Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction L&T Final
Introduction L&T Final
As part of a group that has more than 100 companies and 350,000 employees in its
fold and a presence in 80 countries, L&T Quality Management Services L&T inherits
a legacy of trust, an enviable reputation for excellence and ethics, and a wide canvas
for its operations. A division of L&T Sons, the principal promoter company of the
L&T group of companies, i s c l o s e l y a l i g n e d t o t h e n e e d s a n d
r e q u i r e me n t s o f t h e g r o u p . I t s p r i ma r y mi s s i o n i s t o collaborate with
group companies, through long and short-term initiatives and develop training and
assessment programmers, to maximize the companies’ performance potential. Also,
given the increasing international spread of the L&T group, works with the companies
to enhance their global competitiveness. In recent years, the L&T group has
significantly increased its global footprint. This is clearly reflected in the group’s
financials for the year. The total revenue generated in 2008 -09 is estimated
at $70.8 billion (around Rs. 325,334 crore), of which 64.8 percent is from businesses
outside India. Plays a critical role in helping companies adapt to changing
international market conditions. It also assists new companies entering the
group through mergers and acquisitions, by helping them align with the L&T
group’s values and code of ethics. Abides by the same set of values that define
the L&T group of companies: integrity and maturity, unity and understanding,
learning and sharing, and passion for excellence. It ensures that these are adhered to
in every venture that is undertaken, irrespective of the location, scope and nature of
business involved. The mission of is providing value to companies in the L &T group
for continually enhancing their performance excellence and global competitiveness.
The vision of is to expand and accelerate performance excellence by 2013 to ensure
that:
All group companies adopt the L&T Business Excellence Model (HBEM) and
the Management of Business Ethics (MBE) framework.
All large companies including one international company are JRD QV award
winners.
All group companies have the lowest carbon footprint in their relevant business
segments.
1|Page
SWOT Analysis of L&T
Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&T) is a giant in the field of construction and
manufacturing in India. L&T also has ventured into electronic and electrical
equipment, financial services and information technology. L&T has observed
impressive growth in revenue in the past few years and has many projects in the
pipeline currently.
Competitive advantage: L&T is one of the most respected companies in India for
engineering for its custom made technology-intensive equipment and systems. With
the strong brand name and strong manufacturing facilities, L&T holds a competitive
advantage.
Strong financial position: L&T’s financial position has been improving from the
past few years with company’s total assets growing at a CAGR of 18% and its total
capital grew at a CAGR of 12% from FY2011-15. Improving financial conditions
provides a cushion at the time of adverse market conditions.
2|Page
Weaknesses in the SWOT Analysis of L&T :
Dependence on Indian market: Indian market contributes over 65% of its total
revenues and thus makes L&T largely dependent on the Indian market.
Overdependence on a particular market makes the company vulnerable to any
fluctuations in the Indian market.
Increasing debt: L&T’s debts have been increasing steadily for the past few years.
L&T’s debt has increased from INR 98960 million in FY2011 to INR 136090 in
FY2016. Increasing debts impact company’s financial flexibility.
Strong order book position: L&T has won various contracts in the recent past and
secured new orders worth more than $20000 million in the year 2015-16 which
showed a growth of over 7% over the year.
Low Oil prices affect the industry: With oil prices decreasing, various drilling
projects have been stopped and expansion plans have been scaled back. This affects
growth opportunity for the company and the industry.
GST impact can be negative: The cost of under construction buildings are expected
to increase with GST and it will have an overall negative impact on the construction
industry.
