Ee 9

You might also like

You are on page 1of 1

CHECKPOINTS

INDUSTRIAL FOOT PROTECTION


Protecting Your Most Valuable Asset, Your Employees
By Lori Hyllengren
Outfitting employees with reliable industrial footwear reduces injuries and lost work time while improving
productivity and morale. That’s because every year, more than 50,000 workers suffer foot injuries, resulting in
an average of 9 lost work days.
According to data from Bureau of La- 3) Choose the Right Footwear tabs on product wear and tear, process invoic-
bor Statistics, 75% of these injuries involve If workers need toe protection, experts es, and manually distribute vouchers.
workers who failed to comply with safety recommend shoes that conform to the Digital programs can simplify these pro-
regulations. But getting workers the cor- ASTM F2413-18 standard. This means the cesses. User experiences vary, but the concept
rect footwear can be a serious challenge shoe must include a protective toe cap as an of a digital process is an online one-stop shop
for safety managers. This article presents integral, permanent part of its design, as op- where program managers can review consol-
five ways to overcome this challenge. posed to add-on protective devices such as idated invoices from employee purchases at
strap-on toe caps that can fit poorly, hamper multiple store locations, authorize or revoke
1) Know the Regulations mobility or be forgotten by employees. electronic vouchers in real time, and run re-
Understanding the code of practice ports to analyze important program metrics.
around safety footwear is not easy. Workers Digital programs minimize management
in industrial settings must have protective time by automating formerly manual steps,
footwear according to OSHA. Organiza- efficiently collecting information that was
tions that fail to comply with OSHA regu- previously difficult to find and providing a
lations run the risk of warnings, sanctions better big-picture view of program details.
and fines. In 2019, OSHA raised its max-
imum penalties to $13,260 a per day for 5) Perform Scheduled Maintenance
failure-to-abate violations. If a workplace To keep a safety footwear program
is cited with a willful and repeat violation, Red Wing Shoe Co. testing industrial foot- tuned up, it is important to create a main-
the maximum penalty is $132,598. wear in the laboratory. tenance plan. Employers must regularly
OSHA standards categorize footwear check work shoes to determine whether
as a type of PPE. And while OSHA dic- In addition, shoes should defend against they need to be replaced. Any time a heavy
tates the use of PPE, ASTM International workplace-specific threats. For example, object hits a safety toe, it could be compro-
(a global standards organization) sets heat-resistant soles protect workers in pav- mised. Any material embedded in the soles
performance requirements for protective ing, roofing and hot metal industries. Electric should be removed immediately. Regular
footwear. Safety footwear must comply hazard shoes provide secondary protection cleanings are important for maximum pro-
with current ASTM standards. against stepping on live electrical circuits, tection and longevity.
electrically energized conductors, parts or Employers must also periodically conduct
2) Understand the Label apparatuses. Puncture-resistant shoes defend workplace hazard assessments. Fulfilling
There are two ASTM standards for safe- against nails, sharp cables and other debris this OSHA mandate is not only important
ty toe footwear. ASTM F2413-18 specifies found in construction, tire manufacturing, for compliance, but also helps protect em-
the minimum performance requirements metal recycling and glass industries. ployees against new hazards or dangerous
to protect against various hazards. ASTM It is important for safety managers to under- conditions that may have emerged on the
F2412-18a dictates the test methods used stand the unique hazards of the job and find job since the last assessment. PSJ
to measure foot protection. Two signif- footwear to match. In general, the more dan-
icant risks are impact (falling objects) gerous the job, the more likely the shoe will be References
and compression (rolling objects). An BLS. (2015, Dec, 2). Type of injury or illness
designed for a certain category of risk. Manu- and body parts affected by nonfatal injuries and
ASTM-certified shoe may be labeled with facturers and retailers can help employees find illnesses in 2014. Retrieved from www.bls.gov/
several label codes. For example: the appropriate pair of shoes for their needs. opub/ted/2015/type-of-injury-or-illness-and
•ASTM F2413-18 -body-parts-affected-by-nonfatal-injuries-and
•M/I/C 4) Go Digital -illnesses-in-2014.htm
•Mt Managing a safety footwear program can Kallis, R. (2017, Jan 1). Safe footwear im-
The first line says the shoe meets the be complex. Program administrators must proves worker outcomes. Retrieved from https://
ASTM F2413-18 standard. Next, the M assign shoes to specific workers based on their ohsonline.com/Articles/2017/01/01/Safe-Foot
stands for male. (F stands for female for jobs, the weather or environmental factors, wear-Improves-Worker-Outcomes.aspx
women’s shoes). The I stands for the impact such as wet floors. Then s/he must ensure that OSHA. (2019, Jan 23). OSHA penalties. Re-
rating (a 50-lb weight is dropped onto the employees purchase the correct shoes, keep trieved from www.osha.gov/penalties
toe from a height of 18 in., delivering 75 ft-
lb of force). The C is the compression rating Lori Hyllengren is the laboratory manager for Red Wing Shoe Co. and S.B. Foot Tanning Co. She has
experience in product quality testing of leather, footwear and PPE garments across international stan-
(the shoe can withstand 2,500 lb of com-
dards including ASTM, Canadian Standards Association (CSA) and European Standards (EN). Hyllengren
pressive force on the toe). The last line (Mt) represents Red Wing Shoe Co. on the ASTM D31 Leather Committee, Department of Defense Footwear
indicates that the shoe offers impact protec- Committee, ASTM Subcommittee F13.30 on Footwear and CSA Protective Footwear Committee Z195,
tion for the metatarsal area of the foot. where test methods and specifications are developed for the U.S. and Canada.

assp.org MARCH 2019 PROFESSIONAL SAFETY PSJ 29

You might also like