Evaluation Evaluation Method for Data

Process Logic Model Element Information Source Collection

Question
How effective was Process Content area teachers will meet weekly during BMS Focus Group
the training and Evaluation Collaborative Planning to level set and integrate Administrative Performance Data
how effective is the meaningful technology into each week's lesson team, instructional Comparing
post training planning. coach, teachers, Performance data,
integration by technology liaison Pre and post
teachers? artifacts of students'
work

How effective was Process The technology teacher will join the planning and BMS Focus Group,
the training and Evaluation collaboration meetings on a bi-weekly basis to Administrative survey
how effective is the provide help in coordinating the latest technology team, instructional Performance Data
post training tools available. coach, teachers, Pre and Post
integration by technology liaison artifacts of
teachers? students" work
Did the integration Outcome Short Term Outcomes • Decrease in behavior BMS Observation, School
of meaningful Evaluation referrals by 10% or greater Administrative Data, Survey
technology impact • Increase in student engagement in the classroom team, teachers,
positive student based on teacher and administrators’ observations students
behaviors? Did the • Teacher’s comfort level integrating technology
training strengthen increases on an ongoing basis (Post survey – 6
technology skills months)
amongst teachers?
Did the integration Outcome Intermediate Outcomes • Increased student BMS School data, High
of meaningful Evaluation performance on high stakes testing by a full level Administrative Stakes Testing
technology close (Beginner to Developing, etc.) team, instructional Results, School
the student • Consistent student growth of 35% coach, teachers, Data, Lexile Scores
achievement gap? • Increase in the % of students reading at or above district personnel
grade level

Did the integration Outcome Long Term Outcomes • Student growth -35% or BMS State Assessment -
of meaningful Evaluation greater Administrative CCPRI , High
technology result in • Increase in students taking advanced courses team, instructional Stakes Testing
significant student • A significant increase in Career and College Ready coach, teachers, Georgia Milestones
growth of 35% at a students upon graduation district personnel
steady and CCPRI Results will increase for the school. CCPRI
consistent rate? = College and Career Ready Performance Index
Did this student
growth create an
increase in students
taking advanced
courses?