Kategori incisor winging yang menjadi acuan pada penelitian ini adalah sebagai

berikut12:

a) straight yaitu kedua gigi insisivus membentuk permukaan labial yang rata sehingga

terlihat lurus dari permukaan oklusal

b) unilateral yaitu hanya satu gigi insisivus yang mengalami rotasi

c) bilateral yaitu gigi insisivus mengalami rotasi ke arah labial sehingga menimbulkan

bentuk “V” ketika dilihat dari permukaan oklusal

d) counter yaitu gigi insisivus mengalami rotasi ke arah palatal, merupakan kebalikan

dari bilateral winging.

Edgar HJH. Dental Morphology for Anthropology: An Illustrated Manual by E. Susanne Daly. New York: Routledge.
2017. p
 Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

suku * scoring_IW 149 100.0% 0 .0% 149 100.0%

suku * scoring_IW Crosstabulation

 scoring_IW

Bilateral winging Counter winging straight unilateral winging Total

suku Dayak Bukit Count 21 3 5 15 44

Expected Count 19.5 7.7 4.1 12.7 44.0

% within suku 47.7% 6.8% 11.4% 34.1% 100.0%

Dayak Ngaju Count 24 7 6 18 55

Expected Count 24.4 9.6 5.2 15.9 55.0

% within suku 43.6% 12.7% 10.9% 32.7% 100.0%

Banjar Hulu Count 21 16 3 10 50

Expected Count 22.1 8.7 4.7 14.4 50.0

% within suku 42.0% 32.0% 6.0% 20.0% 100.0%

Total Count 66 26 14 43 149

Expected Count 66.0 26.0 14.0 43.0 149.0

% within suku 44.3% 17.4% 9.4% 28.9% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 12.792a 6 .046

Likelihood Ratio 12.724 6 .048

N of Valid Cases 149

a. 2 cells (16,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is

4,13.

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

 Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

suku * skor_IW 99 100.0% 0 .0% 99 100.0%

suku * skor_IW Crosstabulation

skor_IW

Bilateral winging Counter winging Straight winging Unilateral Winging Total

suku Dayak Bukit Count 21 3 5 15

Expected Count 20.0 4.4 4.9 14.7 4

% within suku 47.7% 6.8% 11.4% 34.1% 100.0

Dayak Ngaju Count 24 7 6 18

Expected Count 25.0 5.6 6.1 18.3 5

% within suku 43.6% 12.7% 10.9% 32.7% 100.0

Total Count 45 10 11 33

Expected Count 45.0 10.0 11.0 33.0 9

% within suku 45.5% 10.1% 11.1% 33.3% 100.0

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .953a 3 .813

Likelihood Ratio .985 3 .805

N of Valid Cases 99

a. 2 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is

4,44.

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

 Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

suku * skor_IW 105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%

suku * skor_IW Crosstabulation

skor_IW

Bilateral winging Counter winging Straight winging Unilateral Winging Total

suku Dayak Ngaju Count 24 7 6 18

Expected Count 23.6 12.6 4.2 14.7 5

% within suku 43.6% 12.7% 10.9% 32.7% 100.0

Banjar Hulu Count 21 17 2 10

Expected Count 21.4 11.4 3.8 13.3 5

% within suku 42.0% 34.0% 4.0% 20.0% 100.0

Total Count 45 24 8 28 1

Expected Count 45.0 24.0 8.0 28.0 10

% within suku 42.9% 22.9% 7.6% 26.7% 100.0

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 8.433a 3 .038

Likelihood Ratio 8.669 3 .034

N of Valid Cases 105

a. 2 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is

3,81.
 suku * FE Crosstabulation

FE

NW W Total

suku Dayak Bukit Count 8 36 44

Expected Count 9.3 34.7 44.0

% within suku 18.2% 81.8% 100.0%

Dayak Ngaju Count 13 42 55

Expected Count 11.7 43.3 55.0

% within suku 23.6% 76.4% 100.0%

Total Count 21 78 99

Expected Count 21.0 78.0 99.0

% within suku 21.2% 78.8% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-

Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .435a 1 .509

Continuity Correctionb .170 1 .680

Likelihood Ratio .439 1 .507

Fisher's Exact Test .623 .342

N of Valid Casesb 99

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9,33.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table