Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Plasmonics: The Promise of Highly Integrated Optical Devices
Plasmonics: The Promise of Highly Integrated Optical Devices
Plasmonics: The Promise of Highly Integrated Optical Devices
(Invited Paper)
Abstract—This paper reviews the fundamentals of surface plas- considerations: for a nonmagnetic core with dielectric constant
mon polariton (SPP) excitations sustained by interfaces between εcore > 0 of a dielectric waveguide, the dispersion relation re-
metallic and insulating media, with a focus on applications in lating the propagation constant β = kz and the transverse phase
waveguiding of electromagnetic waves at visible and near-infrared
frequencies. The large wavevectors accessible via SPP oscillations constants kx and ky of the wavevector of the propagating beam
allow for significantly reduced wavelengths and thus increased con- to the frequency can be written as
finement of the propagating modes, promising a subwavelength ω2
photonic infrastructure suitable for integration on Si-based pho- β 2 + kx2 + ky2 = εcore . (1)
tonic chips. Various geometries such as single interfaces, multi- c2
layer structures, and nanoparticle ensembles are discussed and For a 3-D wave, both kx and ky are real, thus, (1) implies
their properties assessed in terms of light confinement and energy an upper limit on the transverse phase constants via kx , ky ≤
attenuation of the guided modes. Metal/insulator/metal (MIM) and √
ω/c εcore = 2πncore /λ0 , where ncore and λ0 are the refrac-
certain forms of nanoparticle waveguides promise novel avenues tive indices of the core and the wavelength of the radiation in
for light confinement, guiding, and coupling, which could provide
the basis for subwavelength photonic devices. vacuum, respectively. Via Fourier reciprocity, this upper limit
for the transverse phase constants leads directly to a lower limit
Index Terms—Nanophotonics, optoelectronics, plasmonics. of the lateral mode size of the 3-D wave propagating in the
waveguide [4]
I. INTRODUCTION λ0
d x , dy ≥ . (2)
HE miniaturization of photonic devices for guiding and 2ncore
T confining electromagnetic energy to size scales compati-
ble with those of highly integrated electronic circuits currently
This fundamental limit for the size of the optical mode propa-
gating in dielectric waveguides of about half the wavelength in
poses one of the biggest challenges for the information technol- the host medium not only applies to homogeneous media, but
ogy industries. In the area of electronic circuits for information also to beams propagating in line defect waveguides in photonic
processing, the switch from micro- to nanoscale integration is crystals, and more generally to any structure where the confine-
well underway: components of CMOS logic circuits have en- ment results from interference effects such as Bragg reflection.
tered the sub-100-nm size scale, and quantum effects begin to In analogy to the transverse mode size in waveguides, the effec-
govern the electronic function of devices in both semiconductor- tive mode volume of optical microcavities is also fundamentally
based nanoelectronics and emerging areas such as molecular limited by diffraction [5], and there is currently a significant
electronics [1]. Apart from considerable fabrication challenges, effort in establishing broad design principles [6] to create di-
further size reduction of nanoelectronic circuits will be gov- electric photonic devices with mode volumes approaching this
erned by the constraints imposed by the switch to quantum fundamental barrier of (λ/2n)3 .
information processing and ultimately by the physical limits of In order to break the diffraction limit, clearly a different ap-
computation imposed by energy and entropy considerations [2]. proach from the simple scaling down of dielectric micropho-
However, miniaturization of photonic devices such as waveg- tonic waveguides and cavities is needed. In order to create opti-
uides and cavities for guiding and confining electromagnetic en- cal modes with lateral sizes in the deep subwavelength regime,
ergy at visible and near-infrared frequencies toward the sub-100- lower dimensional optical waves, where one or both of the lat-
nm size scale is limited by the well-known diffraction limit of eral phase constants kx and ky are imaginary, have to be em-
light. This fundamental barrier is a direct consequence of the ployed. As (1) suggests, such low-dimensional waves can be
three-dimensional (3-D) nature of waves propagating in dielec- achieved for core materials where εcore < 0, i.e., with metals
tric materials, which are usually the building blocks of integrated up to ultraviolet frequencies. In this case, the upper limit (2)
optical components [3], and can be derived from elementary does not apply, and waveguides as well as cavities with effec-
tive mode areas and volumes on the deep subwavelength scale
breaking the diffraction limit can be realized. The respective
Manuscript received October 31, 2005; revised August 14, 2006. This work
was supported in part by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research modes occurring at the interface between a metal and a di-
Council (EPSRC), U.K. electric are called surface-plasmon polaritons (SPPs) or short
The author is with the Centre for Photonics and Photonic Materials, surface plasmons (SPs), and in recent years, an explosion of re-
Department of Physics, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, U.K. (e-mail:
s.maier@bath.ac.uk). search interest in nanoscale metallic structures sustaining both
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/JSTQE.2006.884086 propagating and localized SPs has been seen. Fueled by rapid
1077-260X/$20.00 © 2006 IEEE
1672 IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN QUANTUM ELECTRONICS, VOL. 12, NO. 6, NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2006
how such coupling structures can be efficiently interfaced with [19] , “Plasmon-polariton waves guided by thin lossy metal films of finite
nanometric waveguides. From the materials point of view, the width: Bound modes of asymmetric structures,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 63,
no. 12, p. 125417, Mar. 2001.
