Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TRVFS PDF
TRVFS PDF
Page 1
TRVFS 2011: 12
The Swedish Transport Administration's regulations Out of print
October
on a change in the Swedish Road Administration's regulations 17, 2011
(VVFS)
2004: 43) on the application of European General advice is marked
calculation standards; with indented text and
the word Advice
decided on October 4, 2011. Reprint
The Swedish Transport Administration prescribes 1 with the support of chapter 10 § 6 plan and
the Construction Ordinance (2011: 338) regarding the Swedish Road Administration's
regulations (VVFS 2004: 43) on the application of
European calculation standards
partly to the headline closest before chapter 9, Section 9 shall read
"National parameters for 8.1 (1) and 8.2 (1)" ,
partly to Chapter 1 2 and 10, Chapter 6. 3 and 6, chapter 7. 5 and 9
§ 8, ch. Section 7, Chapter 12 § 1, Chapter 19 2 and 6, chap. § 1,
Chapter 28 1, 2a, 4, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12, 16, 16a, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22,
Sections 23 and 26 and Appendix 1, Appendix 3 and Appendix 5 shall have
following wording,
partly to Chapter 15 Section 1 and Chapter 30 § 1 shall cease to apply,
partly that the regulation should introduce three new chapters, 41 - 43
chapter, of the following wording,
partly that the regulation should introduce four new paragraphs 21
Cape. 8a, chap. 7a, 21a and 25a, and immediately before
these paragraphs are worded as follows.
The regulation will therefore have the following wording from and
with the date on which these regulations enter into force.
Section 1 According to section 1.4 of the Swedish Road Administration's regulations (VVFS)
2004: 31) on bearing capacity, charter and durability
construction works on roads and streets
European standards transferred to Swedish standards (SS-
EN) and that provides methods for verifying building works
bearing capacity, charter and durability are used as
alternative or supplement to what is prescribed in it
Constitution.
Table 1
Swedish designation, title and edition EN standard 1) Chapter i
ISSN 0283-2135this
ISSN 0283-2135constitution
SS-EN 1990 Euro code - Basic EN 1990: 2002 2
dimensioning rules for supporting structures,
edition 1
SS-EN 1990 / A1: 2005 Euro code - EN 1990 / A1: 7
Basic dimensioning rules 2005
for supporting structures, edition 1
SS-EN 1991-1-1 Eurocode 1 - Loading EN 1991-1-1: 3
trusses - Part 1-1: General loads - 2002
Heaviness, self-weight and useful load,
edition 1
SS-EN 1991-1-3 Eurocode 1 - Loading EN 1991-1-3: 4
trusses - Part 1-3: General loads - 2003
Snow load, edition 1
SS-EN 1991-1-4 Eurocode 1 - Loading EN 1991-1-4: 9
trusses - Part 1-4: General loads - 2005
Wind load, edition 1
Advice:
Example of choice of security class.
C Bridge
D Other buildings
Generally
2 § 4 Appendix B3.2 and B3.3 may not be applied. Appendix B1, B2,
B3.1, B4 and B5 retain their informative character at it
national application.
§ 1 Advice:
Snow loads at levels above 1500 m above sea level should
is determined for each project where relevant
National parameters for 1.1 (3), 2 (4), 3.3 (1), 3.3 (3) and
4.3 (1)
National parameters for 1.1 (4), 5.2 (2), 5.3.4 (3), 5.3.6 (3)
and 6.2 (2)
§3 Advice:
In cases where verification is made for exceptional snow drift
According to Section 2, Appendix B may be used. (VVFS 2005: 48)
§4 Advice:
In cases where verification is made for exceptional snow drift
According to section 2, the snow load can be regarded as an accident accident.
(VVFS 2005: 48)
Section 5 Appendix C may not be applied. Snow load on land with one
Repetition time of 50 years is specified in Appendix 1.
Advice:
Snow loads on land for various municipalities are listed in appendix
1. (VVFS 2005: 48)
Section 6 On load-bearing parts in safety class 3, at least snow load must be applied
Section 5 applies unless 4.1 (2) is invoked.
10
Advice:
If the building's intended lifetime is considerable
more than 50 years should use a snow load on land
with a repetition time corresponding to the service life
considered. (VVFS 2005: 48)
§7 Advice:
A load picture that takes snow removal into account should be considered
if not covered by the form factors given in the
section 5.3 and whether it can be of decisive importance
load bearing capacity or stability. (VVFS
2005: 48)
§8 Advice:
ISO 4355 can be used to determine C t . (VVFS
2005: 48)
Section 9 When applying formulas 5.4 and 5.5, the upper one
the value is set to 1.6 . (VVFS 2005: 48)
Section 10 Advice:
Snow overhang at eaves should be considered in places such as
is located 400 m above sea level. In places that are located
below 400 m above sea level, the snow overhang can
Summa.
11
§ 1 Advice:
The class division of bridge superstructures should be expanded
with "Type 4: Broban plate of wood on beams of wood".
Wooden bridge plate on box or I beams of steel
belongs to type 2. Aluminum bridge bridge belongs to type 1. (VVFS)
2005: 48)
Advice:
For type 4 bridge superstructure, the values for type 3 should be
used. (VVFS 2005: 48)
Advice:
Maximum and minimum air temperature for different
municipalities are listed in Appendix 2. (VVFS 2005: 48)
12
Section 5 The recommended values in Tables 6.1 and 6.2 apply.
Advice:
For type 4 bridge superstructure, both ∆T M, heat and
ΔT M, Cool added to 5 C, and K acid to 1.0. (VVFS
2005: 48)
Advice:
For type 4 bridge superstructure, method 2 should not be used.
(VVFS 2005: 48)
Advice:
For bridge superstructure type 4, see national selection in section 6.
(VVFS 2005: 48)
13
2 § 5 The client may specify values etc. for the current project.
