This document discusses the evolution of India's party system from a One Party Dominant System (OPDS) to a Multi-Party System (MPS). It traces how the Indian National Congress dominated the political landscape from 1947 to 1977 under an OPDS. The 1977 election marked a turning point as a non-Congress coalition government was formed for the first time. However, this coalition proved unstable. The 1989 election further consolidated India's transition to an MPS as no single party could form a majority government, establishing the modern era of coalition politics in India where no party can gain a parliamentary majority on its own.
This document discusses the evolution of India's party system from a One Party Dominant System (OPDS) to a Multi-Party System (MPS). It traces how the Indian National Congress dominated the political landscape from 1947 to 1977 under an OPDS. The 1977 election marked a turning point as a non-Congress coalition government was formed for the first time. However, this coalition proved unstable. The 1989 election further consolidated India's transition to an MPS as no single party could form a majority government, establishing the modern era of coalition politics in India where no party can gain a parliamentary majority on its own.
This document discusses the evolution of India's party system from a One Party Dominant System (OPDS) to a Multi-Party System (MPS). It traces how the Indian National Congress dominated the political landscape from 1947 to 1977 under an OPDS. The 1977 election marked a turning point as a non-Congress coalition government was formed for the first time. However, this coalition proved unstable. The 1989 election further consolidated India's transition to an MPS as no single party could form a majority government, establishing the modern era of coalition politics in India where no party can gain a parliamentary majority on its own.
where multiple political parties exist and contest elections, but only one party forms the government and thus dominates the political and party system. The OPDS existed in India in the years following independence. At that time (First General Election 1951- 52) Indian National Congress won the elections even though other political parties contested the elections.
The turning point in India's party system came in the
1977 General election, when for the first time, a non- Congress government assumed power at the Center. The Emergency resulted in electoral loss for the Congress party and for the first time in its electoral history, the Indian National Congress was forced to contest as part of a coalition. The Janata Party's win had ended the thirty year OPDS by the Congress.
The history of OPDS in India is effectively the history of
Indian National Congress's gains and losses in successive elections. It also traces the evolution of the Indian Party system from OPDS to a Multiparty System (MPS).
OPDS in India effectively existed only from 1947 till
1977. Emergence of a Multi-Party System
The electoral developments of 1977 raised the hope that perhaps
parliamentary democracy in India had matured and taken the next step to a point were there would not be one-party dominance anymore. Indeed it was felt that India was close to achieving a two-party system like in the advanced matured democracies of Britain and North America. The events that unfolded proved these hopes to have been premature. The Janata experiment as many people now call it was a reaction to the semi- dictatorship situation that Indira Gandhi had inflicted on the people of India. Also many smaller parties had come together for the sake of their survival and to merely end the Congress dominance rather than any ideological consensus. Naturally therefore once in power these fault lines opened up and there was a series of debilitating bitter squabbles and faction fights. There were many interest groups that were part of the coalition and all of them wanted protection and prominence for their interests. Further there were many leaders with personal individual ambitions and they naturally clashed with each other. Also the factions that dominated the Janata Party in the national parliament were antagonistic to those which had an upper hand in several key Janata controlled state legislatures. One of the most divisive issues that contributed to the fall of the government in 1979 ultimately was the issue of dual membership of the members of the Jan Sangh, the earlier political form of the present day BJP, with the Rashtriya Swyamsevak Sangh (RSS) and affiliated organisations. The RSS was regarded my most as a communal organisation for their militant mobilisation against on Hindu minorities and their suspected role in communal riots. The Jan Sangh members had refused to shed their dual membership resisting all pressure. Indira Gandhi and the Congress party came back to power in the 1980 elections and the Congress party under her continued to operate like before with Indira herself ruling from the top with a small coterie often referred to as the High Command. Indira Gandhi was killed in 1984 and in the elections that followed the Congress came back to power with Rajiv Gandhi as the Prime Minister. Rajiv Gandhi tried may innovations but the general problems of a deepening economic crisis with growing disparities between the rich and the poor continued and also the process of a certain institutionalisation of corruption. Later he was himself embroiled in what became one of independent India’s biggest corruption scandals – the Bofors Scandal. His image of being a person free from corruption and greed took a huge battering and got destroyed as his Defence Minister V.P. Singh quit the government and confirmed the allegations and suspicions and joined the opposition that had started rallying around him. Rajiv Gandhi also played into the hands of Hindu communalists who alleged