Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (Ipcrf) For Teachers Elementary Level
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (Ipcrf) For Teachers Elementary Level
ELEMENTARY LEVEL
(1st Semester)
Name of Employee VERVINA T. VILLONES Name of Rater MEDELINA B. BESARIO
Position TEACHER III Position MASTER TEACHER 1
Review Period 1st Semester ( May-October) Date of Review OCTOBER 27, 2017
Bureau/Center/Service/Division San Isidro ES/ Sta. Fe District/ Leyte Division
WEIGHT
ACTUAL
MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS RATING SCORE
RESULT
KRA
KRA 1 I. Teaching 35%
Learning
Process
1. Prepared at least 90 (May- 5% 5 - Prepared 90 and above 5 - submitted before Q-90 Q E T A 0. 250
complete DLP/DLL October) complete and the 1st period of E- -
throughout the rating congruent set of lesson classes T-during 5 - 5 5
1st period
period. plans/DLL 4 - submitted during
4 - Prepared 68-89 the 1st period of
complete and classes
congruent set of lesson 3 - submitted during
plans/ DLL the 2nd period of
3 - Prepared 67 complete classes
and congruent set of 2 - submitted during
lesson plans/DLL the 3rd period of
2 - Prepared 24-45 classes
complete and 1 - submitted during
congruent set of lesson the 4th period of
plans/DLL classes or beyond
1 - Prepared 23 and below within the day
complete set of lesson
plans/DLL
Page 1 of 18
2. Utilized at least 3 (May- 6% (Refer to DepEd Order 5 - Utilized 5 or more Q-
Varied Learning October) No. 42, s. 2016) appropriate IMs Audio, Q E T A
Resources that are 5 - ICT/Multimedia, 4 - Utilized 4 & 0.240
appropriate to the Audio, Visual and appropriate IMs Visual 4 4 - 4
lesson’s objective Printed and 3 - Utilized 3 E- 4
daily. Manipulative appropriate IMs T- -
(ICT/Multimedia, instructional materials 2 - Utilized 2
Visual and Printed were utilized through- appropriate IMs
Materials, out the lessons. 1 - Utilized only 1 IM
Manipulative) 4 - Audio, Visual and
MOV: Printed and
- IMs Checklist manipulative
instructional materials
were utilized through-
out
the lessons.
3 - Visual, Printed and
other Manipulative
instructional materials
were utilized through-
out the lessons.
2 - Printed materials were
utilized throughout the
lessons.
1 - Innovative instructional
materials were not
utilized throughout the
lessons.
5. Taught all
competencies in the 5% 5 - with 90-100% 5 - 95% - 100% and 5 - 90-100% in line Q- 89%
Budget of Lesson per mastery above of the With the LCD E- 85%
Q E T A
quarter in all subject 4 - with 80-89% mastery competencies for 4 - 80-89% in line T- 89%
areas with at least 75% 3 - with 70-79% mastery the quarter were with the LCD 0.200
4 4 4 4
mastery. 2 - with 60-69% mastery taught 3 - 70-79% in line
MOV: 4 - 85-94% with the LCD
Lesson Plan 1 - with 59 and below 2 - 60-69% in line
3 - 75-84%
mastery
LCD (Learning 2 - 65-74% with the LCD
Competency 1 - 59 and below in
1 - 64% and below line with mastery
Directory)/Budget of
Lessons
Curriculum Guide
Teacher’s M&E
Report (SMEA)
Page 4 of 18
6. Constructed/Enhanced (May- 4% 5 - Constructed/enhanced 5 - indexed Q- - Q E T A
40 complete varied October 60 or more IMs/eIMs E- 4 0.120
indexed IMs/e- 4- daily T- - 3 3 3
IMs/Learning 3 - constructed/enhanced 4 - indexed weekly
Resources. 40-49 only IMs/eIMs
(Note: Acknowledge 2 - constructed/enhanced every other
the source of the 30-39 only day
copied materials and 1 - constructed/enhanced 3 - indexed
show the enhanced 29 and below IMs/eIMs
materials) weekly
2 - indexed
IMs/eIMs
monthly
1 - indexed
IMs/eIMs
quarterly
Page 5 of 18
Quarterly Test. SMEA T- - Q E T A
2nd & 3rd
(Note: To be Quarter 4 4 - 4
implemented in SY Result
2017-2018)
Q- above
4. Zero-out non-readers 5 - 0 non-reader 3.0%
(May- 2% (11)
