Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1994 - Eur J Med Chem - 29 - 33l-338
1994 - Eur J Med Chem - 29 - 33l-338
1994 - Eur J Med Chem - 29 - 33l-338
0 Elsevier, Paris
Summary - The new analogues, containing nitrogen at the 17-position instead of the 17a-position, of chandonium iodide 2 have
been prepared and evaluated for potential neuromuscular-blocking activity in in vitro studies using chick-biventer cervicis prepara-
tions. There is a slight increase in the interonium distance between the 2 quatematy heads of 13(DPJ-240). All the bisquatemary
compounds 13 (DPJ-240), 14 (DPJ-252), 15 (DPJ-262), 16 (DPJ-260) and 17 (DPJ-261) showed potent neuromuscular-blocking
activity but slightly less than chandonium iodide 2. Monoquaternary ammonium derivatives 12 (DPJ-246), 21 (DPJ-245), 23 (DPJ-
246) and 24 (DPJ-243) of 17-azasteroids were also synthesized and pharmacologically testled. They exhibited weak neuromuscular-
blocking activity as compared to the bisquatemary compounds and chandonium iodide 2.
lsoomyl nitrite
Pot. t- butoxide
5
6
Scheme 1.
6 Oppenouer
oxidotion
Sodiu m-pentanol
Me
0 Me
Scheme 2.
334
Me Neuromuscular-blocking activity
@P
Mel N-Me
Me
10 b The neuromuscular-blocking activity of all the
Q compounds was investigated on chick biventer cervicis
21
0& \ preparations. All compounds could abolish the twitch
C N
\
Me 12
response by indirect stimulation. Responses to exogen-
ous acetylcholine and carbachol were also reduced but
responses to KC1 were not significantly affected by
the test compounds. Twitches recovered on wash-out
of the compounds. All compounds caused concen-
tration-dependent parallel shifts of the dose-response
curve to carbachol to the right. The maximum
RX
11 responses to carbachol were not reduced in the
Resin lCl,Brl - presence of the compounds. Plots of (dose ratio - 1)
against negative log molar concentration of antagonist
gave straight lines with slopes close to 1, which is
consistent with competitive antagonism (table I).
It is interesting to note that the location of the nitro-
13 R , R’ , R* =Me; X=1 gen atom at the 17-position had a significant effect on
the biological activity of the newly synthesized
14 R, R’, R’ =Me; X = Br
compounds in the in vitro studies. All the bisquater-
15 R, R’, It’= Me; X= Cl nary compounds were found to possess potent neuro-
muscular-blocking activity, but were slightly less
16 R, R’nEt, R2= Me; X=1 active as compared to the prototype chandonium
17 R,R’=n-But, R’=Me; X=X iodide 2. It appears from the results that the chloride
form 15 (DPJ-262) is more active than the iodide
Scheme 3. 13 (DPJ-240) and bromide 14 (DPJ-252) forms of
bisquatemary compounds. A correlation between the
size of the N-substituent and antagonistic activity
ethanol to afford 24 (DPJ-243), 21 (DPJ-245) and 23 was also observed. Increasing the size of the sub-
(DPJ-248) respectively (schemes 4 and 5). An stituent from methyl 13 (DPJ-240) through ethyl
alternative procedure [39] to 13 and related 16 (DPJ-260) to butyl 17 (DPJ-261) groups resulted in
compounds [40] has recently been reported. a reduction in the activity.
Me
Sodium-
pentonol
Me
OMe
N
Me Mel
b
0 LYF ’
20 21
Scheme 4.
