Professional Documents
Culture Documents
20CD PDF
20CD PDF
Sr.No. CaseNo/Branch Title Subject Judgement Date Judgement Received Date Compliance Date Compliance By Remarks
1 LPA 1014/15 in Manju Rani Reg.Consider for the For the reasons afore-stated, the appeal is
09-03-2017 22-05-2017 21-09-2017 Directorate Communication made to
CWP v/s post of PGT Biology allowed; the order passed by learned Single to HSSC vide
No.25889/12 State & Ors.
Judge is set aside and the appellant's writ No.4/365-12 Co(1)
Coordination
petition is dt.13.12.16
accepted with a direction to the authorities
to treat her eligible for the post of PGT
Biology. In case the appellant, on the basis
of her performance in the
interview and overall selection criteria has
made to the selection list, she shall be
offered appointment within a period of two
months from the date of receipt of certified
copy of this order. The appellant in that
eventuality shall be entitled to notional
seniority from the date candidate lower in
merit was
offered appointment. However, she shall
not be paid any arrears of pay.
(10) Ordered accordingly
2 CWP 10152/18 Chanderpal & Reg.Grant the Without expressing any opinion on the
26-04-2018 19-06-2018 18-10-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) Ors. benefit of Selection merits of the case, instant petition is
v/s Grade
disposed of with a direction to respondent
State & Ors.
No.2 to look into the
grievances unfolded by the petitioners in
the legal notice dated 06.03.2018 (P-7)
and to decide the same in accordance with
law, rules and regulations as well as
instructions issued by the Government from
time to time and also in view of judgment
referred in para 2 of this order, within a
period of four months from the date of
receipt of certified copy of this order.
However, in case the petitioners still feel
aggrieved by any of the order passed by the
afore-said authority, they shall be at
liberty to have recourse
to other remedies available to him under
law including to approach this Court
3 CWP 10155/18 Satish Kumar Reg.Grant the Without expressing any opinion on the
26-04-2018 14-05-2018 13-09-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) Sharma & Ors. benefit for revised merits of the case, instant petition is
v/s pay scale
disposed of with a direction to respondent
State & Ors.
No.2 to look into the grievances unfolded
by the petitioners in the legal notice dated
06.03.2018 (P-7) and to decide the same in
accordance with law, rules and regulations
as well as instructions issued by the
Government from time to time and also in
view of judgment referred in para 2 of this
order, within a period of four months from
the date of receipt of certified copy of this
order.
However, in case the petitioners still feel
aggrieved by any of the order passed by the
afore-said authority, they shall be at
liberty to have recourse
to other remedies available to him under
law including to approach this Court
4 CWP 10238/18 Jagroop Singh Reg.Prepare and Having heard learned counsel for the
26-04-2018 22-06-2018 21-08-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s complete the parties, the instant petition is disposed of
State & Ors. service book and to
in terms of CWP No.2886 of 2018 titled
grant him all
consequential ‘Randhir Singh Vs.
benefits such as State of Haryana & others’ decided on
salary, annual 27.02.2018 involving the same issue.
increments
etc.alongwith
interest @ p.a from
the date it became
due
5 CWP 10278/18 Balbir Singh Reg.Selection Grade Learned counsel for the petitioner is
26-04-2018 17-07-2018 Directorate
HR(G-II) v/s advised to file a detailed
State & Ors.
representation/serve legal notice to the
concerned respondent(s) for getting his
grievances redressed and in case of
non-redressal of his grievance(s), he shall
be at liberty to have recourse to the
remedies available under law as well as to
approach this Court
6 CWP 10317/18 Pawan Singh Reg.Transfer In response, learned State counsel submits
26-04-2018 08-05-2018 03-05-2018 Directorate
PGT-IV Kadian that claim/grievance of the petitioner shall
v/s
be re-examined, notwithstanding the
State & Ors.
impugned order
of his transfer. And appropriate orders, in
accordance with law, shall be passed
within a period of one week from today.
And, if the petitioner is not
already relieved, he shall not be relieved
from his original posting, till a decision, as
indicated above, is reached.
The petition is accordingly disposed of, in
the above terms. In the event, the
claim/grievance of the petitioner is
declined, the respondent authority shall
pass a comprehensive order, assigning
reasons in support thereof.
7 CWP 1040/14 Parveen Kumar Reg.Appointment The writ petition is allowed in view of the
27-05-2015 14-08-2015 Directorate Deemed University
PGT-I v/s for the post of PGT judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. Matter
State & ors. English
7626 of 2015 titled as Gurmail Kaur and The Hon'ble High Court
others Vs. State of Haryana and another granted stay in LPA
decided on 27.5.2015. No.1215 of 2015 against
the order dt.27.05.15
passed in CWP
No.7626/15 titled as
State of Haryana
Vs.Gurmail Kaur
8 CWP 10476/17 Wazir Singh & Reg.Pay Fixation I find this to be a fair submission. Keeping
16-05-2017 14-06-2017 13-09-2017 Directorate
Coordination Ors. in view the plight as portrayed, I deem it
v/s
appropriate to dispose of this petition with
State & Ors.
a direction to the respondent No.2 to
decide the said legal notice of the
petitioners and pass a speaking order
thereon within a period of three months
from the date of receipt of a certified copy
of this order. Ordered
accordingly.
Since the main case has been decided, the
pending civil miscellaneous application, if
any, also stands disposed of.
9 CWP 10499/18 Kohar Singh & Reg.Deemed date of In view of the above, this petition is
09-05-2018 28-05-2018 27-08-2018 Directorate
HRME-I Ors. regularization of disposed of with a direction to the
v/s service
competent authority amongst the
State & Ors.
respondents to take a decision on the legal
notice by passing a speaking order
declaring the rights of the petitioner for
regularization, if any, on
non-discriminatory principles and in the
light of the earlier orders passed by this
Court in relation to
similar issue in the Education Department
concerning part-time workers/sweepers.
The department would take into
consideration the orders
placed on file at Annex. P-5 and P-6. Final
decision be taken within three months
from the date of receiving a certified copy
of this order.
10 CWP 10507/18 Lalita Taneja Reg.Grant the Without expressing any opinion on the
30-04-2018 15-05-2018 14-08-2018 Directorate
PGT-II (Lect.in.History benefit of Stepping merits of the case, the instant petition is
Retd.) up being claimed
disposed of with the direction to
v/s with the same
State & Ors. Scheduled Caste respondent No.1- Financial Commissioner
junior teacher in the and Secretary to Govt. of Haryana,
cadre and further Education Department, Haryana Civil
by notional pay Secretariat, Chandigarh to look into the
fixation and pension grievances unfolded by the petitioner in
revision and other representation dated 08.08.2017
retiral benefits (Annexure P-9) and to decide the same in
revision with accordance with Rules, Regulations and
interest
instructions issued by government from
time to time as well as in view of similar
order passed by respondents vide order
dated 01.05.2017 (P-5), within a period of
3 months from the date of receipt of
certified copy of this order.
In case, the petitioner still feels aggrieved
against any of the order(s) passed by the
concerned authority, she shall be at liberty
to have
recourse to the other remedies available
under law including filing of writ petition.
11 CWP 10551/18 Ishwar Chand Reg.Stepping up and Without expressing any opinion on the
30-04-2018 24-05-2018 23-08-2018 Directorate
PGT-II (Lect.in.History) notional pay merits of the case, the instant petition is
v/s fixation
disposed of with the direction to
State & Ors.
respondent No.1- Financial Commissioner
and Secretary to Govt. of Haryana,
Education Department, Haryana Civil
Secretariat, Chandigarh to look into the
grievances unfolded by the petitioner in
representation dated 15.09.2017
(Annexure P-9) and to decide the same in
accordance with Rules, Regulations and
instructions issued by government from
time to time as well as in view of similar
order passed by respondents vide order
dated 01.05.2017 (P-5), within a period of
3 months from the date of receipt of
certified copy of this order.
In case, the petitioner still feels aggrieved
against any of the order(s) passed by the
concerned authority, he shall be at liberty
to have
recourse to the other remedies available
under law including filing of writ petition.
16 CWP 10816/18 Melo Devi Reg.Regularization That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
02-05-2018 06-06-2018 05-09-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service this stage, only with a direction to the
State & Ors.
respondents to consider and decide the
claim/grievance of the petitioner, as also
the legal notice dated 25.02.2018
(Annexure P7), within a period of 3 months
from the receipt of certified copy of this
order. And pass appropriate orders in
accordance with law.
Needless to assert, in the event the claim of
the petitioner is declined, the
respondent-authorities shall pass a
comprehensive order assigning reasons in
support thereof.
