Computational Electromagnetics Modeling,

Which Module to Use?

(https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?
s=100&p%5Burl%5D=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.comsol.com%2Fblogs%2Fcomputational-
Walter Frei
electromagnetics-modeling-which-module-to-use%2F)
(https://www.comsol.com/blogs/author/walter-
(https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?
frei/)
url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.comsol.com%2Fblogs%2Fcomputational-electromagnetics-
September 10, 2013
modeling-which-module-to-use%2F) (http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?
mini=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.comsol.com%2Fblogs%2Fcomputational-
electromagnetics-modeling-which-module-to-use%2F&ro=false)

A question we get asked all of the time is: “Which of the COMSOL products should be used
for modeling a particular electromagnetic device or application?” There are currently six
modules labeled as “Electrical” in the product suite; the AC/DC Module, RF Module, Wave
Optics Module, MEMS Module, Plasma Module, and Semiconductor Module. The first four
address applications purely governed by various forms of Maxwell’s equations, while the
Plasma Module addresses the coupling of electromagnetic fields to plasma transport and
chemistry, and the Semiconductor Module solves the drift-diffusion equations for electrons
and holes. If you are interested in solving Maxwell’s equations alone, then any one (or several)
of the first four modules, or even the core package alone, will be of use to you. Here, I will help
you choose which module to use for your particular computational electromagnetics modeling
projects, and point out some example models along the way.

Computational Electromagnetics: Maxwell’s Equations

Maxwell’s equations relate the electric charge density, ; electric field, ; electric
displacement field, ; and current, ; as well as the magnetic field intensity, , and the
magnetic flux density, :

To solve these equations we need a set of boundary conditions, as well as material constitutive
relations that relate the to the field, the to the field, and the to the field.
Under varying assumptions, these equations are solved in the different modules within the
COMSOL product suite. (Note: Most of the equations presented here are shown in an abbreviated
form to convey the key concepts. To see the full form of all governing equations, and to see all of the
various constitutive relationships available, please consult the Product Documentation.)

Steady-State Electric Field Modeling with the COMSOL

Multiphysics Core Package
The core package, COMSOL Multiphysics, will solve Maxwell’s equations under the
assumption of steady-state conditions in either conductive or insulative media. It will solve for
either the flow of current, or the electrostatic fields. The form of Maxwell’s equations that is
solved under the assumption that we are only interested in the steady-state electric currents
is:

This equation is solved for the voltage field, , which is used to compute the electric field,
, and the current, , where is the material conductivity. This Stationary
Electric Currents interface, available in COMSOL Multiphysics, is appropriate for computing the
steady-state current flow through conductive devices, as shown in the Pacemaker Electrode
(http://www.comsol.com/model/pacemaker-electrode-471) model.
Under the assumption that we are interested in the electric fields in perfectly insulating media
with material permittivity , Maxwell’s equations can be re-written as:

This Electrostatic interface is also available in COMSOL Multiphysics, and it’s appropriate for
computing the electrostatic fields around devices, such as capacitors.

Time and Frequency Domain Electric Field Modeling with

the AC/DC or MEMS Modules
As soon as you want to model time-varying electric fields, you will want to look beyond the
core package.
If you can assume that the magnetic fields and magnetically-induced currents are negligible,
you can use the transient electric currents form:
This transient equation solves for both conduction currents, , and displacement
currents, . This is appropriate to use when the source signals are non-harmonic
and you wish to monitor system response over time. You can see an example of this in the
Transient Modeling of a Capacitor in a Circuit (http://www.comsol.com/model/transient-
modeling-of-a-capacitor-in-a-circuit-12695) model.
On the other hand, if you are working with sources that vary sinusoidally with frequency , as
demonstrated in the Frequency Domain Modeling of a Capacitor
(http://www.comsol.com/model/frequency-domain-modeling-of-a-capacitor-12693) model,
the above equation can be re-written as:

This stationary equation solves for the voltage field in the frequency domain, and the
displacement currents become: .

The above two equations are the Time Dependent and Frequency Domain forms of the Electric
Currents interface, and are available in both the AC/DC and MEMS modules. These add-on
products also offer additional boundary conditions for modeling sources, periodicity, and
surfaces of constant potential, as well as modeling thin layers of material that are highly
conductive (http://www.comsol.com/model/electric-shielding-comparison-12623), highly
resistive (http://www.comsol.com/model/contact-impedance-comparison-12621), strong
dielectrics (http://www.comsol.com/model/dielectric-shielding-comparison-12625), or
relatively weak dielectrics (http://www.comsol.com/model/thin-low-permittivity-gap-
comparison-12651) that can also be used for stationary models. The MEMS Module also offers
interfaces for electrostatic actuation and piezoelectric material modeling.