335
Me
/Me
Me N Me1 ~
0
ii \ II
Me-C-O J3F Me-C-O
23
HO
Scheme 5. 24
Monoquaternary compounds, 12 (DPJ-246), 21 (MeOH) 238 nm (log E 3.96) (0.1 N NaOHiMeOH) 288 nm
(DPJ-248), 23 (DPJ-248) and 24 (DPJ-243) carrying (log E 4.29); IR (KBr) v 3375, 3195, 1730, 1630, 1455, 1300,
polar functionalities at the 3-position, more or less at 1145, 1045,945 and 865 cm-l; tH-NMR (CDCl,/DMSO-d,): 6
the same distance from the 17-cationic head, showed 1.0 (s, 3H), 1.13 (s, 3H), 5.46 (m, lH), and 12.4 (s, lH,
exch/D,O).
weak neuromuscular-blocking action in the in vitro
tests as compared to 13 (DPJ-240). 16,17a-Dioxo-17-aza-D-homo-S-androsten-Spy1 acetate 5
Thus, the present study indicates that 2 cationic A mixture of 16-oximino- 17-oxo-5-androsten-3P-ol 4 (1 .O g),
heads at an appropriate distance, and other structural acetic anhydride (15 ml), and glacial acetic acid (10 ml) was
features, are required for a favorable neuromuscular- refluxed for 18 h under anhydrous conditions. The solid resi-
blocking activity. due, obtained after removing the solvent under reduced press-
ure, was washed with petroleum ether (60-80”) and water. The
material obtained was crystallized from ethanol to afford 5,
Experimental protocols
Chemistry Table I. PA, values for the test compounds.
__-_
Compound P& Slope
Melting points are uncorrected. NMR spectra were recorded on
an EMP-390, 90 MHz NMR instrument using tetramethylsil-
ane (TMS) as the internal standard. IR spectra were obtained 12 (DPJ-246) 6.42 kO.07 I.1
with a Perkin-Elmer 882 soectronhotometer in KBr oellets. 13 (DPJ-240) 7.15 + 0.03 1.0
The purity of the compounds was established by thin-layer
chromatography and by elemental analysis (C, H, N). Anhy- 14 (DPJ-252) 6.99 kO.07 0.95
drous sodium sulfate was used as drying agent for organic 15 (DPJ-262) 7.16 0.87
solvents.
16 (DPJ-260) 6.85 f 0.06 0.83
16.Oximino-I 7-oxo-5-androsten-3P-014 17 (DPJ-261) 6.11 f 0.04 1.03
To a stirred solution of 17-oxo-5-androsten-3P-ol 3 (2.0 g) in
potassium tert-butoxide (prepared by dissolving potassium 21 (DPJ-245) 6.1 +0.2 ndb
metal (1 .O g) in tert-butanol (17 ml)) was added isoamyl nitrite
(1.8 ml) at room temperature under a nitrogen atmosphere. The 23 (DPJ-248) 5.03 kO.16 ndb
reaction mixture, after being stirred overnight, was diluted with 24 (DPJ-243) 5.6 I!I 0.2 ndb
water (100 ml), acidified, and the yellow aqueous suspension
was extracted with chloroform (4 x 100 ml). The combined ChandoniumC 8.1 1.0
chloroform extract was washed with sodium bicarbonate sol- TubocurarineC 6.0 1.0
ution (10%) and extracted with sodium hydroxide solution
(lo%, 4 x 100 ml). The combined alkaline extract was washed apA, values were estimated from the Gaddum equation:
with chloroform (100 ml) and acidified while cold. The precipi- dose ratio - 1 = [Al/K,, where K, is the antagonist dissocia-
tated product was filtered, washed, and dried. The product tion constant; bnd: slopes were not calculated because only
obtained was crystallized from methanol to afford 4, 1.0 g 2 sets of dose-response curves were obtained; Cvalues are
(45.0%); mp: 255-257°C (lit [26, 271 250-251°C); UV,,, from identical experiments by Gandiha et al 1975 [12].
