Professional Documents
Culture Documents
History IA
History IA
History IA
Picture of Tony Mendez and Ken Taylor together with Ben Affleck who plays Tony
Mendez on the movie. <http://www.themasterofdisguise.com/photos-video#>
Erick Violand
IB Code: gbm680
History Internal Assessment 2017
Word Count: 2015
Erick Violand
#gbm680
Table of Contents:
Section 1: Identification and evaluation of sources…………………..3
Section 2:
Investigation……………………………………………………………….…4
Section 3:
Reflection……………………………………………………………………..8
Works
cited………………...………………………………………………………….9
2
Erick Violand
#gbm680
(2012) depict reality of the Canadian Caper? The focus time period of the
investigation will be from November 4, 1979 until January 27, 1980 to allow a full
The first source which will be evaluated in depth is Antonio J. Mendez’s book
“Argo: How the CIA and Hollywood Pulled Off the Most Audacious Rescue in
History”, written in 2012. The origin of this source is valuable because Mendez was
one the actual people that held and carried out this operation to take out the six U.S
hostages. The book was written in 2012 and it’s valuable because it was written after
the movie “Argo” came out and was made to take a look at the actual event and how
it happened. A limitation that the book has is that the author wrote the book many
years after the actual Canadian Caper happened so somethings may not be as clear
The purpose of Mendez’s book is to retell and analyze the actual operation
held to take out the six US hostages that were hiding in the Canadian embassy
during the Iranian Hostage Crisis of 1979. Mendez’s being one of the main ones to
carry out the operation gives value to the origin of the book and also the value of the
source increases due to the fact that it is an actual firsthand information about the
structure and procedure the CIA uses, which serves as great information to
understand how the CIA worked at the time and how those procedures helped to
make the plan what it turned out to be, but the great amount of time that passed
since the event happened to when Mendez chose to write the book might have an
3
Erick Violand
#gbm680
effect on how exact are the events and stories that he tells. Even though the book is
not written by someone of the Canadian government, which would have helped on
having more information on the point of view of the Canadian team, the book still has
great value because it was written by one of the great masterminds and executers of
the mission.
The second source to be evaluated in depth is the movie “Argo” produced and
released in 2012. The movie was directed and starred by actor Ben Affleck. The
origin of the source is valuable because Affleck did research and get in character to
give a good representation of Tony Mendez. The film is also valuable because it
portrays and captures the culture and time period of the event vividly and with
exactitude. Some limitations the movie faces are that it has some preference
towards the US government even though it was Canada’s government and embassy
in Tehran, Iran who did most of the job. The movie gives more power to the US
government and that they carried out the event but still manage to portray the actual
Section 2: Investigation
The Canadian Caper, this was the name given to the undercover mission to take out
of the Canadian Embassy, in Tehran; Iran, the six US hostages that managed to
escape the takeover of the US Embassy on November 4, 1979. This mission was
part of the Iranian Hostage Crisis in which the 52 Americans were held hostage for
444 days. The six hostages that were able to escape to the Canadian Embassy were
part of a mission that faked the production of a movie in Iran and gave the six
hostages fake Canadian identities. The operation was held by Tony Mendez, who
4
Erick Violand
#gbm680
was a CIA official who travelled to Iran to help the hostages get out, and Ken Taylor,
who was the Canadian Ambassador of Iran at that time and carried out most of the
operation.
The movie Argo was released in 2012, produced and starred by Ben Affleck. The
movie tells the story from Tony Mendez’s point of view and how he carried out the
mission to rescue the six Americans in Tehran. The movie mostly leans towards the
American view of the event and less of a focus on the actual major help the six
hostages got from the Canadian ambassador Ken Taylor. Mendez states in an article
that “the book The Canadian Caper mentions that Canada had received CIA help in
Ambassador to Iran Kenneth Taylor to engineer the escape of the six from Iran”.
(Mendez, 2). The movie does manage to give a real basic summary of the mission
though it just focuses more on making the drama and thriller than retelling the actual
Many things are different in the movie, one of the most important ones that the movie
did not portray was the fact that it was not only Tony Mendez who went to Tehran to
take out the six hostages. In reality it were two CIA officers with great exfiltration
skills that went to Tehran but the movie decides to just show one to give a bigger
importance to Mendez’s actions and his role on the mission, make it seem that the
mission depended a lot on him. Also the movie has many moments in the climax that
didn’t actually happen. In the movie things like the operation being called of the night
before, the boarding tickets not being confirmed and the six and Mendez being
called off for interrogation where things that never happened. As Mendez states “I
believed that we should try to devise a cover so exotic that no one would imagine it
was being used for operation purposes”, (Mendez, 4) the mission was so out of
5
Erick Violand
#gbm680
usual that it wasn’t even taken into consideration by the Iran airport officer for it to be
an undercover operation.