(VVFS 2008: 250)
3 § 6 Advice:
Bridges should also be dimensioned for a traffic load such as
is determined according to the rules of EN 1991-2, 4.3 with the following
changes.
The axles of the type vehicle are always centrally located within
load bar. The transverse pressure of the wheel pressure is 0.3 m and
in the longitudinal direction 0.2 m. The center distance between the wheel pressures
is assumed to vary arbitrarily between 1.7 m and 2.3 m.
The number and location of the loading field is chosen in each case
so that adverse effects are obtained. Number of cargo fields
with type vehicles is a maximum of two. One cargo type type vehicle
is multiplied by the factor 1.0 and the second load field
type vehicles with a factor of 0.8. Other cargo fields have an even
distributed load q. This can be 0 or 5 kN / m
and is evenly distributed over the width of the load field.
α Q2 0.9
α Q3 0
α q1 0.7
α qi 1.0 for i> 1
α qr 1.0
(VVFS 2006: 61)
Section 5 The same contact area may be used for cargo model 2 as for
load model 1. (VVFS 2006: 61)
6 § 7 Table 4.4a, the row for group 1a, shall be 0.6 times
characteristic value is applied for footnote a. (TRVFS
2011: 12)
Section 7 Advice:
The developer can specify other fatigue load models
for the current project. (VVFS 2006: 61)
Section 8 The builder indicates whether the fatigue load model 5 should
applied and in what way for the current project . (VVFS
2006: 61)
Section 10 Advice:
For protection devices of steel railings that meet
capacity class H2, class B should be applied. For
protection devices of concrete, Class D should be applied.
Section 12 Advice:
q eq should be set to 20 kN / m 2 on the width 6 m and to 10
kN / m 2 on the other width including walkways,
center strip etc. (VVFS 2006: 61)
1 § 9 The developer may specify values etc. for the current project.
Advice:
Table 2.1 in SS-EN 1990 can be seen as a recommendation
tion. (VVFS 2008: 250)
§ 2 The client may specify values etc. for the current project.
(VVFS 2007: 197)
Load Symbol ψ ψ ψ
0 1 2
Wind load F Wk
- Durable dimensioning
situation 0.3 0.2 0
FW * 1.0 - -
Snow loads k ≥ 3 kN / m 2 0.8 0.6 0.2
2.0 k s k <3.0 kN / m 2 0.7 0.4 0.2
1.0 ≤ s k <2.0 kN / m 2 0.6 0.3 0.1
For the other loads in tables A2.1 and A2.2 in the standard,
except for loads during the construction phase, at least they should
recommended values are applied. For loads below
the construction stage should at least be the recommended values
apply.
The value of faktorer factors to be applied for the traffic load off
type vehicles according to ch. § 3 and for cargo on road bank according to 6
Cape. Section 12 shall at least be in accordance with table a
not covered by EN 1991, ψ factors are considered relevant
project.
Load ψ ψ ψ
0 1 2
Traffic load of type vehicles 0.75 0.75 0
Load on road bank 0.75 0.75 0
The builder may specify values for the load of water pressure for
current project. (TRVFS 2011: 12)
18
19
durable Variable
and main load
Permanent loads Collaborative variable loads
temporary
d unfavorable Favorable- Biggest load Other loads
ma
When the load isWhen the load is
γ 1.35 G adverse: adverse:
(Expression d kj, sup
1.00 G kj, inf
γ 1.5 ψ Q γ 1.5 ψ Q
6.10a)
d 0 , 1 k, 1 d 0, in k ,i
durable Variable
and main load
Permanent loads Collaborative variable loads
temporary
d unfavorable Favorable- Biggest loadOther loads
ma
When the load is When the load is
adverse: adverse:
γ ∙ 1.1 G
(Expression d kj, sup 1.00 G kj, inf
γ 1.4 Q γ 1.4 ψ Q
6.10)
d k, 1 d 0, in k ,i
§ 1 Advice:
Steel grades according to table a can also be used .
Section 5 Advice:
The method should not be used for bridges. (VVFS 2007: 267)
Section 6 Advice:
The method can be used provided that elastic analysis
applied. (VVFS 2007: 267)
γ 0.1
M1 =
γ = 9.0 ∙ ff , however, no more than 1.1 (TRVFS 2011: 12)
M2 u y
Section 8 Advice:
The following values can be used for all rolled or
welded beams.
λ 4.0
LT0, =
β = 75.0
(VVFS 2007: 267)
13 Latest wording VVFS 2008: 275. The change means, among other things, that others
the paragraph is deleted.
22
Section 9 Advice:
Method 1 should be used . (VVFS 2007: 267)
Section 10 Advice:
The method can be used in which the interpolation between
χ and χ LT should be done as follows.
χ = ( n χ + m χ ) ( nm+ )
LT
where
N M
n = Oath and m = ,
Edy
N M
rk ,
rky
(VVFS 2007: 267)
Advice:
Reference wind speeds for different municipalities are stated in
Annex 4 of this Constitution. (VVFS 2007: 494)
23
3 § Råd:
Inverkan av topografin är inte inräknad. (VVFS
2007:494)
Råd:
Inverkan av stora och avsevärt högre, närliggande
byggnadsverk kan baseras på vindtunnelförsök. ( VVFS
2007:494)
5 § Råd:
Uttryck (4.8) bör inte tillämpas och därför bör inte
heller figur 4.2 tillämpas. Värde på q p ges i bilaga 4.