336
A solution of 17-methyl-3P-pyrrolidino-17-aza-o-homo-5- small quantities to the stirred solution over a period of 2 h. The
androstene dimethiodide (DPJ-240) 13 (0.2 g), in aqueous reaction mixture was poured into ice-cold water (300 ml) and
methanol (50%, 5 ml), was run through the column packed the aqueous suspension was extracted with chloroform
with resin (bromide form) (25 ml damp solid). Elution with (6 x 100 ml). The combined chloroform extract was washed
aqueous methanol (50%) was continued till the eluate gave no with water, dried, and the solvent was removed under reduced
pale-yellow precipitate with silver nitrate solution. Combining pressure to give a fluffy material which was chromatographed
the eluates and removing the solvent under reduced pressure over a column of neutral alumina (40 g). Elution with petro-
gave a solid residue which was crystallized from leum ether/toluene (5:5) and removal of the solvent under re-
acetone/methanol to afford 14, 0.11 g, (64.0%); mp: duced pressure afforded 19, 0.60 g (57.0%); mp: 98-100°C.
286282°C. Anal for C26H46Br2N2 (C, H, N). IR (KBr): v 3377, 2784, 1445, 1375, 1056, and 812 cm-i;
tH-NMR (CDCl,): 6 1.03 (s, 6H), 2.18 (s, 3H), 3.50 (m, lH),
I7-Methyl-3P-pyrrolidino-I 7-aza-D-homo-5-androstene dimetho- and 5.37 (m, 1H). Anal for C20H31N0 (C, H, N).
chloride (DPJ-262) 15
A solution of 17-methyl-3P-pyrrolidino- 17-aza-D-homo-5- I7-Methyl-17.aza-D-homo-4-androsten-3-one 20
androstene dimethiodide (DPJ-240) 13 (0.2 g), in aqueous 17-Methyl-17-aza-D-homo-5-androsten-3~-ol 19 (0.5 g) was
methanol (50%, 5 ml), was run through the column packed dissolved in a mixture of cyclohexanone (7.5 ml) and toluene
with resin (chloride form, prepared in a similar fashion to the (50 ml), and the solution was subjected to azeotropic distil-
bromide form) (25 ml damp solid). Elution with aqueous lation to remove traces of moisture. Distillation was continued
methanol (50%) was continued till the eluate gave no white at a slow rate till the dropwise addition of a solution of alu-
precipitate with silver nitrate solution. Combining the eluate minium isopropoxide (0.6 g), in dry toluene (20 ml), was
and removing the solvent under reduced pressure gave a solid complete. The reaction mixture was refluxed for 3 h and then
residue which was crystallized from acetone/methanol to yield allowed to stand at room temperature for 12 h. The slurry was
15, 0.14 g (98.0%); mp: 318-320°C. Anal for C,,H,,Cl,N, filtered, washed, and the organic solvents were removed by
CC, H, N). steam distillation. The residual aqueous supension was cooled
and extracted with chloroform (4 x 100 ml). The combined
I7-Methyl-3P-pyrrolidino-I 7-aza-o-homo-5-androstene chloroform extract was washed, dried, and the solvent was
diethiodide (DPJ-260) 16 removed under reduced pressure to give an oily residue of 20
Ethyl iodide (0.5 ml) was added to a refluxing solution which could not be crystallized, 0.22g (44.3%). This was used
of 17-methvl-3~-ovrrolidino-17-aza-o-homo-5-androstene 11 as such in further reactions. UV,,, (MeOH): 242 nm. The
(0.1 g) in abiolute’ethanol (15 ml) and refluxing was continued compound was further characterized by preparing its methio-
for 7 h. The reaction mixture was cooled, filtered and concen- dide derivative.
