EMM3508

ENGINEERING DESIGN II
Semester 2, 2018/2019

Group No. : 8

Project 1 : Palm Oil Motorised

Cutter Machine

No. Matric No. Name

1 189860 Siti Khairiyah binti Sulaiman
2 190332 Syakir Akmal bin Shariff
3 191081 Ahmad Akmaluddin bin Muhammad
4 190924 Imaduddin bin Jamil
5 ES02376 Yucan Wang

Lecturer : Ass. Prof. Dr. Nuraini Binti Abdul Aziz

Dr. Muhammad Azim bin Azizi
CONTENT

Title Page Number

1.0 Introduction 1

2.0 Theoretical Background 1

3.0 Palm Oil Motorised Cutter

3.1 Power Supply 2

3.2 Pole 2
3.3 Copper Wire 2
3.4 Motor 3
3.5 Crank Slider 3
3.6 Sickle 3

4.0 Detailed Selection and Calculation

4.1 Cutting Force Needed by Fresh Fruit Bunch 4

4.2 Pulling Force from Sickle 5
4.3 Torque of Crank Slider 7
4.4 Spur Gears 7
4.5 DC Motor 8
4.6 Displacement of Crank Slider 9
4.7 Cutting Speed of Crank Slider 10
4.8 Hollow Aluminium Pole (Oval Shaped) 10
4.9 Vibration 13
4.10 Copper Wire 14
4.11 Lithium Polymer Battery 15

5.0 Analysis of System

5.1 Analysis on Sickle 15

5.2 Analysis on Pole 16

6.0 Conclusion 16

7.0 References 17

8.0 Appendix 18
1.0 Introduction

Palm oil is essential to consumer that led to increasing the palm oil production.
Previously, sickle and pole were used to harvest palm oil where the sickle is attached to pole
by rope or welding. Length of pole was chosen according average height of palm oil tree. This
manual method shown in Figure 1 consumes a lot of time and energy.
Palm oil motorized cutter had been introduced by MPOB in 2007. Motorised cutter
provides faster, easier and safer pruning and harvesting. It is designed for comfortable controls
to ensure maximum workers comfort. MPOB claimed that it easy to use and is less and was
able to increase harvesting productivity by more than double This will reduce the harvesting
time and increase the production.

Figure 1: Manual Palm oil Cutter

The objective of this project is to improvise the previous design in EMM 3507. In
previous design, weight is the only aspect that is focussed on. In this project, the motorised
cutter is designed based on sustainable method.

2.0 Theoretical Background

Malaysian Palm Oil Board (MPOB) was the first organizer that introduce mechanize
palm oil harvesting tool. They also come out with CANTAS where is powered by a petrol
engine and utilises with a chisel and C- sickle. CANTAS model has shown below in Figure 2

It has been proved that CANTAS can reduced the harvesting time and energy used.
The productivity can get 560 to 750 bunch per day. The production is depending on
topography of the estate, operator skill and cropping level. Harvesting rate are different
between mechanize cutter and conventional. This shows that labour cost can be reduce using
this mechanize machine. The cutter does not restrict to topography of estate.

1
3.0 Palm Oil Motorised Cutter

The palm oil motorised cutter is designed based on sustainable methods that focusses on
operational efficiency, safety, functionality, productivity, material use, ease of operation and
maintenance.

3.1 Power Supply

Lithium Polymer Battery is chosen as the power supply. This battery is chosen because
it has high working voltage for single battery cells. It is pollution free and has long cycle life.
Since battery is the main power supply to move the sickle, it is covered with a water resistant
and non-rust material. The safety design is proposed since this motorised cutter might be
affected during raining or wet condition.
The charger to the batteries also has an auto cut off when fully charged. It is important
to use a LiPo compatible charger for LiPos. LiPo batteries require specialized care. They
charge using a system called CC/CV charging. It stands for Constant Current / Constant
Voltage. Basically, the charger will keep the current, or charge rate, constant until the battery
reaches its peak voltage (4.2V per cell in a battery pack).
This battery also has the safety wire that can be pull off if there are any emergency to
stop it immediately. The wire is easy to reach and pull. Besides, the battery is easy to plug
and remove. This is very convenient when the battery needs to be charged and replaced.
Workers are reminded to bring additional battery since a battery can only last for 9 hours.