17 CWP 10852/99 Anant Ram Reg.promotion as Perusal of Annexure R-1, it is evident that
11-05-2017 31-05-2017 10-08-2017 Directorate
PGT-II Singla lect. the petitioner has been denied the
v/s
monetary benefits from 1988 to 2000 on
State & Ors.
the promotion post of Lecturer in
Commerce. The concerned respondent is
hereby directed to calculate difference of
pay from 26.9.1988 to 27.6.2000 and
disburse the same within a period of three
months from today.
With the above observations, petition
stands disposed of.
18 CWP 1098/16 Yashpal Singh & Reg.Challenge the A perusal of the afore-referred preliminary
15-02-2016 04-05-2016 03-06-2016 Directorate
PGT-II Ors. transfer orders fact finding inquiry by the DEO, Rohtak
v/s
shows recommendation of disciplinary
State & Ors.
proceedings against the Principal and the
TGTs mentioned therein. It is directed that
the final decision with regard to the same
be taken by the competent Authority
expeditiously but not later than one month
from the date of receipt of a certified copy
of this order.
27 CWP 11764/18 Naresh Kumar & Reg.Regularization The petition is disposed of at this stage
10-05-2018 12-06-2018 10-07-2018 Directorate
HRME-I Ors. of service with a direction to respondent No.2 to
v/s
objectively consider the legal notice dated
State & Ors
7.2.2018 (Annexure P-5) and pass a
speaking order therein within a period of
four
weeks from the date of receipt of certified
copy of this order.
28 CWP 11783/18 Sher Singh & Reg.Refixation of Without expressing any opinion on the
10-05-2018 07-06-2018 06-09-2018 Directorate
HR(G-II) Ors. pay after restoring merits of the case, instant petition is
v/s the benefits of
disposed of with a direction to respondents
State & Ors. adhoc relief and DA
cut as on 01.04.79 to consider the grievances unfolded by the
petitioners in the legal notice dated
28.02.2018 (P-14) and to take a conscious
decision by passing a speaking order as per
the judmgents referred to above in para
no.1 of this order, within a period of three
months from the date of receipt of a
certified copy of this order. In case,
petitioners still feel aggrieved by any of the
orders passed by the
aforesaid authority, they shall be at liberty
to have recourse to the other remedies
available under law as well as to approach
this Court.
37 CWP 12697/15 Kulwant Singh & Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.7626
30-06-2015 23-07-2015 Directorate Deemed University
PGT-I Ors. post of PGT of 2015 (Gurmail Kaur & others Versus Matter
v/s
State of Haryana & another), decided on The Hon'ble High Court
State & Ors.
27.5.2015. granted stay in LPA
No.1215 of 2015 against
the order dt.27.05.15
passed in CWP
No.7626/15 titled as
Gurmail Kaur Vs. State of
Haryana
38 CWP 12849/15 Parveen Bala Reg.Consider for the The writ petition is allowed in terms of
02-07-2015 23-07-2015 Directorate Deemed University
PGT-I v/s post of PGT judgment rendered by this Court in CWP Matter
State & Ors. Economics
No. 5781 of 2015 decided on 4.6.2015 The Hon'ble High Court
titled as Subhash Chand Vs. State of granted stay in LPA
Haryana and others. No.1220 of 2015 against
the order dt.04.06.15
passed in CWP
No.5781/15 titled as
Subhash Chand Vs. State
of Haryana
39 CWP 12853/15 Meena Devi Reg.Consider for the The writ petition is allowed in terms of
02-07-2015 23-07-2015 Directorate Deemed University
PGT-I v/s post of PGT Hindi judgment Matter
State & Ors.
rendered by this Court in CWP No. 5781 of The Hon'ble High Court
2015 decided on 4.6.2015 titled as Subhash granted stay in LPA
Chand Vs. State of Haryana and others. No.1220 of 2015 against
the order dt.04.06.15
passed in CWP
No.5781/15 titled as
Subhash Chand Vs. State
of Haryana
64 CWP 14466/18 Shakuntla Arora Reg.Same cadre and Without expressing any opinion on the
10-07-2018 24-07-2018 23-10-2018 Directorate
PGT-II (Lect.in.History stepping up benefit merits of the case, the instant petition is
Retd.) being claimed with
disposed of with the direction to
v/s the same scheduled
State & Ors. caste junior teacher respondent No.1-Financial
in the cadre and Commissioner and Secretary to Govt. of
further by notional Haryana, Education Department, Haryana
pay fixation and Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh to look into
pension revision the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in
and other retiral representation dated 29.09.2017
benefits with (Annexure P-9) and to decide the same in
interest accordance with Rules, Regulations and
instructions issued by government from
time to time as well as in view of similar
order passed by
respondents vide order dated 01.05.2017
(P-5), within a period of 3 months from the
date of receipt of certified copy of this
order.
In case, the petitioner still feels aggrieved
against any of the order(s) passed by the
concerned authority, she shall be at liberty
to have recourse to the other remedies
available under law including filing of writ
petition.
65 CWP 14521/18 Ramesh Kumar Reg.Regularization The petition is disposed of with direction to
31-05-2018 19-06-2018 15-08-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service respondent No.2 to objectively consider the
State & Ors.
legal notice (Annexure P-5) and pass a
speaking order
thereupon, within a period of eight weeks
from the date of receipt of certified copy of
this order.
76 CWP 15605/15 Seema Reg.Consider for the The present writ petition is allowed, in
31-07-2015 18-08-2015 Directorate The Hon'ble High Court
PGT-I v/s post of PGT English terms of judgment dated 04.06.2015 granted stay in LPA
State & Ors.
rendered in CWP No.5781 of 2015 titled as No.1220 of 2015 against
Subhash Chand vs. State of Haryana and the order dt.04.06.15
others. passed in CWP
No.5781/15 titled as
Subhash Chand Vs. State
of Haryana
77 LPA 1561/16 in Sunil Kumar Reg.Transfer of Though the permission, if any granted by
26-08-2016 19-09-2016 Directorate
CWP v/s Guest Faculty the Competent Authority for joining LLB
No.16274/16 State & Ors.
degree is not on record, nevertheless, we
PGT-II
are of
the considered view that transfer being an
incidence of service, learned Single Judge
has rightly declined to interfere with the
same. However, the appellant may
approach the Competent Authority and
make out a case based
upon the mitigating circumstances,
including the utility of LLB degree with
reference to the nature of duties he is
required to perform. We have no
reason to doubt that the Competent
Authority shall sympathetically consider
the appellant's request. It shall be
appreciated if the decision is taken within
a period of one month from the date of
making a request by the appellant.
Ordered accordingly.
78 CWP 1567/17 Om Parkash & Reg.Refixation/ACP In my opinion, it would be appropriate if
30-01-2017 06-02-2017 29-03-2017 Directorate Speaking orders are
PGT-IV Ors. the present writ petition is treated as being passed
v/s
representation and respondent No.2
State & Ors.
decides the same by passing speaking order
within two months from today.
Ordered accordingly. However, it is made
clear that till the passing of the speaking
order, recovery shall not be made from the
petitioners.
Disposed of accordingly.
Copy of this order be given dasti to the
learned State counsel under the signatures
of Reader/Bench Secretary.
79 CWP 15725/17 Pinki & Ors. Reg.Step-up of their Consequently, this petition is disposed of
20-07-2017 22-08-2017 21-12-2017 Directorate
PGT-II v/s pay with a direction to the competent
State & Ors.
authority amongst the respondents to take
a decision on the legal
notice of the petitioners (Annexure P-6),
dated 22.11.2016, in terms of the judgment
of this Court in Neelam Rani (supra) within
a period of 4 months from the date of
receipt of a certified copy of this order.
If the petitioners' case is not covered by the
aforesaid judgment or any other judgment
on the subject, detailed reasons as to why it
is not
covered, shall be given in the speaking
order to be passed.
It is also clarified that in case a speaking
order has already been passed giving such
detailed reasons, then only a short order
need be passed now, annexing therewith
detailed order already passed (if any).
80 CWP 1573/15 Surinder Kaur & Reg.Consider for the After hearing learned counsel for the
29-01-2015 10-02-2015 09-04-2015 Directorate 13/24-15 HRL-I(4)
PGT-I Anr. post of PGT Punjabi petitioners, however, without opining on Report from DVC
v/s & Mathematics
the merits of the controversy, the present awaited
State & Ors.
petition is disposed of at this stage with a
direction to respondent No. 2 to take a
final decision on the show cause notices
issued to the petitioners, to which they
have already filed replies, within a period
of two months from the date of receipt of
copy of the order.
81 CWP 15850/15 Purushotam Reg.Promotion For orders, see the detailed order of even
18-12-2017 04-04-2018 Directorate LPA is being filed.