a policy of appeasement of Muslims when he passed a legislation nullifying the Shah Bano judgement of the Supreme Court that had opened the possibility of divorced muslim women enjoying some basic much needed rights. Further he then tried to play a neutralising Hindu card by permitting shilanyas near the disputed site in Ayodhya which only encouraged further militant communalism. Also there was no move back from the authoritarian ownership style of Indira Gandhi in Congress functioning and all decisions on top positions in the party were reserved to be decided by the Gandhi family. The elections of 1989 were held in these circumstances and proved to be in many ways the most significant ever as it may have truly set in motion a Multi-Party system in India and an era of coalitions that has lasted for almost twenty years now and there are no signs that it can end. The states had started becoming a multi-party system even before 1989 as by 1987 nearly half of the states had come to be ruled by non-Congress parties of one kind or the other. The coalition that took shape in 1989 was truly a coalition for the first time ever as even the 1970s coalitions had one or two parties that were powerful. But in this coalition that saw the coming together of the right wing BJP and the left wing CPI(M) and CPI on the one hand and regional parties from the south like DMK and northern parties like the National conference from the J&K on the other there was formed a breathtaking pan-Indian national coalition across ideological and regional divides and no one party or two parties were too powerful. Everybody’s support more or less was needed for the coalition to survive. The National Front as it was called had a short existence of only eleven months and fell apart for partly the same reasons that the government of 1977 had fallen apart for. There was a clash about V.P. Singh and his Reservations agenda which he tried to follow by accepting the recommendations of the Mandal Commission Report. There was a nationwide and bloody strike by students opposing the Mandal Commission recommendations that made the government very unpopular. Further, the BJP led by leaders like Lal Krishna Advani decided to carry out a RathYatra from Somnath to Ayodhya which the government failed to dissuade him from doing even though the BJP was part of the coalition. Finally a scheming Chandrashekhar who had probably felt sidelined when V.P. Singh became the Prime Minister managed to break the Janata Dal and walked out with a large section and formed a separate party called the SJP (Samajwadi Janata Party) that with the support of the Congress formed a minority government. The Congress wanted to act before a new coalition could settle down and the nation got used to a non-Congress regime at the centre and so was happy to play along with Chandrashekhar’s manoeuvres. But soon Congress withdrew its support and the government fell. Coalition Politics in India To have a majority in parliament any government needs to cross the half way mark in the Lok Sabha which has a total strength of 540 members. When the numbers are not available with a single party, two or more parties can combine to vote for a government and allow it to come into existence. When two or more parties add up their numbers in parliament by voting together in a motion of confidence helping a government prove its majority, the arrangement is called a coalition. Usually all the parties join the government but if any party votes for the government but stays out of government that party is regarded as part of the coalition but supporting the government from outside. The need for a coalition becomes urgent when no single party has the majority to form a government on its own. If a coalition is not formed in such situations it leads to the calling for fresh elections. The modern era of coalition politics has come into being as a consequence of the development of the multi-party system. Many parties as opposed to one or a few have substantial strength today and can win enough seats in parliament. Naturally therefore it has become harder and harder if not impossible for single party majorities in parliament. The major contest today is between coalitions led by the major national parties as opposed to between the parties themselves. The elections of 1991 were held in two phases in May and June 1991 because of Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination. Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination naturally created a sympathy wave but still the Congress could not get a majority and there was a hung parliament. The Congress formed a minority government with support from an assortment of parties. The very fact that the Congress itself formed a government with support from other parties and not on its own and had to look for a coalition showed that the era of coalitions had truly arrived. In fact the Congress indulged in a sordid game of bribing members of parliament to win a vote of confidence in what came to be known as the JMM bribery case. But interestingly the Congress managed to complete its five year term and indeed totally turned the direction of the economic policy of the country away from a state led welfare economy model to a private sector growth led model. The term was marked by the usual levels of faction fights and the Babri Masjid demolition and the communal riots that followed. This angered the Muslim community particularly in north India who drifted away from the Congress. Indeed the politics of north India turned gradually into one of competition for vote banks based on caste and community etc. Also there was a marked communal polarisation in most north Indian and western Indian states like Gujrat between Hindus and Muslims following the Babri Masjid demolition and the communal riots that happened over the following years post that