The Supreme Court has ruled in favour of three people who claimed their lives were blighted by past

minor criminal convictions.

The judges found the way the criminal records are disclosed to employers infringed human rights.

The government will have to consider reform of the system, said BBC legal affairs correspondent Clive
Coleman.

The charity Unlock said the ruling stands to affect thousands of people with old and minor criminal
records.

Christopher Stacey, co-director of Unlock, said that criminal checks leave many people "unnecessarily
anchored to their past".

He claims that in the past five years alone, more than a million youth criminal records were disclosed on
standard or enhanced Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks that related to offences from more than
30 years ago.
 Criminal record disclosure checks ruled unlawful

Supreme Court justices found that the criminal records disclosure scheme was "disproportionate" in two
respects.

These were that all previous convictions should be disclosed, however minor, where the person has more
than one conviction, and also in the case of warnings and reprimands issued to young offenders.

They announced their decision on Wednesday following the government challenge against a Court of
Appeal judgment in 2017 over the legality of the scheme.

The appeal ruling backed the High Court's 2016 finding that the scheme was "not in accordance with the
law" within the meaning of Article 8 of the ECHR, which protects the right to private life.

The children's charity Just for Kids Law, which brought one of the cases to court, had argued that DBS
checks fail to treat children differently to adults.

Its CEO Enver Soloman said the "landmark judgement" would benefit thousands of children issued with
cautions each year, a disproportionate number of whom are from Black and Minority Ethnic backgrounds.

"There is now an overwhelming view shared by the higher courts and MPs that the government should act
immediately to ensure no child who is given a caution ends up with a criminal record that stigmatises them
for life."

Shoplifting and 'dares'

One of the cases involved a woman, referred to in court as P, who was charged with shoplifting a 99p book
in 1999 while suffering from untreated schizophrenia.

She was bailed to appear before magistrates 18 days later, but failed to attend court, which meant she
ended up with two convictions - for which she received a conditional discharge.

P wants to work as a teaching assistant, having previous experience of teaching, and has sought voluntary
positions in schools. However, with each application she is required to disclose her historic convictions,
which has the effect of leading to the disclosure of her medical history to explain them.
In another case, G was arrested at the age of 13 for sexually assaulting two younger boys, with offences
involving sexual touching and attempted intercourse.

Police records indicated the sexual activity was consensual and carried out as "dares", in the form of sexual
curiosity and experimentation on the part of all three boys.

The Crown Prosecution Service decided it was not in the public interest to prosecute. G received a police
reprimand in Sept 2006 and has not offended since.

In 2011, when working as a library assistant in a local college, he was required to apply for an enhanced
criminal records check because his work involved contact with children.

The police proposed to disclose the reprimand with an account of the mitigation. As a result, G withdrew
his application and lost the job. He has since felt unable to apply for any job requiring an enhanced
criminal records check.

Their cases were heard alongside that of W, a man who - more than 35 years ago - was convicted aged 16
of actual bodily harm, and given a two-year conditional discharge.

Due to the categorisation of this type of offence, under the current rules the record will never come off his
standard or enhanced DBS check. However, the justices allowed the government's appeal regarding W.
Those involved cannot be named for legal reasons.

Bob's story: 'Mucking about'

Image copyrightBOB ASHFORD

Bob Ashford, 65, from Somerset, says he struggled to get a job after being convicted of trespassing and
possession of an offensive weapon when he was 13 years old.
 "I was mucking about on a railway embankment with a group of lads and one of them had an air pistol," he
told the BBC.

"It wasn't until I finished university and started applying for jobs I realised the impact this was going to
have because I had to disclose these offences."

He said he did eventually have a successful career in the criminal justice system but as recently as six years
ago he had to stand down as a candidate to be a police and crime commissioner after his past convictions
were disclosed.

He welcomed the Supreme Court ruling as a "step in the right direction" but said there should be a
"complete review" of the whole DBS system.

'Barrier to rehabilitation'
The Justice Committee, which published an inquiry in July, welcomed the ruling.

Bob Neill MP, chair of the committee, said the disclosure system is "inconsistent with the aims of the
youth justice system, with mistakes made as a teenager able to follow someone around for decades,
creating a barrier to rehabilitation, and preventing large numbers of people from gaining access to
employment, education, and housing".

Corey Stoughton, advocacy director of Liberty which represented P, said: "P made a mistake a long time
ago and has been unfairly punished ever since.

"Using overly broad bureaucratic rules that deny people meaningful careers by forcing them to to carry a
scarlet letter for life is both cruel and pointless."

Mr Stacey from Unlock, which intervened in the case, urged the government to take "prompt and
considered action" and carry out a fundamental review of the wider DBS system.

Related Topics
 European Court of Human Rights

 Crime

 Law and order

 Employment

 UK Supreme Court

Share this story About sharing

 Email
 Facebook
 Messenger
 Twitter
 Pinterest
 LinkedIn
More on this story
 
Criminal record disclosure checks ruled 'unlawful'
22 January 2016


Private tutors 'should face DBS criminal record checks'
17 July 2018

UK

PM considers fourth bid to pass Brexit deal

 30 March 2019

 From the sectionUK Politics

Full article PM considers fourth bid to pass Brexit deal
 Eurostar trains delayed by trespasser

 30 March 2019

 From the sectionLondon

Full article Eurostar trains delayed by trespasser
 Sala pilot 'not qualified to fly at night'

 30 March 2019

 From the sectionWales

Full article Sala pilot 'not qualified to fly at night'
Top Stories
PM considers fourth bid to pass Brexit deal
Theresa May is exploring ways to put her EU withdrawal agreement before MPs again, after its latest
rejection.
26 minutes ago
Sala pilot 'not qualified to fly at night'
7 hours ago
Trump threatens to shut Mexico border
7 minutes ago

Features
Review: Van Gogh and Britain ★★★★☆
Why the founder of Mother's Day hated greetings cards
The unlikely similarities between the far right and IS
May's aim to prove deal is least worst option

The joy of rain in a city famed for its sunshine

VIDEO
Black beauty and the Brazilian butt lift
No deal - how are EU countries preparing?

VIDEO
Muses no more: Ballet's newest choreographers
The fight for Africa's fish

Elsewhere on the BBC

Eco-anxiety

How to spot it and what to do about it

Full article Eco-anxiety

Daily news briefing direct to your inbox

Sign up for our newsletter

Full article Daily news briefing direct to your inbox
 Most Read
 1Brexit: Theresa May ponders fourth bid to pass deal
 2Sala pilot David Ibbotson 'not qualified to fly at night'
 3Tasmanian devils 'adapting to coexist with cancer'
 4Secret tape increases pressure on Trudeau in SNC-Lavalin affair
 5Trump threatens to shut Mexico border amid migration surge
 6Eurostar: Trains delayed by trespasser near St Pancras
 7Masterchef 2019: All-female final for 15th series
 8Brexit: 'Mission unaccomplished'
 9Winter in LA: The joy of rain in a city famed for its sunshine
 10Betws-y-Coed residents are evacuated after mountain fire
Why you can trust BBC News