Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IPCRF 2018 2019 For Teacher I III Final
IPCRF 2018 2019 For Teacher I III Final
Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
DIVISION OF LAPU-LAPU CITY
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Applied a range Quality Used different Used different Used different
Services Knowledge and of teaching teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies
Pedagogy strategies to that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical
develop critical and creative and creative and creative
and creative thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills
thinking, as well and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS
as other higher as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
order thinking with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
skills. 7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
lessons as lessons as lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Managed Quality
Services Environment classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom
and Diversity of structure to management management management
Learners engage learners, strategies that strategies that strategies that
engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
individually or in
activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
groups, in
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
meanigful
7.5% with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
exploration,
discovery and Efficiency
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
hands-on lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported
activities within a by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
range of physical 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
learning acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
environments. Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Managed Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher
Services learner behavior management management management
constructively by strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner
applying positive behavior that behavior that behavior that
and non-violent promote positive promote positive promote positive
discipline to and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
ensure learning- discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown
focused in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted
environment with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
7.5%
Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and
Services and Planning managed and implemented implemented implemented
implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning process as learning process as learning process as
learning shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
processes to with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
meet curriculum
requirements and Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
varied teaching 7.5% developmentally developmentally developmentally
contexts. sequenced sequenced sequenced
teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning process as learning process as learning process as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other given of the other given of the other given
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 8. Participated in Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services and Planning collegial participated in participated in participated in
discussions that LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/
use teacher and gs to discuss gs to discuss meetings to discuss
learner feedback teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
to enrich teaching feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich
practice. instruction as instruction as instruction as
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
7.5% submitted submitted submitted
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Designed, Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected,
Services and Reporting selected, organized and used organized and used organized and used
organized and diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic,
used diagnostic, formative and formative and formative and
formative and summative summative summative
summative assessment assessment assessment
assessment strategies strategies strategies
strategies consistent with consistent with consistent with
consistent with curriculum curriculum curriculum
curriculum requirements as requirements as requirements as
requirements. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5%
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 4. Assessment 12.Communica Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally
Services and Reporting ted promptly and showed prompt and prompt and clear showed prompt and
clearly the clear communication of clear
learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, communication of
progress and the learners’ needs, progress and the learners’ needs,
achievement to progress and achievement to key progress and
key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key
including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders,
guardians. including parents/ guardians as including parents/
guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as
7.5% shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV
submitted submitted
Submitted 1 No acceptable
learner-centered evidence was
lessons as shown
evidently shown in
any of the other
given MOV
Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Used different No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
teaching strategies evidence was
that develop critical shown
and creative
thinking skills
and/or other HOTS
as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4
Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Applied No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
differentiated evidence was
teaching strategies shown
to address learner
diversity as shown
in MOV 1 with a
rating of 4
Submitted 1 No acceptable
developmentally evidence was
sequenced shown
teaching and
learning process as
evidently shown in
any 1 of the given
MOV
Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Rarely participated No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
in LAC/FGD/ evidence was
meeting to discuss shown
teacher/learner
feedback to enrich
instruction as
shown in the MOV
submitted
Participated in 1 No acceptable
LAC/FGD/meeting evidence was
as evidently shown shown
in any 1 of the
given MOV
Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Designed, selected, No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
organized and used evidence was
diagnostic, shown
formative and
summative
assessment
strategies
consistent with
curriculum
requirements as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4
Submitted 1 No acceptable
assessment tool as evidence was
evidently shown in shown
any of the
acceptable MOV
Submitted 1 No acceptable
acceptable MOV evidence was
shown
Submitted 1 No acceptable
acceptable MOV evidence was
shown
Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Rarely showed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
prompt and clear evidence was
communication of shown
the learners’ needs,
progress and
achievement to key
stakeholders,
including parents/
guardians as
shown in the MOV
submitted
Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:
Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:
Numerical Ratings
Score
E T Ave
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Final Rating #DIV/0!
Adjectival Rating #DIV/0!