Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 13 views

    Node No: Without DG With DG Using Sensitivity Factor With DG Using GA

    Uploaded by

    swaroop paul
    The document contains graphs and data about voltage profiles, real power losses, and branch losses for different test systems with and without distributed generation. The graphs compare three scenarios: without DG, with DG using a sensitivity factor, and with DG using a genetic algorithm. They show that DG placement using a genetic algorithm performs better in reducing losses and stabilizing voltages across all nodes and branches compared to using a sensitivity factor or no DG at all.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Node No: Without DG With DG Using Sensitivity Factor With DG Using GA

    Uploaded by

    swaroop paul
    13 views4 pages
    The document contains graphs and data about voltage profiles, real power losses, and branch losses for different test systems with and without distributed generation. The graphs compare three scenarios: without DG, with DG using a sensitivity factor, and with DG using a genetic algorithm. They show that DG placement using a genetic algorithm performs better in reducing losses and stabilizing voltages across all nodes and branches compared to using a sensitivity factor or no DG at all.

    Original Description:

    gs o

    Original Title

    Outputs gs

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document contains graphs and data about voltage profiles, real power losses, and branch losses for different test systems with and without distributed generation. The graphs compare three scenarios: without DG, with DG using a sensitivity factor, and with DG using a genetic algorithm. They show that DG placement using a genetic algorithm performs better in reducing losses and stabilizing voltages across all nodes and branches compared to using a sensitivity factor or no DG at all.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    13 views4 pages

    Node No: Without DG With DG Using Sensitivity Factor With DG Using GA

    Uploaded by

    swaroop paul
    The document contains graphs and data about voltage profiles, real power losses, and branch losses for different test systems with and without distributed generation. The graphs compare three scenarios: without DG, with DG using a sensitivity factor, and with DG using a genetic algorithm. They show that DG placement using a genetic algorithm performs better in reducing losses and stabilizing voltages across all nodes and branches compared to using a sensitivity factor or no DG at all.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 4

    1

    Without DG
    With DG using S ensitivity factor
    With DG using GA
    0.99

    0.98

    0.97
    Voltage in (p.u)

    0.96

    0.95

    0.94

    0.93

    0.92

    0.91

    0.9
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 121314 151617 181920 212223 242526 272829 303132 333435 363738 394041 424344 454647 484950 515253 545556 575859 606162 636465 666768 69
    Node No

    0.99

    0.98

    0.97
    Voltage in (p.u)

    0.96

    0.95

    0.94
    Without DG
    With DG using Sensitivity factor
    0.93 With DG using GA

    0.92

    0.91

    0.9
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 121314 151617 181920 212223 242526 272829 303132 333435 363738 394041 424344 454647 484950 515253 545556 575859 606162 636465 666768 69
    Node No
    50
    With DG using Sensitivity factor
    Without DG
    45
    With DG using GA

    40
    Total real power loss in (Kw)

    35

    30

    25

    20

    15

    10

    0
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1112 1314 1516 17 1819 2021 2223 2425 26 2728 2930 3132 33 3435 3637 3839 4041 42 4344 4546 4748 4950 51 5253 5455 5657 5859 60 6162 6364 6566 67 68
    Branch No

    50

    45

    40
    Total real power loss in (Kw)

    35

    30

    25

    With DG using Sensitivity factor


    20
    Without DG
    With DG using GA
    15

    10

    0
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1112 1314 1516 17 1819 2021 2223 2425 26 2728 2930 3132 33 3435 3637 3839 4041 42 4344 4546 4748 4950 51 5253 5455 5657 5859 60 6162 6364 6566 67 68
    Branch No
    1
    Without DG
    With DG using Sensitivity factor
    0.99 With DG using GA

    0.98

    0.97
    Voltage in (p.u)

    0.96

    0.95

    0.94

    0.93

    0.92

    0.91
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
    Node No

    losses for 33-Bus System


    40
    With DG using Sensitivity factor
    Without DG
    35 With DG using GA

    30
    real power loss in (Kw)

    25

    20

    15

    10

    0
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
    Branch No
    1.15
    With DG using Sensitivity factor
    Without DG
    With DG using GA
    1.1

    1.05
    Voltage in (p.u)

    0.95

    0.9

    0.85

    0.8
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    Node No

    0.35
    With DG using GA
    Without DG
    With DG using sensitivity factor
    0.3
    Real power loss in (KW)

    0.25

    0.2

    0.15

    0.1

    0.05

    0
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    Branch No

    You might also like