Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Study Notes Essay 2 Ethics CDM 031819
Study Notes Essay 2 Ethics CDM 031819
Ethics Portion
PRUDENCE
= the excellence of practical reasoning (Aristotle and Aquinas)
Disposes us to see things rightly and to pursue what is good for us in a particular situation
Enables us to size up the situation accurately, to determine the best course of action and to embark on
it
Aquinas (following Aristotle) – right reason in action
PRUDENCE AND OTHER VIRTUES
One cannot be just without being prudent also – as much as we know what justice entails, prudence
determines what it takes to act justly in a given situation (prudence as the “Charioteer” of the virtues)
3
Appetites
Both need the moral virtues
A) UNIVERSAL
a. Something speculative
b. True knowledge of what is right and what is wrong (good vs. evil)
c. This knowledge is universal – ex: shouldn’t kill; should tie my shoes before walking down
icy steps
d. (Aquinas says this light never goes out
B) PARTICULARS
a. What goods are at stake here and now in this situation
b. Perceive this situation as unique vs. another situation/interaction we have seen
c. We don’t “know” the particulars of each situation; we need to perceive them
d. This takes experience (in a sense, the ‘right’ experience’)
e. An intellectual perception
C) MORAL VIRTUES
a. Well-ordered appetites
b. Moral virtues set the end
c. My will needs to be ordered so I can see the situation for what it is
1. Passions
a. Concupiscable sensory – food, drink, sex
b. Irascible – passions that raise me to anger to defend what I perceive to be good or to
flee what I should be defending
2. Will – the rational appetites (ex: choose friendship – desire because I understand)
There are intellectual virtues (Prudence) and moral virtues (temperance, courage, justice)
Moral virtues perfect corresponding appetites/passions:
Concupiscable – temperance
Irascible – courage (perseverance, patience)
Will - justice
PR
Appetites
Moral virtues
POSSIBILTY OF SELF-DECEPTION
FOUR STATES OF HUMAN NATURE
1) Before the fall – whole, integral, exists with grace
2) After the fall yet uder the law of sin
3) **After the fall – under the law of Grace (sanctifying Grace and redemptive Grace)
a. Baptism – wounds from original sin remains such that we still face temptation
4) Healed/beatified human nature (only in heaven)
PR
Concupiscence
Appetites
Akratic action – incontinence – knowing the right thing but choosing not to do it; lack of self-control;
acting against one’s better judgement
Saint Paul as a Saint – he’s not sunning (akrasia) like you and I may do (and maybe he did in the
beginning)
SIDEBAR – Conscience can be obscured; first spark of conscience (desire to do good) cannot
PRUDENCE ITSELF
(vs. how it relates) [INTEGRAL PARTS, CONNECTED PARTS, VICES CONTRARY]
EIGHT INTEGRAL VIRTUES FOR PRUDENCE – if we go wrong in one, we may not have perfect Prudence;
prudence cannot function properly without these; to grow in Prudence, we must attend to these
“EXELLECES OF THE PERFECTLY PRUDENT PERSON”
FIVE – for discerning (1st face; perceiving)
THREE – for doing (2nd face)
FIVE INTEGRAL VIRTUES (“EXCELLENCES” “PARTS”) OF PRUDENCE – for discerning (1st face; perceiving);
concerned with the capacity to form proper judgements based on past or present circumstance
1) Memory
a. The experience of the past; how people are used to behave and how things usually turn
out; we can better assign speculative knowledge to the situation at had because of past
experieces
b. Memory has to be whole and can’t be wounded
c. Must have memory and can also make new ‘past experiences’ (that is, must be able to
learn from our experiences)
d. There are different ways memories can be distorted (memories must be healed)
e. We can distort our memories, for instance by being overly-focused (kind of selective
memories)
2) Insight
a. The ‘ah-ha’ moment when you finally get it
b. For example – seeing the goods and values at stake for the discernment
c. ?of memories and what is happening in front of me
d. “understanding” “Intelligence” – ability to perceive with clarity the particularities of a
given situation and understand it in relation to moral principles; make rational
