the upper bound for all
systems would show
‘An appraisal of the results shown in Table 8.2 shows that considerably
iven by the failure modes approach. For instance, in
the present example the results show that the system failure rate and
ly due to the overlapping forced outage of the two
that the system outage duration is mainly due to the overlapping
ment will give the greatest reliability improvement. This information is
not readily deducible from the network reduction method, particularly
when the system increases in size.
8.3. Inclusion of busbar failures
‘The results shown in Sections 8.2.3 and 8.2.4 were evaluated assuming
the breakers and busbars were ‘
nents can be taken into account using both network re
modes. analyses. ‘The effect of busbars is considered
breakers in Section 8.9. Assume the busbars in Fig. 8.1 have the
reliability data shown in Table 8.3.
Table 83 Reliability indices of
Dbusbars in Fig. 8.1
Component 2 (flyx) (hows)
5 coe
6 oo 2
(@) Network reduction
"previously obtained in Se
Di
App = 6.984% 10*+0.01+0.02= 3.070 10" tyr
Ujy= 4.107 10 +0.01 5 +0.02X2=9.411 x10"? hours/yr
Us
fog 2-307 hours,
(b) Failure modes dnalysis
nal failure modes (minimal cut sets) are component S and
component 6, giving the results shown in Table 8.4.
Toble 8.4. Rel dices including busbar failures
Failure dee ee Up
event (iy) (hows) (howrsye)
Subtotal
from 6.98610 5.88 4,110x10"
‘Table 82
5 1x10?
6 2107
‘Tol 3.070107
by failures of the two busbars.
components are series components and therefore counteract much of the
benefit provided by the redundancy aspect of the parallel bran
Recognition of series components can be an important aspect in system
design because they frequently possess the dominant role. This must not
be assumed to be a general conclusion, however, because their contribu-
tion depends on their own individual reliability indices. For instance, if
the failure rate of each busbar was very small compared with that of the
parallel branches, the contribution by the parallel branches could still be
. This effect is illustrated by the results of Fig. 8.3, whi
variation in the values Of App typ and Upp of
failure raté of the busbars are increased, the’ repair times being those
shown in Table 8.3. ;