Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MET Laboratories, Inc.: Vibration and Shock Testing
MET Laboratories, Inc.: Vibration and Shock Testing
for the
Tested Under
Customer Purchase Order #50460
and
MIL-STD-810F
Prepared For:
Prepared By:
MET Laboratories, Inc.
914 West Patapsco Avenue
Baltimore, Maryland 21230
Certificates and reports shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written permission of MET Laboratories, Inc. While use of the National
Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) letters or the NVLAP Logo, the Standards Council of Canada Logo, A2LA or the Nationally
Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL) Letters in this report reflects MET Accreditation under these programs, these letters, logo, or statements do
not claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any Agency of the U.S. Government.
Optima EPS Corporation
Rack (70” x 19’W x 36”L, 500 lbs - 750 lbs) MIL-STD-810F
Test Report
for the
Tested Under
Lab Manager
Todd Talbot
Environmental Lab
Certificates and reports shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written permission of MET Laboratories, Inc.
Table of Contents
List of Photographs
Photograph 1. Vibration, Vertical Axis Test Setup ............................................................................................................ 11
Photograph 2. Vibration, Longitudinal Axis Test Setup .................................................................................................... 12
Photograph 3. Vibration, Transverse Axis Test Setup ....................................................................................................... 13
Photograph 4. Shock, Vertical Axis Test Setup ................................................................................................................. 22
Photograph 5. Shock, Longitudinal Axis Test Setup.......................................................................................................... 23
Photograph 6. Shock, Transverse Axis Test Setup............................................................................................................. 24
List of Plots
Plot 1. Vibration, Vertical Axis – Control............................................................................................................................ 8
Plot 2. Vibration, Longitudinal Axis – Control.................................................................................................................... 9
Plot 3. Vibration, Transverse Axis – Control ..................................................................................................................... 10
Plot 4. Shock, Vertical Axis – Positive Control ................................................................................................................. 16
Plot 5. Shock, Vertical Axis – Negative Control................................................................................................................ 17
Plot 6. Shock, Longitudinal Axis – Positive Control ......................................................................................................... 18
Plot 7. Shock, Longitudinal Axis – Negative Control........................................................................................................ 19
Plot 8. Shock, Transverse Axis – Positive Control ............................................................................................................ 20
Plot 9. Shock, Transverse Axis – Negative Control........................................................................................................... 21
List of Tables
Table 1. Shock Pulse Levels .............................................................................................................................................. 15
I. Executive Summary
MET Laboratories, Inc. was contracted by Optima EPS Corporation to perform acceptance testing to MIL-STD-810F
criteria on the Rack (70” x 19’W x 36”L, 500 lbs - 750 lbs) under the Optima EPS Corporation purchase order number
50460.
The tests were based on MIL-STD-810F. The results obtained relate only to the item(s) tested.
The EUT was subjected to a vibration test in accordance with the procedures of MIL-STD-810F. The visual
inspection of the EUT revealed the EUT was compliant with the requirement after minor adjustments were
made. (see vibrations section for details).
The EUT was subjected to a shock test in accordance with MIL-STD-810F. The visual inspection of the EUT
revealed the EUT was compliant with the requirement(s). No anomalies noted.
A. Overview
This document describes the test setups, test methods, required test equipment, and the test limit criteria used to
perform an Acceptance Test of the Optima EPS Corporation, Rack (70” x 19’W x 36”L, 500 lbs - 750 lbs). The
tests were based on MIL-STD-810F. The tests described in this document were formal tests as described with
the objective of the testing was to verify compliance of the Equipment Under Test (EUT) to the requirements of
the aforementioned specifications.
Model(s) Tested: Rack (70” x 19’W x 36”L, 500 lbs - 750 lbs)
Model(s) Covered: Rack (70” x 19’W x 36”L, 500 lbs - 750 lbs)
Temperature: 15-35º C
Lab Environmental
Relative Humidity: 30-60%
Test Conditions:
Barometric Pressure: 860-1060 mbar
B. References
ISO 1012-1: 1992 (E) Quality Assurance Requirements for Measuring Equipment
Department of Defense Test Method Standard for Environmental Engineering
MIL-STD-810F
Considerations and Laboratory Tests
Bellcore Special Report, Network Equipment-Building System (NEBS) Criteria
SR-3580
Levels
C. Test Site
All testing was performed in a limited access test laboratory. This facility is located at MET Laboratories, Inc.,
914 W. Patapsco Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21230. All testing was conducted in the Environmental Simulation
Lab at MET Laboratories, Inc. All equipment used in making physical determinations is accurate and bears
recent traceability to the National Standards and Technology.
Test Requirement(s): This procedure utilizes standard laboratory vibration exciters driving the test item directly or
through a local fixture.
Test Procedure: A. The cabinet was loaded with 90 lbs on 6 shelves for a total of 540 lbs.
B. The test item is supported by a test frame independent of the vibration exciters.
C. Select the specific exciters based on size and mass of the test items and fixtures,
frequency range, and low frequency stoke length required.
Test Results: During the vibration a few screws backed out and had to be refastened with Lock-Tite. After
this correction, no damage or deterioration of functional performance was noted.