(VVFS 2007:494)
6 § Råd:
c s c d should not be separated. (VVFS 2007: 494)
Section 7 Advice:
k p , B and R can be calculated as follows:
6.0
k = ln (2vT ) + ; k p = 3.0 for static structures
p ln (2vT )
R
nv=
x, 1
B2 + R2
⌈ ⎛ hrs⎞ ⎧ b ⎫ ⎧│ ⎛ hrs⎞ ⎫│⌉
B 2 = exp│- 05.0│
│hrs │ ⎬ ⎨ 04.0 + 01.0│
│+ ⎨⎩ 1 - hrs │⎬ │
│hrs │
⌊
│ ⎝ ref⎠ ⎭│⎩ ⎝ ref⎠ │⎭⌋
│
2π F φ φ
R2 = hb
δ +δ
s A
24
φ = 1
hrs 2hnx1
1+
m) (
hv
φ = 1
b 2.3BN
1+ x1
hv )(
m
(VVFS 2007: 494)
Section 8 Advice:
The method in Appendix B can be applied together with
values according to section 7. (VVFS 2007: 494)
9 § 14 The developer may specify values etc. for the current project.
(TRVFS 2011: 12)
Section 10 Appendix A.4, A.5, B.1, B.2, C, D and E.1 may not
apply. Appendix A.1, A.2, A.3, B.3, B.4, E.2, E.3, E.4 and F
retains its informative character at the national level
application. (VVFS 2007: 494)
§ 1 Advice:
The design of auxiliary structures should be according to
applicable standards. (VVFS 2007: 494)
Section 2 Advice:
The developer can enter values etc. for the current project.
If no values are specified, recommended values should be
National parameters for 3.1 (7), 3.3 (2), 3.3 (6), 4.9 (6),
4.12 (2) and 4.13 (2)
§ 3 Advice:
The developer can enter values etc. for the current project.
(VVFS 2007: 494)
Section 4 Advice:
The developer can enter values etc. for the current project.
If no values are given, the values according to a) and b) i
note used. (VVFS 2007: 494)
§ 1 The risk level must not be higher than what corresponds to the
index β = 3.1 for accidental loads and β = 2.3 for
for the reference period 1 year. (VVFS 2007: 494)
§ 2 The developer may specify the choice of options for the current project.
Advice:
These parameters can be determined by risk assessment.
according to Appendix B, unless the developer specifies otherwise.
(VVFS 2007: 494)
26
§ 3 Advice:
Impact class CC2 should be applied unless
pure indicates otherwise for the current project. (VVFS 2007: 494)
Section 4 Advice:
For superstructures of light structures that are given a
forming that reduces the risk of collision, with eg.
free height above road> 5.3 m and> 5.9 m above railway
the rail top, the collision load can usually
taken to zero. (VVFS 2007: 494)
Section 5 Advice:
For bridges and other buildings over the road, the values should be
for "Motorways etc" according to Table 4.1 apply. For
building works next to a road can values according to table 4.1
applied, whereby the developer can specify the applicable
traffic category for the current project. As an alternative to
loads according to table 4.1 loads can be calculated according to the appendix
C. (VVFS 2007: 494)
Section 6 Advice:
Bridges with a free height of at most 5.2 m should be dimensioned
for cargo according to table 4.2. For other construction works
the builder can set values for forces and free heights
för aktuellt projekt. Om inga värden anges bör tabell
4.2 och höjden 5,2 meter tillämpas.
h 0 bör sättas till 5,2 m och h 1 bör sättas till 6,0 m. b blir
då 0,8 m . (VVFS 2007:494)
7 § Råd:
Ytan bör sättas till 0,5 x 0,25 m med måttet 0,5 i brons
längdled. (VVFS 2007:494)
27
8 § Råd:
Reglerna i detta avsnitt bör tillämpas för bärverk intill
alla typer av banor om inte annat påvisas vara rikti-
gare. (VVFS 2007:494)
Section 10 Advice:
Values for collision loads according to Table 4.4 should apply
pas. (VVFS 2007: 494)
Section 11 Advice:
If the developer does not specify otherwise for the current project
Classification of vessels should be as set out in Annex C, Table C.4
apply. (VVFS 2007: 494)
Section 12 Advice:
If the developer does not specify otherwise for the current project
values according to Appendix C, Table C.3 should be applied. (VVFS
2007: 494)
Section 13 Advice:
If the developer does not specify otherwise for the current project
the values etc. listed in note 1 should be applied.
(VVFS 2007: 494)
Section 14 Advice:
If the developer does not specify otherwise for the current project
should apply 1 MN. (VVFS 2007: 494)
28
Section 15 Advice:
If the developer does not specify otherwise for the current project
values according to Appendix C, Table C.4 should be applied, whereby
interpolation is allowed. (VVFS 2007: 494)
Section 16 Advice:
If the developer does not specify otherwise for the current project
at least 5% of the value F dx should be applied. (VVFS
2007: 494)
29
Section 2 Advice:
The method should not be used. (VVFS 2007: 494)
1 § Råd:
Nitar bör uppfylla fordringarna i SS 39 och SS 318.
Material till nitar bör uppfylla fordringarna i
SS-EN 10263-2. (VVFS 2007:494)
30
3 § Råd:
Förspänningskraften bör vara minst 0,7 f ub A s . (VVFS
2007:494)
2 § Råd:
Inspektion bör minst utföras enligt BSK 99, kapitel 10.
(VVFS 2007:494)
3 § 17 Råd:
Analysmetoden ”livslängdsmetoden” bör tillämpas.
Utmattning i primärbärande bärverksdelar bör anses
vara stora konsekvenser. (VVFS 2009:19)
Section 4 Advice:
For cross-sectional class 4, voltages should be calculated on gross
two-section reduced for the effect of shear deformation
down into wide flanges. (VVFS 2007: 494)
§ 1 Advice:
The recommended value for RT R should be applied. No
restrictions apply to the application of Table 2.1. (VVFS
2007: 494)
National parameters for 2.3.6 (1), 2.3.6 (2) and 4.5 (4)
§ 1 The developer may specify value etc. for the current project.