event. The BJP also relatively gained in strength and emerged as the single largest party in the 1996 elections. But the basic new trend of a multi-party system with no single party being strong enough alone to come to power without a coalition did not change. That trend has not changed till now and is unlikely to in the future. In this new era of coalitions there is a constant making and unmaking of coalitions and wheeling and dealing between parties for relative positional advantage and a certain dilution of ideological commitments. There is a willingness to compromise ideological moorings for power political considerations that would have been quite unbelievable even a few years back. Who could have thought that atheist parties like the DMK (Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam) or parties like the TDP (Telgu Desam Party) who have a commitment to secularism can be part of the same coalition government with the avowedly Hindu nationalist BJP that they were part of in the NDA (National Democratic Alliance) government till 2004. The regional parties from the states now hold the balance of power in most situations and bargain hard for offering support to the major coalitions in terms of grants etc for the states that they represent and indeed births in ministries. This has interestingly made regionalism and parochialism in politics somewhat mainstream. Coalition politics is the way of life now. The blurring of ideological commitments of parties has left many citizens confused and with a feeling of helplessness. There is a feeling that politics is increasingly a game of power play in search of the illicit fruits of office and not any more a place for effective redress of social and economic problems of the people. One has been left surprised for example at the way parties that demonstrate hostility for each other turn into friends for the sake of power and vice versa. For instance the BSP (Bahujan Samaj Party) that has historically always claimed to represent the interests of dalits and backward castes and have been hostile to upper castes and Brahmins have in recent times successfully attempted to forge a social coalition with those very same privileged castes. Similarly many of the left parties that have always vowed for socialism and people’s rights have in recent times diluted their rigid stances on economic policy and approved of policy measures that are at least on the face of them quite right wing like for instance the economic prescriptions of free markets led global trade and investments. Most importantly the dilution of Congress Party’s agenda of Nehruvian Socialism and its replacement by a market led and private business led growth policy has reduced the distance between it and the extreme right wing parties like the BJP to a substantial extent and there is little to tell the difference increasingly between parties. All parties have their share of corruption scandals also and so even choosing the best party for supporting a particular ideology leaves the voter confused. But it can be said coalition politics particularly with the way it has led to empowerment for regional parties from the states has added to India’s search for true federalism in real sense that has been termed by some scholars like Balveer Arora as a kind of ‘electoral federalism’. Another feature of the new era of coalition politics is that most parties are controlled by a few strong individual leaders or families like private fiefdoms and as a consequence there are constant splits and break ups when ambitions clash. Thus it can be said in conclusion the era of coalition politics while empowering many sections that did not count previously has also in a way lowered the standards of our democracy and has not led to the maturity that we have been searching for since independence in ideological terms and in terms of policy slants. Thankfully our Constitution is silent on the party system except in the Tenth Schedule (introduced in 1985) relating to the Anti-Defection Law thus leaving the possibility open that we will continue to evolve for better or worse as we have done over the decades. Questions: 1. Explain the journey that he Indian party system has had since independence.
NOTE {rfrnc}:- Contemporary India INDIAN
POLITICS SINCE INDEPENDENCE: AN OVERVIEW The list is based on information from: http://www.itihaas.com/independent/pm-pres.html Jawaharlal Nehru August 15, 1947 - May 27, 1964 (Indian National Congress (INC), which led the struggle for independence)
Lal Bahadur Shastri June 9, 1964 - January 11, 1966
(INC. Succeeds Nehru after the latter dies of a heart attack) Indira Gandhi January 24, 1966 - March 24, 1977 ( INC. Installed as PM by the "Syndicate" after Shastri's death, in the hope that she would be a malleable leader, and the Syndicate the "power behind the throne)
Morarji Desai March 24, 1977 - July 28, 1979
(As leader of the JANATA PARTY, a coalition formed to oppose Indira Gandhi during her imposition of the STATE OF EMERGENCY) Charan Singh July 28, 1979 - January 14, 1980 (Differences within the JANATA party lead to the resignation of MORARJI) Indira Gandhi January 14, 1980 - October 31, 1984 (Wins elections in 1979-80 after factional conflicts make the Janata Party unable to stay together) Rajiv Gandhi October 31, 1984 - December 1, 1989 (Comes to power after the assassination of his mother in 1984)
Vishwanath Pratap (VP) Singh Dec. 2, 1989 -
November 10, 1990 (Wins General Elections in which CORRUPTION, particularly the BOFORS deal, is a major issue. Heads a coalition government led by his party the JANATA DAL)
Chandra Shekhar November 10, 1990 - June 21, 1991
(Inability of the Janata Dal-led coalition to stay together makes him PM. He had temporary support from the INC led by Rajiv Gandhi during his short tenure. Rajiv withdraws support in 1991, and fresh elections are called.)