3|Page
PORTERS 5 FORCES MODEL
4|Page
Balance Sheet of L&T
Sources of funds
Owner's fund
Equity share capital 120.44 117.14 58.47
Share application money 25.09 - -
Preference share capital - - -
Reserves & surplus 18,142.82 12,317.96 9,470.71
Loan funds
Secured loans 955.73 1,102.38 308.53
Unsecured loans 5,845.10 5,453.65 3,275.46
Total 25,089.18 18,991.13 13,113.17
Uses of funds
Fixed assets
Gross block 7,235.78 5,575.00 4,188.91
Less : revaluation reserve 23.29 24.59 25.9
5|Page
Book value of unquoted investments 11,771.54 7,793.04 6,642.82
6|Page
Retained earnings 3,610.63 2,868.84 1,679.31
RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Liquidity Ratios: These ratios are calculated just to analyse the short term
financial position of the company. An important concern about any company
is its liquidity or to meet its current obligations.
Liquidity exists when the company satisfy its maturing short debts. Liquidity
is important in carrying out a business. Liquidity ratios are of following types:
Quick ratio/Acid test ratio: The quick ratio is the stringent test to liquidity. It
is founded by dividing the most liquid current assets by current liabilities.
Inventory is not included since the length of time needed to convert to cash is
long. Prepaid expenses are also not an element since they are not convertible
in cash. General acceptable ratio is 1 to 1.
7|Page
Quick ratio=quick assets/current liabilities
Quick assets=current assets-stock-prepaid expenses
Absolute liquid ratio: Ratios based on cash flow from operations give a more
direct indication of a company’s ability to generate sufficient cash to satisfy
cash to satisfy predicate cash requirements. General acceptable ratio is 0.5 to
2. Efficiency Ratios: These are those ratios that are typically used to analyse
how well a company uses its assets and liabilities internally. These ratios look
at the internal working of the company. In other words efficiency ratios
measure the quality of a business' receivables and how efficiently it uses and
controls its assets, how effectively the firm is paying suppliers, and whether
the business is overtrading or under trading on its equity (using borrowed
funds).
Efficiency ratios are of following types:
Inventory turnover ratio: This ratio indicates the number of time the stock has
been turned over during the period and evaluates the efficiency with which a
firm is able to manage its inventory. This ratio indicates whether investment
in stock is within proper limit or not. This ratio is a relationship between the
cost of goods sold during a particular period of time and the cost of average
inventory during a particular period. It is expressed in number of times.
Inventory turnover ratio= Cost of goods sold / Average inventory
8|Page
Debtors turnover ratio: It indicates the velocity of debt collection of a firm. In
simple words it indicates the number of times average debtors (receivable) are
turned over during a year. Trade debtors are expected to be converted into
cash within a short period of time and are included in current assets. Hence,
the liquidity position of concern to pay its short term obligations in time
depends upon the quality of its trade debtors.
Debtors Turnover Ratio = Net Credit Sales /Average Debtors
Average collection period: The average collection period ratio represents the
average number of days for which a firm has to wait before its debtors are
converted intocash.
Creditors turnover ratio: It signifies the credit period enjoyed by the firm in
paying creditors. Accounts payable include both sundry creditors and bills
payable. Same as debtors turnover ratio, creditors turnover ratio can be
calculated in two forms, creditors turnover ratio and average payment period.
Average payment period: It gives the average credit period enjoyed from the
creditors. It can be calculated using the following formula:
Average Payment Period =365/ creditors turnover ratio
Working Capital Turnover Ratio = Cost of goods sold / Net Working Capital
9|Page
3. Solvency ratios: Solvency ratios are measures to assess a company’s
ability to meet its long-term obligations and thereby remain solvent and avoid
bankruptcy. It is a measure of a company's ability to service debts, expressed
as a percentage. A high solvency ratio indicates a healthy company, while a
low ratio indicates the opposite. A low solvency ratio further indicates
likelihood of default. Different industries have different standards as to what
qualifies as an acceptable solvency ratio, but, in general, a ratio of 20% or
higher is considered healthy. Potential lenders may take the solvency ratio into
account when considering making further loans.
Proprietary ratio: This ratio indicates the long-term or future solvency position
of the business. It shows the relationship between equity and total assets.
Proprietary ratio=equity/total assets
Solvency ratio: This ratio shows the relationship between total outsider’s
liabilities and total assets.