PGT-II Dutt date passed in CWP-13344-2015 ‘Anant A.G.Haryana raised
v/s
Pal and others vs. The State of Haryana some objections in draft
State & Ors
and another’. of LPA
92 CWP 16347/18 Prithvi Singh & Reg.Selection Grade Keeping in view the above, the present writ
09-07-2018 20-07-2018 31-12-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) Ors. petition is disposed of by giving directions
v/s
to the respondents No.2 and 3 to look into
State & Ors.
the representation (Annexure P-9) as per
judgment (Annexure P-8) passed by this
Court and decide the same preferably
within the period of six months.
93 CWP 16474/18 Subhash Reg.Regularization This petition is disposed of by giving
10-07-2018 24-07-2018 Directorate
HRME-I Chander & Anr. of Service direction to pass appropriate orders on the
v/s
legal notice dated 25.04.2018 (Annexure
State & Ors.
P-7) keeping in view the orders passed in
favour of the juniors (Annexure P-4) in
accordance with law.
94 CWP 16495/15 Surender Kumar Reg.Consider for the The writ petition is allowed in terms of
18-08-2015 24-08-2015 Directorate The Hon'ble High Court
PGT-I v/s post of PGT Hindi judgment rendered by this Court in CWP granted stay in LPA
State & Ors.
No. 5781 of 2015 decided on 4.6.2015 No.1220 of 2015 against
titled as Subhash Chand Vs. State of the order dt.04.06.15
Haryana and others. passed in CWP
No.5781/15 titled as
Subhash Chand Vs. State
of Haryana
95 CWP 16512/18 Mukhtyar Singh Reg.Regularization As the matter in controversy is restricted to
23-10-2018 30-10-2018 29-01-2019 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service that point only and petitioner has already
State & Ors.
got issued legal notice dated 25.04.2018
(Annexure
P7), present writ petition stands disposed
of with the directions to the respondents to
look into and take the required action on
legal notice
(Annexure P7) expeditiously and preferably
within a period of three months from the
date of receipt of a certified copy of this
order.
96 CWP 16515/18 Rohtash Kumar Reg.Regularization This petition is disposed of by giving
10-07-2018 14-08-2018 13-02-2018 Directorate
HRME-I & Ors. of Service direction to pass appropriate orders on the
v/s
legal notice dated 08.05.2018 (Annexure
State & Ors.
P-5) keeping in view the orders passed in
favour of the juniors (Annexure P-4) within
a period of 6 months from the date of
receipt of certified copy of the order.
101 CWP 17219/18 Pushpa Kalra & Reg.Selection Grade Without expressing any opinion on the
01-08-2018 28-08-2018 27-11-2018 Directorate
PGT-IV Ors merits of the case, instant petition is
v/s
disposed of with a direction to respondent
State & Ors
No.2-The Director,
Secondary Education, Haryana, Shiksha
Sadan, Sector 5, Panchkula to look into the
grievances unfolded by the petitioners in
the legal notice dated 19.06.2018 (P-10)
and to take a conscious decision by passing
a speaking order in view of
the judgments referred in the aforesaid
legal notice (P-10), within a period of three
months from the date of receipt of a
certified copy of this order. However, if
petitioners still feel aggrieved by any of the
orders passed by the aforesaid authority,
they shall be at liberty to have recourse to
other remedies available under law as well
as to approach this Court.
108 CWP 17606/16 Dr.Sunil Kumar Reg.Transfer The Director General School Education will
29-08-2016 14-09-2016 17-09-2016 Directorate
PGT-II v/s look into this grievance within two or three
State & Ors.
days from the date of receipt of the order
and take a fair and just decision on the
representation on this special feature
which constitutes the ground of challenge.
Disposed of.
109 CWP 17719/14 Sandeep Kumar Reg.Consequential Consequently, this writ petition is allowed
02-07-2015 24-08-2015 23-11-2015 Directorate LPA No.214/16 has been
HR(G-I) & Ors. benefits of and the respondents are directed to work filed and admitted. To be
v/s promotion
out arrears and pay the same to the heard within one year.
iState & Ors. including arrears of
petitioner within three months from the Stayed the impugned
pay which were
date of receipt of certified copy of this order
payable to the said
Sh.Ved Pal Singh order, failing which the petitioner would
be entitled to claim the same with interest
@ 8% p.a from the date/s the same fell due
till the date of payment.
110 CWP 17743/16 Pawan Singh Reg.Transfer The Director General School Education will
30-08-2016 06-09-2016 09-09-2016 Directorate
PGT-II v/s look into this grievance within two or three
State & Ors.
days from the date of receipt of the order
and take a fair and just decision on the
representation on this special feature
which constitutes the ground of challenge.
Disposed of.
111 CWP 18010/17 Balbir Singh Reg.Grant of Accordingly, instant petition is treated as
17-08-2017 26-09-2017 25-12-2017 Directorate
HR(G-II) Sheoran & Ors. Additional representation on behalf of the petitioners
v/s Increment
and is disposed of with a direction to
State & Ors.
respondent(s) to look into the grievances
unfolded by the petitioners in the instant
petition (representation) and decide the
same particularly in view of Government of
Haryana Circular dated 24.04.2014
bearing Memo No.10/01/2014-3GSII
(Annexure P-1), within
a period of 3 months from the date of
receipt of certified copy of this order.
117 CWP 18627/18 Girdhari Lal & Reg.Selection Grade Accordingly, instant petition is disposed of
31-07-2018 28-08-2018 27-11-2018 Directorate
PGT-IV Ors. with a direction to respondent
v/s
No.2-Director of Secondary Education
State & Ors.
Haryana, Panchkula to
consider the case unfolded by the
petitioners in legal notice (P-7) and to
decide the same in the light of letter dated
12.12.2000 (P-1) as well as judgment
passed by this Court in CWP No.8082 of
2001, titled as “R.K. Verma and ors. v. State
of Haryana and anr.”, decided on
01.12.2010 (P-2), which has attained
finality by way of dismissal of LPA, SLP as
well as review petition, within a period of
three months from the date of receipt of
certified copy of this order.
However, if petitioners still feel aggrieved
against any order passedby the aforesaid
authority, they shall be at liberty to have
recourse to the other
remedies available under law as well as to
approach this Court.
118 CWP 18819/15 Sarita Jain Reg.Grant Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed
08-09-2015 30-09-2015 10-10-2015 Directorate
T.Edu. Cell College Permission for D.Ed of with a direction to respondent no. 2 to
Education Course
decide the above issues within a period of
v/s
State & Ors. 10 days from from the date of receipt of
certified copy of the order. Needless to say
that in case the relief is to be denied, the
order should contain reasons.
121 CWP 19095/15 Babli Reg.Revision of Pay Taking into consideration the facts &
10-11-2017 27-12-2017 26-03-2018 Directorate LPA is being filed.
PEN-II v/s Scale circumstances of the case in hand, this A.G.Haryana raised
State & Ors.
Court is of the view that grant of interest @ some objections in draft
9% per of LPA
annum, on the delayed payment after
expiry of three months from the date of
retirement of the husband of the petitioner
till the actual payment, is legally and
factually justified. Accordingly, this Court
awards an interest @ 9% per annum on
the delayed payment(s) w.e.f. March 01,
2013 to actual date of payment.
Accordingly, respondents are directed to
calculate the interest on the delayed
payments reflected in the aforesaid reply
within a period of three months from the
date of receipt of a certified copy of this
judgment and disburse the same within a
period of two months thereafter.
Disposed of accordingly.
122 CWP 19151/18 Parmeshwari Reg.Regularization Keeping in view the above and order dated
03-08-2018 16-08-2018 27-09-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service 10.01.2017 (Annexure P-6), the present
Staete & ors.
writ petition is disposed of and respondents
are
directed to look into the legal notice dated
25.05.2018 (Annexure P-5) and pass
appropriate orders within a period of 6
weeks from the date of receipt of this order
in accordance with law.
123 CWP 19181/18 Krishna Devi Reg.Regularization Keeping in view the above and order dated
03-08-2018 16-08-2018 27-09-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service 10.01.2017 (Annexure P-6), the present
State & Ors.
writ petition is disposed of and respondents
are
directed to look into the legal notice dated
22.05.2018 (Annexure P-5) and pass
appropriate orders within a period of 6
weeks from the date of receipt of this order
in accordance with law.
124 CWP 19186/17 Ajit Singh & Ors. Reg.Upgraded grade After hearing the learned counsel for the
25-08-2017 13-09-2017 Directorate
PGT-III v/s pay or pay scale petitioners and noticing the grievance as
State & Ors. w.e.f the date of
expressed in the petition, we are of the
anomaly of revision
of scales i.e. considered view that this petition needs to
01.01.06 be disposed of at this stage
with a direction to the respondents to
consider and decide the claim of the
petitioners as contained in the legal notice
dated 25.04.2017 (Annexure P-10) by
passing a speaking order as expeditiously
as
possible. Ordered accordingly.