P.V. Narasimha Rao June 21, 1991 - May 16, 1996
(Rajiv Gandhi's assassination during the election campaign results in a victory for the INC, and RAO now becomes leader of the party and the PM. Completes his term in office, but loses popularity. The Hindu nationalists, the BHARTIYA JANATA PARTY (BJP) gain support, especially after they make the issue of the mosque in AYODHYA a major campaign issue.) Atal Behari Vajpayee May 16, 1996 - 1 June 1996 (Elections in 1996 result in a HUNG Parliament, no party or group of parties has an absolute majority. The BJP is the single largest party, and its leader VAJPAYEE is invited to form a government, but cannot muster support in Parliament, is compelled to resign.)
H. D. Deve Gowda 1 June 1996 - 12 April 1997
(A post-election coalition of parties, known as the UNITED FRONT (UF), comes together to try and cobble a majority in Parliament. The UF is composed of parties that want to maintain a distance from the BJP and the INC, and many strong regional parties were an important component. However, the UF government still depends on "outside" support from the INC)
Inder Kumar Gujral 21 April 1997 - 19 Mar 1998
(The INC objects to some of GOWDA's policies, and threatens to withdraw support if he is not removed. GUJRAL, a former INC member and member of Mrs. Gandhi's Cabinet, but now a leading figure in the UF, takes over as PM.)
Atal Behari Vajpayee 19 March 1998 - April 2004
(INC withdraws support to GUJRAL as well, and a General Election called in 1998, which is won by another coalition, this time led by the BJP, also with the support of important regional parties. VAJPAYEE becomes PM. Break-up of the coalition [with a little help from the INC and other parties!] leads to yet anotherGeneral Election in 1999, which the BJP- led coalition (known as the National Democratic Alliance [NDA]) manages to win. Regional allies rather than the BJP increase their strength in Parliament, while the INC records its worst-ever electoral performance. ) Manmohan Singh May 2004-2014 (General Elections were called in April 2004 by the ruling NDA coalition, who fully expected another term in office. Despite a massive campaigning effort based on touting the achievements of the NDA government ("India Shining" had been the slogan in the months leading up to the election) they lost decisively. Another coalition (called the United Progressive Alliance [UPA]), with the INC as the single largest party, and supported by many regional parties as well as the Indian Communist parties, came to power. An interesting feature of 2004 was the decision by the leader of the INC, Sonia Gandhi (Rajiv Gandhi's widow) to forego the Prime Minister's position because of fierce opposition of many in the BJP on the grounds that Sonia was not born in India but was an Italian by birth who had much later become a naturalized Indian citizen. 2009 elections were fought and won on the basis of an improving economy and social justice. Narendra Modi May 2014 to Current Modi rose steadily through the ranks of the RSS and the BJP through his political career to become Chief Minister of the state of Gujarat. A controversial figure, accused of having had a hand in a pogrom of Muslims in his state in 2000, Modi’s 2014 victory was based on increasing disillusionment with the policies of the INC (widely perceived to be corrupt and ineffective). At the same time, Modi’s own personality (a forceful speaker, and decisive, if domineering, leader) was a contrast to Singh and other leaders of the INC. He posed a challenge based on both his personality and his promises/ideology to the leaders of the INC in the elections in spring 2014, promising economic growth and development while ensuring that the Hindu Nationalist core supporters of the BJP were not alienated. Note: Gulzarilal Nanda was caretaker Prime Minister twice in the 1960s, between Nehru and Shastri, and Shastri and Indira.