Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Secado Por Atomización PDF
Secado Por Atomización PDF
SPRAY DRYING
6.0 INTRODUCTION
Spray drying involves both partide formation and drying,
which makes it a special drying process. The feed is
transformed from the fluid state into droplets and then
into dried partides by spraying it continuously into a hot
drying medium. Similar to fluid bed drying, flash drying,
spray granulation, spray agglomeration, spray reaction,
spray cooling, and spray absorption, spray drying is a sus-
pended partide processing operation (Masters, 1991).
The main differences between spray drying, fluidized bed
drying and flash drying are the feed characteristics (fluid
in spray drying versus solids); residence time (5 to 100 s
for spray drying versus 1 to 300 min for fluidized bed)
and partide size (10 to 500 /-Lm for spray drying versus 10
to 3000 /-Lm for fluidized bed).
The most common spray dryer is the open cyde, co-
current unit illustrated in Figure 6.1 (Dittman and Cook,
1977; Masters, 1991, Shaw, 1994). The open cyde sys-
tems have an intake of atmospheric air on a continuous
185
G. V. Barbosa-Cánovas et al., Dehydration of Foods
© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1996
186 Spray Drying
Drying Chamber
Dry Product )
6.1 FUNDAMENTALS
The main features of spray drying are the formation of
droplets or spray and the contact with air. The atomiza-
tion step produces a spray for the optimum evaporation
condition and subsequently a product within specifica-
tions. Atomization results from the breakdown of liquid
bulk into small droplets, and the different atomization
techniques available vary according to the type of energy
used to produce the droplets. The classification of atom-
izers used in spray drying is summarized in Figure 6.2.
AtomÎZer Incorporating
I I I I
Centrifuga! Energy Pressure Energy Kinetic Energy Sonic Energy
I I I I
Rotary Pressure Nozzle Pneumatic Nozzle Sonic Nozzle
I I I I
l
Bushing Vaned Vaneless Centrifuga! Nozzle 2-fluid 3-fluid Sirens Whistles
Wheels Wheels Discs I I
Swirl Grooved Interna!
Cups Chamber Core Mixing
1. Nozzle Cap
2. Oritice Insert
3. Grooved Core Insert
(2)
where Q is the flow rate and Eh is the energy or power.
The flow of liquid from the orifice of a centrifugal pres-
sure nozzle may be expressed as:
2(1TdVinlet) = 2(1Tbr2Ur) (3)
or
(5)
(7)
190 Spray Drying
Variable Effect
Nozzle capacity
feed rate below design Atomization incomplete
feed rate at minimum specifications Decrease droplet size
feed rate within specifications Increase droplet size
Sprayangle
large angles Small droplets
Pressure
increase (medium range) Decrease size
Viscosity
increase Coarse atomization
Droplet size varies with
'T]0.17 to 'T]0.2
disc, considering low feed rate and disc speed, are shown
in Figure 6.5a. The spray consists of aparent droplet and
two satellites. An increase in disc speed and feed rate
causes a change from the direct-droplet mechanism to
one of ligament breakup as shown in Figure 6.5b. A liquid
sheet (Figure 6.5c) forms when the liquid ligaments join
each other, and then extends from beyond the edge of the
disc. This phenomenon is also referred to as the velocity
spraying mechanism (Masters, 1991).
On vane wheels (Figure 6.6a) the liquid disintegra-
tion occurs at the wheel edge due to the frictional effect
between air and the fluid surface. The liquid emerges as a
thin film from the vane. The optimum droplet size for a
given feed rate depends on the following conditions
(Masters, 1991): vibrationless rotation; large centrifugal
force; smooth and complete wetting of vane surface; and
uniform feed rate and distribution.
Acceleration along the vane ceases when the liquid
reaches the edge of the wheel, thus the radial velocity of
the liquid can be expressed as follows (Masters, 1991):
2 2 2)0.33
U = 0.0024 [ p1T N dQ (9)
r h2 2
f.L n
(10)
.. .r
~'~"_:
a. Droplets from the edge b. Ligament formation c. Liquid sheet
Feed
.J,
(a) (b)
Figure 6.6. Rotary atomizers: (a) vaned disc (adapted from Masters,
1991); and (b) sharp-edge Hat disc (adapted from Heldman and
Singh, 1981).
where Dvs is the Sauter mean diameter (m), dis the atom-
izer wheel diameter (m), h is the vane height (m), N is the
velocity (rpm), Q is the mass liquid feed rate (kg/h), Qp is
194 Spray Drying
Variable Effect
Wheel speed D = wheel diameter
Constant feed rate N = wheel speed, rpm
p = 0.55-0.80
Feed rate Q= feed rate
Constant wheel speed q = 0.1-0.12
Wheel Vane
Speed Loading Rate
(mls) (kg/h m) a b d K * 10-4
Normal Low
0.24 0.82 0.24 1.4
85-115 250
Normal-high Normal
0.2 0.8 0.2 1.6
85-180 250-1500
Very high Normal-high
0.12 0.77 0.12 1.25
180-300 1000-3000
Normal-high Very high
0.12 0.8 0.12 1.2
85-140 3000-60,000
From Masters, 1991.