Solvency ratio= total outsider’s liabilities/ total assets
Or
10 | P a g e
Solvency ratio= 1- Proprietary ratio
Fixed assets to shareholder’s funds: This ratio finds the relationship between
fixed assets and shareholder’s funds. Fixed assets to shareholder’s funds.
Interest coverage ratio: This ratio relates the fixed interest charges to the
income earned by the business. It indicates whether the business has earned
sufficient profits to pay periodically the interest charges.
Interest Coverage Ratio = Net Profit before Interest and Tax / Fixed Interest Charges
Gross profit ratio: The gross profit ratio indicates how much of each sale
available to meet expenses and profits after merely paying for the goods that
were sold. This interactive tutorial explains the gross profit ratio by walking
you through the steps, including where Sales and Cost of Goods Sold are on
the Income Statement. It lets you use your own numbers -- great for checking
homework answers!
11 | P a g e
Operating profit ratio: This ratio shows the relationship between operating
profit and net sales.
Net profit ratio: This ratio finds the relationship between net sales and net
profit.
12 | P a g e
Return on Equity (ROE): In real sense, ordinary shareholders are the
real owners of the company. They assume the highest risk in the
company. (Preference shareholders have a preference over ordinary
shareholders in the payment of dividend as well as capital. Preference
shareholders get a fixed rate of dividend irrespective of the quantum of profits
of the company). The rate of dividends varies with the availability of profits
in case of ordinary shares only. Thus ordinary shareholders are more
interested in the profitability of a company and the performance of a company
should be judged on the basis of return on equity capital of the company.
Return on equity capital which is the relationship between profits of a
company and its equity.
13 | P a g e
RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Liquidity Ratios
Current Ratio:
Quick Ratio:
Year 2010
15197.91/21242.86=0.7154
Year 2009
12421.26/16718.78=0.7429
Year 2010
13766.04/21242.86=0.648
Year 2009
11645.97/16718.78=0.696
14 | P a g e
INTERPRETATION ON THE BASIS OF LIQUIDITY RATIOS
In the company L&T info tech the company’s current ratio for both the years
2010 and 2009 is less than the standard ratio of 2:1. In year 2010 it was 1.240
and in 2009 it was 1.335. At the same time current ratio decline in year 2010
as compared to year 2009.
Further in quick ratio test again company’s ratios in both the years are lesser
than the standard generally accepted ratio. In year 2010 and 2009 it was
around 0.7154 and 0.7429 respectively.
Finally in acid test ratio company’ position is again declining as in both the
years ratio is falling.
So in the end we can say that company’s short term financial position is
declining because all its liquidity ratios are below than the standard acceptable
ratios. Moreover in year 2010 its more less as compared 2009. So company
should make proper efforts to solid its position to satisfy short term debts.
2. Efficiency Ratios:
Year 2010
COGS=28453.55
Average stock= (opening stock + closing stock)/2=1585.265
Inventory turnover ratio=28453.55/1585.265=17.948
Year 2009
COGS=26271.62
Average stock=1744.205
Inventory turnover ratio=26271.62/1744.205=15.062
15 | P a g e
Inventory Conversion Period
Inventory conversion period=365/ Inventory turnover ratio
Year 2010
Inventory conversion period=365/17.948=20.33=21 days
Year 2009
Inventory conversion period=365/15.062=24.23=25 days
16 | P a g e
INTERPRETATION ON THE BASIS OF EFFICIENCY RATIOS
L&T info tech has improved its position in converting its inventory to sales.
This ratio in year in 2009 was approximately 25 days which reduced to 21
days in year 2010. Further working capital turnover ratio of the company has
also increased. It indicates that company is efficiently using its working
capital. Which depicts that company is utilizing its assets in a efficient
manner.