(VVFS 2007: 494)
Section 2 Advice:
Stainless steel for wire should with regard to corrosion
is selected according to table A.1 in SS-EN 1993-1-4. (VVFS
2007: 494)
§ 1 Advice:
No restrictions are given for the use of steel grades.
are tables 1 and 2. (VVFS 2007: 494)
32
§ 1 The developer may specify value etc. for the current project.
(VVFS 2007: 494)
2 § 18 Advice:
The "method of life" method of analysis should be applied.
(TRVFS 2011: 12)
§ 3 Advice:
Materials should meet the requirements of Table 3.1 (S).
Section 4 Advice:
Materials should meet the requirements of Table 3.2 (S).
Section 5 Advice:
Plastic analysis can be used for accident crashes. (VVFS
2007: 494)
Section 7 Advice:
The method in paragraph 1 should be used. (VVFS 2007: 494)
‾ λ c, 0 = 0.4
Section 9 Advice:
Injection screws should not be used.
( VVFS 2007: 494)
Section 10 Advice:
Section 11 Advice:
Partially welded dressings can be used as one
alternatives to spring welds. (VVFS 2007: 494)
Section 12 Advice:
Plug welds should not be used. (VVFS 2007: 494)
Section 13 Advice:
Flaking joints can be used. (VVFS 2007: 494)
Section 14 Advice:
Welds according to 4.12 (1) and (2) of EN 1993-1-8 should not
used. (VVFS 2007: 494)
Section 15 Advice:
Only uniform nodes should be used.
(VVFS 2007: 494)
Section 16 Advice:
For bridge sheet with thickness according to Appendix C.1.2.2
verification of fatigue strength for local bending
exclusion. (VVFS 2007: 494)
35
17 § Råd:
λ 4 kan sättas till 1,0. (VVFS 2007:494)
18 § Råd:
För brobaneplåt med tjocklek enligt bilaga C.1.2.2 kan
verifiering av utmattningshållfastheten för lokal böj-
ning uteslutas. ( VVFS 2007:494)
19 § Råd:
∆T γ kan förutsättas vara 5°C. ∆T 0 kan förutsättas vara
15°C om byggherren inte anger annat. (VVFS
2007:494)
Advice:
Dimensioning according to other parts of SS-EN 1990 to
SS-EN 1999 normally also ensures the carrier's support
ability, statute and endurance for the levels of on-
effect arising from earthquakes in Sweden.
In cases where the client also wishes to verify the support system
with regard to earthquake, SS-EN 1998 can be included
Recommended values are used. Applicable levels
for the impact on earthquake should then for the present
the project is determined according to the principles in SS-EN 1998.
(VVFS 2007: 494)
36
§ 3 Advice:
k t should be set to 1.0. (VVFS 2008: 167)
Section 4 Advice:
When determining the necessary covering concrete layer,
c min, major , should be taken into account the intended life span.
Life expectancy classes are defined in SS 13 70 10.
37
38
Section 5 The builder may specify values etc. for the current project.
(VVFS 2008: 167)
Section 6 Advice:
The values below should be used.
k 1 = c min + 15 (mm)
k 2 = c min + 65 (mm)
Section 7 Advice:
The client may specify the method for the current project, however
method D should be combined with at least one of the others
methods are used. (VVFS 2008: 167)
Section 8 Advice:
When determining transverse capacity in structures
which is not biased, the condition should be 1.0 ≤ cotθ 2.5
be fulfilled. When determining the transverse capacity in
bias constructs should condition
1.0 θ cotθ 3.0 be met. (VVFS 2008: 167)
8a § Advice:
v Rd, max should be determined according to
39
Section 9 Advice:
k 1 should be set to 1.0 while N is set to the recommended
value. (VVFS 2008: 167)
Section 10 Advice:
k 3 should be set to 1.0, while k 4 and k 5 are added to them
recommended values. (VVFS 2008: 167)
Section 11 Advice:
When determining acceptable calculated fracture width
w max should be taken into account life expectancy class. About building
the gentleman does not state otherwise, the values according to table b
is turned over as the upper limit for calculated fracture width.
40
1) For the exposure classes X0 and XC1 have the crack width
no impact on the durability so this limit is set
with regard to appearance. If appearance requirements are missing
the border is eased.
2) In addition, for these exposure classes, the absence of
tensile stresses are checked for quasi-permanent load
combination.
(VVFS 2008: 167)
Section 12 Advice:
When determining which tensile stress is allowed
without minimum restraint for limiting
fracture widths need to be included should be taken into account
life class. The following value should be used.
σ ct, p = f ctk / ζ
Section 13 Advice:
k 3 should be set to 7 ϕ ϕ / c, while k 4 is added to it
recommended value. (VVFS 2008: 167)
41
Section 14 Advice:
Reinforcementas has bending tested according to
SS-EN ISO 7438 and bending test according to
SS-EN ISO 15630-1 and buckle reinforcement
vats according to SS-EN ISO 7438 and double bending
vats according to SS 11 26 22 can be bent with a bending
radius, ie. internal radius of curvature, which is not less than
0.75 times that used in the bending test
the diamond diameter provided the bending occurs
at temperatures above 0 ° C. In other cases, they should
the values applied are applied. (VVFS 2008: 167)
Section 15 Advice:
A s, max can be assumed to be unlimited. (VVFS 2008: 167)
Section 16 Advice:
If the cross-link reinforcement is not designed as
closed jumpers consist of up or down reinforced reinforcement
should β 3 be set to 0. In other cases, it should be \ t
Section 17 Advice:
The recommended value should be applied.
In beams that are not box beams, life is provided with one
minimum transverse reinforcement ρ w, min = 0.15%. For life with
the width b w greater than the beam height h can be the requirement
minimum cross-linking is reduced to ρ w, min = (0.10)
+ 0.05 h / b w )%.
