Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 16 views

    Weight Ed Mean Verbal Interpr Etation

    Uploaded by

    Jhemson ELis
    1) Teachers agreed that the computer laboratory can be used for classes and that teachers can operate computers easily. 2) Students agreed that the computer laboratory was useful for integrating technology into classes, as a source of information for different topics, and to enhance their interests through internet access. 3) Teaching with technology and multimedia was seen to enhance student performance, and working with computers was thought to promote self-paced learning.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Weight Ed Mean Verbal Interpr Etation

    Uploaded by

    Jhemson ELis
    16 views3 pages
    1) Teachers agreed that the computer laboratory can be used for classes and that teachers can operate computers easily. 2) Students agreed that the computer laboratory was useful for integrating technology into classes, as a source of information for different topics, and to enhance their interests through internet access. 3) Teaching with technology and multimedia was seen to enhance student performance, and working with computers was thought to promote self-paced learning.

    Original Description:

    man

    Original Title

    Mann Whitney

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Teachers agreed that the computer laboratory can be used for classes and that teachers can operate computers easily. 2) Students agreed that the computer laboratory was useful for integrating technology into classes, as a source of information for different topics, and to enhance their interests through internet access. 3) Teaching with technology and multimedia was seen to enhance student performance, and working with computers was thought to promote self-paced learning.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    16 views3 pages

    Weight Ed Mean Verbal Interpr Etation

    Uploaded by

    Jhemson ELis
    1) Teachers agreed that the computer laboratory can be used for classes and that teachers can operate computers easily. 2) Students agreed that the computer laboratory was useful for integrating technology into classes, as a source of information for different topics, and to enhance their interests through internet access. 3) Teaching with technology and multimedia was seen to enhance student performance, and working with computers was thought to promote self-paced learning.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    Weight Verbal

    ed Interpr
    IndicatorsMean etation Rank
    1.    All teachers
    2.76 can Agree
    utilize computer
    8.5 laboratory for their classes.
    2.    All teachers
    2.76 can Agree
    operate8.5computers easily.
    3.    Computer3.5Strongly
    laboratory
    Agree
    was1used in integrating ICT in classes.
    4.    DCP packages
    3.45 Agree served as3a good productivity tools for education.
    5.    Students3.4can Agree
    use the computer
    5 laboratory to search for information about different topics.
    6.    Students’
    3.38 interests
    Agreeon topics
    7 was enhanced through internet access.
    7.    Teaching
    3.47through
    Agree
    technology
    2 and multimedia enhanced students’ performance.
    8.    Working3.44
    with computers
    Agree promotes
    4 self-paced learning among students.
    9.    Computer
    3.39laboratory
    Agree is a 6conducive place for students to learn.
    Composi 2.98 Agree
    p - value Decision Interpretation
    Objectives .061 Accept No Significant
    Sex
    PROGRAMS .032 Reject Significant
    APPLICABILITY .705 Accept No Significant

    p - value Decision Interpretation


    Objectives .000 Reject Significant
    Years in Service
    PROGRAMS .000 Reject Significant
    APPLICABILITY .000 Reject Significant

    p - value Decision Interpretation


    Objectives .000 Reject Significant
    Educational Attainment
    PROGRAMS .000 Reject Significant
    APPLICABILITY .001 Reject Significant

    p - value Decision Interpretation


    MONITORING .000 Reject Significant 1.844 11
    Sex GENERATING .000 Reject Significant 173
    USINGCOMPUT .005
    ER Reject Significant

    p - value Decision Interpretation


    MONITORING .000 Reject Significant
    Years in Service GENERATING .000 Reject Significant
    USINGCOMPUT .000 .000
    ER Reject Significant

    p - value Decision Interpretation


    MONITORING .000 Reject Significant
    Educational Attainment
    GENERATING .000 Reject Significant
    USINGCOMPUT .036
    ER Reject Significant
    718.500

    .000 .001 .000 .000 .036

    You might also like