125 CWP 19437/10 Usha Sabharwal Reg.Reinstate with Learned State counsel has also raised an
20-02-2017 17-03-2017 Directorate Draft of LPA has been
HR(AS) v/s all consequential argument that under the subsequent 2008 prepared by the branch
State & Ors. benefits including
Rules, the cadre of Craft Teacher (Tailoring which will be filed
arrears of salary
& Cutting) had been declared as a dying shortly
with 12% interest
from date due till cadre and no fresh appointment is being
the date of payment. made in that cadre.
In my opinion, the adjustment of the
petitioner in terms of Sub Rule 3 of Rule 59
of the Higher Education Rules 2003 would
not amount to
reviving the cadre.
Consequently, the present petition is
disposed of in the same terms as passed in
that judgment (Annexure A-1).
126 CWP 19459/18 Moman Ran Reg.ACP Instant petition is disposed of with a
06-08-2018 24-08-2018 23-11-2018 Directorate
PGT-IV Kaushik & Anr. direction to respondent No.3- Director,
v/s
Department of Secondary Education,
State & Ors.
Haryana, Shiksha Bhawan,
Sector 5, Panchkula to look into the
grievances unfolded by the petitioners in
legal notice (P-8) and to take a conscious
decision, within a period of three
months from the date of receipt of certified
copy of this order..
However, if the petitioners still feels
aggrieved against any of the order(s)
passed by the concerned authority, they
shall be at liberty to have recourse to the
remedies available under law as well as to
approach this Court.
03-01-2019 Page 52 of 135
Sr.No. CaseNo/Branch Title Subject Judgement Date Judgement Received Date Compliance Date Compliance By Remarks
127 CWP 19561/18 Zile Singh Reg.Promotion for At this stage, the present petition is
08-08-2018 31-08-2018 02-03-2019 Directorate
HR(G-II) v/s the post of disposed of by giving direction to the
State & Ors. Headmaster High
respondent No.2 to look into
School
representation dated 16.04.2018
(Annexure P-6)
and legal notice dated 18.05.2018
(Annexure P-7) and pass appropriate
orders in accordance with law, within a
period of six months from the date of
receipt of certified copy of this order.
128 CWP 19736/16 Brahma Nand & Reg.Quashing the Learned counsel for the petitioners rightly
03-11-2016 28-11-2016 27-03-2017 Directorate File is being put up
Coordination Ors. impugned Note-III points out that identical issue arose for
v/s of Appendix-B
consideration before this Court in CWP
State & Ors. (Annexure P-I)
dated 11.04.12 and No.22554 of 2016 titled as Lakhbir Singh
in consequence the and others vs State of Haryana and
substituted another,decided on 27.10.2016.
provision of The instant writ petition is also disposed of
corrigendum dt. in the same terms.
01.09.16 (Annexure
P-8) being ultra
vires to Article 14 of
the constitution of
India and being
unjustified,
arbitrary and
having no nexus
with the ultimate
object to be
achieved amounting
to bad effect of birth
marks throughout
the life of a
candidate
135 CWP 20637/15 Shakuntala Devi Reg.Extension in Applying the ratio of the above mentioned
19-07-2018 08-10-2018 Directorate
PGT-III v/s Service judgments to the facts of the present case,
State & Ors.
the present writ petition stands allowed. A
direction is given to the respondents to
take the date of retirement of the
petitioner as 30.09.2017 and she is entitled
to consequential benefits alongwith 6%
interest.
136 CWP 20666/18 Sushil Punia Reg.Correction in this petition, at this stage is being disposed
18-08-2018 11-09-2018 23-10-2018 Directorate
PGT-II v/s Lecturer Seniority of by giving direction to the respondents to
State & Ors. List for the purpose
pass a speaking order on the Sugam
of promotion to the
post of Principal Sampark Ticket (Aneexure P-3) within a
period of six weeks from the date of receipt
of certified copy of this order
137 CWP 20725/18 Mamo Devi Reg.Count previous Without expressing any opinion on the
20-08-2018 11-09-2018 10-12-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s service for the merits of the case, instant petition is
State & Ors. purpose of
disposed of with the direction to
pensionary benefits
respondent(s) to look into the
grievances unfolded by the petitioner in
her legal notice (P-4) and to deal with and
dispose of the same, in accordance with
law within a period of three months from
the date of receipt of certified copy of this
order. If the concerned authority
comes to the conclusion that petitioner is
entitled to the benefits claimed, to release
the same within a period of next 45 days.
The claim with regard to interest on
delayed payment of retiral benefits to the
petitioner shall also be considered in view
of the observations
made by Full Bench of this Court in case
captioned as “R.S. Randhawa vs. State of
Punjab, 1997 (3) RSJ 318 as well as Govt. of
Haryana Instructions
No.1/2(152)01-2FRII, dated 20.02.2002.
However, if the petitioner still feels
aggrieved against any of the order passed
by the concerned authority, she shall be at
liberty to approach this
Court as well as to have recourse to the
other remedies available under law.
03-01-2019 Page 58 of 135
Sr.No. CaseNo/Branch Title Subject Judgement Date Judgement Received Date Compliance Date Compliance By Remarks
138 CWP 20757/18 Dr.Shayam Reg.Seniority In view of the said fact, this petition is
20-08-2018 28-09-2018 27-03-2019 Directorate
PGT-II Sunder Ahuja disposed of by giving direction to the
v/s
respondents, especially resondent
State & Ors.
No.2-Director, SecondaryvEducation,
Haryana to look into the representation
dated 29.05.2018 (Annexure P-3) and pass
appropriate orders keeping in view the
seniority list (Annexure P-2), in accordance
with law, within a period of six months
from the date of receipt of certified copy of
this order.
139 CWP 20802/18 Raj Kumar Reg.Refix and revise Without expressing any opinion on the
20-08-2018 12-09-2018 11-12-2018 Directorate
PGT-II (Retd.Lecturer) the pension of by merits of the case, instant petition is
v/s taking into account
disposed of with the direction to
State & Ors. the total service
rendered by the respondent No.2-Director, Secondary
petitioner i.e. 34 Education, Haryana, Shiksha Sadan, Sector
years 2 months and 5, Panchkula, District Panchkula to
6 days consider the claim of the petitioner put
forth by him in legal notice
(P-1) and to take a conscious decision,
within a period of three months from the
date of receipt of certified copy of this
order.
However, if the petitioner still feels
aggrieved against any of the order passed
by the concerned authority, he shall be at
liberty to approach this
Court as well as to have recourse to the
other remedies available under law.
150 CWP 21734/12 Sandeep Reg.Appointment The writ petition is allowed in view of the
27-05-2015 14-08-2015 Directorate Deemed University
PGT-I v/s for the post of judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. Matter
State & Ors. Lect.Physical
7626 of 2015 titled as Gurmail Kaur and The Hon'ble High Court
Education
others Vs. State of Haryana and another granted stay in LPA
decided on 27.5.2015. No.1215 of 2015 against
the order dt.27.05.15
passed in CWP
No.7626/15 titled as
Gurmail Kaur Vs. State of
Haryana
151 CWP 21807/17 Anita Reg.HTET Accordingly, without commenting on the
25-09-2017 12-01-2018 09-02-2018 Directorate
Coordination v/s merits of the case or the entitlement of the
state & Ors.
petitioner for the abovesaid relief and
keeping in view the fact that the matter is
still pending consideration, the present
writ petition is disposed of with direction
to respondent-Commission to take a
decision on the representation dated
21.08.2017 (Annexure P-7) and declare the
result of the petitioner. In case the
petitioner is found successful and falls
within the zone of consideration for
appointment, necessary steps will be taken
to send a recommendation to the State
Government for
appointment. The said exercise shall be
done within a period of 4 weeks from the
date of receipt of certified copy of the
order. In case the petitioner does not fall
within the zone of consideration, the
Commission will inform the petitioner.
159 CWP 2223/17 Karan Pal & Ors. Reg.Grant Selection Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem
21-03-2018 04-04-2018 03-08-2018 Directorate Reminder has been
PGT-II (Lect.in.History) grade w.e.f 01.01.96 that the matter in issue is squarely covered issued to DEO Palwal on
v/s instead of
by an order and judgment, dated 21.05.18
State & Ors. 01.04.05/25.03.03
20.02.2017, rendered by this Court in CWP
No. 9347 of 2016 (Jagat Singh Yadav v.
State of Haryana and others). And,
therefore, the petition at hands be disposed
of in the same terms.
Ordered accordingly.