3.2 Pole
For pole, operational efficiency is on how the pole can withstand pressure and force
from other load to prevent bending. The pole is designed for lightweight purposes. The
motorised cutter used oval shaped pole. This is to increase surface contact area that produces
a firmer hand grip during handling. Stiffness at y axis will reduce pole deflection and allow
harvesting for higher plant.
The improvement proposed for pole part is to place kill switch at the hand grip area (on
pole) for emergency cases. The kill switch will stop entirely the operations of motorised cutter.
Besides, the pole is designed to have groove at both ends to provide more strength in joints
between parts. The pole has a fixed length of 1.8 meter because the motorised cutter is
designed purposely for normal height palm oil tree which range 2.8 meter to 3 meters.

Initially, the material of pole is carbon fibre since the focus of the previous design is
lightweight. Carbon fibre is expensive that lead to a higher price for the motorised cutter. This
will lessen the marketability of the cutter since the selling price is not affordable. So, aluminium
is chosen to replace carbon fibre. Aluminium is durable, not easily broken and has a lower
thermal expansion.

3.3 Copper Wire

Copper wire is chosen because copper is the electrical conductor in many categories
of electrical wiring. Copper wire is used in power generation, power transmission, power
distribution, telecommunications, electronics circuitry, and countless types of electrical
equipment. Besides that, copper has the highest electrical conductivity rating of all non-
precious metals. Resistivity of copper wire is 1.7𝑥10−8 .

2
 The improvement for this part is to include all mass of wire connectors and study how
the electricity flows from the power supply to sickle.

3.4 Motor
Torque of the motor is capable to cut the brunch. Motor chosen has compatible torque
for an average brunch. It is offers extremely good performance, but it can also be overdriven,
and it will draw more current. The motor chosen suitable for cutting and the motor provides
speed reduction and torque multiplication.

3.5 Crank Slider

Gear used is two spur gear with different diameter. The first gear is connected to the
motor while the second gear is connected to crank slider. There are bearings in the second
gear to reduce the vibration produced by the motor.
Gear drives are surface contact, so they are mechanically strong, allowing scopes for lifting
higher loads, and have longer service life. Because of positive non-slip drives, constant
velocity ratio and power transmission, there is less fluctuation and impact. Working within a
smaller space can avoid man-machine contact effectively. Noise and vibrations will increase
at very high speed.
Crank slider designed is simple planar motion in a small space, which can be well
separated from the operator. Cast iron is used for slider since wear strength is more compared
to the Aluminium. Materials for rods is steel alloys 4340 that has high tensile and compressive
strength.
There will be no dead points in one working cycle. Simple planar motion of the link is easy
to realize, and the rod can be substituted with circle cylinder. The crank slider should undergo
regular inspection and applying proper lubrication.

3.6 Sickle
Sickle had been chosen since it require small force but produce more cutting energy
due to the slicing principle. The sickle, with its unique design, could effectively get access to
the fronds as well as the bunch stalks during the harvesting process.
Cutting with sickle also require lesser force compared to others. This is because slicing
cut only need the cutting edge to slice and not penetrate the material. The frond will start to
bend due to its own weight and this bending will cause the fibres to be in a stress state and
eventually cut.
Spring steel materials is the best material for sickle blade. It is a high-carbon steel wire
known for its impressive ability to withstand the stress of compression and decompression
without breaking or becoming deformed.