The movie starts out with the takeover of the US embassy and the six escaping to
the Canadian embassy. Later the US is informed of the case and plans start being
made to see what they are going to do to take the hostages out. Mendez explains
this was what happened in reality, the US government was analyzing their plans to
see which one would result best and they ended up with the fake movie one. There’s
one part that Mendez’s states about the fake passports that were to be used “the
debate over the passports began with the question whether to use ordinary US
managers were not comfortable with the idea of using foreign passports”, and this is
Also in reality Mendez and other US officials had several meetings with Canadian
managers and government officials to state the details of the cover up mission and
how it was to be carried out. The mission itself had a very long procedure of
meetings, brainstorming and decision making done by the US and Canada and most
of it was on US and Canadian territory itself, not over the phone from US to Iran how
the movie portrays Mendez doing. Mendez also talks about his plans and how
another CIA official named Julio was involved. The two where to fly to the location
with a delay of 24 hours between each, so if one got caught the other one would get
through.
“As soon as I got back from Bonn, I sent a Flash message to Washington and
Ottawa that I was ready… Thirty minutes later, however, I received another message
6
Erick Violand
#gbm680
to give final approval and was being briefed at the moment. After 30 minutes, I
received the presidential OK.” (Mendez, 10) There you can see how even the US
president delayed the mission to give the OK, something that was not shown in the
movie but it was changed to give more of a thrill feeling to the movie. Also in the
movie, the six and Mendez went to see the locations were they supposedly where
going to film the movie and it actually never happened and they stayed in the
In the film, the mission was called off the night before by the CIA team working on
the mission and the team still went through it and the tickets were approved and sent
to the Iranian airport system at the same time they were checking in and this was
just added to give the viewers a bigger and better climax. In the article “‘Argo’ Fact
vs Fiction: The CIA Weighs In” a tweet from the CIA twitter accounts states that “It
didn’t happen. An early flight was picked so airline officials would be sleepy &
Revolutionary Guards would still be in bed” and “The Canadians had already
purchased the tickets for the Americans. There were no issues at the counter.”
These two tweets show how flawlessly the operation really went and all the thrill and
The Argo mission or the Canadian Caper was a well elaborated, well planned and
smart undercover mission. It did have its risks at the moment of being conducted but
it was a great way to take out the six Americans out of Tehran. While being a very
unexpected cover up mission it had its long processes to reach what it was, it
needed lots of investigation, approvals and meetings for it to be set, it was a complex
process for it just to be a fake film production. The movie is not such an accurate
depiction of the actual event because besides showing more of USA’s government
point of view, it focused mostly on creating events on the script to make a bigger of a
7
Erick Violand
#gbm680
plot and climax instead of actually focusing on the big help Canada gave to the CIA
in order to make the mission work out. The movie focused mostly on creating a
greater description of events created for the moment where the mission was carried
out instead of describing vividly and accurately the long and complex process. To
conclude we could say that the movie is a great retelling of the Canadian Caper in
general but it’s not an accurate depiction of the details of the mission.
Section 3: Reflection
The analysis and investigation methods used in this IA have allowed me to
understand more about how complex and thorough is the investigation process that
I can see the hard time historians may have of finding primary sources for what they
want to investigate. It was tough finding a book about my topic in the libraries and
stores where I live and so I had to recur to online books and pdfs to be able to have
sources and not providing a biased answer to the question because I liked the
movie. History many times present biased investigation and analysis and that
something historians may find tough to do while investigating. Also completing this
conduct an accurate analysis and provide an accurate answer to the given question.
Collecting many sources is not as important as knowing which ones to analyze, while
conducting the investigation one must have in mind the reliability of the source, but
also its importance to the actual development of the question. This is a challenge
historians have when presented with many sources and have to pick the most
important ones so they don’t flood their research with irrelevant sources or data.
8
Erick Violand
#gbm680
Completing this research has given me the knowledge of the challenges historians
face while conducting research and answering a question and how tough it is to
Works Cited
Han, Angie. ‘Argo’ Fact vs Fiction: The CIA Weighs In. Slash Film, November 11th,
Mendez, Antonio. “Argo: How the CIA and Hollywood Pulled Off the Most Audacious
Rescue in History”. New York, U.S.A. The Penguin Group, published in 2013.
(https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/kent-
Mendez, Antonio. “The Master of Disguise: My Secret Life in the CIA”. New
Pellietier, Jean; Adams, Claude. “The Canadian Caper”. Markham, Ontario. Paper