3. Solvency Ratios:
Debt-to-equity Ratio:
Debt to Equity Ratio= debt/shareholder’s equity
Debt=long term loans + debentures
Year 2010
Debt=6035.29
Shareholder’s equity=18311.64
Debt to Equity Ratio=6035.29/18311.64=0.329
Year 2009
Debt=5449.44
Shareholder’s equity=12459.69
Debt to Equity Ratio=5449.44/12459.69=0.437
Year 2010
Debt=6035.29
Long term loan + equity=6035.29 +18311.64 =24346.93
Funded debt to total capitalisation ratio=6035.29/24346.93=0.237
17 | P a g e
Year 2009
Debt=5449.44
Long term loan + equity=5449.44 + 12459.69=17909.13
Funded debt to total capitalisation ratio=5449.44/17909.13=0.304
Proprietary Ratio:
Proprietary ratio=equity/total assets
Year 2010
Equity= 18311.64
Total assets=32727.37
Proprietary ratio=18311.64 /32727.37=0.559
Year 2009
Equity=12459.69
Total assets=27518.99
Proprietary ratio=12459.69/27518.99=0.452
Solvency Ratio:
Solvency ratio= total outsider’s liabilities/ total assets
Or
Solvency ratio= 1- Proprietary ratio
Year 2010
Solvency ratio= 1-0.559=0.441
Year 2009
Solvency ratio= 1-0.452=0.547
Fixed assets to Shareholder’s Funds:
Fixed assets to shareholder’s funds= fixed assets/ shareholder’s
funds
Year 2010
Fixed assets=6365.76
Shareholder’s funds=18311.64
18 | P a g e
Fixed assets to shareholder’s
funds=6365.76/18311.64=0.346
Year 2009
Fixed assets=5194.40
Shareholder’s funds=12459.69
Fixed assets to shareholder’s funds=5194.40/12459.69=0.416
Year 2009
Net Profit before Interest and Tax=1231.21
Fixed Interest Charges=415.56
Interest Coverage Ratio =1231.21/415.56=2.962
4. Profitability Ratios:
Year 2010
Gross profit=36995.93
Net sales=36675.15
19 | P a g e
The gross profit ratio= (36995.93/36675.15)*100=100.87
Year 2009
Gross profit=34045.04
Net sales=33646.57
Year 2010
=36675.15-32295.43=4379.72
Net sales=36675.15
Operating profit ratio= (4379.72/36675.15)*100=11.941
Year 2009
Operating profit=33646.57-30040.84=3605.73
Net sales=33646.57
Year 2010
Net sales=36675.15
20 | P a g e
Net profit=4375.52
Net profit ratio= (4375.52/36675.15)*100=11.9304
Year 2009
Net sales=33646.57
Net profit=3481.66
Operating Ratio:
Year 2010
Net sales=36675.15
Operating ratio= (60748.98/36675.15)*100=165.640
Year 2009
Net sales=33646.57
21 | P a g e
o Overall Profitability Ratios:
Return on Investment:
Year 2010
Net profit=4375.52
Shareholder’s funds=18311.64
Return on investment (ROI) = (4375.52/18311.64)*100=23.894
Year 2009
Net profit=3481.66
Shareholder’s funds=12459.69
Return on investment (ROI) = (3481.66/12459.69)*100=27.943
Year 2010
22 | P a g e
Shareholder’s funds=12459.69
Preference dividend=0.00
Return on Equity = (3481.66-0.00)/12459.69*100=27.943
Year 2010
Year 2009
23 | P a g e
Ratio Analysis
Liquidity ratios
Profitability ratios
24 | P a g e
Average collection period ----- -----
Solvency ratios
25 | P a g e
INTERPRETATION ON THE BASIS OF RATIO ANALYSIS
Interpretation of the ratios calculated from financial statements is a tool used to draw
comparative and significant conclusions which can be helpful in decision making.
Interpretation of different ratios of L&T info tech signifies various facts about
company.
