Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Legal-Forms-Compilation Melody
Legal-Forms-Compilation Melody
1.) Acknowledgement
2.) Secretary’s Certificate
3.) Verification/Sample Complaint
4.) Complaint for Collection of Sum of Money
Plaintiff as Natural Person
Defendant as Juridical Person
5.) Juridical Persons as Parties
Republic of the Philippines as party
Private Corporation with other Juridical Parties or Entities Duly
Registered Parties but not Incorporated
6.) Corporation De Facto as Plaintiff
7.) Real Party in Interest or Indispensable Parties
8.) Representative Parties
9.) Stockholders Suing in a Derivative Suit
10.) Actions Prosecuted or Granted by Representative on Behalf of Beneficiaries
11.) Spouses as Partner
12.) Minors as Incompetent
13.) Permissive Joinder of Parties
14.) Joinder or Permissive Parties
15.) Class Suit
16.) Unwilling Plaintiff may be Impleaded as Defendant
17.) Misjoinder and Non-Joinder of Parties
18.) Alternative Defendant
19.) Unknown Identity of Defendant
20.) Entity Without Juridical Personality as Defendant Corporation by Estoppel
BEFORE ME, this 4th day of February, 2018 in the City of Cebu, Philippines, personally
appeared Mr. X, with [Valid Identification Document] (Driver’s License No. N25-07-
007777) issued by the [official agency] (Land Transportation Office) on 10 January 2018,
known to me to be the same person who executed the foregoing instrument, and who
acknowledged to me that the same is his free act and deed.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand and affixed my Notarial seal on the day, year
and place written.
Doc. No.
Page No.
Book No.
Series of 2018
NOTE: If the instrument consists of 2 or more pages, include the following after the 1st
paragraph:
This instrument, consisting of ___ pages, including the page on which this
acknowledgment is written, has been signed on the left margin of each and every page
thereof by ___________ and his witnesses (if any), and sealed with my Notarial seal.
* The Notary Public’s seal must be impressed on every page of the document notarized.
II. SECRETARY’S CERTIFICATE
SECRETARY’S CERTIFICATE
I, Mr. X, Filipino, of legal age, with office address at Uytengsu Urgello St., Cebu City, after
being sworn in accordance with law, do hereby depose and state as follows:
2. That during the special meeting of the Board of Directors held on 1 February 2018,
wherein a quorum was present and acted throughout, after being informed of the
necessity of obtaining loans and/or credit accommodation with any banking/
lending institution, to generate funds for the purpose of expanding the business of
exporting hard disk drives, the Board approved the following resolution, to wit:
3. That the foregoing Resolution remains valid and has not in any manner been
novated, revoked, nor repealed to date.
Corporate Secretary
_________________
III. VERIFICATION
Defendant Mr. X, of legal age, after having been duly sworn, desposes and says:
That he has caused the preparation of the forgoing motion for relief from order of
default; he has read the allegations thereof and the same are true and correct of his
personal knowledge and/or based on authentic records.
Mr. X
Affiant
III. VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION
FOR NON-FORUM SHOPPING
I, Mr. X, Filipino, single, of legal age, and with address at Uytengsu, Urgello St., Cebu City
hereby depose and state that:
Mr. X
Affiant
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 3rd day of February 2018 at the City of
_________, affiant exhibiting to me his ____________________ .
Doc No.______;
Page No._____;
Book No._____;
Series of 2011.
IV. COMPLAINT FOR COLLECTION OF
SUM OF MONEY
Mr. X
Plaintiff,
ABC Corporation
Defendant
x---------------------------x
COMPLAINT
COMES NOW, the plaintiff through undersigned counsel, and to this Honorable
Court respectfully alleges:
1. That plaintiff is single, Filipino citizen and residing at Uytengsu, Urgello St., Cebu
City where she may be served with court processes, motions, and decision while
defendant is a Corporation, having its name ABC Corporation as duly registered by
the Security of Exchange Commission (SEC) with business address at Sto. Rosario
St., Cebu City where summons and other court processes may be served;
2. That on 14 February 2013, the defendant, ABC Corporation borrowed from the
plaintiff a sum of money amounting to Ten Million Pesos with an agreed interest of
five percent (5%) per month as evidenced by a promissory note herein attached as
Annex “A” and form an integral part of this complaint;
3. That as shown in the attached promissory note, the indebtedness of the defendant
Corporation has become due and demandable on February 14, 2015 ;
4. That despite plaintiff’s repeated demands, both written and verbal, defendant
failed, neglected and refused to fulfill obligations without just and valid grounds to
the continued damage and prejudice of plaintiff, as evidence by Annex “B”-Demand
Letters;
Signature of Counsel
V. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES AS
PARTY
Plaintiff,
- versus - Civil Case No.__________
Defendant
x---------------------------x
COMPLAINT
COMES NOW, the plaintiff through undersigned counsel, and to this Honorable
Court respectfully alleges:
1.) That plaintiff is the Department of Public Works and a government agency, with
business address at Jones St., Cebu City where said agency may be served with
court processes, motions, and decision while defendant is a private corporation,
having its name DEF Construction Corp as duly registered by the Security of
Exchange Commission (SEC) with business address at Mantalungon St., Mandaue
City where summons and other court processes may be served;
2.) That on 3 February 2016, plaintiff and the defendant have entered into a contract.