connections; distinguish between relevant and irrelevant, consistent and inconsistent,
truthful and untruthful
e. Aquinas: “the right estimate about a particular end”
3) Docility (from Pieper)
a. Willingness to learn from others
b. To be teachable
c. You have to be a learner (common use: docility to the Holy Spirit)
d. Peiper: the person who can receive and wait before reality (not the know-it-all)
e. Be silent before reality so it can teach you (Peiper: the silence of the soul)
f. For Aquinas – most directly this means the ability to listen to others even those under
you
4) Reasoning (corollary to insight)
a. Ability to make accurate judgements – prudent decisions require sharpness of mind and
acute reasoning – correct inferences; correct applications of general principles to
particular cases (defective reasoning leads to wrong decisions)
b. ‘ah-ha’ moment when solving the math problem (insight) but the rest of the problem
needs to be solved
c. Need to be able to reason through something
d. Need to connect all the dots
5) Alertness
a. Mental quickness; sharpness, shrewdness
b. Ability
c. Aristotle – a habit whereby congruities are discovered rapidly
d. To spot abnormalities – thigs about this situation that are different ad to react quickly
e. (the truly Prudent person does all of these things quickly – like second-nature)
THREE INTEGRAL VIRTUES (“EXCELLENCES” “PARTS”) OF PRUDENCE – for doing (2nd face); focus on the
future – on forming sound moral judgements in light of possible consequences
6) Farsightedness
a. Providencia; foresight
b. To foresee something
c. Requires a vision to the end and means
d. Prudence is not ONLY this as some people mistakenly say
e. The ability to see what is going to happen in terms of both proximate and long-term
ends
f. Considers the future consequences of his actions in light of the final end (what is
conducive to overall well-being and happiness
g. Imprudent robber: successful robbery but went to jail; the choice to rob the bank was
insensitive to the overall goal of his life, that is, to be happy
7) Circumspection
a. Ability to foresee that a given action will not be made wrong by the circumstances in
which it is performed
b. Lack of circumspection involves the choice of means that are bad or vain through
external circumstances
c. Ex: a professor wishes to cultivate friendship with his students. To that end, he brings
cookies to class which turned out to be poisoned but an angry worker in the bakery.
Half of the students die. Professor went to jail and did not make new friends – he had
lack of circumspection
d. Attention to changing circumstances
e. Looking around
f. While we are moving into action, our eyes are open
g. Looking for circumstances that may be changing
h. (ex: made a decision last week and acting on it today – need more circumspection)
i. Be attentive
8) Caution
a. Ability to foresee and prevent an action
b. Caution is what makes circumspection succeed
c. Attention to obstacles that might arise
d. Taking precautions against foreseeable obstacles
e. Note: one can be blindsided by an obstacle that was not foreseeable – this doesn’t
mean the decision wasn’t prudent – was the obstacle really foreseeable? Was due
diligence done?
The idea is to pass through #6,7,&8 and then do it.
[grave matter is that which is contrary to Caritas [the appetite that carries us forward to the true and
ultimate end – had to be a Grace; had to be above nature [even though we still have appetites directed
to the earth])
SIDEBAR – the concupiscent, irascible appetites are directed to the good – aoriginal sin didn’t change
that – what’s broken in the dominion of reason over the appetites – we are healing now in the presence
of Grace; we are not healed here on earth
Assent of the mind/intellect – faith an an intellectual supernatural act – not as consent of the will
(assent of the intellect)
[will] Caritas
[intellect] Faith
[will] Hope
Hope = acknowledgement that not yet at that fulfillment; striving for this great good which is difficult,
but possible (through the Grace of God) to attain. Heaven is only possible with God’s help.
Distinction between God’s supernatural Grace = grace
Vs.
Faith changes the balance of decisions because it sees a wider view (vs. the narrower view that comes
from philosophy alone)