3
4.0 Detailed Selection and Calculation

4.1 Cutting Force Needed by Fresh Fruit Bunch

According to Jelani [1], value for FOCSA and ENCSA of sickles are as follows. The values
are results from experiment carried out using the load cell that placed at the blade to
measure the force needed to cut the plant.

FOCSA : 12.2 kg/𝑐𝑚2 (specific cutting force per unit area)

: 119.7 N/𝑐𝑚2

ENCSA : 65.41 kg cm/𝑐𝑚2 (specific cutting energy per unit area)

: 6416.6 N/𝑐𝑚2

Contact surface area of sickle blade with frond is shown below.

thickness of sickle’s blade= 3 mm
(150 – 200 mm)

Figure 2: Cross section of palm oil frond and fruit stalk

Contact surface area (min) = 0.3 cm x 15 cm

= 4.5 𝑐𝑚2
Contact surface area (max) = 0.3 cm x 20 cm
= 6 𝑐𝑚2

4
Specific Cutting Force (min) = 119.7 N/𝑐𝑚2 x 4.5 𝑐𝑚2
= 538.65 N
Specific Cutting Force (max) = 119.7 N/𝑐𝑚2 x 6 𝑐𝑚2
= 718.2 N

538.65 N+ 718.2 N
Average Cutting Force, 𝐹𝑐 =
2
= 628.425 N

Cutting Force (Safety Factor), 𝐹𝑐 = 628.425 N x 1.5

= 942.64 N

4.2 Pulling Force from Sickle

Pulling force from worker with accurate angle will cut the fronds. The figure below shows the
cutting force of sickle.

𝒇
Fc =
𝒄𝒐𝒔 𝑩

where
𝐹𝑐 : Cutting Force
𝐹𝑃 : Pulling Force
B : Cutting Oblique

Figure 3: Cutting force of the sickle

Oblique cut is a cut with the edge which is not perpendicular to the direction of knife motion.
Greater oblique angle will reduce force needed. Optimum oblique angle in cutting the fronds
is 45°.

Pulling Force, 𝐹𝑃 = 𝐹𝑐 cos B

= 942.64 N cos 45°
= 666.54 N

5
For efficient cutting, the sickle has been designed with a ‘C-shaped’ profile. This profile has
been found to be effective in providing efficient cutting as well as reducing the vibrations
transferred to the operator during the cutting operation.
It is called a ‘C-sickle’ which enables the cutting force (Fc) to act in-line with the reaction
force (Fr), thus giving maximum cutting force (efficient cutting), and at the same time
minimizing significantly the vibrations transferred to the operator. Figure below shows all
forces that act on sickle to perform the cutting action.

Thickness of edge blade 3 mm

Edge Angle 10°

Mass of sickle 0.6 kg

Spring Steel
Materials of sickle
Materials

Figure 4: Forces act on sickle and the specification of the sickle designed

𝑭𝒄 + 𝑭𝑷 + 𝑾 > 𝑭𝒓
where
𝐹𝑐 : Cutting force required to accomplish the cutting
𝐹𝑃 : Pulling force applied by workers
W : Weight of sickle
𝐹𝑟 : Reaction force from worker to counter cutting force developed
x : Maximum distance where point 𝐹𝑐 can be applied
𝛿𝑥 : Distance of point 𝐹𝑐 from sickle holder

Cutting is performed when the sum of Fc (Cutting Force), Fp (Pulling Force) and W (Weight
of sickle) is greater than Fr (Reaction Force).

942.64 N + 666.54 N + 0.6kg (9.81) = 1 615.066 N

6
 4.3 Torque of Crank Slider
Torque produced by crank slider will move the sickle. So, the value of torque produced must
be more than pulling force needed to cut the frond.

