Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

SIDENRENG RAPPANG VERSUS

MASYARAKAT EKONOMI ASEAN


Barisan
PO Box 91651, Sidrap-Sout Sulawesi, Indonesia
E-mail: uchenklppmstisip@yahoo.co.id

Muhammad Rohady Ramadhan

Ahmad Mustanir

Dep. Of Government, The Social and Political Science College


Muhammadiyah Rappang

Abstract
Barisan, Muh. Rohady Ramadhan and Ahmad Mustanir, 2016. Sidenreng Rappang Versus Asean Economic
Community (AEC) 2016. This study aims to identify strengths and weaknesses as well as opportunities and
challenges of the Sidenreng Rappang district government in the implementation of the Asean economic
community policy (AEC) 2016. In addition to identifying the research, this study also aims to find the
government’s strategic steps in addressing these challenges.The results of this study indicate that although
Sidenreng Rappang has the strength and opportunity, also known weaknesses and challenges are quite
large. The weakness which is also a big challenge is the low capacity of human resources owned by it, the
government of Sidenreng Rappang is expected to make development strategy and protection strategy to
overcome it.
Keywords: Sidrap, AEC.

BACKGROUND The development vision of Sidenreng


In the 21st century the internationalization Rappang Regency 2014- 2018 “The Realization
of the activities of the world community of Sidenreng Rappang The Foremost and
in almost all fields will increase and lead Leading One with Religious Society With
us to developments in the interconnected Increasing Double Income”.
phenomena among the countries of the world. In December 1997 a summit was held in
Developments in technology and patterns of Kuala Lumpur, the ASEAN leaders decided
economic activity make people in the world to turn ASEAN into a stable, prosperous and
increasingly touching each other, need each highly competitive region with just economic
other, mutually determine the fate of each other, development, and reduce poverty and socio-
but also compete with each other. economic inequality (ASEAN Vision 2020).
The long term development vision of Sidenreng At the Bali Summit in October 2003, ASEAN
Rappang Regency in 2005-2025 as stated in leaders stated that the ASEAN Economic
Regional Regulation Number 26 Year 2007 Community (MEA) will be the goal of regional
"The Realization of Sidenreng Rappang as economic integration by 2020, the ASEAN
One of the Leading Security Community and the ASEAN Socio-
Regencies in East Indonesia in 2025”. With Cultural Community are two inseparable
three advantages: 1) As the center of agribusiness pillars of the ASEAN Community. All parties
development, 2) As an independent region, are expected to work strongly in building the
and 3) Having a cultured and religious ASEAN Community by 2020. At the 12th
society. ASEAN Summit in January 2007, the Leaders