(for grades 1 to 6) October 4 - non-reader is only 0.1- Q E T A
1.0% of E- -
(Based on EGRA/ Phil for T- -
IRI result) Grades 2- the class 1 - - 1
0.020
6 only) 3 - non-reader is only 1.1-
MOV: Phil-IRI Result, 2.0% of
SMEA Report the class
2 - non-reader is only 2.1-
3.0% of
the class
1 - non-reader is above
3.0% of the
class
Q- 3.0%
0f the class
5. Zero-out non – (May- 2% (11)
numerates (based on October) 5 - 0 non-numerates E- - 0.020
the EGMA and other T- -
Page 6 of 18
test) 4 - non-numerates is only Q E T A
0.1-1.0% of the class
MOV: Numeracy Test 3 - non-numerates is only 1 - - 1
Result, SMEA Report 1.1-2.0% of the class
2 - non-numerates is only Q- 3
readers
2.1-3.0% of the class
E- -
1 - non-numerates is above T- -
3.0% of the class
6. Increased number of Q E T A
readers from non- 3% 5 - increased 5 or more
reader to frustration readers from current 3 - - 3 0.090
level; from frustration reading level to the next
to instructional/ higher reading level
independent level in 4 - increased 4 readers from
all classes handled current reading level to
(Note: Non-adviser the next higher reading
will take the reading level
performance of the 3 - increased 3 readers from
classes handled) current reading level to
the next higher reading
MOV: Phil-IRI level
Result, SMEA Result 2 - increased 2 readers from
current reading level to
the next higher reading
level
1 - increased 1 reader from
current reading level to
the next higher
Page 7 of 18
7. Compiled Pupil’s (May- 3% 5 - Compiled complete and 5 - compiled weekly Q- Q E T A
Compiled
Portfolio October) Properly labelled 4 - compiled twice a complete and
0. 150
students' written and month Properly
5 5 - 5
MOV: Pupil’s income generating 3 - compiled monthly labelled
students'
Portfolio product/performance- 2 - compiled quarterly written and
income
based output 1 - compiled semestral generating
4 - Compiled complete product/
3 - Compiled complete
students written
and product/
performance-based
output
2 - Compiled complete
written output with
no performance/product-
based output/not
properly labelled
Page 8 of 18
Summative Test
Question with TOS
SREYA
ECCD
checklist/card
MOV: School
Record Checklist
Page 13 of 18
5. Participated on the 5 - Level 3 of SBM Q-
improvement of SBM (May- practice, Regional Level 2
Q E T A
4% E- -
Level of Practice October) Level 0.120
MOV: 4 - Level 3 of SBM T- - 3 - - 3
SBM Level of Practice practice, Division Level
Result 3 - Level 2 of SBM
practice, Division Level
2 - Level 1 of SBM
practice, Division Level
1 - on process of
collecting and
organizing data
Page 14 of 18
B. Action Research Solved problem in school 1% 5 - Action Research
through Action Research Replicated by other
schools
4 - Implemented the
Action Research with
MOVs
3 - Approved Action
Research by the
SDS/ASDS
2 - Submitted Action
Research Proposal to
be SDS/ASDS
1 - Proposed Action
Research to the
Immediate Supervisor
Page 16 of 18
PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS DISCUSSIONS
The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed on content of this appraisal form and the performance rating.
Signature Signature
2. For newly hired teachers, they have to fill-in the semesters applicable to their ACTUAL date of service. For example:
a. Teacher A, hired August 6, 2017, IPCRF to be filled-in should be both 1st Semester and 2nd Semester;
b. Teacher B, hired November 8, 2017, IPCRF to be filled-in should be for the 2nd Semester only, therefore, the initial rating for
the 2nd Semester shall become the FINAL rating.
3. This IPCRF ready-to-print and is consisting of 13 pages. YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO MAKE ANY CORRECTIONS/ALTERATIONS/ADDITIONS to the
template. Any comments/suggestions will be treated separately.
Page 18 of 18