The defendant, DEF Corporation has obliged to finish the construction of the bridge
located at Osmena St., Cebu City for a period of twelve (12) months, the contract
herein attached as Annex “A” and form an integral part of this complaint;
3.) That the defendant failed the completion of the construction of the bridge, left
unfinished and no whereabouts was reported to the Government whatsoever;
4.) That twelve (12) months already lapsed from the stipulated date of completion and
the construction of the bridge remain unfinished.
5. That despite plaintiff’s repeated demands, both written and verbal, defendant
failed, neglected and refused to fulfill obligations without just and valid grounds to
the continued damage and prejudice of plaintiff, as evidence by Annex “B”-Demand
Letters;
Signature of Counsel
VI. CORPORATION DE FACTO AS
DEFENDANT
Mr. X,
Plaintiff,
-versus- Civil Case No.______
x--------------------------------------x
The plaintiff, Mr. X, of legal age, and residence of Uytengsu, Urgello St., Cebu City.
On March 23, 2005, plaintiff and defendant XYZ Corporation entered into a contract
of sale of 1,000 sacks of palay at P500.00 each sack, whereby plaintiff was to deliver said
number of sacks of palay to defendant corporation and the latter was to pay the price
thereof, upon delivery.
Plaintiff delivered said 1,000 sacks of palay to defendant corporation on March 30,
2005 at the latter’s office at 23 Maria Clara St., Manila, but notwithstanding such delivery
and demands for payment thereof, said corporation refused to pay the total price thereof
of P500,000.00, alleging that it was not liable as it did not register itself as corporation.
WHEREFORE, plaintiff prays that defendants be ordered to pay plaintiff jointly and
severally the amount of P500,00.00 with legal interests thereon from March 30, 2005 until
the whole amount and interests thereon are fully paid
Signature of Counsel
XI. SPOUSES SUING JOINT
Plaintiffs
Defendants.
x x
Mario Domaboc and Maria Domaboc are both of legal age, husband and wife and
with residence, Uytengsu, Urgello St., Cebu City.
The transaction in this suit involves basically that of the husband Mario Domaboc, but his
wife, Maria Domaboc is joining him as party plaintiff, because the suit is for nullification of
the mortgage of conjugal property.
XII. MINOR AS PLAINTIFF
Plaintiffs,
Robin Padilla
Defendant.
x-------------------------------------x
Plaintiffs Marimar Beckham 14 years old, the only of child of the Spouses Ema and
Peter Beckham, both being dead and she is represented in this suit for conveyance of real
property which she inherited from her parents when the latter died in 1999 and said
parcel of land was registered was registered in the name of defendant, in trust and for the
benefit of Plaintiff. For the purpose of this suit Rachel Zane alleges that she is the aunt of
the Plaintiff, and she has an interest with the Plaintiff at heart and prays with the
Honorable Court that she be appointed guardian ad litem , to represent the Plaintiff and
protect her interests in the instant case.
XIII. JOINDER OF PERMISSIVE PARTIES
IN ONE COMPLAINT
A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I, K and L
Plaintiffs,
Defendant
x------------------------------------------x
Plaintiff are of legal age and are the heirs of the passengers of the bus owned by
defendant as common carrier, bound for Baguio City on September 2009, when bus
turned turtle due to its driver’s driving recklessly and negligently, resulting in the death of
all passengers, and causing plaintiffs to suffer damages in the amount of no less than
Php500,000.00 each for medical expenses and loss of earnings , and involving questions
of law and fact common to all plaintiffs.
XV. COMPLAINT IN FORM OF CLASS
SUIT
Plaintiffs,
Defendants
x x
Plaintiffs are legal age and are members of the voluntary association, known as XYZ
Voluntary Association, which is composed of over 500 members, who are required to
contribute P200.00 monthly, in return for the benefits extended to its members. Plaintiffs
are suing on their own behalf as members of said association and on behalf of all other
members thereof, who are so numerous that it is impracticable to implead them all as
plaintiffs.
Defendants, as officers of said corporation, have mismanaged its affairs, did not
render any accounting to the members, and appropriated the members’ contributions unto
themselves, thereby compelling the members thereof to compel said officers to wind up
the affairs of the association and to require defendants as officers thereof to render an
accounting of the money and property of the association.
XVI. UNWILLING PLAINTIFF, IMPLEAD
AS DEFENDANT
Pedro, Juan and David, all
Plaintiffs,
-versus-
Dela Cruz,
Defendants.
x x
1. This is an action for partition of a parcel of land consisting of 10,000 sq.m., located
in Cebu City, and which defendants inherited from their parents, when the latter
died in an accident on October 3, 2009, and since said date, defendants Samson
dela Cruz, their elder brother, has been occupying the same and reaping all its
income to himself.