258
affirmed their strong commitment to accelerate Meningkatkan Daya Saing Dalam Menghadapi
the establishment of ASEAN Community by masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN 2015 (Ramadhani
2015 proposed in ASEAN. Vision 2020 and & Arifin, 2013). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013
ASEAN Concord II, and signed the Cebu Dalam Mempersiapkan Sumber Daya Manusia
Declaration on Accelerating the Establishment Indonesia Menghadapi “Masyarakat Ekonomi
of ASEAN Community by 2015 In ASEAN” (ASEAN Economic Community)
particular, the leaders agreed to accelerate pada 2015 (Afandi, 2014).
the establishment of the ASEAN Economic The analysis of the local government
Community in December 2015, in which the strategy of Sidenreng Rappang Regency in
AEC has five main pillars: facing the challenge of implementing the
1. Free flow of goods ASEAN economic community is done by using
2. Free flow of services SWOT analysis method (Strength, Weekeness,
3. Free investment flow Opportunities, threat). SWOT analysis is a tool
4. Free flow of skilled labor used to identify various internal and external
5. Free capital flow environmental factors systematically allegedly
President Joko Widodo insists Indonesia influencing or influenced by the organization so
is ready to face the AEC. “We must be ready that will produce the formulation of strategy of
and optimistic able to face the MEA. I met the sorganization (Nurmandi, 2010).
leaders of the ASEAN head of state and they FINDING AND DISCUSSIONS
were also afraid of the power of Indonesia. So,
we must be ready to take advantage of the AEC”. SWOT Analysis of Sidenreng Rappang Regency
To understand clearly the strategies that Formulating the government strategy of
should be applied in the face of any changes Sidenreng Rappang to face the challenge of
can be done by first doing the analysis in depth. Asean economic community (AEC) is done
Rare appropriate analysis to do is to use the by using SWOT analysis method (Strength,
SWOT analysis method (Strenght, Weaknesses, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) in
Opportunities, Threats). several sectors. Sidenreng Rappang District
Government is expected to be able to make
Based on the above discussion, the strategic policies that are more in line with the
researcher conducted the research with the strengths and opportunities that are possible
theme “Sidenreng Rappang Versus ASEAN to be applied. Based on SWOT analysis, it is
Economic Community (AEC)”. The purpose concluded that the strategy analysis focused
of this research is to find a good strategy model on the food security sector in Sidenreng
for the government in facing the challenges and Rappang Regency which consists of agriculture,
opportunities of AEC? plantation, animal husbandry and fishery.
LITERATURE REVIEW a. Agricultural Sector
Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN (MEA) Aquaculture Development has shown an
dan Daya Saing Investasi Indonesia (Usman, upward trend over the last 5 (five) years. In 2009
2016). Perubahan Perdagangan Bebas ke the area of development of 148.04 Ha
Integrasi ASEAN (Changes Free Trade to ASEAN increased to 382.84 Ha in 2013. While the area
Integration) (Rahim & Taufiq, 2015). Potret of rice Cultivation has decreased area. In 2009
UMKM Indonesia Menghadapi Masyarakat the total area reached 237.44 Ha to 224.96 Ha
Ekonomi ASEAN (Tedjasuksmana, 2014). in 2013. 1) Strength (Large rice field area, good
mempersiapkan Sumber Daya Manusia irrigation, and Government support through
Indonesia Dalam Menghadapi Masyarakat irrigation dam development 2) Weakness
Ekonomi ASEAN Tahun 2015 (Pramudyo, (Low human resources owned by farmers and
2014). Optimalisasi Pemanfaatan Teknologi Behavior of the people who feel prestige to
Informasi Komunikasi Berbasis E-Commerce as farm) 3) Opportunities (The high demand of
media Pemasaran Usaha Kecil Menengah Guna the general public on agricultural products and