(19)
Variable Effect
Mass ratio air/liquid
Increase ratio Decrease droplet size
Mair/Mliq < 0.1 Deteriorative atomization
Mair/ Mliq ;;:: 10 Upper limit for effective ratio
Increase to create smaller size
particles
Relative velocity
Increase air velocity Decrease droplet size
Viscosity
Increase fluid viscosity Increase droplet size
Increase air viscosity Decrease droplet size
From Masters, 1991.
1T 3 dv 1T 3 ( )
- D - = - D Pw-Pa g-O.5Cd Pav;.A
2 (20)
6 dt 6
198 Spray Drying
or
(22)
( 1)
Hot HI"'-'[::;:~~...,
, . - - - - Air EHhaust
Ta2 Ha2 qa2
Drying [hamber
(2)
L -_ _-
_ -_
- -_
-L
} -_ _ Dry Product
Figure 6.9. Dryer data for heat and mass balances (Fs , dry
solid rate; T s , temperature of solids; qs, enthalpy of solids; w s ,
moisture content of solids; Ga , dry air rate; Ta, air tempera-
ture; Ha, air humidity; qa, air enthalpy.)
200 Spray Drying
where qsl and qs2 are the enthalpies of solid entering and
leaving the dryer, qal and qa2 are the enthalpies of air
entering and leaving the dryer, and qL is the heat loss.
The performance of spray drying is measured in
terms of thermal efficiency, which is related to the heat
input required to produce a unit weight of dried product
of desired specifications. The overall thermal efficiency
(l1overall) is defined as the fraction of total heat supplied to
the dryer used in the evaporation process:
(7; -T2 )
= 100 ( (24)
Tloverall
7;-1'0 )
where T l is the entering temperature of hot air, T 2 is the
exiting temperature of air and To is the atmospheric air
temperature. The evaporative efficiency (l1evap) is defined
as the ratio of the actual evaporative capacity to the
capacity obtained in the ideal case of exhausting air at
saturation temperature:
(7; - T2 )
Tlevap = 100 ( ) (25)
7; - Tsat
(26)
(27)
where Nu is the Nusselt number, Sh is the Sherwood
number, Re is the Reynolds number, Pr is the Prandtl
number via or Cpvlk, Cp is the heat capacity, a is the ther-
mal diffusivity, v is the kinematic viscosity, Sc is the
Schmidt number vii, h is the heat transfer coefficient, 1 is
a characteristic length, k y is the mass transfer coefficient,
Deff is the diffusivity, and K1,z are constants reported as
0.6 (Masters, 1991).
202 Spray Drying
Mass balance
Heat balance
dw == hA (T _ T ) == 2'ITKg d (T - T )
dt A a w A a w (33)
(35)
(36)
Solution
The wet bulb temperature is obtained from the psychro-
metric chart, Tw = 42°C, and the latent heat is 2202.59
kJ/kg. Using Eq. (29) for a pure liquid droplet:
tcr = (P1Ad~)/[8Kg(Ta - Tw )]
tcr =0.035 s
Eq. (30) is used for the finite final diameter condition:
P2 = 1394.28 kg/m3.
Replacing aH the values in Equation (30):
6.4 Drying of Droplets 205
t = (2202.59 kJ/kg)[IOOO kg/m 3 (20E _6m)2 -1394.28 kg/m 3 (IOE -6m)2(1000 J/kJ)]
ter =0.023s.
The time for completing the constant rate period is a
function of moisture content when the partide reaches a
constant diameter. The critical moisture content of the
partide is achieved at the end of the constant rate period.
A heat balance during the falling rate period is expressed
as follows:
(37)
or
(38)
(ppdcÂ)(wc -we )
tfr = (6hb.Tave )
tfr =0.1114s.