161 CWP 22417/17 Bhoop Singh & Reg.Pay Fixation Consequently, these petitions are allowed
30-10-2017 30-04-2018 29-08-2018 Directorate
PGT-II Ors. (Lect.in in the same terms as Neelam Ranis' case
Phy.Education)
(supra), with the competent authority
v/s
State & Ors. amongst the respondents directed to
consider the case of each of the petitioners
for stepping up their pay scales to the level
of their juniors, as per the ratio of the
aforesaid judgment, and to pass a speaking
order thereafter. The speaking order shall
be passed in the case of each
petitioner/identical set of
petitioners within a period of 4 months
from the date of receipt of a certified copy
of this order.
If the case of each/any petitioner(s) is
found to be covered by the decision in that
case, the arrears of difference of pay be
released to them
within another period of 3 months
thereafter, but with such arrears restricted
to a period of 3 years and 2 months prior
to the date of filing of the petition before
this Court, by each particular petitioner.
On such arrears, the petitioners would also
be entitled to interest @ 6% per annum, as
was granted in Neelam Ranis' case.
6. It needs to be noticed that in Neelam
Ranis' case, it is seen that no restriction of
payment of arrears was ordered, but that
was obviously for
the reason that she had stated that she was
drawing less salary than her juniors from
01.07.2009, with the petition having been
filed in the year 2010 itself, i.e. soon
thereafter, hence there was obviously no
need to restrict the arreras.
. A photocopy of this order be also placed
on the files of the other connected matters.
169 COCP 228/17 Ishwar Singh Reg.Revise the After hearing learned counsel for the
01-11-2017 05-12-2017 04-03-2018 Directorate
IN cwp v/s pension and parties and on perusal of various orders
nO.7684/15 Sh.P.K.Dass, IAS pensionary benefits
and the stand taken in the written
PEN-II after computing the
service w.e.f statement, it would be in the interest of
18.01.88 to 31.10.11 justice that in case the petitioner makes a
detail representation to the competent
authority i.e. the Managing Committee
preferably within a period of one month
from today, it is expected that the
Managing Committee shall consider the
same preferably within a period of two
months
thereafter.
The contempt petition is disposed of
accordingly.
In case the petitioner is still aggrieved in
any manner, he is at liberty to avail the
appropriate remedy.
170 CWP 22879/16 Narender Singh Reg.Transfer Without making any observation on the
07-11-2016 15-12-2016 06-01-2017 Directorate
PGT-II (Lect in merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to
Geography)
dispose of this petition with a direction to
v/s
State & Ors. the
respondents No.3 to 5 to consider and
decide the legal notice dated (Annexure
P5) within a period of two months in
accordance with law.
The petition stands disposed of
accordingly.
171 CWP 23112/18 Jagdish Chander Reg.Regularization At this stage, present petition is disposed of
04-10-2018 31-10-2018 28-11-2018 Directorate
HRME-II v/s of Service by giving direction to the respondents to
State & Ors.
look into the legal notice dated 16.05.2018
(Annexure P-5) and pass appropriate
orders in accordance with law, within a
period of four weeks from the date of
receipt of certified copy of this order. In
case,
the petitioner is found eligible, his services
be regularized with all consequential
benefits at par with his juniors.
172 CWP 2316/18 Ramesh Kumar Reg.Grant the house That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
02-02-2018 16-05-2018 15-08-2018 Directorate
PGT-III & Ors. rent allowances this stage, only with a direction to the
(Lect.inPol.Scien monthly without
respondents to consider and decide the
ce) computing @10% of
v/s basic pay of claim of the petitioners as also their
State & Ors. petitioners and representation, dated 17.11.2017
overlooking the (Annexure P-4), within a period of three
statutory provision months from the receipt of a certified copy
of notification of this order. And, pass appropriate orders
2/10/2013-4FR/16 in accordance with law. In the event, the
69 dated claim of the petitioners is declined, the
19.07.2016 authority shall pass a comprehensive
order assigning reasons in support thereof.
173 CWP 23296/16 Indu Rani Reg.Transfer Without making any observation on the
10-11-2016 16-01-2017 15-04-2017 Directorate
PGT-III v/s merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to
State & Ors.
dispose of this petition with direction to
respondent No.2 to
consider and decide representation of the
petitioner dated 23.9.2016 (Annexure P-9),
in accordance with law, within a period of
three months from the date of receipt of
certified copy of this order.
The petition stands disposed of
accordingly.
174 CWP 23313/18 Kaiash Chand Reg.Revised Pay Without expressing any opinion on the
18-09-2018 25-10-2018 24-02-2019 Directorate
PGT-IV Sharma & Ors. Scale merits of the case,instant petition is
v/s
disposed of with a direction to respondents
State & Ors.
to look into the grievances unfolded by the
petitioners in the legal notice dated
15.05.2018 (P-10) and to take a conscious
decision in accordance with law, rules and
regulations, particularly in view of the
judgments referred to
above in para 1 of this order, within a
period of four months from the date of
receipt of a certified copy of this order.
However, in case petitioners still feel
aggrieved by any order of the afore-said
authorities, they shall be at liberty to have
recourse to the other remedies available
under law as well as to approach this
Court.
175 CWP 23600/17 Ram Bhagat Reg.Count previous Accordingly, without commenting upon the
10-11-2017 28-11-2017 27-01-2018 Directorate Letter issued to DEO
PGT-II (Lect.in.History) service as clerk for merits of the case or the entitlement of the Jhajjar for sending case
v/s the purpose of
petitioner, as such, keeping in view the
State & Ors. pensionary benefits
above and the fact that
the necessary order would have to be
passed by the competent authority. The
representation dated 27.09.2012
(Annexure P-7) has been addressed to the
erstwhile employer and not to respondents
No.1 & 2, with whom the petitioner has
been re-employed, therefore, the present
writ petition is disposed of, with a direction
to the competent authority to treat the
writ petition as representation and decide
the said issue as to the petitioner's
entitlement to be treated under the
Old Pension Scheme, as prayed for. Let
necessary decision be taken within a period
of 2 months from the receipt of a certified
copy of this order. If the benefit is to be
denied, the same should contain reasons
and be conveyed to the
petitioner, forthwith.
176 CWP 23660/16 Tabassum Reg.Appointment In view of the above factual position, the
18-09-2018 29-10-2018 30-10-2018 Directorate
PGT-I v/s for the post of PGT writ petition stands allowed and direction
State & Ors. Urdu
is given to respondents to consider the
petitioner eligible
for selection under Category No 18
(Haryana Cadre) and category No. 34 (For
Mewat District), in view of notification
dated 22.03.2018 (Annexure P-11 and
P-12). This exercise shall be completed
within a period of four weeks.
182 CWP 24319/13 Ram Charan Reg.Arrear of Keeping in view the prayer made in the
14-05-2015 09-07-2015 08-11-2015 Directorate Recalling order by filing
PEN-II Sharma Revised Pension petition, the present petition is allowed CM No.11117/15 and
v/s
with a direction to the competent same is fixed for hearing
State & Ors.
authority, to consider and decide the case on 20.11.15 and Hon'ble
of the petitioner, in terms of judgment in Court granted stay stay
LPA No.1169 of 2012 titled as 'State of till the decision of SLP
No.38930/15
Haryana and another Vs. Harbans Lal and
others', decided on 08.10.2012, by passing
a speaking order, within a period of four
months from the date of receipt of a
certified copy of this order.
14.05.2015
183 CWP 24357/18 Prem Chand Reg.Grant the Without expressing any opinion on the
24-09-2018 17-10-2018 16-01-2019 Directorate
PEN-II v/s benefit of revised merits of the case, instant petition is
State & Ors. pension
disposed of with a direction to respondent
No.2 to look into the grievances unfolded
by the petitioner in the legal notice dated
25.07.2018 (P-5) and to take a conscious
decision in accordance with law, rules and
regulations,
particularly in view of the judgments
referred in the legal notice, within a period
of three months from the date of receipt of
certified copy of this order.
However, in case petitioners still feel
aggrieved by any order of the afore-said
authority, he shall be at liberty to have
recourse to other remedies
available under law including to approach
this Court.
197 CWP 2553/18 Rajbala & Ors. Reg.Regularization The issue is open for the competent
05-02-2018 21-02-2018 20-05-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service authority to look into in accordance with
State & Ors.
law by passing a speaking order.
Accordingly, the instant petition is
disposed of with a direction to the
respondents to consider and decide the
legal notice after hearing the petitioners or
their representative/s effectively before
assigning comprehensive reasons upon
which the decision is proposed to be
passed. The decision be taken within three
months from the date of receipt of certified
copy of this order and conveyed to the
petitioners within the same time frame. If
relief is deserved, it may be granted
without the necessity of passing a reasoned
order.
198 CWP 25655/18 Partap Singh & Reg.Regularization This petition is being disposed of by giving
05-10-2018 12-10-2018 Directorate
HRME-II Ors. of Service direction to the respondents to pass
v/s
appropriate orders on the legal notice
State & Ors.
dated 23.05.2018 (Annexure P-5) keeping
in view the judgment passed by this Court
in CWP-14131-2016 Mukesh Kumar and
others V/s. State of Haryana and others
(Annexure P-6), in accordance with law.