Shifting Dynamics of Social Politics:The Implication


for Policy Making and Comunity Empowerment
259
the high demand from outside) 4) Challenges cassava, sweet potatoes, and nuts. 1) Strength (The
(Lack of supply of subsidized fertilizers from existence of suitable agricultural irrigation to serve
the government and many pest disorders not as a source of pond water and suitable weather
followed by toxic pesticide inventory). conditions for freshwater fish development), 2)
b. Plantation Sector Weakness (Frequent community fish decompose
Plantation commodity is the second highest due to the absence of fish management industry,
contributor (2) in supporting the GRDP in lack of human resources to manage the crops ,
agriculture sector which is 4.53% this year. And fish crops are only for food and there is no
Compared to the previous year, commodities management system that makes long-lasting fish),
slowed by 2% from 6.50% to 4.53%. 1) Strength 3) Opportunities (High public interest to consume
(large plantation area, existence of community freshwater fish and Presence of government efforts
with gardening, fertile plantation land), 2) to provide guidance to the community related to
weakness (lack of community human resources fish management), and 4) Threats (Lack of public
on plantation, lack of socialization from related interest for freshwater fish farming and lack of
apparatus, frequent crop failure due to long dry cooperation among government agencies
season) 3) Opportunities (Increased Production especially between agriculture and fisheries)
Outcomes / Great Opportunities Opportunity SIDRAP VS AEC
for Marketing of Plantation Products, The implementation of the ASEAN Economic
Widespread Employment Opportunities), and Community will underline some key points that
4) Challenges (Often Dry Drought, Lack of will be a challenge for the Sidenreng Rappang
Public Interest for Gardening, Lots of Land district government. AEC comes up with free
Used as Citizen Settlements). points of free flow of goods, free flow of sevice,
c. Livestock Sector free flof of investment, free flow of skilled labor,
The livestock sector is the pre- eminent and free flow of capital.
sector in Sidenreng Rappang Regency after a. Free points of free flow of goods
agriculture this can be seen with the number of The opening of ASEAN free market makes
farms, both large livestock and small livestock. the outflow of goods into the country becomes
It is also known as an egg producer. The types of more rapidly. The provision of basic goods
cattle that exist in Sidenreng Rappang District needs become the nation’s main challenge.
are: Cow, buffalo, horse and goat. While the Further development, liberalization of free
types of poultry are: free chicken, laying chicken goods flow is one of the main elements in
layer, broiler and duck. 1) Strength (Availability realizing ASEAN as a joint market based on
of large cattle feed location (Pitu Riase), Laying production. The embodiment of the impact of
chicken farming and chicken cutting (almost an open economic nature certainly involves the
all sub- districts), suitable rice field area for political system. Sidenreng Rappang Regency
post-harvest farm duck) 2) Weakness (Human is one of the areas that has the potential to
resources of rancher and source of capital), 3) provide some basic human needs sourced from
Opportunities (Business assistance through agriculture especially rice.
people’s business credit (KUR) from banking
According to (Usman, Masyarakat Ekonomi
and High (Free trade opening and inability of
ASEAN (MEA) dan Daya Saing Investasi
farmers to manage capital from banking)
Indonesia, 2016) For some things, Indonesia is
d. fishery Sector still considered not ready to face the competition
Sidenreng Rappang Regency is known as one AEC. The size of Indonesia’s large economy could
of the agricultural areas in South Sulawesi province be one of the causes. Indonesia is indeed the largest
and is a National Rice Mill. This can be seen from country in ASEAN, both in terms of the size
the role of the agricultural sector, especially food of the population, and the size of its economy.
crops that have a big enough share in economic But unfortunately, in terms of quality, especially
growth. Some of the main food crops produced competitiveness, Indonesia is still lagging behind
in Sidenreng Rappang Regency are: rice, corn, compared to Singapore, Malaysia, and Thailand.
The 2nd Journal of Government
260 and Politics International Conference
This condition is also followed by the economic 75 people, plantation 14 people, animal husbandry
condition of Sidenreng Rappang Regency, 46 people, and fishery 5 people. The availability
especially in the provision of basic needs of the of these extension workers when compared with
community sourced from agriculture, plantation, the potential possessed by the region can be said
fishery, and livestock. that not directly proportional. One example is
b. Free flow of sevice agricultural extension which amounts to 75 people
Service-free flow is present in the with rice field area 44.934 ha with a ratio of 1:
implementation of the ASEAN economic 599,15 Ha.
community by opening up the widest possible Given these shortcomings, the strategic steps
opportunity for the provision and delivery of required by the government in order to face the
services. The readiness of local governments ASEAN economic community. The existence
in order to prepare services to the community of free access related to skilled workers, the local
becomes the demand. government should develop development strategies
c. Free flof of investment to maintain and empower local communities.
The strategy is in line with the opinion (Bilson,
Implementation of the free flow of 2001) that human resource development is the
investment in the ASEAN region aims to make Identification of development needs, Formulating
Southeast Asia region an attractive place for appropriate development programs for the
investors and competing, both from ASEAN employees concerned, and Monitoring and
countries and those from outside the region. evaluation of the implementation of the
This is related to policies on business activities development program that has been developed.
to attract foreign direct investment (FDI) or
Foreign Investment (PMA). e. Free flow of capital
The presence of this freedom becomes an The development of global trade in the
opportunity for the district government Sidenreng last twenty years is increasingly massive. This
Rappang to welcome the entry of investors invest is marked by an increase in global export and
in some sectors. Some sectors that are in dire need import value. The increase in exports and imports
of investment in Sidenreng Rappang district, such in recent years has been partly attributable to
as livestock, fishery, plantation and others. the rising volume of world trade and declining
world commodity prices. In 1980, the value of
The free flow of investment becomes the trade transactions amounted to USD 3,813.48
government’s need in developing the Sidenreng billion. In 2010 the value of trade transactions
Rappang district. The Sidrap government is has reached USD 30,367 billion.
expected to be able to develop a development
strategy. A strategy is regarded as a development This development will continue and increase
strategy if the organization deliberately designs with the opening of the free market of the
a strategy that aims to improve the status, ASEAN economic community. To anticipate the
capacity, resources that will ultimately give birth phenomenon, local governments must develop
to a different new organizational posture in the protective strategies to maintain local conditions.
future. Wechsler and Backoff (Suwarsono, 2013) CONCLUSION
mentioned that the organization is fully laid out Sidenreng Rappang District Government
and operated in a mode of development. has the power and opportunity especially in
d. Free flow of skilled labor agriculture sector to face the implementation of
The low human resources owned by the Asean Economic Community (AEC). While the
district government of Sidenreng Rappang in the weaknesses as well as a challenge lies the ability
four main sectors that are the focus of the study of human resources that are owned, especially the
is still in the low category. The lack of human resources of extension workers both agricultural
resources is reflected in the availability of extension extension and other sectors. The strategic step
workers in each sector. Local governments have that should be taken by the local government is the
only the availability of extension teams; Agriculture transformation- development strategy. This strategy