Torque needed by crank slider = Pulling force x Length of crank slider

= 666.54 N x 0.074 m
= 49.324 N.m

4.4 Spur Gears

Torque of crank slider is equal to torque of gear B. So, torque of gear A can be calculated.
Torque Gear B = 49.324 N.m
𝑑𝐵
𝑇𝐵 = 𝑇𝐴
𝑑𝐴

62
49.324 N.m = x 𝑇𝐴
22

𝑇𝐴 = 17.5 N.m

Diameter Gear A 22 cm

No. of teeth gear A 20

Diameter Gear B 62 cm

No. of teeth gear B 60

Module both gear 1.0

Figure 5: Torque on gear

Pitch diameter,
𝑑𝐴 = 𝑁𝐴 . 𝑚 = 20 (1.0) = 20
𝑑𝐵 = 𝑁𝐵 . 𝑚 = 60 (1.0) = 60

Transmitted load at gear A

60 000 𝐻
𝑊=
𝜋 𝑑𝐴 𝑛

where
H (kW) = power of motor
n (rpm) = speed of motor

60 000 (1.1)
W= = 2.1 kN
𝜋 (20)(500)

7
 4.5 DC Motor
Motor is placed at Gear A. So, the value of speed and torque of Gear A is the value from the
motor. Torque required from motor is 17.5 N.m.

Motor used in this motorised cutter will produced 500 rpm of speed and operates at 1.1kW
power. So, torque produced is

𝑷𝒐𝒘𝒆𝒓 (𝑾)𝒙 𝟗.𝟓𝟒𝟗

𝑻𝒎𝒐𝒕𝒐𝒓 = 𝑺𝒑𝒆𝒆𝒅 (𝑹𝑷𝑴)
1 100 𝑊 𝑥 9.549
= 500

= 21 N.m

Torque produced by motor is more than torque needed for gear A to move the crank slider.

Figure 6: Specification for Motor Velocity

8
 4.6 Displacement of Crank Slider
Crank slider should reach maximum displacement of 80 mm to cut the most matured frond.

Diameter Gear B 62 cm

Length of r 31 mm

Length of l 74 mm

Maximum displacement, x 80 mm

Figure 7: Crank slider at Gear B

where
r = radius of Gear B
𝜃1 = crank angle
𝑟
𝜃2 = 𝑠𝑖𝑛−1 ( sin 𝜃1 )
𝑙
y = 180 – (𝜃1 + 𝜃2 )

x = √𝑟 2 + 𝑙2 − 2(𝑟)(𝑙) cos 𝑦

Length of crank slider needed to reach maximum displacement of x = 80 mm,

r = 31 mm
𝜃1 = 180
31
𝜃2 = 𝑠𝑖𝑛−1 ( sin 180 ) = 0
𝑙
y = 180 – (180 + 0 ) = 0

x = √𝑟 2 + 𝑙2 − 2(𝑟)(𝑙) cos 𝑦

80 = √312 + 𝑙2 − 2(31)(𝑙) cos(0)

l = 74 mm

9
 4.7 Cutting Speed of Crank Slider
The cutting speed of sickle is the velocity of crank slider. Sickle is attached to the sickle
sleeve which is the slider from the crank slider mechanism. From the journal, the velocity
needed to cut the fronds is about 8 to 15 mm/s.
Maximum cutting speed is when the crank angle = 270°

𝑟 2 sin 𝜃1 cos 𝜃1
𝑣 = −𝑟 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜃1 −
√𝑙2 − 𝑟 2 𝑠𝑖𝑛2 𝜃1

312 sin 270° cos 270°

= −(31) sin(270°) −
√742 − 312 𝑠𝑖𝑛2 270°
= 31 mm/s

4.8 Hollow Aluminium Pole (Oval Shaped)

Length 1.8 m

Mass 1.01 kg

Thickness 0.002 m

Density 2700 kg/𝑚3

Young Modulus 70 GPa

Value of a 0.02 m

Value of b 0.015 m
Mass = Density x Volume
Mass for full oval = 2.7 g/cm³x (π x 2 x1.5x 180)
= 4.58 kg

Mass for hollow oval = 2.7g/cm³x (π x1.8x1.3x 180)