209 CWP 26386/14 Jagdish Kumar Reg.Grant the Perusal of the records it is evident that no
21-03-2017 12-04-2017 20-06-2017 Directorate 13/52-15 ME(4)
HRME-I v/s arrear of Promotion reasons have been assigned as to why the LPA is being filed.
State & Ors. as Dy.Sudt.
petitioner's name was over looked for A.G.Haryana raised
promotion to the post of Assistant and some objections in draft
Deputy Superintendent as and when it was of LPA
due.
Therefore, the condition imposed in the
order dated 04.10.2013 (Annexure P-1) to
the extent that the petitioner is entitled to
notional pay fixation with effect from
14.09.2011 is hereby set aside and the
concerned respondent is directed to pay
arrears during the intervening period from
14.09.2011 to
04.10.2013 in the cadre of Deputy
Superintendent and extend petitioner's
difference of pay along with the interest at
the rate 9% per annum and
petitioner is entitled to cost of `10,000/-.
Cost shall be paid to the petitioner within
three months.
210 CWP 26654/15 S.K.Education Reg.Recognition Without commenting upon the arguments
26-08-2016 06-09-2016 05-12-2016 Directorate File put up to fix
HR(PS) Society as such raised by the counsel for the personal hearing before
v/s
petitioner and keeping in view the fact the W.ACSSE
State & Ors.
counsel was not present before the
Appellate Authority, and in view of the
averments made in Para No.4 of the writ
petition justifying the absence, the present
writ petition is allowed. The Appellate
Order dated
11.08.2015 (Annexure P-2) passed by the
respondent No.1 is, accordingly, set aside.
The said respondent shall re-hear the
appeal of the
petitioner.
Necessary exercise be done within a period
of 3 months from the receipt of the
certified copy of this order.
214 CWP 27356/18 Uday Veer Reg.Regularization At this stage, this petition is being disposed
26-11-2018 21-11-2018 20-02-2019 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service of by giving direction to the respondents to
State & Ors.
consider the case of the petitioner keeping
in view the judgment passed in
CWP-2009-2016 Balwinder Singh and
others V/s. State of Haryana and others,
decided on 04.10.2018 within a period of
three months from the date of receipt of
certified copy of this order failing which
Rs.50,000/- will be paid by the respondents
to the petitioner as costs.
215 CWP 27369/18 Mahabir Singh Reg.Promotion for The petition is being disposed of by giving
30-10-2018 12-11-2018 11-02-2019 Directorate
HR(G-II) v/s the post of direction to the respondents to pass
State & Ors. Headmaster High
speaking order on the legal notice dated
School
14.08.2018 (Annexure P-7) within a period
of four months from the date of receipt of
certified copy of this order
216 CWP 27411/18 Bhateri Devi Reg.Regularization This petition is being disposed of by giving
26-10-2018 21-11-2018 20-02-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service direction to the respondents to pass
State & Ors.
appropriate order keeping in view detailed
order passed in CWP-2009-2016 Balwinder
Singh and others V/s. State of Haryana and
others, decided on 04.10.2018, within a
period of three months from
the date of receipt of certified copy of this
order failing which Rs.50,000/- will be paid
to the petitioner as cost
217 CWP 27428/16 Kailash Chand & Reg.Higher Pay Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem
20-02-2018 28-03-2018 27-07-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) Ors. Scale which was that the matter in issue is squarely covered
v/s subject matter in
by an order and judgment, dated
State & Ors. CWP No.8082/01
and same was 20.02.2017, rendered by this Court in CWP
allowed while No. 9347 of 2016 (Jagat Singh Yadav v.
restricting arrears State of Haryana and others). And,
of pay to 38 months therefore, the petition at hands be disposed
to the filing of the of in the same terms.
writ petition Ordered accordingly.
225 CWP 29946/17 Sanjay Kumar & Reg.Advance Accordingly, the present writ petition is
29-01-2018 23-02-2018 22-04-2018 Directorate
PGT-II Ors. increment on treated as a
v/s acquire higher
representation on behalf of the petitioners
State & Ors. qualification
and is disposed of with a direction to the
respondents to look into the grievance of
the petitioners, hearing them and take a
final decision within three months from the
date of certified copy of this order.
226 CWP 30061/17 Nisha Education Reg.The petitioner Keeping in view the above, the petitioner is
29-12-2017 01-01-2018 01-01-2018 Directorate
Academic v/s is aggrieved by the permitted to make a representation today
State & Ors. order Annexure P-4,
itself, to respondent No.2, who will pass a
whereby all the
Schools in Haryana speaking order
have been directed thereupon on 01.01.2018 by 13:00 hours.
to observe winter This petition is disposed of accordingly.
vacation from A copy of this order be given under the
25.12.2017 to signatures of Bench Secretary of this Court
08.01.2018. He
submits that
according to the
Haryana School
Education Rules
2003, a total 220
working days are
mandated and this
year because of
public violence in
Haryana caused by
the followers of
Baba Gurmit Ram
Rahim Singh, in the
month of August
2017, the schools
have not been able
to complete the
mandated period,
230 CWP 3541/99 Gurmail Chand Reg.Grant all For detail order see order of even date in
09-02-2017 25-04-2017 Directorate File sent to F.D
Coordination & Ors. benefits of such CWP-3542-1999(O&M) titled as “Ranjodh
v/s merger including
Singh and others vs. State of Haryana
State & Ors. seniority, avenue of
promotion, parity in and others.”
pay scales etc.
231 CWP 3542/99 Ranjodh Singh & Reg.Grant all Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner
09-02-2017 25-04-2017 Directorate File sent to F.D
Coordination Ors. benefits of such states that the facts of the present case are
v/s merger including
covered by the judgment of this Court
State & Ors. seniority, avenue of
promotion, parity in passed in CWP-10269-2010 titled as
pay scales etc. “Makhan Singh vs. State of Haryana and
another” decided on 23.09.2015 and pray
that the present petitions be disposed of in
the same term.
232 CWP 3881/18 Arun Sehrawat Reg.Promotion for That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
19-02-2018 26-03-2018 21-05-2018 Directorate
PGT-II v/s teh post of PGT this stage, only with a direction to the
State & Ors. History
respondents to consider and decide the
claim of the petitioner, as also his legal
notice 23.01.2018 (Annexure P9), within a
period of 8 weeks from the receipt of
certified copy of this order. And pass
appropriate orders in accordance with law.
In the event the claim of the petitioner is
declined, the respondent authority shall
pass a comprehensive order assigning
reasons in support thereof.
233 CWP 3992/18 Ravinder Kumar Reg.Delegation of In response, learned State counsel submits
20-02-2018 15-03-2018 20-03-2018 Directorate
HR(G-II) v/s power of Drawing that this petition itself shall be considered
State & Ors. and Disbursing
as representation on behalf of the
petitioner, and the respondents shall deal
with the grievance and claim of the
petitioner within a period of 4 weeks from
today. Appropriate orders, in accordance
with law, shall be passed and
communicated to the petitioner.
The petition is accordingly disposed of in
the above terms.
Needless to assert that in the event the
claim of the petitioner is declined, the
respondent authority shall pass a
comprehensive order assigning reasons in
support thereof.
03-01-2019 Page 95 of 135
Sr.No. CaseNo/Branch Title Subject Judgement Date Judgement Received Date Compliance Date Compliance By Remarks
234 CWP 4002/18 Hans Kaur & Ors. Reg.Regularization That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
20-02-2018 21-03-2018 20-06-2018 Directorate 13/120-18ME (6)
HRME-I v/s of Service this stage, only with a direction to
State & Ors.
respondents No.1 to 3, to consider and
decide the claim of the petitioners, as also
their legal notice dated 16.12.2017
(Annexure P6), within a period of 3 months
from the receipt of certified copy of this
order.
And pass appropriate orders in accordance
with law. Needless to assert that in the
event the claim of the petitioners is
declined, the respondent authority
shall pass a comprehensive order assigning
reasons in support thereof
235 CWP 4049/15 Wazir Singh Reg.Consider for the For order, see judgment of even date
13-11-2017 27-12-2017 26-02-2018 Directorate
PGT-I v/s post of PGT English passed in CWP No.25682 of 2014, Arun
State & Ors.
Singh & others vs. State of Haryana &
another.