trated to induce crystallization, The crystalline material was
filtered, washed and dried to afford 16, 0.02 g (10.7%); mp: 17-Methyl-l7-aza-D-homo-5-androsten-3~-yl acetate 22
284-286°C. Anal for C2sHs012N2 (C, H, N). A mixture of 17-methyl-17-aza-D-homo-5-androsten-3P-ol 19
(0.25 g), acetic anhydride (5.0 ml), and pyridine (5 ml), was
17.Methyl-3/%pyrrolidino-I 7-aza-D-homo-5-androstene dihut- heated on a water bath for 15 min. The reaction mixture was
iodide (DPJ-261) 17 poured into a mixture of crushed ice and potassium hydroxide
n-Butyl iodide (0.5 ml) was added to a refluxing solution solution (lo%, 50 ml) and the aqueous suspension was ex-
of 17-methyl-3P-pyrrolidino-17-aza-o-homo-5-androstene 11 tracted with chloroform (3 x 50 ml). The combined chloro-
(0.1 g) in absolute ethanol (15 ml) and refluxing was continued form extract was washed, dried, and the solvent was removed
for 4 h. The reaction mixture was cooled, filtered, and concen- under reduced pressure to give an oily residue 22 which could
trated to induce crystallization. The crystalline material was not be crystallized, 0.15 g (52.7%). Thin-layer chromatography
filtered, washed, and dried to afford 17, 0.05 g (25.5%); mp: gave a single spot. The residue was characterised by synthe-
258-260°C. Anal for C,,H,,I,N, (C, H, N). sizing its quaternary derivative.
17-Methvl-I 7-aza-o-homo-4-androsten-j-one methiodide IDPJ- (Briggs MH, Christie G, eds) Academic, London, Vol3,39-65
245) 21. 7 Buckett WR, Hewett CL, Savage DS (1973) J Med Chem 16, 1116-l 124
Methyl iodide (0.2 ml) was added to a solution of 17-methyl- 8 Baird WLM, Reid AM (1967) Br J Anaesrh 39,775-780
17-aza-D-homo-4-androsten-3-one 20 (0.2 a) in absolute etha- 9 McDowell SA, Clarke RSJ (1969) Anaesthesia 24,581-590
no1 (20 ml) and processed as above to-afford 21, 0.28 g 10 Singh H, Paul D (1974) J Chem Sot Perkin Tram 1, 1475-1479
11 Gandiha A, Marshall IG, Paul D, Singh H (1974) J Pharm Pharmacol
(95.2%); mp: 278-280°C. Anal for C2,H341N0 (C, H, N). 26,871-877
Neuromuscular-blocking activity 12 Gaodiha A, Marshall IG, Paul D, Rodger IW, Scott W, Singh H (1975)
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol2, 159-170
Two chick biventer cervicis preparations [41] were mounted in 13 Harvey AL, Paul D, Rodger IW, Singh H (1976) J Pharm Pharmacol
lo-ml tissue baths containing physiological salt solution of the 28,617-619
followine comuosition (mM): NaCl. 118.4: KCl. 4.7: MaSO,. 14 Bhardwaj TR, Kapoor S, Shekhar CC, Jindal DP, Singh H (1988) Ind J Chem
1.2; KH2?04, i.2; CaCl;, 2.5; NaHdO,, 251 and glucbse,“ll.i: 27B, 209-212
15 Singh H, Gupta RK, Bardwaj TR (1988) Ind J Chem 27B, 508-512
The solution was maintained at 34°C and pH 7.3, and bubbled
16 Abraham J, Jindal DP, Singh H (1992) Ind J Chem 3 lB, 566569
with oxygen containing 5% C02. 17 Abraham J, Jindal DP, Singh H, Patnaik GK, Srimal RC (1993) Eur J Med
In preliminary experiments to determine the effective concen- Chem 28.231-234
trations of the neuromuscular-blocking compounds, twitches 18 Bowman WC, Webb SN (1972) J Pharm Pharmacol24,762-772
were evoked by stimulating the motor nerve every 10 s with 19 Palmer RA, Kalam MA, Singh H, Paul D (1980) J Cryst MO/ Srruct 10,