42
Section 18 Advice:
s b, max should be set to 0.75 d (1 + cot α). (VVFS
2008: 167)
Section 19 Advice:
A s, min should be set to 0.002 A c . (VVFS 2008: 167)
Section 20 Advice:
A s, max can be assumed to be unlimited. (VVFS 2008: 167)
Section 21 Advice:
A s, vmax can be assumed to be unlimited and A s vmin is added
the recommended value. (VVFS 2008: 167)
Section 22 Advice:
q 2 bör sättas till 1 MPa och ϕ min sätts till det rekom-
menderade värdet. (VVFS 2008:167)
23 § Råd:
h 1 kan antas vara obegränsad och A s,bpmin sätts till det
rekommenderade värdet. (VVFS 2008:167)
43
26 § Råd:
Värdet för α cc,pl bör sättas till 1,0 och värdet för α ct,pl
till 0,5. (VVFS 2008:167)
27 § Råd:
Om minst 8 prov är utförda kan de rekommenderade
värdena användas. (VVFS 2008:167)
28 § Råd:
Minst 8 prov bör vara utförda varvid värden enligt
tabell C.3(S) kan tillämpas.
Section 29 Advice:
The value of k 2 should be set to 0.5 ∙ a c / z 0 . (VVFS 2008: 167)
44
§ 3 Advice:
Exposure class for concrete surfaces protected by
waterproofing should be added to XD1. (VVFS 2008: 167)
Section 4 Advice:
In the case of tuberculosis, all surfaces in so-called road
environment is considered directly exposed to thawing. With road
environment means surfaces within the marked frame in figure a
as well as surfaces of pylons and arches down to 2.0 m below
the top of the bridge lane. Top surfaces on bridge tracks
and busy bottom plates which are provided with
layers are not considered to be in the road environment.
Concrete surfaces that are directly exposed to saline salts should be carried out
in the exposure classes XD3 and XF4. With soil against
filled back sides of concrete walls in road environment can be carried out
in the exposure class XD1.
45
3.0 m
6.0 m
2.0 m
1.0 m
6.0 m "Soil" -fyllning
Vägbanekant
(VVFS 2008: 167)
Section 5 Advice:
Nonlinear analysis should not be used. (VVFS 2008: 167)
Section 6 Advice:
Method c should not be used. (VVFS 2008: 167)
Section 7 Advice:
When determining acceptable calculated fracture width
w max should be taken into account life expectancy class. life expectancy
class is defined in SS 13 70 10. If the client does not
otherwise, values according to table a should be used as upper
limit for calculated fracture width.
46
Section 8 Advice:
The method should not be used. (VVFS 2008: 167)
Section 9 Advice:
The value X should be set to 20% and the largest proportion
spliced tension reinforcement to 80%. The distance a is added
the recommended values. (VVFS 2008: 167)
§ 9a The builder may specify values etc. for the current project.
(VVFS 2008: 275)
Section 10 Advice:
Transverse reinforcement with diameter less than 8 mm
should not be used. (VVFS 2008: 167)
Section 11 Advice:
The value of k should be set to 0.5. (VVFS 2008: 167)
47
Advice:
The standard can also be applied for
- steel according to table 3.1.b. When using steel
according to SS-EN 10327, however, the dimensioning should be
the lowest of the 0.2 limit and the breaking limit and that
must be demonstrated that the product in question meets
the values in the directions used by the steel.
- steel according to SS-EN 10025-5
- steel according to SS-EN 10025-6 provided that
the limitations according to SS-EN 1993-1-3 and
SS-EN 1993-1-12 is considered
- steel S550GD + ZA according to SS-EN 10326-5. (VVFS
2008: 167)
§ 3 Advice:
No thickness limits are given. The thickness may
matched by functional requirements, such as walkability. For
Forms are valid for formulas according to 8.1 (2). (VVFS
2008: 167)
F
=F
FRDT, = RSQ,
RDV, γ
M2
Higher values can be used after testing according to
SS-EN 1990, Appendix D. In addition, the rules shall apply
parts of SS-EN 1993-1-3, Appendix A are followed.
25.1FRSQ,
F = 25.1F =
RDT, RDV, γ
M2
49
Section 6 Advice:
In supporting structures, only nails with certified properties should
per, with regard to load bearing capacity during shearing, drawing
and extraction, used. (VVFS 2008: 167)
Section 7 Advice:
The conversion factors can be set equal to 1.00. (VVFS
2008: 167)
50
§ 1 Advice:
The value should be set to n mps = 0.05 E / f yd , ie. ε mps = 0.05.
(VVFS 2008: 167)
Section 2 Advice:
Absolute numbers should not be used, only relative values
according to table 8.3. (VVFS 2008: 167)
§ 3 Advice:
Values of γ M1 are stated in SS-EN 1993-1 to 1993-6.
(VVFS 2008: 167)
Section 4 Advice:
Values of γ Mf are stated in SS-EN 1993-1 to 1993-6.
(VVFS 2008: 167)
§ 1 Advice:
No national choices that deviate from the recommended
values have been made. (VVFS 2008: 167)
§ 1 Advice:
Interaction between global and local effects needs
not normally considered. (VVFS 2008: 167)
Section 2 Advice:
Chapter 10 of EN 1993-1-5 should not be used. (VVFS
2008: 167)
Generally
Advice:
For plates in geotechnical category 2 or 3 basic
on friction ground with very low to medium-high firmness
calculation of settlement should be performed. (TRVFS 2011: 12)
Advice:
Sufficient time between installation and start of
Sample soil should be in silty soils and there
there is a risk of so-called false pile stops. (VVFS
2009: 19)
2a § 25 Advice:
For the purposes of paragraph 7.6.1.1 (3)
The pressure for piles under pressure is defined as that set
of the pile tip corresponding to a maximum of 10% of pile
diameter, taking into account the elastic pile of the pile
printing.
26 Latest wording VVFS 2008: 180. Among other things, the amendment means that the Council
deleted.
