Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Atty:: Sales Lady Direct Examination
Atty:: Sales Lady Direct Examination
Direct Examination
ATTY: The 2nd witness for the defense is being offered to show that there was indeed a subsequent
agreement between the parties .
CLERK: Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth
Witness: Yes, I do
Q: Isn’t it you said that you were the saleslady of Mr. Orlina?
A: Yes
Q: You also stated that you have been employed with him for 3 years?
A: Yes
Q: You also stated that on November 8, 2018, you, together with your boss were in Starbucks.
A: Yes.
Q: That you two were reconciling documents for the BIR, is that correct?
A: Yes
Q: Isn’t it that tax related matters must be taken action by the accountant of an establishment?
A: Yes
Q: You also stated that upon entering of Mr. Lupo, Mr. Orlina approached him and that they started
talking.
A: Yes
Q: How far were you from the area they were talking?
A: About 3 tables away from them
Q: Do the place play any music?
A: Yes
Q: With that distance and with music playing, are you able to clearly hear the discussion of Mr. Winston
and Mr. Lupo
A: I only heard some parts of the conversation.
Q: Then how can you be sure that they agreed that in case of failure of delivery caused by fortuitous
events, the contract will automatically be rescinded.
A: *Pause 3 secs. Mag iisip kunwari* Because my boss repeated to me what they have discussed.
ATTY: The 2nd witness for the plaintiff is being offered to show that there was no such verbal
agreement that took place between the parties.
CLERK: Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth
Witness: Yes, I do
Witness: I am Jam Lupo, a resident of Lot 6 Block 3, Central City Subdivision, Legazpi City
Q: What were you doing when your father and Mr Orlina were talking?
A: I was just using my phone.
Q: What were they talking about?
A: I heard that they were talking about politics. They were talking about who will they vote as senators
this coming election.
---Cross Examination---
Q: You stated that you are the daughter of the Mr. Lupo
A: Yes
Q: You said that you were with him when he went to Starbucks.
A: Yes.
Q: You said earlier that your father asked you to come here to testify?
A: Yes
Q: What is it?
A: He told me that I should testify on what really happened last November 8 on Starbucks.
Q: Do you know that the law punishes those who falsely testify in the court?
A: Yes sir.
Q: Isn’t it true that your lawyer told you what your answers to my questions should be?
A: Yes, he told me to answer all your questions truthfully, but to listen carefully to your questions
because they might be confusing. He also told me not to let you put words in my mouth. I was told not
to guess if I was not sure, but to tell the truth and say I was not sure.
Q:
Q: You said earlier that you were using your phone while your father and the defendant were talking?
A: Yes sir
Q: So you will agree with me that you are not fully paying attention as to what your father and Mr.
Orlina are talking about since you’re busy with your phone?
A: *wait for 2 secs* I heard them talking about their preferred senatorial candidates
Q: Ms. Witness, the question is answerable by yes or no. Do you agree that you are not fully paying
attention while your father and Mr Orlina were talking since you’re busy with your phone?
A: Yes, I agree.