ORDER IN CWP NO.25682/14
Resultantly, this Court is of the opinion that
the petitioners would be entitled for
appointment against the vacant seats
which were never
consumed being in the zone of
consideration and accordingly, the writ
petitions are allowed. The petitioners shall
be offered appointment letters
and the State should operate the merit list
in the respective categories in the subjects
of English, Hindi, and Biology. In case there
are persons senior in merit than the
petitioners, they will firstly be offered the
said posts and in case the vacancies still
exist, the petitioners will be
accommodated. The
necessary exercise be concluded within a
period of two months from the date of
receipt of certified copy of the judgment.
241 CWP 4541/14 Aruna Aggarwal Reg.Retiral Benefits Accordingly, instant petition is disposed of
21-09-2018 29-10-2018 28-12-2018 Directorate
PEN-II v/s with the direction to respondent to
State & Ors.
calculate and make the interest @ 9% per
annum on the delayed payments, after
expiry of three months from the date of
retirement till the actual date(s) the
various payments of the retiral benefits
were made, within a period of two months
from the date of receipt of a certified copy
of this order. In case of non-compliance of
aforesaid direction, the petitioner
shall be at liberty to have recourse to the
other remedies available to her as well as
to approach this Court.
242 CWP 4589/14 Pardeep Kumar Reg.Consider for the The writ petition is allowed in view of the
27-05-2015 14-08-2015 Directorate Deemed University
PGT-I v/s post of PGT English judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. Matter
State & Ors.
7626 of 2015 titled as Gurmail Kaur and The Hon'ble High Court
others Vs. State of Haryana and another granted stay in LPA
decided on 27.5.2015. No.1215 of 2015 against
the order dt.27.05.15
passed in CWP
No.7626/15 titled as
Gurmail Kaur Vs. State of
Haryana
243 CWP 4590/18 Hari Parkash & Reg.Step up of pay That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
26-02-2018 12-03-2018 11-06-2018 Directorate
PGT-II Ors. this stage, only with a direction to the
(Lect.History)
respondents to consider and decide the
v/s
State & Ors. claim of the petitioners, as also their
representation dated 24.01.2018
(Annexure P14), within a period of 3
months from the receipt of certified copy of
this order.
And pass appropriate orders in accordance
with law. Needless to assert that in the
event the claim of the petitioners is
declined, the respondent authority
shall pass a comprehensive order assigning
reasons in support thereof.
254 CWP 5292/18 Harish Kumar & Reg.Selection Grade The factual position, as set out above, is
14-03-2018 28-03-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) Ors. not disputed by the learned State counsel,
v/s
who rather submits that the matter is
State & Ors.
indeed covered by the decision of this Court
in the case of R.K. Verma and others
(supra) and be disposed of in terms thereof.
Ordered accordingly.
255 CWP 5332/18 Sandeep & Ors. Reg.HRA That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
06-03-2018 28-03-2018 27-06-2018 Directorate
PGT-II v/s this stage, only with a direction to the
State & Ors.
respondents to consider and decide the
claim of the petitioners as also their
representation, dated 18.12.2017
(Annexure P-4), within a period of three
months from the receipt of a certified copy
of this order. And, pass appropriate orders
in accordance with law. In the event, the
claim of the petitioners is declined, the
authority shall pass a comprehensive
order assigning reasons in support thereof.
256 CWP 5422/18 Ram Swaroop & Reg.Step up of pay Let the exercise be completed within one
07-03-2018 06-04-2018 05-05-2018 Directorate 13/134-18ME(3)
HRME-I Anr. (Lab month from the date of receiving of
Attendant)
certified copy of this order. In case, hearing
v/s
State & Ors. of the petitioners is necessary, then order
be passed within one month thereafter. In
the event, the petitioners are found entitled
to the stepping of pay, then arrears be
calculated and paid to them within the
next two months. However, actual payment
is restricted to the three years prior to the
filing of the petition and
the previous years will carry only notional
benefits.
With these observations and directions, the
petition stands disposed of.
263 CWP 5806/13 Sudesh Kumar, Reg.Termination of Accordingly, the writ petition is liable to be
06-12-2017 25-01-2018 22-02-2018 Directorate
Coordination Lect.Hindi Service due to not allowed with costs which are imposed to
v/s having requisite
the tune of Rs.10,000/- upon Smt. Suman
State & Ors. qualification
Lata, District Education Officer who had
filed the reply and has vehemently opposed
the reappointment of the petitioner on
solely untenable grounds.
Accordingly, directions are issued to
respondent no. 2 to adjust the petitioner as
a guest faculty on the same terms and
conditions as earlier within a period of
four weeks from the date of receipt of
certified copy of the order. Preference be
given to her appointment in Government
Senior Secondary School, Khanpur Kalan
as it has been informed by the counsel for
the petitioner as per communication dated
05.12.2017 that there are two sanctioned
posts available in the said school.
264 CWP 5918/18 Anoop Singh Reg.Count previous That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
12-03-2018 30-03-2018 29-06-2018 Directorate
PGT-III v/s service for the this stage, only with a direction to the
State & Ors. purpose of pay
respondents to consider and decide the
fixation
claim/grievance of the petitioner as also
his legal notice, dated 23.8.2017 (Annexure
P-9), within a period of three months from
the receipt of a certified copy of this order.
And, pass appropriate orders in accordance
with law. In the event, the claim of the
petitioner is declined, the authority shall
pass a comprehensive
order assigning reasons in support thereof.
(
268 CWP 604/94 Mahadev & Ors. Reg.Release Arrear Petitioners have been found entitled for the
01-10-2014 27-11-2014 26-02-2015 Directorate Recovery Stayed.
HR(AS) v/s of pay of account of requisite amount of grant-in-aid for the State filed LPA
State & Ors. revision of pay
posts held by them. Accordingly, No.933/15 filed on
scales
respondent no.1 is 29.06.15 and same is
directed to release the requisite amount of fixed for hearing on
grant-in-aid for the posts held by the 26.10.17
petitioners, within a period of three
months from the date of receipt of certified
copy of this order, failing which petitioners
shall be entitled for receiving the amount
of grant-in-aid for the posts held by them,
alongwith interest @ 12% p.a. from the
date the amount became due till its
payment.
Resultantly, with the abovesaid
observations made and directions issued,
instant writ petition stands allowed,
however, with no order as to costs.
269 CWP 6112/18 Karam Singh Reg.Promote as That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
13-03-2018 28-03-2018 27-06-2018 Directorate
PGT-II v/s Lecturer Geography this stage, only with a direction to the
State & Ors. w.e.f. the year
respondents to consider and decide the
2005-06 when
become eligible for claim/grievance of the petitioner as also
promotion his representation, dated 27.12.2016
(Annexure P-5) within a period of three
months from the receipt of a certified copy
of this
order. And, pass appropriate orders in
accordance with law. In the event, the
claim of the petitioner is declined, the
authority shall pass a comprehensive
order, assigning reasons in support thereof.
270 CWP 6169/15 Baby Goyal Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.5781
04-06-2015 13-07-2015 Directorate Deemed University
PGT-I v/s post of PGT Hindi of 2015 (SubhashChand Versus State of Matter
State & Ors.
Haryana & others), decided on 4.6.2015. The Hon'ble High Court
granted stay in LPA
No.1220 of 2015 against
the order dt.04.06.15
passed in CWP
No.5781/15 titled as
Subhash Chand Vs. State
of Haryana
271 CWP 6179/18 Chanderbhan Reg.Refixation of Without expressing any opinion on the
14-03-2018 21-05-2018 20-08-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) Sharma & Ors. pay & pension merits of the case, the instant petition is
v/s
disposed of with the direction to
State & Ors.
respondent No.2-The Director, Primary
Education, Forest Building, Sector 17,
Chandigarh to look into the grievances
unfolded by the petitioners in the
representation dated 09.12.2017 (P-7) and
to decide the same as per Rules and in the
light of
judgments referred to above in para no.1 of
this order, within a period of 3 months
from the date of receipt of a certified copy
of this order. In case of
non compliance of this order, petitioners
shall be at liberty to have recourse to the
other remedies available to them as well as
to approach this Court.
272 CWP 6241/18 Geeta Devi Reg.Regularization As to this, learned counsel for the
20-03-2018 07-05-2018 19-06-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service respondents submits that the
State & Ors.
claim/grievance of the petitioners as also
their legal notice dated 21.11.2017
(Annexure P-8), shall be considered and
dealt with within a period of three months
from today. And, appropriate orders, in
accordance with law, shall be passed.
The petition is accordingly, disposed of, in
the above terms.
However, in the event, the claim of the
petitioners is declined, the
respondents-authority shall pass a
comprehensive order assigning reasons in
support thereof.
273 CWP 6277/15 Khazan Singh Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.5781
04-06-2015 13-07-2015 Directorate Deemed University
PGT-I v/s post of PGT Hindi of 2015 (SubhashChand Versus State of Matter
State & Ors.