27 Latest text VVFS 2008: 180
28 Latest text VVFS 2008: 180
29 Latest text VVFS 2008: 180
54
Section 7 Advice:
Partial coefficients for both load and load effects as well
bearing capacity can be set to 1.0, if not, in the event of an accident
the builder states otherwise.
Advice:
Model factors for piles can be obtained from the Swedish Road Administration's
publication 2009: 46 TK Geo, section 2.5.1.4. (TRVFS
2011: 12)
Advice:
Static equilibrium normally only needs to be verified at
foundation with plates on very solid soil and
Mountain. (TRVFS 2011: 12)
16 § 33 Advice:
For some tip-bearing prefabricated concrete piles can
a simplified dimensioning of geotechnical carrying capacity
carried out by stop-laying criteria according to the Swedish Road Administration
kets publication 2009: 46 TK Geo, section 2.5.2.
§ 1 Advice:
The lowest operating temperature can be set to -30 ° C
throughout the country. (VVFS 2008: 250)
§ 2 The client may specify value etc. for the current project.
(VVFS 2008: 250)
2008: 250)
Section 7 Advice:
Joints between pile elements should be dimensioned for those
forces and moments expected during stroke and
use. (VVFS 2008: 250)
60
§ 1 Advice:
No national choices that deviate from the recommended
values have been made. (VVFS 2008: 275)
§ 2 The client may specify value etc. for the current project.
(VVFS 2008: 275)
§ 3 Advice:
The conversion factors may be set equal to 1.0. (VVFS
2008: 275)
γ is1added
Section 4 Partial coefficients according to section shall apply. sys
the recommended value. (VVFS 2008: 275)
§ 1 Advice:
No national choices that deviate from the recommended
values have been made. (VVFS 2008: 275)
62
§ 1 Advice:
Table 2.2S lists a subdivision of loads after
duration that is relevant to Swedish conditions.
Long warehouse
Advice:
Limits with regard to eg. appearance and
comfort can be specified by the client. (VVFS 2008: 400)
Section 4 Advice:
Nails in end wood can be assumed to be force transmitting in
secondary supports, whereby the carrying capacity can be determined
according to 8.3.1.2 (4). (VVFS 2008: 400)
63
Section 5 Advice:
Section 6 Advice:
After mounting and required brace should be maximal
deflection of the wood part ( a bow, perm ) should not exceed 10 mm.
(VVFS 2008: 400)
Section 7 Advice:
Maximum deviation from the vertical ( a dev, perm ) should
be at most 0.02 h , where h is the largest height of the truss,
however, no more than 50 mm. (VVFS 2008: 400)
§ 1 Advice:
Loads during the construction period should be attributed to
heat class means. (VVFS 2008: 400)
Section 2 Advice:
Deflection of traffic load, including walkway load, should
limited to l / 400. (VVFS 2008: 400)
64
§ 1 Advice:
The values for the average temperature increase and that
maximum temperature rise during the cooling phase
should be added:
∆ Θ 1 = 180 K
∆ Θ 2 = 220 K (VVFS 2009: 19)
Section 2 Advice
Class B should be used. (VVFS 2009: 19)
Section 3 Advice
The lower limit should be used. (VVFS 2009: 19)
Section 4 Advice:
Advanced calculation methods according to 4.3 can use
das. (VVFS 2009: 19)
Section 6 Advice:
Class WB should be applied. (VVFS 2009: 19)
Section 7 Advice:
Methods B, C and D can be used. (VVFS 2009: 19)
65
Section 8 Advice:
If nothing else is demonstrated by testing, it should be wondering
the limit value according to section 3.3.3 is used. (VVFS
2009: 19)
Section 2 Advice:
Advanced calculation methods can be used. (VVFS
2009: 19)
§ 3 Advice:
In addition to using the recommended value can
Appendix E is used. (VVFS 2009: 19)
66
Section 2 Advice:
∆ Θ 1 = 180 K and ∆ Θ 2 = 220 K should be used. (VVFS
2009: 19)
§ 3 Advice:
The lower limit should be applied. (VVFS 2009: 19)
§ 1 The rules in the Swedish National Board of Housing, Building and Planning's regulations (BFS 2008: 8) about
application of European design standards, chapters
6.1.1 shall apply. (VVFS 2009: 19)
Section 2 Advice:
Calculation methods in SS-EN 1999-1-1 should be used,
however, with modulus of elasticity and 0.2-limit replaced by
the values E al, Θ and f o, Θ at elevated temperature Θ al .
In addition, γ M is replaced with γ M, fi .
67
§ 3 Advice:
Methods according to section 2 should be used. (VVFS 2009: 19)
Section 4 Advice:
Methods according to section 2 should be used. When calculating
The crushing load N cr and the slenderness parameter λ should
an additional reduced modulus of elasticity E α1 , / 1.2
used and buckling curve for buckling class B
selected. (VVFS 2009: 19)
§ 1 Advice:
∆ Θ 1 = 180 K and ∆ Θ 2 = 220 K should be used. (TRVFS
2011: 12)
§ 1 Advice:
No national choices that deviate from the recommended
values have been made. (TRVFS 2011: 12)
68
Advice:
When evaluating soil parameters, the Swedish Road Administration can
publication 2009: 46 TK Geo, ch. 5 is applied. (TRVFS
2011: 12)
69
70
Table 1a 45 Values of S K for Sweden's municipalities based on the snow load map in figure 1a.
