1.0 Theory of Fire OK

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 21

COMBINED CHIEF AND SECOND

ENGINEER UNLIMITED
VOYAGE FOR 3000 kW
OR MORE

1
Halon

Halogen based vapourising liquids


General description
 Halogenated hydrocarbon derived from such as methane
and ethane – good extinguishing agents
 Example:
 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC)
 1.1.1 trichloroethane (methyl chloroform)
 Bromomethane (CB)
 Bromochlorodifluoromethane (BDF / 1211)
 Bromotrifluoromethane (BTM / 1301)
 All are toxic, decomposed when contact with fire –
produced acid gas with chlorine, bromine or fluorine
 Due to this reason, authorities reluctant to accept
 However, BCF & BTM less toxic, accept for marine use

ECSU / MEP / Slide no3


Halon Numbering System

1st no – number of carbon atoms


2nd no – number of fluorine atoms
3rd no – number of chlorine atoms
4th no – number of bromine atoms
5th no – number of iodine atoms
If only 4 numbers available such as 1301,
meaning?

ECSU / MEP / Slide no4


Effect of Component Gases

Bromine
Chain breaker
Bad for ozone
1500x worst than fluorine
Fluorine – increase its inertness and
stability
Bromine – increase its fire extinguishing
effectiveness

ECSU / MEP / Slide no5


Physical Properties

Colourless & odourless gas


Non-corrosive in gas state, highly corrosive
when dissolved in water
Used nitrogen for pressurised (42 bar at
20°C)
Process – disrupts the chain reaction of
combustion - extinguish fires

ECSU / MEP / Slide no6


Toxicity

 Safest agent - comparing toxicity level


 Concentrations up to:
 7% can breathed 5 minutes without effect
 10% reduced to 1 minute
 Temperature above 510°C – halon will decompose
 Important products – Hydrogen Bromide (HBr) &
Hydrogen Fluoride (HF)
 Small concentrations – cause irritant, give forewarn to
personnel of increasing concentrations
 Considered lesser threat than other products of fire
poisonous smoke - carbon monoxide etc.
ECSU / MEP / Slide no7
Concentration required

4.25 to 5% by volume

ECSU / MEP / Slide no8


Advantages
Clean with no residue
Only slightly toxic / irritant
Easy and safe to store
Electrically non-conductive
Good penetration
Suited to automatic release
Low working concentrations – relatively safe for
personnel
Fast action / response / extinguish quickly
Smaller quantity than CO2 needed – enclosed
spaces
Slightly pressurised storage container / keep low
pressure in liquid form
Negative catalyst
ECSU / MEP / Slide no9
Disadvantages

Toxic gas produced when contact with fire


Expensive
Limited world recharging facilities
Require propellant gas for quick release

ECSU / MEP / Slide no10


Halon – Rules & Regulation
 Only permitted machinery space, pump rooms or cargo
spaces solely for carriage of vehicles not carrying cargo
 No new installations
 System designed – minimum medium quantity discharged
to space based on liquid phase within 20 seconds
 Means of safely checking pressures
 Volume 0.16 m³/Kg
 Fire resistant release mechanism
 Over pressure device fitted
 Leakage warning alarm
 For locally operated devices the concentration should not
above 7% for 1301 and 5.5% for 1211 at 20°C
 Discharge time for liquid phase < 10 seconds
ECSU / MEP / Slide no11
Montreal Convention

Following the Montreal protocol, the


usage of Halon was agreed to be:
halved by the year 1995
phased out by the year 2000

ECSU / MEP / Slide no12


Response / Plan by IMO
 No new installations after July 1992
 Testing of systems banned by January 1992, integrity test on
spaces required
 Requirement for Halon stocks to be recorded
 Existing Halon systems phased out by 2000
 2nd requirement – Halon should only used as fire fighting
medium in space where no other suitable means of
extinguishing the fire to protect personnel and property
 This guideline is valid until January 2000
 Companies required to replace with suitable alternative -
difficulty in restocking Halon as production of Halons is phased
out by industry
 Have suitable alternative method fitted at owners best interest.
 To replace the system at convenience rather than as necessary
 Halon systems still in use as of August 2000
ECSU / MEP / Slide no13
Halon System
Introduction

 Vapourising fluids
Fluorine, chlorine & bromine - halogens
 Most common – BTM (Halon 1301)
 Alternative to CO2
 Negative catalyst – inhibit combustion
 Extinguish takes milliseconds
 Requires space evacuation
 High rate of dispersal – 10 seconds
 High density, low boiling point, can stored like CO2
 Smaller space required compared to CO2
ECSU / MEP / Slide no15
Limitation

Not suitable for fires involving metals /


hydrides
Installed in chemical tanker – cargo tank
protection

ECSU / MEP / Slide no16


Disadvantages

Expensive
Not suitable for deep seated fires
No cooling effect
Recharging facilities
Distribution pipe problems

ECSU / MEP / Slide no17


Operation

ECSU / MEP / Slide no18


Questions?
ALAM’s Way Forward

20
THANK YOU

21

You might also like