2. The instant suit being a suit by and among members of the same family, plaintiffs
exerted all efforts to reach an amicable settlement of the case, by talking to
defendant Samson dela Cruz, convincing him to agree to extra-judicial partition of
the property and even informing him that plaintiffs are willing to forego any claim
of accounting to convince him to settle the case amicably, but all such efforts
proved useless.
3. Plaintiffs had asked Myrna dela Cruz, being a co-owner, to join plaintiffs as co-
plaintiff, but the latter refused, constraining plaintiffs to implead her as a
defendant.
XVIII. ALTERNATIVE DEFENDANT
Plaintiff,
Defendant,
x___________________________x
COMPLAINT
1. Plaintiff is single, of legal age, and a resident of 123 Vicente Rama Avenue,
Cebu City;
2. Plaintiff was riding in the bus of Defendant Sogbow Liners going to Bogo, Cebu
when it met an accident causing damage and injury to the former;
3. That Lito Lapis is the driver of the said bus during the accident;
4. That a white vehicle with plate number YJD 123 collided with the bus of Sogbow
Liners;
5. That the said vehicle was driven and owned by Leila Singko at the time of the
accident;
6. That the said plaintiff is suing Lito Lapis, Sogbow Liners and Leila Singko in the
alternative for recovery of damages.
John Doe,
Defendant.
x-----------------------------------------x
COMPLAINT
1. On January 3, 2018 Plaintiff was on her way home being with him her
groceries;
2. On her way walking in the gutter of the road, someone ,whose identity is not
known yet, was riding a motor vehicle and hit Plaintiff causing damages to her
groceries and his property including his phone and bag that has been destroyed;
3. Plaintiff is claiming for damages due to her for the destroyed phone and
groceries due to the hitting of John Doe;
4. The actual name of the liable party will be added when discovered.
PRAYER
WHEREFORE xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
IX. STOCKHOLDERS SUING IN A
DERIVATIVE SUIT
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
BRANCH20
Plaintiff(s),
C.A.NO:
vs.
PALERMO,
- and -
Corporation,
Nominal Defendant,
Defendant(s).
Deborah A. Risberg ("Plaintiff') is a shareholder of Aspen Technology Inc. ("Aspen" or the "Company"), and files this
Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint (the "Complaint") pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.1 on behalf of
the Company against certain of its officers and directors seeking to remedy Defendants' violations of the law, including
breaches of fiduciary duties relating to events that began as early as September 1997 and continued until the present
day (the "Relevant Period") and that have caused substantial financial losses to Aspen and other damages, including, but
not limited to, its reputation and goodwill. Plaintiff, he alleges upon personal knowledge as to her own acts and upon information
and belief as to all other matters, based upon, inter alia, an investigation conducted by her counsel, which included, among other
things, the review of publicly available documents filed with the Philippines Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), press
releases and other media repor
X. ACTIONS PROSECUTED OR
AGENDED BY REPRESENTATIVES OR
ON BEHALF OF BENEFICIARIES
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
6TH JUDICIAL REGION
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
BRANCH 30
ILOILO CITY
PETITION
1. That the Petitioner is of legal age, married, Filipino and resident of No. 08 Brgy.
Sta. Cruz, Arevalo, Iloilo City, where she can be served with summons and other
processes of this Honorable Court;
2. That Petitioner is the sister and the executor named in the last will and testament
of CARREY MANANSALA WHOOPS, deceased, who died in Iloilo City, on
September 23, 2013, hereto attached and marked as Annex “A” of this petition
is the death certificate;
3. That said CARREY MANANSALA WHOOPS executed and left said last will and
testament in accordance with the formalities of the Republic of the Philippines,
said last will and testament (photostatic copy only) dated November 12, 2012 is
hereto attached as Annex “B” and made an integral part of this petition, the
original thereof to be presented to this Honorable Court at the time of the
probate;
4. That the subscribing witnesses to said will are: RUSHELLE B. PARCON, of legal
age, single, Filipino and a resident of Room 3, PRP Condominium, General Luna
St., Iloilo City; WILMA M. LAGANCE, of legal age, single, Filipino and a resident
of Phase 4, Block 3, Lot 8, Lavida Loca Subdivision, Villa, Iloilo City; and ANNA
JADE L. GRANADA, of legal age, single, Filipino and a resident of Phase 2, Block
4, Lot 15, Carmen J. Ledesma Village, Jaro, Iloilo City;
6. That the petitioner, KAREN MANANSALA LATUMBO, named in the will as executor
thereof, be allowed to serve without the required bond and that Petitioner is
legally qualified, competent, willing and ready to accept the appointment as
Executor of the last will and testament and hereby signifies her willingness to
serve and discharge her duties and responsibilities as such;
7. That the property left by the decedent consists of real and personal property,
estimated to have the gross value of FIFTY MILLION PESOS(Php50, 000,000.00)
more or less;
8. That the testatrix, at the time of the execution of the said will, was 53 years old,
of sound and disposing mind, and not acting under duress, fraud, or undue
influence and was in every respect capacitated to dispose of his estate by will.
XXXXXXX