Municipality SK Municipality SK Municipality SK
Ale 1.5 Eksjö 2.5 Hammaro 2.5
Alingsås 2.0 Emmaboda 2.0 Haninge 2.0
Alvesta 2.0 Enkoping 2.0 Haparanda 3.0
Aneby 2.5 Eskilstuna 2.0 Heby 2.0-2.5 b
Arboga 2.5 Eslov 1.5 Hedemora 2.5
Arjeplog 3.0-4.0 a Essunga 2.0 Helsingborg 1.0
Arvidsjaur 3.0 Herrljunga 2.0
Arvika 2.5 Fagersta 2.5 Hjo 2.0
Askersund 2.5 Falkenberg 1.5-2.0 b Hofors 2.5
Avesta 2.5 Falköping 2.0-2.5 b Huddinge 2.0
Falun 2.5-3.0 b Hudiksvall 3.0-3.5 b
Bengtsfors 2.5 Filipstad 2.5 Hultsfred 2.5
Mountain 3.0-4.5 a Finspång 2.5 Hylte 2.0
Bjurholm 3.0 Flen 2.0 Håbo 1.5
Page 74
74
75
78
79
50 Latest text VVFS 2007: 197. The amendment means that table 3a is deleted.
80
q
q
2.5
2.5 1.0 0.66 B
1.3 3.6
1.3 1.32 B
q
2.4 1.8 1.10 B
0.44 B 2.5
j) k) l) m) n)
81
Figure 4.1
The reference wind load v b im / s, ie. average wind speed over 10 minutes on
height 10 meters above the ground surface with roughness factor z 0 = 0.05 and with
return time 50 years
82
Table 4.1
The reference wind speed v b im / s for Sweden's municipalities
Municipality vb Municipality vb Municipality vb
Ale 25 Ekerö 24 Hallstahammar 23
Alingsås 25 Eksjö 24 Halmstad 25
Alvesta 24 Emmaboda 24 Hammaro 23
Aneby 24 Enkoping 23 Haninge 24
Arboga 23 Eskilstuna 23 Haparanda 22
Arjeplog 22-26a Eslov 26 Heby 23
Arvidsjaur 21-22a Essunga 25 Hedemora 23
Arvika 23 Fagersta 23 Helsingborg 26
Askersund 24 Falkenberg 25 Herrljunga 25
Avesta 23 Falköping 24 Hjo 24
Bengtsfors 24 Falun 23 Hofors 23
Mountain 24 Filipstad 23 Huddinge 24
Bjurholm 22 Finspång 24 Hudiksvall 23
Bjuv 26 Flen 24 Hultsfred 24
Boden 21-22a Forshaga 23 Hylte 25
Bollebygd 25 Färgelanda 25 Håbo 23
Bollnas 23 Gagnef 22 Hällefors 23
Borgholm 24 Gislaved 24 Härjedalen 23-25a
Borlange 22 Gnesta 24 Harnosand 22
Boras 25 Gnosjö 24 Härryda 25
Botkyrka 24 Gotland 24 Hässleholm 25
Boxholm 24 Dregs 23 Höganäs 26
Bromley 25 Grästorp 24 Hogsby 24
Bracke 23 Gullspång 24 Horby 25
Burlington 26 Gallivare 21-26a Hoor 25
Bastad 25 Gavle 23 Jokkmokk 22-26a
Dals- Ed 24 Gothenburg 25 Jarfalla 24
Danderyd 24 Gotene 24 Jonkoping 24
Degerfors 23 Habo 24 Kalix 22
Dorotea 24 Hagfors 22 Kalmar 24
Eda 23 Hallsberg 23 Karlsborg 24
83
85
Height v b = 21 m / s v b = 22 m / s v b = 23 m / s
terrain terrain terrain
hrs
(M) 0 IN II III IV 0 IN II III IV 0 IN II III IV
2 0.55 0.48 0.36 0.32 0.29 0.60 0.52 0.39 0.35 0.32 0.65 0.57 0.43 0.38 0.35
4 0.64 0.57 0.45 0.32 0.29 0.70 0.63 0.50 0.35 0.32 0.76 0.68 0.54 0.38 0.35
8 0.74 0.67 0.56 0.39 0.29 0.81 0.74 0.61 0.43 0.32 0.88 0.81 0.67 0.47 0.35
12 0.80 0.74 0.63 0.46 0.32 0.87 0.81 0.69 0.50 0.35 0.95 0.88 0.75 0.55 0.38
16 0.84 0.78 0.68 0.51 0.37 0.92 0.86 0.74 0.56 0.40 1.01 0.94 0.81 0.61 0.44
20 0.87 0.82 0.71 0.55 0.41 0.96 0.90 0.78 0.60 0.45 1.05 0.98 0.86 0.66 0.49
25 0.91 0.86 0.76 0.59 0.45 1.00 0.94 0.83 0.65 0.49 1.09 1.03 0.91 0.71 0.54
30 0.94 0.89 0.79 0.62 0.48 1.03 0.98 0.87 0.69 0.53 1.13 1.07 0.95 0.75 0.58
35 0.97 0.92 0.82 0.65 0.51 1.06 1.01 0.90 0.72 0.56 1.16 1.10 0.98 0.79 0.62
40 0.99 0.94 0.84 0.68 0.54 1.08 1.03 0.93 0.75 0.59 1.18 1.13 1.01 0.82 0.65
45 1.01 0.96 0.87 0.71 0.56 1.11 1.06 0.95 0.77 0.62 1.21 1.16 1.04 0.85 0.68
50 1.03 0.98 0.89 0.73 0.59 1.13 1.08 0.97 0.80 0.64 1.23 1.18 1.06 0.87 0.70
55 1.04 1.00 0.91 0.75 0.61 1.14 1.10 0.99 0.82 0.67 1.25 1.20 1.09 0.90 0.73
60 1.06 1.02 0.92 0.77 0.63 1.16 1.11 1.01 0.84 0.69 1.27 1.22 1.11 0.92 0.75
