 279.
27 Id., at p. 140.
28 Id., at p. 141; p. 53.
29 Id., at pp. 287-288.
30 Id., at pp. 175-177.
31 Id., at p. 176.
32 Id., at p. 53.
314
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168f9fbdc98fe6b9317003600fb002c009e/p/ATP184/?username=Guest Page 7 of 17
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 789 17/02/2019, 1)46 PM
_______________
315
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168f9fbdc98fe6b9317003600fb002c009e/p/ATP184/?username=Guest Page 8 of 17
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 789 17/02/2019, 1)46 PM
_______________
40 Id., at p. 54.
41 See Omnibus and Urgent Motion for Reconsideration dated June
21, 2011; id., at pp. 217-235.
42 Id., at pp. 258-259.
43 Id., at pp. 149-153.
44 Id., at p. 293. Signed by Clerk of Court V Allan Sly M. Marasigan.
45 Id., at pp. 54-55.
46 Id., at pp. 267-276.
47 Id., at p. 269.
48 Id., at p. 270.
49 Id., at p. 271.
50 Id., at p. 272.
51 Id., at pp. 81-111.
316
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168f9fbdc98fe6b9317003600fb002c009e/p/ATP184/?username=Guest Page 9 of 17
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 789 17/02/2019, 1)46 PM
_______________
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168f9fbdc98fe6b9317003600fb002c009e/p/ATP184/?username=Guest Page 10 of 17
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 789 17/02/2019, 1)46 PM
54 Id., at p. 62.
317
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168f9fbdc98fe6b9317003600fb002c009e/p/ATP184/?username=Guest Page 11 of 17
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 789 17/02/2019, 1)46 PM
_______________
318
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168f9fbdc98fe6b9317003600fb002c009e/p/ATP184/?username=Guest Page 12 of 17
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 789 17/02/2019, 1)46 PM
litigant, viz.:
_______________
319
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168f9fbdc98fe6b9317003600fb002c009e/p/ATP184/?username=Guest Page 13 of 17
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 789 17/02/2019, 1)46 PM
_______________
60 See Gochan v. Gochan, 423 Phil. 491, 502; 372 SCRA 256, 264
(2001), citing Ruiz v. J.M Tuason & Co., Inc., 117 Phil. 223, 227-228; 7
SCRA 202, 206 (1963).
61 Id.
320
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168f9fbdc98fe6b9317003600fb002c009e/p/ATP184/?username=Guest Page 14 of 17
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 789 17/02/2019, 1)46 PM
_______________
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168f9fbdc98fe6b9317003600fb002c009e/p/ATP184/?username=Guest Page 15 of 17
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 789 17/02/2019, 1)46 PM
321
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168f9fbdc98fe6b9317003600fb002c009e/p/ATP184/?username=Guest Page 16 of 17
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 789 17/02/2019, 1)46 PM
··o0o··
_______________
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168f9fbdc98fe6b9317003600fb002c009e/p/ATP184/?username=Guest Page 17 of 17