(gn)²/Hz
0.1288
control(f)_c0
high-abort(f)
high-alarm(f)
low-abort(f)
0.0100
low-alarm(f)
profile(f)
0.0010
0.0001
1.26E-05
10.00 100.00 500.00
Frequency (Hz)
dB (gn)²/Hz
-30.5000
-32.5000 control(f)_0
-35.0000
profile(f)_0
-37.5000
high-abort(f)_0
-40.0000
-42.5000 high-alarm(f)_0
-45.0000
low-abort(f)_0
-47.5000
low-alarm(f)_0
-50.0000
-52.5000
-55.0000
-57.5000
-60.0000
-62.5000
-65.0000
-67.5000
-70.0000
-72.5000
-75.0000
-77.5000
10.00 100.00 500.00
Frequency (Hz)
(gn)²/Hz
0.0079
profile(f)
high-abort(f)
0.0010 low-abort(f)
high-alarm(f)
low-alarm(f)
control(f)
0.0001
1.00E-05
1.00E-06
6.31E-07
10.00 100.00 500.00
Frequency (Hz)
Test Requirement(s):
The equipment shall not sustain any damage or deteriorate in functional performance during
or after it has been exposed to the environment described in MIL-STD-810E.
Test Procedure:
A. The cabinet was loaded with 90lbs on 6 shelves for a total of 540lbs.
B. A dummy load and an input (control) accelerometer were mounted to the table of the
shock machine.
C. Calibration shocks were performed until two consecutive shock pulses produced
waveforms that met or exceeded the shock profile.
E. The proper operation of the EUT was verified. Unless otherwise noted the EUT was in
an operational mode during testing.
F. The EUT was subjected to three shock pulses, in each direction of each axis, at the test
levels on Table 1.
G. Before, during, and after the shock test, the performance of the EUT was evaluated.
Test Results: The EUT is compliant with the requirement(s). No damage or deterioration of functional
performance was noted as a result of this test. The functionality of the EUT was evaluated
before and after the test with no anomalies noted.
gn
15.0000
14.0000 profile(t)
13.0000
high-abort(t)
12.0000
low-abort(t)
11.0000
10.0000 control(t)
9.0000
8.0000
7.0000
6.0000
5.0000
4.0000
3.0000
2.0000
1.0000
0
-1.0000
-2.0000
-3.0000
-4.0000
-4.9000
-0.01 -0.01 -0.01 -0.00 0 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02
Time (Seconds)
gn
6.5000
profile(t)
4.5000
high-abort(t)
3.0000
low-abort(t)
1.5000
control(t)
0
-1.5000
-3.0000
-4.5000
-6.0000
-7.5000
-9.0000
-10.5000
-12.0000
-13.5000
-15.0000
-0.06 -0.04 -0.03 -0.01 0 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.07
Time (Seconds)
gn
15.0000
control(t)_2
13.5000
high-abort(t)
12.0000
low-abort(t)
10.5000
profile(t)
9.0000
7.5000
6.0000
4.5000
3.0000
1.5000
-1.5000
-3.0000
-4.5000
-5.2000
-0.01 -0.01 -0.01 -0.00 0 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02
Time (Seconds)
gn
3.5000
profile(t)
2.0000
high-abort(t)
1.0000
0 low-abort(t)
-1.0000 control(t)
-2.0000
-3.0000
-4.0000
-5.0000
-6.0000
-7.0000
-8.0000
-9.0000
-10.0000
-11.0000
-12.0000
-13.0000
-14.0000
-15.0000
-0.01 -0.01 -0.01 -0.00 0 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02
Time (Seconds)
gn
15.0000
profile(t)
13.5000
high-abort(t)
12.0000
low-abort(t)
10.5000
control(t)
9.0000
7.5000
6.0000
4.5000
3.0000
1.5000
-1.5000
-3.0000
-4.5000
-5.2000
-0.01 -0.01 -0.01 -0.00 0 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02
Time (Seconds)
gn
3.5000
profile(t)
2.0000
high-abort(t)
1.0000
0 low-abort(t)
-1.0000 control(t)
-2.0000
-3.0000
-4.0000
-5.0000
-6.0000
-7.0000
-8.0000
-9.0000
-10.0000
-11.0000
-12.0000
-13.0000
-14.0000
-15.0000
-0.01 -0.01 -0.01 -0.00 0 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02
Time (Seconds)
V. Test Equipment
MET Asset # Equipment Manufacturer Model Last Cal Date Cal Due Date
2T5663 SHAKER SYSTEM UNHOLTZ DICKIE NONE NO CAL REQUIRED
2T5757 VIBRATION CONTROLLER DACTRON NONE 4/6/2006 4/6/2007
2T5605 ACCELEROMETER AMP. DYTRAN NONE 4/25/2005 4/25/2006
2T5535 ACCELEROMETER PCB NONE 8/15/2005 8/15/2006
2T5307 ACCELEROMETER DYTRAN NONE 8/15/2005 8/15/2006
2T5895 ACCELEROMETER PCB PIEZOTRONICS NONE 11/16/2005 11/16/2006
End of Report