BRIDGE @ CH: 78+240 (CA CH:78+275)

ABSTRACT OF HYDRAULIC PARTICULARS

Discharge using Rational Method/INGLI'S method

Design Discharge
Afflux and Linear Waterway
Scour depth calculatios

1 Catchment Area 0.79 sq. km

2 Propoosed span arrangement RECONSTRUCTION 3 x 7.00 m

3 Design discharge 20.639 cumecs

4 Velocity through vent 1.39 m/s
5 LBL 401.333 M
6 HFL 402.320 M
7 Afflux 0.041 m
8 Affluxed HFL 402.361 m
9 Vertical Clearance 0.600 m
10 Free-board requird - m
11 FRL required EL 403.561 M
12 Existing FRL -
13 FRL PROPOSED EL 404.508 M OK
14 Bank to bank width at HFL 18.68
15 Required linear waterway 18.55 m
16 Linear water way provided 21.00 m
17 Scour depth for box (dsm) 1.25 m
18 Scour below bed 0.27 m
CATCHMENT AREA

BRIDGE 78+240 Sq kms

CATCHMENT AREA 0.79

LENGTH OF LONGEST
STREAM 1.93 km
HEAD 14 m

PROPOSED
BRIDGE
 HYDRAULIC CALCULATION

Chainage(Km) 78+240 Bridge

DATA :
Catchment Area (A) 0.790 Sq kms

Length Of The Longest Stream (L) 1.930 km

Head (H) 14.000 m

Run Off Coefficient (C) 0.400

Point Rainfall (F) 252.000 mm

1 Discharge calculation by Rational / Empirical methods:

By Rational Method: (For catchment areas upto 25 sqkm)

Time of concentration, tc 0.73 hours

tc = (0.87 L3/H)^0.385
Spread factor f 1.000
Intensity of Rainfall, Ic=F/T(T+1/ tc+1)) 151.45 mm/ hour
Ic= (F/24)* ((24
+1)/(tc+1))
RATIONAL METHOD
Q=0.277 *C*A*IC * f 13.26 m3/sec

DICKEN'S METHOD
Q = C M^3/4 ( C=14) 11.73 m3/sec

RYVE'S METHOD
Q = C*M^2/3 ( C=10) 8.54 m3/sec

INGLI'S FORMULA
Q = 125*A / (A+10)^1/2 30.06 m3/sec

2 Discharge calculation by Manning's Formula (AV method)

Bed level at Proposed bridge 401.333
HFL (observed at site) 0.80 m from bed level

Hydraulic
Wetted Wetted Bed Velocity
PARAMETERS HFL (OBSERVED) Mean Discharge (Q)
Area( A) Perimeter (P) Slope (V)
Depth ( R)

Manning's Formula M (m2) (m) R = A/P 1/S (m/s) (cumec)

At the cross section of Proposed

402.133 13 24 0.54 0.002 0.69 13.76
bridge site

TOTAL DISCHARGE (AV) = 13.76 m3/s @ OFL = 402.13 M

Unobstructed Flow area = 12.99 m2
Unobstructed Velocity = 0.69 m/s
4 Design discharge
Discharge by Rational Method = 13.256 Cumecs
Discharge by Dicken's Method = 11.731 Cumecs
Discharge by Ryve's Method = 8.539 Cumecs
Discharge by Inglis Method = 30.063 Cumecs
Discharge by AV method = 13.760 Cumecs
Discharge by SUH Method = - Cumecs

Comparing all above discharges,

Maximum Discharge of Above methods = 30.063 Cumecs
Second Highest discharge = 13.760 Cumecs
Increase second highest discharge by 50% = 20.639 cumecs

Hence Design Discharge = 20.64 Cumecs

Peak Flood Discharge (Adopted in design report) = 20.64 Cumecs

5 Fixing Design HFL for Peak Flood Discharge

Bed slope = 0.0020
DESIGN HFL 402.320 (by ITERATIONS)
COMPARTMENT I
Avg.
Depth of Vertical Ht Wetted
Chainage Bed level HFL Depth of Distance Area
water at Bed level perimeter
water
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (Sq.m) (m) (m)
3.0 402.600 402.320 0.000
7.0 401.550 402.320 0.770 0.385 4 1.540 1.050 4.136

