Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Compare and Contrast The Mechanisms Employed by Cocaine
Compare and Contrast The Mechanisms Employed by Cocaine
and cannabis to stimulate dopamine release in the brain, and how this relates to
epinephrine (Udenfriend & Wyngaarden, 1956). It coordinates movement, via the nigrostriatal
dopaminergic system (Miklyaeva, Castañeda, & Whishaw, 1994); and emotional responses via
the mesolimbic dopaminergic system (Salimpoor, Benovoy, Larcher, Dagher, & Zatorre,
2011). It has been found that psychostimulant drugs such as cocaine effect the levels of
dopamine in brain (Pierce & Kumaresan, 2006), and as dopamine has a positively reinforcing
effect (Old & Milner, 1954), drugs that directly affect dopamine levels have a higher abuse
potential (Volkow et al., 1997). This essay will look at how commonly used drugs act on the
brain and how this effects their abuse potential; comparing opioid analgesics, behavioural
Cannabis is an anandamide psychedelic drug obtained from the hemp plant, cannabis
sativa. It causes a disruption of psychomotor behaviour and a euphoric state of mind. This is a
result of the active compound tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) binding with CB1 cannabinoid
receptors, which causes an inhibitory effect on amino acids and monoamine neurotransmitters
(Iversen 2003). The inhibition of amino acids, such as gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA),
subsequently increases dopamine release (Schlicker & Kathmann, 2001), and this increase of
dopamine causes cannabis to have reinforcing effects, leading to an increased abuse potential.
Chait and Zacny (1992) conducted a study that directly looked at the reinforcing effects
of cannabis in humans. They found that both smoking cannabis and ingestion of THC acted as
cannabinoid receptors are found within the brain substrates that are associated with reward
1
Ellen Oxenham
functions (Gardner & Vorel, 1998), or that cannabinoids cause an increased firing rate of
dopamine neurons in brain areas that are associated with reinforcing effects; such as the
mesolimbic and striatal tissues (French, Dillon, & Wu, 1997). From this research we can see
that there is a well-established link between cannabis and dopamine, suggesting that cannabis
has a high abuse potential as a result of the reinforcing effects of dopamine. But how does this
The abuse rates of different drugs were assessed in a study by Compton, Thomas,
Stinson, and Grant (2007). The study found that, of a large sample of United States citizens
aged 18 and above, 8.5% fitted the DSM-IV criteria for Substance abuse or dependence
specifically for cannabis. This was much higher than that of cocaine, which had an overall
prevalence of 2.8%. This could be because cannabis has a direct effect of the levels of dopamine
in the brain, however, cocaine also has a similar neurochemical effect. Therefore, it may be
because more people use cannabis as opposed to cocaine as a result of permissive beliefs about
cannabis use; for example, that it is not dangerous in comparison to other illicit drugs such as
cocaine (Chabrol, Massot, & Mullet, 2004). These beliefs, would suggest an increased rate of
cannabis use and decreased rate of cocaine use, which would subsequently effect the rate of
behavioural stimulant, extracted from the Peruvian coca shrub. It is a dopamine antagonist and
works by blocking dopamine transporters, and inhibiting the reuptake of dopamine in the brain;
causes increased levels of the neurotransmitter in the synaptic cleft (Volkow et al, 1997). As a
result of increased dopamine levels, cocaine causes increased alertness, elevated mood, and
euphoria; which can make it appealing to use again. This can be seen in studies that show re-
dopaminergic nerve terminals (Lyness, Friedle, & Moore, 1979); suggesting a strong link
2
Ellen Oxenham
between dopamine and substance abuse potential. In addition to this, it has been found that
repeated administration of cocaine increases the turnover of dopamine and therefore decreases
natural levels of the neurotransmitter in the absence of cocaine (Dackis, & Gold, 1985); this
Heroin, unlike cocaine, is similar to cannabis in that it doesn’t inhibit the reuptake of
dopamine, but instead acts on other receptors which increase dopamine levels. Heroin is
converted into morphine in the brain and binds with opiate receptors, activating the mesolimbic
dopamine system and providing similar effects to cannabis such as a feeling of well-being and
relaxation (Tanda, Pontieri, Di Chiara, 1997). It is a synthetic opioid analgesic drug that is
synthesized from morphine, but is more potent and has a higher uptake rate than morphine
(Oldendorf, Hyman, Braunm & Oldendorf, 1972); which may explain its high abuse potential.
Binnekade, Raaso, and Vanderschuren (2002). They found that, after training rats to poke their
nose to receive either cocaine or heroin and withdrawing the drug for a week, administration
of Quinpirole (a D2 receptor agonist) causes the animal to repeatedly poke it’s nose in an
attempt to self-administer more drugs. These findings were true for both heroin and cocaine
trained rats, suggesting that increased dopamine levels, directly effects the abuse potential of
both cocaine and heroin. However, after three weeks of withdrawal the findings were only
consistent for cocaine trained rats and heroin trained rats no longer responded to the activation
of D2 receptors. This may suggest that the abuse potential for heroin and cocaine is similar for
the first week of withdrawal, but after three weeks of withdrawal the abuse potential of heroin
is reduced. This supports the findings of Compton, Thomas, Stinson, and Grant (2007) that
found the rate of heroin abuse to be lower than that of cocaine abuse.