vast majority of work in SPP waveguides and plasmonics in gen- [20] R. Charbonneau, P. Berini, E. Berolo, and E. Lisicka-Shrzek, “Experi-
eral has thus far focused on the noble metals Au and Ag, due to mental observation of plasmon-polariton waves supported by a thin metal
the ease of fabricating nanostructures and the fortunate optical film of finite width,” Opt. Lett., vol. 25, no. 11, p. 844, Jun. 2000.
[21] T. Nikolajsen, K. Leosson, and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, “Surface plasmon po-
properties of these metals at near-infrared and visible frequen- lariton based modulators and switches operating at telecom wavelengths,”
cies up to the onset of their interband transitions. Metals showing Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 85, no. 24, pp. 5833–5835, Dec. 2004.
compatibility with current CMOS processing techniques such [22] R. Zia, M. D. Selker, P. B. Catrysse, and M. L. Brongersma, “Geometries
and materials for subwavelength surface plasmon modes,” J. Opt. Soc.
as Al or Cu also offer the possibility of plasmon excitation at vis- Amer. A, vol. 21, no. 12, p. 2442, Dec. 2004.
ible and even ultraviolet frequencies, and an active exploration [23] R. Zia, M. D. Selker, and M. L. Brongersma, “Leaky and bound modes of
of new material systems is currently underway. surface plasmon waveguides,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 71, p. 165431, 2005.
[24] R. Zia, A. Chandran, and M. L. Brongersma, “Dielectric waveguide model
After successful demonstrations of plasmon waveguides for guided surface polaritons,” Opt. Lett., vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 1473–1475,
based upon a variety of designs, the field is now at a crucial Jun. 2005.
point. For the promise of a deep subwavelength photonic ar- [25] J. R. Krenn, B. Lamprecht, H. Ditlbacher, G. Schider, M. Salerno,
A. Leitner, and F. R. Aussenegg, “Non-diffraction-limited light trans-
chitecture to come true, the tradeoff between localization and port by gold nanowires,” Europhys. Lett., vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 663–669,
loss requires active functional elements such as switches be im- Dec. 2002.
plemented within the constraints of the micrometer-scale prop- [26] R. M. Dickson and L. A. Lyon, “Unidirectional plasmon propagation in
metallic nanowires,” J. Phys. Chem. B, vol. 104, pp. 6095–6098, 2000.
agation length. With the ever-increasing pace and breadth of [27] B. Prade, J. Y. Vinet, and A. Mysyrowicz, “Guided optical waves in planar
research in this area, one can be hopeful that demonstrations of heterostructures with negative dielectric constant,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 44,
crucial active photonic function based on the plasmonic devices no. 24, pp. 13556–13572, Dec. 1991.
[28] R. Zia, M. D. Selker, P. B. Catrysse, and M. L. Brongersma, “Geometries
are within reach. and materials for subwavelength surface plasmon modes,” J. Opt. Soc.
Amer. A, vol. 21, no. 12, p. 2442, Dec. 2005.
[29] G. Veronis and S. Fan, “Bends and splitters in metal–dielectric–metal sub-
REFERENCES wavelength plasmonic waveguides,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 87, p. 131102,
2005.
[1] R. W. Ed., Nanoelectronics and Information Technology. Weinheim, [30] G. Mie, “Beiträge zur Optik trüber Medien, speziell kolloidaler Met-
Germany: Wiley–VCH, 2003. allösungen,” Ann. Phys., vol. 25, p. 377, 1908.
[2] S. Lloyd, “Ultimate physical limits to computation,” Nature, vol. 406, [31] U. Kreibig and M. Vollmer, Optical Properties of Metal Clusters. Berlin,
pp. 1047–1054, 2000. Germany: Springer, 1995.
[3] B. E. A. Saleh and M. C. Teich, Fundamentals of Photonics. New York: [32] S. A. Maier, M. L. Brongersma, P. G. Kik, and H. A. Atwater, “Obser-
Wiley, 1991. vation of near-field coupling in metal nanoparticle chains using far-field
[4] J. Takahara, S. Yamagishi, H. Taki, A. Morimoto, and T. Kobayashi, polarization spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 65, p. 193408, 2002.
