Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bacteriuria in Individuals Who Become Delirious: Commentary
Bacteriuria in Individuals Who Become Delirious: Commentary
Bacteriuria in Individuals Who Become Delirious: Commentary
0002-9343/$ -see front matter Ó 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.10.016
256 The American Journal of Medicine, Vol 127, No 4, April 2014
heterogeneous syndrome of delirium, which also can lead to benefits and harms of antibiotic treatment will require
lasting impairment.) meticulously cautious study.
To date, studies that suggest a causal relationship
between urinary tract infection and delirium are observa-
tional and lack prospective design, clear definition and CONCLUSIONS
ascertainment of urinary tract infection and delirium, ade- Delirium and urinary tract infection are each complex,
quate sample size, demonstration of a chronologic link, incompletely defined, and poorly understood syndromes.
adjustment for comorbidities, evaluation for other causes of No evidence beyond anecdote suggests that delirious pati-
delirium, outcomes data after antibiotic treatment, or some ents who have asymptomatic bacteriuria do better with
combination of these. We found no studies showing that antibiotic treatment. For these patients, we believe clinicians
antibiotic treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria is associ- should not ask whether there is a “real urinary tract infec-
ated with better delirium outcomes. tion,” but whether the patient is safer with antibiotic treat-
ment or without it. Accepting asymptomatic bacteriuria as
the cause of delirium, dubbing it “urinary tract infection,”
INCIDENTAL BACTERIURIA AND INCIDENT and then giving antibiotics is dangerously complacent.
DELIRIUM Until better evidence is developed, we suggest the
Prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria in the elderly is following for delirious patients with asymptomatic
high, with community rates ranging from 11% to 16% bacteriuria as we define it. (1) Use the term “bacteriuria”
among women and 4% to 19% among men. In long-term or “asymptomatic bacteriuria” rather than “urinary tract
care facilities, the corresponding rates are more than twice infection.” This nomenclature will encourage continuing
as high: 25% to 50% and 15% to 40%, respectively.3 The diagnostic evaluation for other causes of delirium and
majority do not become delirious. Patients with delirium may moderate the impulse to give antibiotics. (2) Consider
from a completely unrelated cause will have asymptomatic careful monitoring rather than antibiotic administration.
bacteriuria at these rates by chance alone. Rates may be For those with recent Clostridium difficile infection, for
even higher because factors such as advanced age, dementia, example, the balance surely tips toward careful observa-
functional disability, medical illness, and institutional tion. (In contrast, patients with features of the systemic
residence are associated with both syndromes. inflammatory response syndrome are excluded from our
definition of asymptomatic bacteriuria and often require
prompt empiric antibiotic treatment.) (3) If the decision is
WHAT DATA ARE NEEDED? made to treat with antibiotics, obtain a urine culture be-
No data show that delirium-related outcomes improve when forehand and stop treatment if the culture is negative. If
patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria are treated with the culture is positive, causality is not established. Whether
antibiotics. Rigorous observational trials would likely be the patient has improved, stabilized, or worsened, the
burdensome and inconclusive. Surveillance for incident benefits and burdens of continued antibiotic treatment
bacteriuria, for example, would require repeated bladder require ongoing evaluation. Short-course therapy is often
catheterization of many elderly women. Randomized con- the best course.
trolled trials are essential. Such trials would also provide an Randomized controlled trials will require careful
opportunity to investigate interactions between host and evaluation and follow-up of many vulnerable subjects. The
bacteria via study of urine and serum biomarkers. goals—to ensure proper evaluation of delirium in the many
If antibiotic treatment of delirious patients with asymp- patients with incidental bacteriuria, to protect these often
tomatic bacteriuria is shown to be ineffective, 2 difficult and frail individuals from the dangers of unnecessary antibiotic
important treatment questions would follow. First, are treatment, and to curtail the enormous costs and society-wide
antibiotics necessary for all delirious patients who do have harms from antibiotic resistance—fully justify this effort.
lower urinary tract symptoms? In the elderly, urinary
symptoms are prevalent and nonspecific.8 Further, ran- Robin McKenzie, MDa
domized controlled trials in young women with lower uri- Miriam T. Stewart, MDb
nary tract symptoms suggest that delaying or withholding Michele F. Bellantoni, MDc
antibiotic treatment is safe.9 Similar studies in the elderly Thomas E. Finucane, MDc
a
would require careful planning and execution. Second, how Division of Infectious Diseases
should bacteriuria and delirium be managed in patients who Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Md
are so impaired that they can neither confirm nor deny b
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
symptoms? Prevalence rates of asymptomatic bacteriuria are
Baltimore, Md
high in these individuals, who are susceptible to mental (current affiliation: The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia,
status change with slight perturbation. Severely demented Philadelphia, Pa)
patients are frequently treated with antibiotics and conse- c
Division of Geriatrics
quently harbor highly resistant bacteria.10 These bacteria Johns Hopkins University
pose an individual and public health threat. Gauging the Baltimore, Md
McKenzie et al Bacteriuria and Delirium 257