<TOPIC> Republic v Encelan <NAME>

KEY TAKE-AWAY OR DOCTRINE TO REMEMBER

RECIT-READY / SUMMARY

FACTS
 Cesar Married Lolita, and they had two children. To support the family, Cesar went abroad and worked as an OFW
in Saudi Arabia. After two years of working abroad, Cesar learned that Lolita is having an illicit affair with Alvin
Perez, and thereafter, left the conjugal dwelling together with the two children. But even with such circumstances,
Cesar never failed to send financial support for the family.
 On June 1995, Cesar filed a petition against Lolita for the declaration of the nullity of his marriage based on Lolita’s
psychological incapacity. Cesar, during a hearing even presented a psychological evaluation report on Lolita with
the finding that “Lolita was not suffering from any form of psychiatric illness, but had been unable to provide the
expectations expected of her for a good and lasting marital relationship....and her transferring from one job to
another depicts some interpersonal problem with co-workers as well as her impatience in attaining her
ambitions .... and her refusal to go with her husband abroad signifies her reluctance to work out a good marital and
family relationship...”
 Cesar found ally in RTC as it gave him a favourable decision which declared his marriage to Lolita null and void. The
court of Appeals also affirmed the decision of RTC, and thereafter, the case was elevated to the Supreme Court, thus,
this case.
ISSUES / RATIO ARTICLES/LAWS INVOLVED
1. Whether or not psychological incapacity is
indeed present in the person of Lolita as to nullify
a valid marriage.

HELD

No. Marriage is an inviolable (never to be broken) social institution protected by the State and any doubt should be resolved
in favor of its existence and continuation against its dissolution and nullity. In this case, sexual infidelity and abandonment
of the conjugal dwelling do not necessarily constitute psychological incapacity; these are simply grounds for legal
separation. To constitute psychological incapacity, it must be shown that the unfaithfulness and abandonment are
manifestations of a disordered personality that actually prevented the erring spouse from discharging the essential marital
obligations, which the court found not present in the person of Lolita.