“Guiding of a one-dimensional optical beam with nanometer diameter,” [33] S. A. Maier, P. G. Kik, and H. A. Atwater, “Observation of coupled
Opt. Lett., vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 475–477, Apr. 1997. plasmon-polariton modes in Au nanoparticle chain waveguides of differ-
[5] K. J. Vahala, “Optical microcavities,” Nature, vol. 424, pp. 839–846, ent lengths: Estimation of waveguide loss,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 81,
Aug. 2003. pp. 1714–1716, 2002.
[6] D. Englund, I. Fushman, and J. Vučković, “General recipe for designing [34] , “Optical pulse propagation in metal nanoparticle chain waveguides,”
photonic crystal cavities,” Opt. Express, vol. 13, no. 16, pp. 5961–5975, Phys. Rev. B, vol. 67, p. 205402, 2003.
Aug. 2005. [35] S. A. Maier, P. G. Kik, H. A. Atwater, S. Meltzer, E. Harel, B. E. Koel, and
[7] S. A. Maier, M. L. Brongersma, P. G. Kik, S. Meltzer, A. A. G. Requicha, A. A. G. Requicha, “Local detection of electromagnetic energy transport
and H. A. Atwater, “Plasmonics—A route to nanoscale optical devices,” below the diffraction limit in metal nanoparticle plasmon waveguides,”
Adv. Mater., vol. 13, no. 19, p. 1501, Oct. 2001. Nat. Mater., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 229–232, Apr. 2003.
[8] S. A. Maier and H. A. Atwater, “Plasmonics: Localization and guiding [36] J. R. Krenn, A. Dereux, J. C. Weeber, E. Bourillot, Y. Lacroute,
of electromagnetic energy in metal/dielectric structures,” J. Appl. Phys., J. P. Goudonnet, G. Schider, W. Gotschy, A. Leitner, F. R. Aussenegg, and
vol. 98, no. 1, p. 011101, Jul. 2005. C. Girard, “Squeezing the optical near-field zone by plasmon coupling of
[9] W. L. Barnes, A. Dereux, and T. Ebbesen, “Surface plasmon subwave- metallic nanoparticles,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 82, no. 12, pp. 2590–2593,
length optics,” Nature, vol. 424, pp. 824–830, Aug. 2002. Mar. 1999.
[10] R. H. Ritchie, “Plasma losses by fast electrons in thin films,” Phys. Rev., [37] S. A. Maier, P. E. Barclay, T. J. Johnson, M. D. Friedman, and O. Painter,
vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 874–881, Jun. 1957. “Low-loss fiber accessible plasmon waveguides for planar energy guiding
[11] C. J. Powell and J. B. Swan, “Effect of oxidation on the characteristic and sensing,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 84, no. 20, pp. 3990–3992, May
loss spectra of aluminum and magnesium,” Phys. Rev., vol. 118, no. 3, 2004.
pp. 640–643, May 1960. [38] S. A. Maier, M. D. Friedman, P. E. Barclay, and O. Painter, “Experimen-
[12] H. Raether, Surface Plasmons (Ser. Springer-Verlag Tracts in Modern tal demonstration of fiber-accessible metal nanoparticle plasmon waveg-
Physics), vol. 111. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1988. uides for planar energy guiding and sensing,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 86,
[13] P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy, “Optical constants of the noble metals,” p. 071103, 2005.
Phys. Rev. B, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 4370–4379, Dec. 1972.
[14] S. I. Bozhevolnyi, J. Erland, K. Leosson, P. M. W. Skovgaard, and
J. M. Hvam, “Waveguiding in surface plasmon polariton band gap struc-
tures,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 86, pp. 3008–3011, Apr. 2001.
[15] E. N. Economou, “Surface plasmons in thin films,” Phys. Rev., vol. 182, Stefan A. Maier is with the Centre for Photonics
no. 2, pp. 539–554, Jun. 1969. and Photonic Materials, University of Bath, Bath,
[16] J. J. Burke and G. I. Stegeman, “Surface-polariton-like waves guided by U.K. He is currently a Reader in the Department of
thin, lossy metal films,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 5186–5201, Apr. Physics, University of Bath.
1986.
[17] D. Sarid, “Long-range surface-plasma waves on very thin metal films,”
Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 47, no. 26, pp. 1927–1930, Dec. 1981.
[18] P. Berini, “Plasmon-polariton waves guided by thin lossy metal films of
finite width: Bound modes of symmetric structures,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 61,
no. 15, p. 10484, Apr. 2000.