Steady-State Magnetic and Electric Field Modeling with the

AC/DC Module
If you wish to model steady-state magnetic fields, you will want to use the AC/DC Module.
For models that have no current flowing anywhere, the Magnetic Fields, No Currents interface
solves for a magnetic scalar potential, :

Where is the material permeability and . This form is appropriate if you are
computing magnetic fields and flux lines around magnets and magnetically permeable
materials. An example of this is seen in the Magnetic Field from a Permanent Magnet
(http://www.comsol.com/model/the-magnetic-field-from-a-permanent-magnet-78) model.
On the other hand, if you wish to compute magnetic fields due to current flow
(http://www.comsol.com/model/magnetic-field-of-a-helmholtz-coil-15), then the Magnetic
Fields or Magnetic and Electric Fields interface is appropriate. These interfaces solve for the
magnetic vector potential, :

The magnetic vector potential can be used to compute . The source current, ,
can either be imposed or computed by simultaneously solving the electric currents equation
described earlier.

Frequency Domain Electromagnetic Field Modeling with

the AC/DC, RF, or Wave Optics Modules
If you are modeling at a known frequency, where both the electric fields and the magnetic
fields are significant, or induced currents are present, you will need to consider either the
AC/DC Module, RF Module, or Wave Optics Module. The AC/DC Module offers a Frequency
Domain form of the Magnetic Fields interface:

This solves for the magnetic fields, the electric fields , as well as the induced
currents, .
The above equation is quite similar to the Electromagnetic Waves, Frequency Domain interface
offered in both the RF and the Wave Optics modules, shown below:

There are, however, some significant practical differences between these two.
The Electromagnetic Waves, Frequency Domain form assumes that the resultant fields will be
“wave-like” — that the power transfer will occur primarily via radiation. This allows us to
implement features such as the Scattering Boundary Condition and Perfectly Matched Layers,
which are used to model boundaries to free space. This formulation can capture both near-
field and far-field effects around antennas (http://www.comsol.com/model/microstrip-patch-
antenna-11742), resonant coils (http://www.comsol.com/model/modeling-of-an-rf-coil-6126),
waveguides (http://www.comsol.com/model/coplanar-waveguide-cpw-bandpass-filter-
12099), and scatterers (http://www.comsol.com/model/computing-the-radar-cross-section-
of-a-perfectly-conducting-sphere-10332). Additional boundary conditions such as Rectangular,
Coaxial, and Circular Ports can model a junction to a microwave waveguide structure, and
Numeric Ports can be used for modeling dielectric waveguides
(http://www.comsol.com/model/dielectric-slab-waveguide-14709). The solvers are also tuned
to deal with equations that are of this form. The RF Module and Wave Optics Module can also
reformulate this equation as an Eigenfrequency problem, if you are interested in finding the
resonant frequencies of a device.
The frequency domain Magnetic Fields form and its set of boundary and domain conditions on
the other hand, is more adopted to when the fields are “quasi-static” — that is, when the
solution will look similar to the static solution, but have some contribution due to the time-
varying fields. This formulation can capture near-field effects, such as induced currents in
metal objects near current-carrying coils (http://www.comsol.com/model/multi-turn-coil-over-
an-asymmetric-conductor-plate-13777) or mutual inductance between coils
(http://www.comsol.com/model/mutual-inductance-and-induced-currents-in-a-multi-turn-
coil-12687). The electric and magnetic fields around the object being modeled are assumed to
fall off exponentially with distance. This admits features such as Infinite Elements, which are
useful for truncating modeling domains. The boundary conditions such as voltage and current
excitations are more characteristic of low-frequency applications. The solvers in the AC/DC
Module are also tuned for such equations.

AC/DC, RF, or Wave Optics?

There are a couple of helpful concepts here that will help you decide which module to use.
First, find the electrical size of the object you are modeling. Consider the maximum dimension
of the object you are analyzing, , and compare it to the free space wavelength at the
operating frequency you are simulating: . The electrical size is the ratio of these
two. If the object size is much smaller than wavelength, , then it is likely that it
is in the quasi-static regime, and the AC/DC Module is more appropriate. On the other hand, if
the object size is comparable to the wavelength, then it is likely that the object will act as an
antenna, as a transmission line or waveguide, or as a resonator. If you are trying to solve any
kind of antenna, wave scattering, or resonant cavity problem, then the RF or Wave Optics
modules should be used. (Note that this is really independent of the operating frequency; it is
only the ratio of object size to wavelength that matters.) There is some region of overlap
between the AC/DC and the RF Modules, where either formulation could be used, and if you
are right at the boundary between the regions of applicability, you may want to use both,
depending on how wide of a frequency band you are simulating.
As the object size, , gets larger that the wavelength, , the models you build
will become increasingly more computationally demanding (not a big problem in 2D, but
definitely for 3D modeling). In fact, for 3D models, the Electromagnetic Waves, Frequency
Domain form can only practically be used up to an object size of about .A
model of that size would already take a 64GB RAM computer to solve, and memory
requirements will grow as .