= 3.57kg

Full oval – hollow oval

= 4.58kg - 3.57kg
= 1.01 kg

10
Statical moment of pole

Q = A’y’

= (𝜋 x 0.02 x 0.015) x 0.0075

= 1.10325 x 10−5

Inertia of pole

Outer diameter of hollow pole

a = 0.02 m
b = 0.015 m

1
Inertia = Ix + Iy = (π AB ) (A2+B2)
4

1
= (π (0.02)(0.015)) (0.022 + 0.0152)
4

= 1.47 x 10-7 m4

Inner diameter of hollow pole

a = 0.018 m
b = 0.013 m

1
Inertia = Ix + Iy = (π AB ) (A2+B2)
4

1
= (π (0.018)(0.013)) (0.0182 + 0.0132)
4

= 9.0605 x 10-8 m4

Total Inertia = 1.47 x 10-7 m4 - 9.0605 x 10-8 m4

=
5.63 x 10-8 m4

11
Maximum Bending Stress Maximum Shear Stress

𝑀𝑐 𝑉𝑄
σ max = t=
𝐼 𝐼𝐿

(1.01)(0.015) (1509)(1.10325 x 10−5 )

= =
(5.63 x 10−8 ) (𝟓.𝟔𝟑 𝐱 𝟏𝟎−𝟖 )(1.8)

= 269.094 Knm = 164.290 Kpa

Figure below shows the Free Body Diagram, Shear Diagram and Moment Diagram of the
motorised cutter.

Figure 8: FBD, Shear Diagram and Moment Diagram

12
Total downward force at A = Weight of battery

= 1.2 kg (9.81)

= 11.772 N

Weight of pole (Distributed Load)

= 1.01 kg (9.81)

= 9.9081 N/m

Weight of pole at 0.9 m (center of pole)

= 9.9081 N/m x 1.8 m =17.83 N

Total downward force at B

= Weight of sickle + Weight of motor + Weight of crank slider

= (0.6 kg + 1.5 kg + 0.5 kg) 9.81

= 25.506 N

∑ 𝐹𝑦 = 0

- 11.772 N – 17.83 N -25.506 N + By = 0

By = 55.108 N

4.9 Vibration
Vibration produced from motor,

𝟐𝝅 𝑵
𝒘𝒏 =
𝟔𝟎
2𝜋 (500)
=
60

= 52.36 Hz

13
Maximum vibration that pole can withstand,
𝒎𝒈𝒍𝟑
𝜹𝒔𝒕 =
𝟒𝟖 𝑬 𝑰

= 𝟏.𝟎𝟏 𝒙 𝟗.𝟖𝟏 𝒙 𝟏.𝟖𝟑

𝟒𝟖 𝒙 (𝟕𝟎 𝒙 𝟏𝟎𝟗 ) 𝒙 (𝟓.𝟔𝟑 𝒙 𝟏𝟎−𝟖 )

= 3.055 x 10−4

𝑔
𝑤𝑛 = √
𝛿𝑠𝑡

9.81
=√ = 179.21 Hz
3.055 x 10−4

The pole can withstand the vibration produced by the motor since 179.21 Hz < 374.65 Hz

4.10 Copper Wire

In order to determine the voltage supplied to the motor from battery, resistance in the wire
had to be calculated. The resistance equation is as followed,

(1.7𝑥10−8 )(2.0𝑚)
𝑅= Diameter 1.5 mm
𝜋(0.0752 )
Length 2.0 m

Density 8.96 g/cm³

Resistivity 1.7𝑥10−8
R = 1.9 V = IR

12V = I (1.924 x10-6 ohm)

I = (6.237x106A)

V = (6.237x106A) (1.924 x10-6 ohm)

V = 11.99V (so assume 12V because resistance is too small )

Therefore, voltage supplied to motor is 12V

14
 4.11 Lithium Polymer Battery

Lithium Polymer Battery is used as the power supply for motorized cutter. Power
needed to move a cutting head is 500 rpm.