65 1.07 1.03 0.94 0.78 0.64 1.18 1.13 1.03 0.86 0.71 1.28 1.24 1.13 0.94 0.77
70 1.08 1.04 0.95 0.80 0.66 1.19 1.15 1.05 0.88 0.72 1.30 1.25 1.15 0.96 0.79
75 1.10 1.06 0.97 0.81 0.67 1.20 1.16 1.06 0.89 0.74 1.31 1.27 1.16 0.98 0.81
80 1.11 1.07 0.98 0.83 0.69 1.22 1.17 1.08 0.91 0.76 1.33 1.28 1.18 0.99 0.83
85 1.12 1.08 0.99 0.84 0.70 1.23 1.19 1.09 0.92 0.77 1.34 1.30 1.19 1.01 0.84
90 1.13 1.09 1.01 0.85 0.72 1.24 1.20 1.10 0.94 0.78 1.35 1.31 1.21 1.02 0.86
95 1.14 1.10 1.02 0.87 0.73 1.25 1.21 1.12 0.95 0.80 1.37 1.32 1.22 1.04 0.87
100 1.15 1.11 1.03 0.88 0.74 1.26 1.22 1.13 0.96 0.81 1.38 1.33 1.23 1.05 0.89
86
Height v b = 24 m / s v b = 25 m / s v b = 26 m / s
terrain terrain terrain
hrs
(M) 0 IN II III IV 0 IN II III IV 0 IN II III IV
2 0.71 0.62 0.46 0.41 0.38 0.77 0.67 0.50 0.45 0.41 0.84 0.73 0.55 0.49 0.44
4 0.83 0.75 0.59 0.41 0.38 0.90 0.81 0.64 0.45 0.41 0.98 0.87 0.69 0.49 0.44
8 0.96 0.88 0.73 0.51 0.38 1.04 0.95 0.79 0.55 0.41 1.13 1.03 0.86 0.60 0.44
12 1.04 0.96 0.82 0.60 0.42 1.13 1.04 0.89 0.65 0.45 1.22 1.13 0.96 0.70 0.49
16 1.10 1.02 0.88 0.66 0.48 1.19 1.11 0.96 0.72 0.52 1.29 1.20 1.04 0.78 0.56
20 1.14 1.07 0.93 0.72 0.53 1.24 1.16 1.01 0.78 0.58 1.34 1.26 1.10 0.84 0.63
25 1.19 1.12 0.99 0.77 0.59 1.29 1.22 1.07 0.84 0.64 1.40 1.32 1.16 0.90 0.69
30 1.23 1.16 1.03 0.82 0.63 1.33 1.26 1.12 0.89 0.69 1.44 1.37 1.21 0.96 0.74
35 1.26 1.20 1.07 0.86 0.67 1.37 1.30 1.16 0.93 0.73 1.48 1.41 1.25 1.00 0.79
40 1.29 1.23 1.10 0.89 0.71 1.40 1.33 1.20 0.97 0.77 1.51 1.44 1.29 1.04 0.83
45 1.32 1.26 1.13 0.92 0.74 1.43 1.36 1.23 1.00 0.80 1.54 1.48 1.33 1.08 0.87
50 1.34 1.28 1.16 0.95 0.77 1.45 1.39 1.26 1.03 0.83 1.57 1.51 1.36 1.11 0.90
55 1.36 1.31 1.18 0.98 0.79 1.48 1.42 1.28 1.06 0.86 1.60 1.53 1.39 1.15 0.93
60 1.38 1.33 1.21 1.00 0.82 1.50 1.44 1.31 1.08 0.89 1.62 1.56 1.42 1.17 0.96
65 1.40 1.35 1.23 1.02 0.84 1.52 1.46 1.33 1.11 0.91 1.64 1.58 1.44 1.20 0.99
70 1.42 1.36 1.25 1.04 0.86 1.54 1.48 1.35 1.13 0.93 1.66 1.60 1.46 1.22 1.01
75 1.43 1.38 1.27 1.06 0.88 1.55 1.50 1.37 1.15 0.96 1.68 1.62 1.48 1.25 1.03
80 1.45 1.40 1.28 1.08 0.90 1.57 1.52 1.39 1.17 0.98 1.70 1.64 1.51 1.27 1.06
85 1.46 1.41 1.30 1.10 0.92 1.58 1.53 1.41 1.19 1.00 1.71 1.66 1.52 1.29 1.08
90 1.47 1.43 1.31 1.11 0.93 1.60 1.55 1.43 1.21 1.01 1.73 1.67 1.54 1.31 1.10
95 1.49 1.44 1.33 1.13 0.95 1.61 1.56 1.44 1.23 1.03 1.74 1.69 1.56 1.33 1.11
100 1.50 1.45 1.34 1.15 0.97 1.63 1.58 1.46 1.24 1.05 1.76 1.71 1.58 1.34 1.13
87
53 Latest text VVFS 2009: 19. The change means, among other things, that table
A.15 (S) is deleted
88
ξ for n = 1a 2 3 4 ≥5
ξ for n = 3h 4 ≥5 ≥ 10 ≥ 15 ≥ 20 ≥ 40 All
piles
ξ 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.45 1.42 1.40 1.35 1.30
5
ξ 1.50 1.45 1.35 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25
6
a ξ - värdena i tabellen gäller för dynamisk provbelastning utvärderad enligt CASE-metoden
b ξ-värdena multipliceras med en modellfaktor av 0,85 vid användning av signalmatchning av
stötvågorna eller då permanenta sjunkning ≤ 2 mm per mätslag samt utvärderad spetsfjädring <
D/60 för spetsburna pålar
c Om olika påltyper ingår i grundläggningen bör grupper med samma påltyp behandlas för sig vid
90
91
54 VVFS 2004:43
55 VVFS 2005:48
56 VVFS 2006:61
57 VVFS 2007:197
58 VVFS 2007:267
59 VVFS 2007:494
60 VVFS 2008:167
61 VVFS 2008:180
62 VVFS 2008:250
63 VVFS 2008:275
92
GUNNAR MALM
Robert Ronnebrant
64 VVFS 2008:400
65 VVFS 2009:19
66 TRVFS 2011:12
93