2nd Students’ Consultation

5:30 – 6:30 PM | 24 September 2010

StC Lobby

Meeting Objectives:
1. To lay out significant points for discernment on the following agenda:
a. Proposed schedule changes
b. Proposed change for the start and end of school year
c. Security concerns
d. Teacher concerns
e. Students with disabilities

1. Reporting

AGENDA
Proposed Proposed Security Teacher Students
Colle schedule change for concerns concerns with
ge changes the start and disabilitie
end of school s
year
RAISED
SBM • Advantageous • Inconsiste • There are
since there are nt many
no laboratory • Security incompeten
works officials do t teachers
• Might not be not warn • Some are
viable for part- students unfriendly
time teachers who wear
• Long study prohibited
hours attires
• Dragging • Some
• Time lapse guards
may impede permit
memory teachers
retention of who wear
students slippers to
enter
Educat • Disagree on • Long break • Inconsiste • Quizzes
ion the proposed nt must be
schedule especially returned at
• Might not be during least 2
viable to unit- holidays weeks from
loaded courses and the time it
like Biology Sundays was given
and to output- • Nameplate
oriented ones s are not
like Special recognized
Education
 • Biology holds
laboratory
classes every
Wednesday
Nursin • If feasible, • The • Teachers
g Saturday will installation are new
have no class of the RFID • There are
system many good
must not teachers
translate • Answers to
to higher examination
tuition fees s are not
• RFID is not explained
necessary; why they
expenses were the
on which correct ones
should
have been
allocated
to make
Finance
office
more
efficient
• Nameplate
s are not
recognized
Arts • Wednesday as • Not • Unreasona • A dean
and a free day is beneficial ble and should have
Scienc not feasible sometimes administrati
es because of irritating ve skills
laboratory • Commerce
subjects and the
• Not beneficial Science
to all Building do
departments not
conform to
Building
and Fire
Code
Agricul • Changing to • Predominant • Agriculture • Some
ture the proposed sunny students teachers
schedule must weather on who have are
also translate the second morning inconsiderat
to change in semester laboratory e
the number of might affect work in • Students
allowable adversely the Manresa are made to
absences crops tended have to go wait even
• Does it mean by those who home though
 that night take Crop during teachers
classes would Science, lunch are already
be also be thereby break and 15 minutes
extended? compromisin change late
• Not favorable g their uniforms
to night grades so that
classes they can
• Some enter the
freshmen are University
forced to take for their
night classes afternoon
due to the classes
renovation of • There
the Commerce should be
building no need of
presenting
IDs when
going to
mass
CIT • Does not agree • No • Some • Security
to the disadvantage teachers do officials
proposed can be cited not dismiss do not
change of classes help
schedule even when students
the ball has with
already disabilitie
rung s in using
the
elevators

Prepared by: Noted by:

Van Rudolph R. Cabasan Ernesto B. Neri

Executive Secretary President
Central Student Government Central Student Government