With 500 rpm, it needs a motor with 12-volt functioning to move the blade.

Power (W) = 12 V x 15 A = 180 Watt

Battery Life

= Battery Capacity (mAh) / Load Current (mA) * 0.70

(The factor of 0.7 makes allowances for external factors which can affect battery life)

= 10000(mAh)/500(mA)*0.7
=14 hours Nominal voltage 12V

Nominal capacity 20Ah

Runtime
Pulse discharge current 15A (adjustment)
= (10 * Ampere Hours) / Load in Watts Cycle life 500 times
= (10*10Ah)/30 Watts
= 3.33 runtime = 3 hours

5.0 Analysis of System

5.1 Analysis on Sickle

An analysis had been conducted on sickle using CATIA. Figure below shows Stress
Analysis on sickle. The maximum stress that sickle can withstand is 1.02 x 105 N/ 𝑚2 .

Figure 9: Stress Analysis on sickle

15
 5.2 Analysis on Pole
Analysis on pole is crucial to make sure that the pole can withstand the force that
being given. Analysis and simulation (generative structural analysis) is conducted using
CATIA.

Figure 10 : Deformation of pole

From the analysis, deformation of pole is too small, so this proved that the aluminium
pole designed are safe to use.

Figure 11 : Von Misses Stress

From the analysis, red colour shows the higher stress. The higher stress in the pole
are at the location of the worker’s hand to withstand force and area at the bottom of the pole.

6.0 Conclusion
The new proposed motorised cutter design does not improvise too much from previous
design. The new design does not only focus on the weight aspect but on its sustainability.

16
7.0 References

[1] Razak, J. (1997). Design and Development of an Oil Palm Fresh Fruit Bunch Cutting
Device.
[2] Hamedon, Z., Zahid, M.N.O., Tomadi, S.H. (2008). Design and Fabricate the Prototype of
a Motorized Cutter for Harvesting Palm Fruit.
[3] Jelani, A.R., Rizal, A., Gono, Y. (2017). Design and Fabricate the Prototype of a Motorized
Cutter for Harvesting Palm Fruit.
[4] Noordin, M. N. A., Hudzari, R. M., Azuan, H. N. (2016). Development of Standard Approach
for Sickle Blade Manufacturing.
[5] Razak, J., Hitam, A., Jamak, J., Noor, M. (2008). CantasTM – A Tool for The Efficient
Harvesting of Oil Palm Fresh Fruit Bunches.
[6] Razak, J. (1998). Force and Energy Requirements for Cutting Oil Palm Frond.
[7] Ramayanty, B., Tineke, M., Wawan, H. (2015). Physical and Mechanical Properties of Palm
Frond for the Development of Palm Oil Waste Chopper and Pressing Machine Design

8.0 Appendix

Appendix 1 : Engineering Sketch

Appendix 2 : Assembly Drawing
Appendix 3 : Detailed Drawing of Critical Parts

17
ASSEMBLY DRAWING
 H

A
8
8

80
7
7

10
20

6
6

10
10

Isometric view 5
5

Scale: 1:1

Top view Side view

4
4

Front view
3

3
3

2
2

DESIGNED BY:
I _
G8
DATE:
H _
3/19/2019
CHECKED BY:
PROF. MADYAR. NURAINI & DR. AZIM
G _

DATE: F _
20/03/2019
SIZE E _

A4 DASSAULT SYSTEMES D _

C _ 1
1

SCALE WEIGHT (kg) DRAWING NUMBER SHEET

1:1 - SICKLE 1 B _

This drawing is our property; it can't be reproduced or communicated without our written agreement. A _