Haryana & others), decided on 4.6.2015. The Hon'ble High Court
granted stay in LPA
No.1220 of 2015 against
the order dt.04.06.15
passed in CWP
No.5781/15 titled as
Subhash Chand Vs. State
of Haryana
03-01-2019 Page 110 of 135
Sr.No. CaseNo/Branch Title Subject Judgement Date Judgement Received Date Compliance Date Compliance By Remarks
274 CWP 6289/15 Savita Rani Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.5781
04-06-2015 13-07-2015 Directorate Deemed University
PGT-I v/s post of PGT Hindi of 2015 (SubhashChand Versus State of Matter
State & Ors.
Haryana & others), decided on 4.6.2015. The Hon'ble High Court
granted stay in LPA
No.1220 of 2015 against
the order dt.04.06.15
passed in CWP
No.5781/15 titled as
Subhash Chand Vs. State
of Haryana
275 CWP 6292/18 Harish Chander Reg.Release the Instant petition is disposed of with a
14-03-2018 04-04-2018 03-06-2018 Directorate 13/123-18ME(3)
HRME-I v/s pensionary benefits direction to respondents No.1 to 4 to look Information awaited
State & Ors.
into the grievances unfolded by the from DEO Karnal
petitioner in the legal notices and to take a
conscious decision by passing a speaking
order considering all the facts narrated in
the aforesaid legal notices within a period
of two months from the date of receipt of a
certified copy of this order. In case,
competent authorities comes to the
conclusion that petitioner is entitled to the
relief(s) claimed, same be released to him
within a period of next 45 days. Factum of
interest in view of judgment passed by Full
Bench of this Court in case A.S.Randhawa
vs. State of Punjab and others, 1997 (3)
SCT, 468 as well as judgment passed by this
Court in CWP No. 8772 of 2015 captioned
as Charan Dass vs. State of Punjab and
others decided on 11.07.2017 and
Instructions No. 1/2(152)01-2 FR II dated
20.02.2002, issued by the Government of
Haryana, be also considered on delayed
payment(s).
5. However, if petitioner still feels
aggrieved by any of the orders
passed by the aforesaid authority, he shall
be at liberty to approach this
Court.
276 CWP 630/17 Rakesh Kumar Reg. HTET In our considered view, unless the Rule is
17-01-2017 13-02-2017 27-02-2017 Directorate Relaxation in HTET
Coordination v/s found to be inconsistent with any Marks
State & Ors.
Constitutional provision or a Statute or
against public
policy, it would not be expedient for a Writ
Court to interfere with it and assume the
role of Rule Making Authority. The
amendment, substitution or streamlining
of the existing provisions, essentially falls
within the purview of Rule Making
Authority. It is thus not necessary to
express any views on merits, rather we
deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ
petition with a
direction to respondent No.1 to entertain
this petition as a representation on behalf
of the petitioner and consider his grievance
in accordance with the State policy. It shall
be appreciated if an appropriate decision is
taken
within a period of two weeks from the date
of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
The petitioner shall be required to send a
copy of the writ petition alongwith
certified copy of this order to respondent
No.1.
Ordered accordingly.
Further the petitioner belongs to reserve
category of Scheduled Caste. He claims that
under the Rules there is a provision to give
relaxation to the Scheduled Caste and
backward class candidates. If such
relaxation is permissible qua academic
qualification also, the authorities are
directed to consider the petitioner's claim
for that relaxation as well.
Needless to say that if the petitioner's
claim is accepted, then he will also be
entitled to call for the interview as per his
merit.
Dasti.
(
277 CWP 6375/18 Ranbir Singh & Reg.Grant the Accordingly, this petition is disposed of
15-03-2018 04-04-2018 30-05-2018 Directorate
PGT-IV Ors. benefit of selection with a direction to the respondents to
(Lect.in.Pol.Sci.) grade
consider the case of the petitioners
v/s
State & Ors. regarding pay anomaly and decide the
legal notices by passing a reasoned order
on them in the light of the case law relied
upon by the petitioners. Let the exercise be
completed within 8 weeks from the date of
receiving of certified copy of this order.
278 CWP 6381/15 Shakuntla Devi Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.5781
04-06-2015 13-07-2015 Directorate Deemed University
PGT-I v/s post of PGT Hindi of 2015 (SubhashChand Versus State of Matter
State & Ors.
Haryana & others), decided on 4.6.2015. The Hon'ble High Court
granted stay in LPA
No.1220 of 2015 against
the order dt.04.06.15
passed in CWP
No.5781/15 titled as
Subhash Chand Vs. State
of Haryana
279 CWP 6501/14 Harvinder Reg.Quashing the The writ petition is allowed in view of the
27-05-2015 14-08-2015 Directorate Deemed University
PGT-I Kaushal impugned order dt. judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. Matter
v/s 18.01.14 (P-12) and
7626 of 2015 titled as Gurmail Kaur and The Hon'ble High Court
State & Ors. notice dated nil
others Vs. State of Haryana and another granted stay in LPA
(P-13) to the extent
decided on 27.5.2015. No.1215 of 2015 against
of denying
the order dt.27.05.15
counseling for
passed in CWP
issuing
No.7626/15 titled as
appointment letter
Gurmail Kaur Vs. State of
to the candidates
Haryana
like the petitioners
who have acquired
their qualification
of Post Graduate
from IASE
283 CWP 6608/15 Mamta Sharma REg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.5781
04-06-2015 13-07-2015 Directorate Deemed University
PGT-I v/s post of PGT Hindi of 2015 (SubhashChand Versus State of Matter
State & Ors.
Haryana & others), decided on 4.6.2015. The Hon'ble High Court
granted stay in LPA
No.1220 of 2015 against
the order dt.04.06.15
passed in CWP
No.5781/15 titled as
Subhash Chand Vs. State
of Haryana
284 CWP 6696/15 Shakuntla Devi Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.5781
04-06-2015 13-07-2015 Directorate Deemed University
PGT-I v/s post of PGT Hindi of 2015 (SubhashChand Versus State of Matter
State & Ors.
Haryana & others), decided on 4.6.2015. The Hon'ble High Court
granted stay in LPA
No.1220 of 2015 against
the order dt.04.06.15
passed in CWP
No.5781/15 titled as
Subhash Chand Vs. State
of Haryana
285 CWP 6779/15 Abhilasha Arora Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.5781
04-06-2015 13-07-2015 Directorate Deemed University
PGT-I v/s post of PGT Hindi of 2015 (SubhashChand Versus State of Matter
State & Ors.
Haryana & others), decided on 4.6.2015. The Hon'ble High Court
granted stay in LPA
No.1220 of 2015 against
the order dt.04.06.15
passed in CWP
No.5781/15 titled as
Subhash Chand Vs. State
of Haryana
286 CWP 6781/15 Bela Rani Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.5781
04-06-2015 13-07-2015 Directorate Deemed University
PGT-I v/s post of PGT Hindi of 2015 (SubhashChand Versus State of Matter
State & Ors.
Haryana & others), decided on 4.6.2015. The Hon'ble High Court
granted stay in LPA
No.1220 of 2015 against
the order dt.04.06.15
passed in CWP
No.5781/15 titled as
Subhash Chand Vs. State
of Haryana
321 CWP 9183/18 Jeeta Devi Reg.Regularization Without expressing any opinion on the
18-04-2018 01-05-2018 30-08-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service merits of the case, instant petition is
State & Ors.
disposed of with a direction to respondents
to look into the grievances
unfolded by the petitioner in legal notice
dated 25.07.2017 (P-8) and to decide the
same in accordance with rules and
instructions issued by government from
time to time, within a period of three
months from the date of receipt of certified
copy of this order.
However, if petitioner still feels aggrieved
by any order of the aforesaid authority, she
shall be at liberty to approach this Court.
322 CWP 9253/14 Abheyender Reg.Select/Appoint he writ petition is allowed in view of the
27-05-2015 14-08-2015 Directorate Deemed University
PGT-I Singh for the post of PGT judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. Matter
v/s English
7626 of 2015 titled as Gurmail Kaur and The Hon'ble High Court
State & Ors.
others Vs. State of Haryana and another granted stay in LPA
decided on 27.5.2015. No.1215 of 2015 against
the order dt.27.05.15
passed in CWP
No.7626/15 titled as
Gurmail Kaur Vs. State of
Haryana
323 CWP 9337/17 Asha Rani Reg.Step up of pay In response, learned State counsel submits
18-01-2018 26-02-2018 17-04-2018 Directorate
PGT-II v/s that the claim as also the grievance of the
State & Ors.
petitioner, as set out in the petition, shall
be considered and dealt with within a
period of three months from today and
appropriate orders, in accordance with
law, shall be passed.
That being so, the petition is disposed of in
the above terms.
Needless to assert that in the event the
claim of the petitioner is declined, the
respondent authorities shall pass a
comprehensive order assigning reasons in
support thereof.