pulses of 0.2 ms duration and a voltage greater than that which 31-53
produced a maximum twitch. Contractures to exogenouslv 20 Savage DS, Cameron AF, Ferguson G, Hannaway C, Mackary IR (1971)
applied acetylcholine (1W M for 30 s), carbachol (2 x 10-S M J Chem Sot B, 410-415
for 60 s). and KC1 (4 x 10-Z M for 30 s) were obtained in the 21 Stenlake JB, Waigh RD, Dewar GH, Hughes R, Chapple DJ, Coker GG
absence’bf nerve stimulation prior to’ addition of the test (198l)EurJMedChem 16,515-524
compound and after block of twitches by the test compound. 22 Stenlake JB, Waigh RD, Urwin J, Dewar GH, Coker GG (1983)
In other experiments, concentration-effect curves to carbachol Br J Anaesth 55, 3S
were constructed in the absence and in the presence of 3 23 Tuba Z (1980) Arzneim Forsch 30, 342-346
concentrations of the test compounds. PA, values were calcu- 24 K@ati E, Bir6 K (1980) Arzneim Forsch 30,346-354
lated from plots of log (dose ratio - 1) against PA, [42]. 25 Savarese JJ, Ali HH, Basta SJ, Embree PB, Scott RPF, Sunder N, Weakly JN,
Wastila WB. El-Sayad HA (1988) Anesthesiology 68.723-732
26 Stodala FH, Kindal EC, Mckenzie BF (1941) J Org Chem 6,841-844
Acknowledgments 27 Hassner A, Pomerantz IH (1962) J Org Chem 27, 176&1766
28 Hassner A, Wentworth WA, Pomerantz IH (1963) J Org Chem 28,3W306
Authors DP Jindal and AK Verma are thankful to the 29 Bailey DM, Johnson RE (1970) J Org Chem 35,3574-3576
University Grants Commission, New Delhi for the financial 30 Brooks CJW, Ekhato IV (1982) J Chem Sot Chem Commun 943-944
31 Suginome H, Satoh G, Wang JB, Yamada S, Kobayashi K (1990) J Chem Sot
support and Panjab University Chandigarh, India, for providing
Perkin Tram 1 1239-1245
research facilities. 32 Majid MA, Palmer RA, Singh H, Paul D (1977) Acta Crystallogr 833,
364-3649
References 33 Schmitt J, Panouse JJ, Hallot A, Comu PJ, Comog P, Plucket H (1963)
BuEl Sot Chim Fr 807-815
1 Stenlake JB (1979) Progress in Medicinal Chemistry (Ellis GP, West GB, 34 Marshall JA, Johnson WS (1963) J Org Chem 28.421-423
eds) Elsevier, Amsterdam, l&257-286 35 Davis M, Parnell EW, Rosenbaum JR (1967) J Chem Sot 1045-1052
2 Taylor P (1980) The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics (Gilman AG, 36 Bamford DG, Biggs DF, Davis M, Pamell EW (1971) J Pharm Pharmacol
Goodman LS, Gilman A, eds) Macmillan, New York, 222-235 23,595-599
3 Singh H, Jindal DP, Yadav MR, Kumar M (1991) Progress in Medicinal 37 Loewe S, Harvey SC (1952) Naunyn Schmeidebergs Arch Exp Pathol
Chemisrry (Ellis GP, West GP, eds) Elsevier, Amsterdam, 28, 233-315 Pharmakol214,214-226
4 Singh H, Chaudhary AK, Bhardwaj TR, Paul D (1984) J Sci Ind Res 43, 38 Regan BM, Hayes FM (1956) J Am Chem Sot 78,639643
306-315 39 Yadav MR (1993) Ind J Chem 32B, 746753
5 Martin-Smith M (1971) Drug Design (Ariens EJ, eds) Academic, New York, 40 Verma AK, Jindal DP (1991) Ind patent appl258
2.453-530 41 Ginsborg B, Warriner J (1960) Br JPharmacol Chemother 15.410-411
6 Buckett WR (1972) Advances in Steroid Biochemistry and Pharmacology 42 Amnlakshana 0, Schild HO (1959) Br J Pharmacol Chemother 14,48-58