H G B A
 H

A
8
8

7
7

R0.39

R11

6
6

5
5

4
4

Isometric view
Scale: 5:1
Side view Front view
3
3

2
2

DESIGNED BY:
I _
G8
DATE:
H _
3/19/2019
CHECKED BY:
PROF. MADYAR. NURAINI & DR. AZIM
G _

DATE: F _
20/03/2019
SIZE E _

A4 DASSAULT SYSTEMES D _

C _ 1
1

SCALE WEIGHT (kg) DRAWING NUMBER SHEET

5:1 - SPUR GEAR 2 B _

This drawing is our property; it can't be reproduced or communicated without our written agreement. A _

H G B A
 H

A
8
8

R0.39
7
7

6
6

5
5

24

R31
4
4

Side view Front view Isometric view 3

3

Scale: 3:1

2
2

DESIGNED BY:
I _
G8
DATE:
H _
3/19/2019
CHECKED BY:
PROF. MADYAR. NURAINI & DR. AZIM
G _

DATE: F _
20/03/2019
SIZE E _

A4 DASSAULT SYSTEMES D _

C _ 1
1

SCALE WEIGHT (kg) DRAWING NUMBER SHEET

3:1 - SPUR GEAR 3 B _

This drawing is our property; it can't be reproduced or communicated without our written agreement. A _

H G B A
 H

A
8
12
8

15
40 6
15
1 6

4.5
10

4.5
13

4
13 7
7

Side view

2 2
3

27
15

1
20 70
Front view
8

4
6
6

2
1

5
5

Top view
4
4

Isometric view
Scale: 3:2 3
3

2
2

DESIGNED BY:
I _
G8
DATE:
H _
3/19/2019
CHECKED BY:
PROF. MADYAR. NURAINI & DR. AZIM
G _

DATE: F _
20/03/2019
SIZE E _

A4 DASSAULT SYSTEMES D _

C _ 1
1

SCALE WEIGHT (kg) DRAWING NUMBER SHEET

3:2 - SLIDER 4 B _

This drawing is our property; it can't be reproduced or communicated without our written agreement. A _

H G B A
 H

A
8
8

Top view
7
7

3
6
6

Front view

29
5
5

3
2

Side view
4
4

3
3

Isometric view 2
2

Scale: 3:1 DESIGNED BY:

G8 I _
DATE:
H _
3/19/2019
CHECKED BY:
PROF. MADYAR. NURAINI & DR. AZIM
G _

DATE: F _
20/03/2019
SIZE E _

A4 DASSAULT SYSTEMES D _

C _ 1
1

SCALE WEIGHT (kg) DRAWING NUMBER SHEET

3:1 - SLIDER COVER 5 B _

This drawing is our property; it can't be reproduced or communicated without our written agreement. A _

H G B A
 H

A
8
8

15

13 Top view

15
7
7

3
Front view Side view
6
6

12

8
2

73 5
5

4
4

3
3

Isometric view
Scale: 3:1

2
2

DESIGNED BY:
I _
G8
DATE:
H _
3/19/2019
CHECKED BY:
PROF. MADYAR. NURAINI & DR. AZIM
G _

DATE: F _
20/03/2019
SIZE E _

A4 DASSAULT SYSTEMES D _

C _ 1
1

SCALE WEIGHT (kg) DRAWING NUMBER SHEET

3:1 - CONNECTOR 6 B _

This drawing is our property; it can't be reproduced or communicated without our written agreement. A _

H G B A
 H

A
8
8

7
7

6
6

Top view Isometric view

Scale: 5:1 5
5

12

4
4

3
3

6 2
2

DESIGNED BY:
I _
G8

Front view Side view

DATE:
H _
3/19/2019
CHECKED BY:
PROF. MADYAR. NURAINI & DR. AZIM
G _

DATE: F _
20/03/2019
SIZE E _

A4 DASSAULT SYSTEMES D _

C _ 1
1

SCALE WEIGHT (kg) DRAWING NUMBER SHEET

5:1 - BEARING 7 B _

This drawing is our property; it can't be reproduced or communicated without our written agreement. A _

H G B A