For objects much larger than the wavelength, the Wave Optics Module can be appropriate.
The Wave Optics Module solves the same electromagnetic wave equation as the RF Module,
but in addition it also offers a Beam Envelope interface, which solves a slightly different
equation:

This equation takes as input a wave vector, , which defines the average local wave vector
within the modeling space. That is, you must know ahead of time the average direction of the
wave. This is often the case for photonic devices such as waveguides, couplers, and
interferometers. The huge advantage of this formulation is that you can use a very coarse
mesh in the regions where the beam envelope is varying slowly. For example, to model the
fields propagating down a uniform fiber optic cable, the cross-section of the fiber would need
to be meshed finely enough to resolve the mode shape, but the length of the fiber could be
modeled with only a single element, regardless of length! Of course, in regions where the wave
rapidly changes directions, or scatters in multiple directions, a finer mesh is needed, and the
computational requirements will approach that of the Electromagnetic Wave formulation. In
practice, the Beam Envelope interface is useful when the average local direction of propagation
is known, and the field intensity varies slowly. Under those conditions, you can model domains
of length such as a directional coupler
(http://www.comsol.com/model/directional-coupler-14593), for example.
This figure illustrates the range of applicability of the AC/DC, RF, and Wave Optics Modules,
based on the operating frequency. Keep in mind that all of these boundaries between modules
are a bit “fuzzy”. Although the chart is truncated at 1 km, you can certainly analyze larger
systems, if you wish.

Time Domain Electromagnetic Field Modeling with the

AC/DC, RF, or Wave Optics Modules
Both the Magnetic Fields and the Electromagnetic Waves formulations described above can be
re-written and solved in the time domain if you wish to study the transient response of your
system, or seek to model material nonlinear phenomena, such as solving for a transformer with
a nonlinear B-H material (http://www.comsol.com/model/e-core-transformer-using-multi-
turn-coil-domains-14123), or light passing through a material with an optical nonlinearity
(http://www.comsol.com/model/second-harmonic-generation-from-a-gaussian-beam-14701).
When solving in the time domain, just find the characteristic maximum frequency associated
with your input signal, and consult the figure presented above to decide which module to use.
Time domain modeling does lead to relatively longer solution times than frequency domain
modeling (memory requirements will be roughly equivalent) so it is advisable to use it
sparingly. Keep in mind that you may not need to include all of the frequencies associated with
your input signal. For example, if you have a square wave excitation, you can use Fourier
Expansion (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_wave) to determine that such a signal has
infinite frequency content, but you will also see that the higher harmonics have a relatively
small contribution. You can therefore apply a smoothing to your source to remove some of this
high-frequency content from the excitation.
There are also additional physics interfaces for time domain modeling included in these
modules that I have not introduced here. You can find that information in the Specification
Chart (http://www.comsol.com/products/specifications/) as well as the Product
Documentation.

Summary of the Computational Electromagnetics Product

Options
This blog post should help guide you toward the module you will want to use for your
electromagnetic field modeling, based on the physics you want to solve, the operating
frequency, and the characteristic size of the objects you want to analyze. If you have questions
that aren’t addressed here, please do not hesitate to contact us
(http://www.comsol.com/contact).
Check out the products mentioned here:
◾ COMSOL Multiphysics (http://www.comsol.com/comsol-multiphysics)
◾ AC/DC Module (http://www.comsol.com/acdc-module)
◾ RF Module (http://www.comsol.com/rf-module)
◾ Wave Optics Module (http://www.comsol.com/wave-optics-module)
◾ MEMS Module (http://www.comsol.com/mems-module)
◾ Plasma Module (http://www.comsol.com/plasma-module)
◾ Semiconductor Module (http://www.comsol.com/semiconductor-module)

Categories

Electrical (/blogs/category/all/electrical/)

Post Tags
 AC/DC Module (/blogs/tag/acdc-module/)  MEMS Module (/blogs/tag/mems-
module/)  Plasma Module (/blogs/tag/plasma-module/)  RF Module (/blogs/tag/rf-
module/)  Semiconductor Module (/blogs/tag/semiconductor-module/)  Technical
Content (/blogs/tag/technical-content/)  Wave Optics Module (/blogs/tag/wave-optics-
module/)

Newer Post Older Post

How to Model a Shell and Tube Heat
Exchanger
(https://www.comsol.com/blogs/how-
model-shell-and-tube-heat-exchanger/)
Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) using
COMSOL Multiphysics
(https://www.comsol.com/blogs/fluid-
structure-interaction-fsi-using-comsol-
multiphysics/)

Comments

Krupali Donda February 1, 2015 1:12 am

This article is really helpful to understand which module should be chosen. Keep updating
us.

Deyler Castilla October 15, 2015 6:07 pm