Shifting Dynamics of Social Politics:The Implication


for Policy Making and Comunity Empowerment
261
is intended to adopt the advantages that are present
due to the implementation of Asean economic
society (AEC) to overcome all the shortcomings
and weaknesses, and develop the quality of each
sector owned.
REFERENCES
Afandi, R. (2014). Implementasi
Kurikulum 2013 D a l a m
Mempersiapkan Sumber Daya Manusia
Indonesia Menghadapi “Masyarakat
Ekonomi ASEAN” (ASEAN Economic
Community) pada 2015. Pascasarjana Unesa
(hal. 109-117). Semarang: Pascasarjana
Unesa.
Bilson, S. (2001). Memenangkan Pasar dengan
Pemasaran Efektif dan Profitabel. Jakarta:
PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Nurmandi, A. (2010). Manajemen Pelayanan
Publik. Yogyakarta: Senergy Publised.
Pramudyo, A. (2014). mempersiapkan
Sumber Daya Manusia Indonesia Dalam
Menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN
Tahun 2015. JBMA
, 92-100.
Rahim, A., & Taufiq. (2015). Perubahan
Perdagangan Bebas ke Integrasi ASEAN.
Jurnal Kajian Politik Dan Masalah
Pembangunan, 1645- 1656.
Ramadhani, F., & Arifin, Y. (2013). Optimalisasi
Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi
Komunikasi Berbasis E- Commerce Sebagai
Media Pemasaran Usaha Kecil Menengah
Guna Meningkatkan Daya Saing Dalam
Menghadapi masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN
2015. Economics Development Analysis
Journal, 135- 139.
Suwarsono, M. (2013). Strategi
Pemerintahan: Manajemen Organisasi
Publik. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Tedjasuksmana, B. (2014). POTRET UMKM
INDONESIA MENGHADAPI
MASYARAKAT EKONOMI ASEAN
2015. The 7th NCFB and Doctoral Colloquium,
189-202.
Usman, F. (2016). Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN
(MEA) dan. Jurnal Lingkar Widyaiswara ,
33–36.
Usman, F. (2016). Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN
(MEA) dan Daya Saing Investasi Indonesia.
Jurnal Lingkar Widyaiswara , 33–36.

The 2nd Journal of Government


262 and Politics International Conference

You might also like