3
Ellen Oxenham
Research also suggests that the abuse potential of cocaine and heroin may be different
as a result of different neural substrates mediating the reinforcing effects of the drugs
(Ettenberg, Pettit, Bloom, & Koob, 1982). Which would explain why the abuse rate of heroin
is lower than that of cocaine, however it may also be the effect of whether drug is antagonist
or agonist that causes this difference in abuse rates. However, Thomas, Stinson, and Grant
(2007) also found cocaine abuse rates to be higher than that of ecstasy, and the abuse rate of
ecstasy is lower than that of heroin. Therefore, because ecstasy is also an antagonist like
cocaine we cannot conclude that the difference in abuse rates is a result of whether a drug is
agonist or antagonist.
stimulant that causes an increased sense of well-being, increased energy, and distorted sensory
perception (I.e. visual distortion). Ecstasy works in the same way as cocaine, in that it inhibits
the reuptake pre-synaptic dopamine, increasing the levels of these neurotransmitters in the
synaptic cleft and increasing the activation of post-synaptic receptors (De la Torre et al. 2004)
However, ecstasy also works by inhibiting the reuptake of serotonin increasing a person’s sense
dopamine (De la Torre et al. 2004). There is research to suggest that the difference between the
abuse potential of ecstasy and other drugs, such as cocaine, is a result of the drug effecting
serotonin levels as well as dopamine levels, suggesting serotonin plays a role in the reinforcing
effects of ecstasy (Doly et al, 2009). However, this role of serotonin could also mean that
ecstasy has less of a reinforcing effect than other drugs such as cocaine. Research has shown
that of monkeys that are self-administering drugs, the number of doses of ecstasy administered
was lower than that of cocaine, suggesting cocaine has a higher abuse potential (Lile, Ross, &
Nader, 2005); which supports the findings of Compton, Thomas, Stinson, and Grant (2007).
4
Ellen Oxenham
Overall it can be seen that cannabis, cocaine, heroin, and ecstasy all act on the brain in
a way that results in increased dopamine levels. As a result of dopamine having reinforcing
effects, most drugs have a high abuse potential, with Cannabis having the highest abuse rate
(Compton, Thomas, Stinson, & Grant, 2007). Research suggests that the abuse rate of cannabis
is a result of the combined effect of permissive beliefs about the drug (Chabrol, Massot, &
Mullet, 2004) and increased dopamine levels in the brain (Schlicker & Kathmann, 2001).
Dopamine levels are also increased by Cocaine, heroin, and ecstasy, although ecstasy also
increases serotonin levels; which may explain why it has a lower abuse rate than cocaine and
cannabis. In conclusion, the reinforcing effects of dopamine definitely increase the abuse
potential of cannabis, cocaine, heroin, and ecstasy. However, other factors such as the role of
serotonin (De la Torre et al. 2004), the effect of withdrawal time (De Vris, Schoffelmeer,
Binnekade, Raaso, & Vanderschuren, 2002), the number of dopaminergic nerve terminals
available (Lyness, Friedle, & Moore, 1979), and beliefs about different drugs (Chabrol, Massot,
& Mullet, 2004) all contribute to the difference in the abuse potential of each drug.
5
Ellen Oxenham
References
Chabrol, H., Massot, E., & Mullet, E. (2004). Factor structure of cannabis related beliefs in
Chait, L. D., & Zacny, J. P. (1992). Reinforcing and subjective effects of oral Δ9-THC and
Compton, W. M., Thomas, Y. F., Stinson, F. S., & Grant, B. F. (2007). Prevalence, correlates,
disability, and comorbidity of DSM-IV drug abuse and dependence in the United States:
results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions.
Dackis, C. A., & Gold, M. S. (1985). New concepts in cocaine addiction: the dopamine
De la Torre, R., Farré, M., Roset, P. N., Pizarro, N., Abanades, S., Segura, M., ... & Camí, J.
De Vries, T. J., Schoffelmeer, A. N., Binnekade, R., Raaso, H., & Vanderschuren, L. J. (2002).
Ettenberg, A., Pettit, H. O., Bloom, F. E., & Koob, G. F. (1982). Heroin and cocaine
French, E. D., Dillon, K., & Wu, X. (1997). Cannabinoids excite dopamine neurons in the
6
Ellen Oxenham
Gardner, E. L., & Vorel, S. R. (1998). Cannabinoid transmission and reward-related events.
Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I, Q. (2014). How do drugs and hormones influence the brain and
behaviour? In An Introduction to Brain and Behaviour (pp. 172-209). New York, NY:
Worth Publishers
Lile, J. A., Ross, J. T., & Nader, M. A. (2005). A comparison of the reinforcing efficacy of 3,
Lyness, W. H., Friedle, N. M., & Moore, K. E. (1979). Destruction of dopaminergic nerve
Miklyaeva, E. I., Castañeda, E., & Whishaw, I. Q. (1994). Skilled reaching deficits in unilateral
Oldendorf, W. H., Hyman, S., Braun, L., & Oldendorf, S. Z. (1972). Blood-brain barrier:
Olds, J., & Milner, P. (1954). Positive reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of
septal area and other regions of rat brain. Journal of comparative and physiological
7
Ellen Oxenham
Pierce, R. C., & Kumaresan, V. (2006). The mesolimbic dopamine system: the final common
pathway for the reinforcing effect of drugs of abuse? Neuroscience & biobehavioral
Salimpoor, V. N., Benovoy, M., Larcher, K., Dagher, A., & Zatorre, R. J. (2011). Anatomically
distinct dopamine release during anticipation and experience of peak emotion to music.
Schlicker, E., & Kathmann, M. (2001). Modulation of transmitter release via presynaptic
Tanda, G., Pontieri, F. E., & Di Chiara, G. (1997). Cannabinoid and heroin activation of
Volkow, N. D., Wang, G. J., Fischman, M. W., Foltin, R. W., Fowler, J. S., Abumrad, N. N.,
... & Hitzemann, R. (1997). Relationship between subjective effects of cocaine and