The total drying time is obtained by adding Eqs. (35)
and (39) for a droplet in static air (Re ~ O , Heldman and
Singh, 1981):
PIÂd~ (ppdcÂ)(wc - w e )
t = + -"-'---,----'--'-----,----'-
SKg( Ta - Tw ) (6hb.Tave )
=0.023 + 0.114
=0.l37 s (40)
-dw' = -
dw . ht o fdry
- * welg l'd
SO 1 S (41)
dt dt
208 Spray DIJring
Pure liquid
Partial
Pressure
p
a
T T T
w s a
Droplet Temperature
or
dw' -12Kd .lT
(42)
-:it = (PsAd;)
where w' is the amount of water contained by the solids,
and Kd is the thermai conductivity ofthe drying medium.
An increase in the solid phase causes a reduction on the
moisture movement (an increase in the resistance to mass
transfer). The partide begins to heat up because the rate
of heat transfer becomes predominant and subsurface
evaporation occurs when the heat transfer is high enough
to cause vaporization within the droplet. Vapor will be
released either by porous formation or rupture of the
crust. Figure 6.11 shows the effect of crust formation on
the evaporation rate during spray drying.
Evaporation
Rate
Evaporation Time
o Uquid Droplet
O Initial Solid
• Comple.. Cro'"
•
~s Porou,s
PIial>Ie ",,",us Rigid
Rigid Rigid Plastic
@Y (1
(J
o
11
.J., Bubbling Bubbling
Fracturc
CoIJap<ing
11 i3
Mioor Fn>cture Major Frac:twe Inflating CoIJap ..
~ 6 (1 O O
Cry.tal
'Fur' Growtb .J., Skin Reform Continue<! Blis[Sg
.J., ShriveJJing
J. J.
O O
SpCIIlg.. Uke
IJ O
O
(
~
• e FUJal Sbape )
+ Feed
~C:::::::;~~--,
Hot Air Orying Chamber
(43)
a v2 = l+a ( ~-1 )
vi p
2
(44)
(46)
a v2 =
l+a vi ~-1
(
T
)
2
214 Spray Drying
1 +a Y1 (
T,
~ -1
) V;
=~ =
(AA: )3/2 =(D)3
D: (47)
(48)
(49)
or
where Mt is the moisture content at time t, Moo is the mois-
ture content of the dried product, M is the average mois-
ture content, Me is the equilibrium moisture content, MI
is the initial moisture content, n is the series index, D and
Deff are the diffusion coefficients, a is the sphere radius,
and TI is the initial sphere radius.
The drying process of a foamed sphere has two lim-
iting configurations: reduced sphere and spherical shell,
as shown in Figure 6.14.
The diameters of the reduced sphere and the spheri-
cal shell can be expressed in terms of the initial diameter
as follows:
- = ( l-a
Drs )0.33
(50)
D1 Y
- = ( l-a
Dis )0.33
(51)
D1 v
6.7 Foam Spray Drying 215
Reduced drop
Foameddrop
Spherical shell
Replacing Eq. (50) with Eq. (51), the reduced sphere model
can be expressed as follows (Crosby and Weyl, 1977):
(53)
216 Spray Drying
D - Dam
eIT - ( )2/3 (56)
l-u y
(57)
Feed Feed
Cyclone
Cyclone
~ Exhausl Air
a. Spray dryer with external f1uid-bed b. Spray dryers with pneumatic conveyor
Standarized Milk
.J.,
Heat Treatment
Fluid Bed Drying
.J., .J.,
Evaporation
Lecithination
~ ~
Homogenization
Conditioning
~ ~
Spray Drying + Agglomeration
Packaging
Grain Cleaner
Roaster
Storage Tanks Evaporators
Drying
Tower
From Evaporator _ _ _
f
Extractor
Righ Pressure
Feed Pump
~~~~ Pneumatic Rammer
Dry Product
Figure 6.18. Flowchart for a co-currenl nozzle spray dryer for lea.
(Adapled from Maslers, 1991.)
Storage at soc
""
""
U npackingIWeighing
CandlinglCulling
-4 Cracked and rollen eggs
Sound eggs ~
""
Wash
1
~
~~e eggs~ Filter ~ Romogenizer ~ Pasteurization
Breaking Spray Drying
Enzyme Use
Amylase Baking, textiles, brewing
Protease Brewing, tenderizing, detergents,
cheesemaking, tanning
Glucose oxidase Beverages
Pectinase Fermentation, juice clarification
Lipase Detergents
Trypsin Wound debridement
Rennin Cheesemaking
Lactase !ce cream
Cellulase Cellulose breakdown
Frorn Masters, 1991.
222 Spray Drying
Fermenter
Slorage Tanks
StorageTank
Fodder Yeast
92%TS
MixingTank
Spray Dryer
(~~Q
Coffee Whitener