From the Liquidity ratios of the company it seems that company is not having a lot
many current assets. Company’s Current and Quick ratio are below the standard. But
it’s absolute quick ratio meets the standard in both years. Further if we compare the
current ratio of 2010 and 2009, company’s current assets have further declined. So
Liquidity position of company was not so strong in 2009 and it further deteriorated
in 2010.
Turnover ratios of the company are showing very good performance of the
company. Inventory turnover ratio of the company has increased from 15.06271 to
17.948. A lower Inventory ratio means less efficient conversion of stocks. Similarly
Inventory conversion period of the company decreased from 25 days in 2009 to 21
days in 2010.
26 | P a g e
Working capital turnover ratio of company has increased. Higher WCTR
indicates efficient utilization of working capital. Whereas declining WCTR means
inefficient management. WCTR of the company has increased to 5.558 from 4.686
times.
Even the solvency ratios of the company show an improving performance of the
company from 2009 to 2010. Interest coverage ratio of the company has increased
to 3.247 from 2.962.So this much increase in Interest coverage ratio means less and
less risk for long-term creditors. Company’s long term debt is decreasing as
compared to the total capital. Even, its total liabilities has not increased much as
compared to its total assets. As performance of the company is improving so
investors can invest money in this company with more assurance. The solvency has
increased from 2009 to 2010.
So, overall analysis of the financial statements of L&T info tech using ratio analysis
indicates that performance of the company is good and is Improving. It’s Liquidity,
solvency, efficiency and profitability all are improving relatively.
27 | P a g e
1. Comparative Statement:
A statement which compares financial data from different periods of time. The
comparative statement lines up a section of the income statement, balance
sheet or cash flow statement with its corresponding section from a previous
period. It can also be used to compare financial data from different companies
over time, thus revealing the trend in the financials.
Comparative
balance sheet
Rs.
Rs. Crore Rs. Crore Crore
absolute
Particulars Mar ' 10 Mar ' 09 %age change
change
Sources of funds
Owner's fund
Equity share capital 120.44 117.14 3.3 2.817142
Share application money 25.09 - 25.09
Preference share capital - -
Reserves & surplus 18,142.82 12,317.96 5824.86 47.28754
Loan funds
Secured loans 955.73 1,102.38 -146.65 -13.303
Unsecured loans 5,845.10 5,453.65 391.45 7.177762
Total 25,089.18 18,991.13 6098.05 32.10999
Uses of funds
Fixed assets
Gross block 7,235.78 5,575.00 1660.78 29.78978
Less : revaluation reserve 23.29 24.59 -1.3 -5.2867
Less : accumulated depreciation 1,727.68 1,421.39 306.29 21.54862
Net block 5,484.81 4,129.02 1355.79 32.83564
Capital work-in-progress 857.66 1,040.99 -183.33 -17.6111
28 | P a g e
Investments 13,705.35 8,263.72 5441.63 65.84964
Notes:
Book value of unquoted investments 11,771.54 7,793.04 3978.5 51.05196
Market value of quoted investments 2,033.61 1,258.81 774.8 61.55019
Contingent liabilities 1,719.39 1,371.86 347.53 25.33276
Number of equity shares outstanding
(Lacs) 6021.95 5856.88 165.07 2.818395
From the comparative balance sheet of the company the net worth of the company
is decreasing over the given period. We find that both sources of funds and loans
increased in year as compared to year 2009 means total debts of the company is
increasing over the period. Investments are also increasing over the same period.
Current assets of the firm increased by approximately 12%. Total assets increased
by approximately 33%. So we can say that position of the company is satisfactory.
The overall profitability of the concern is going good and the company seems to be
financially strong.
29 | P a g e
References
30 | P a g e
https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/2517190/larsen_and_to
ubro_ltd_lt_financial_and
http://money.rediff.com/companies/larsen-and-toubro-
ltd/17010013/balance-sheet
http://www.larsentoubro.com/corporate/about-lt-group/overview
https://studymoose.com/fundamaental-analysis-of-lt-essay
31 | P a g e