0.385 A1 1.540 P1 4.136

COMPARTMENT II
Avg.
Depth of Vertical Ht Wetted
Chainage Bed level HFL Depth of Distance Area
water at Bed level perimeter
water
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (Sq.m) (m) (m)
8.0 401.400 402.320 0.920

13.0 401.333 402.320 0.987 0.953 5 4.767 0.067 5.000

18.0 401.450 402.320 0.870 0.928 5 4.642 0.117 5.001

23.0 401.550 402.320 0.770 0.820 5 4.100 0.100 5.001

0.901 Α2 13.510 P2 15.003

COMPARTMENT III
Avg.
Depth of Vertical Ht Wetted
Chainage Bed level HFL Depth of Distance Area
water at Bed level perimeter
water
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (Sq.m) (m) (m)
28.0 401.750 402.320 0.570
30.0 401.840 402.320 0.480 0.525 2 1.050 0.090 2.002
33.0 402.630 402.320 0.000 0.240 3 0.720 0.790 3.102

0.383 Α3 1.770 P3 5.104

404.000
BED LEVELS

403.000
402.000 III
I II
401.000
400.000
3

13

18

23

28

30

33

CHAINAGE
 RUGOSITY COEFFICIENT Bed = Clean, straight bank, full stage, no rifts or deep pools (Good)
Bank = Winding some shoals, some weeds and stones (Fair)

COMPARTMENTS I ΙΙ III

Wetted Area( A) (m2) 1.54 13.51 1.77 16.82

Wetted Perimeter
(m) 4.136 15.00 5.10 24.24
(P)
Hydraulic Mean
R = A/P 0.372 0.900 0.347 0.694
Depth ( R)
RUGOSITY
0.040 0.030 0.040 0.037
COEFFICIENT
Bed Slope 1/S 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020
Velocity (V) (m/s) 0.58 1.39 0.55 1.39
Discharge (Q) (cumec) 0.89 18.78 0.98 20.65

TOTAL DISCHARGE (AV) = 20.6 m3/s @ HFL = 402.320

6 Calculation of Waterway cum check for Afflux

i) Design discharge Q = 20.639 cumecs

Velocity of river V = 1.390 m/s

Area of section at bridge A = 16.820 sqm
Low bed level = 401.333
HFL = 402.320

Design HFL = 402.320

Sill level = 401.333

Depth of water d (average) = 0.901
Average Width of Pier = 0.400 m
Available waterway A1 3 7 0.90 = 18.914
Linear Water Way(Laceys formula) 4.75 √Q = 18.548
Bank to bank width at HFL (LWW at HFL) = 18.675
Linear Water Way provided = 21.000
8 Calculation of Percentage Obstruction to flow in BOX
WALL
DEPTH OF OBSTRUCTE
MEMBER CHAINAGE GL HFL THICKNESS VELO DISCHARGE
WATER D AREA
(BOX)
X of HFL & GL 3 Avg ht 0.460 2.30 0.58 1.33
wL 8 401.400 402.320 0.920 0.40 0.37 1.39 0.51
w1 15 401.400 402.320 0.920 0.40 0.37 1.39 0.51
w2 22 401.500 402.320 0.820 0.40 0.33 1.39 0.46
wR 29 401.800 402.320 0.520 0.40 0.21 0.55 0.11
X of HFL & GL 31 Avg ht 0.260 0.52 0.55 0.29
TOTAL 4.09 3.21

TOTAL OBSTRUCTED DISCHARGE = 3.21 m3/s

OBSTRUCTED VELOCITY = 1.65 m/s
Percentage Obstruction = 16%
Percentage obstruction due to the proposed span arrangement = 16% < 20%
As per IRC:89 1997: Appendix 1a para 4.6.3.,
Afflux H [(v²/17.88)+.0015]*[(A/A1)²-1]
Mean velocity v = 0.840 m/s
H = 0.041 <0.3
Afflux HFL = 402.361
9 Scour depth
Design discharge for foundation (increase by 30%) = 27
Silt factor (Ksf) stiff clay = 2.000
Normal depth of scour (Dsm=0.473*((Q/Ksf)1/3)) = 1.124

Discharge per metre width (q) = 1.278 cumec/m

Mean depth of scour dsm= 1.34(q^2/ Ksf)^1/3 = 1.253 m
(for Box)
HFL = 402.320
Lowest Bed level = 401.33

Maximum scour level (HFL-dsm) = 401.07

Scour below bed = 0.27 m