Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Praposal DM-1
Praposal DM-1
Praposal DM-1
INTRODUCTION
complications.1
1
health care workers are most effective in the treatment
diabetes mellitus.3
2
Therefore with early detection of diabetes or
general population.6
3
control of their glycemic levels development of diabetic
distinction was the basis for the older terms for types 1
diabetes.10
4
ability to secrete some endogenous insulin they are
diabetes.11
diabetes.12
5
epidemiological data show that situations are similar
complications.13
6
epidemic.The number of people with diabetes is increasing
inactivity.14
complications of hypoglycaemia.16
7
Patients therefore require a traditional finger
8
complications are coronary artery disease,peripheral
adult was around 45% worlwide and this means that over
9
body’s own immune system destroys the insulin secreting
10
Medication Counseling Center (MCC)which provides
collection.23
11
type 2 diabetic patients towards LSM management of DM in
12
India has gowned the notoriety of being the diabetic
PROBLEM STATEMENT
hospitals.”
OBJECTIVES
programme.
OPERATIONAL DEFINITION
Assess
According to Oxford dictionary,‘Assess’means,to
something.26
13
Knowledge
subject.26
Effect
Health teaching
their attitudes.27
14
Diabetes mellitus
Patients relatives
According to medical dictionary,‘patients relatives’
VARIABLE
Independent variable
or experimental variable.
Teaching.
Dependent variable
15
dependent variable are presumed to be caused by the
independent variable”.
of patient relatives.
Attributing Variables
HYPOTHESIS
ASSUMPTIONS
complication.
16
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
theme.
perception,communication,transaction,stress,growth and a
17
other take some mental action and react to each one of
one can only make inference about the same.The next step
described as follows:
I)Perception:
mellitus.
adolescence.
18
II)Judgment:
III)Action:
IV)Reaction:
V)Interaction:
VII)Transaction:
19
Poor
PERCEPTION Average
Need for health Knowledge
education on diabetes
mellitus. Good
JUDGMENT
Nurse Excellent
Planned teaching about
Educator diabetes mellitus.
Provides better
knowledge MUTUAL GOAL
SETTING REACTION INTERACTION TRANSACTION
JUDGMENT
Learning & update the
knowledge on diabetes
mellitus Not included in study
.
PERCEPTION
Need for education
diabetes mellitus
FEEDBACK
the research more credible. This will support them with other
work which has spoken about the same topic that one has for
research.28
to another.29
21
A.Review of literature related to knowledge of health teaching
22
2,20.3% of type 1 and 12.5% with the"intermediary" diabetes.The
(FDRs) and 178 controls were included in this study.All the cases and
patient relatives.31
23
Latino adults in the emergency department who either had
received higher score on the DKQ than their family care givers
observed.32
among 18,697 adults (aged 18 years and above 7796 male and
24
participants in each group.Participants from urban residents,
25
both has emerged.DM is a disorder characterized by fasting and
26
180 of the 521 individuals attending the programme consented to
27
diabetic clinic at Klinik Kesihatan Seri Manjung from December
28
know the level of knowledge attitude and practices of our
diabetes.39
29
excluded.After analysing the scores,it was found that among
30
of diabetes.The WHO estimated that India would be the home for
31
of the participants were class teachers,23.3% were school
32
exercise of any kind.The overall awareness about the risk of
33
14,which was poor.The awareness of foot care among people with
diabetes.45
34
(p < 0.009).Both the diabetic and non-diabetic groups had very
the HbA1c level.Age was positively associated with HbA1c and WC.
while income was positively associated with BMI and WC. All the
risk factors for the patients outcome include old age female
35
A study was conducted on impact of education on diseased
36
of a Tertiary Care Hospital in North Kerala.Cross-sectional
37
costs well –being and the medication analysis will explore the
study is open and has recruited more than half of the sample.
38
regular blood sugar monitoring was done by 76.6%(222/290).
39
diabetes and patient’s age.Overall pure tone thresholds were
40
patients with type 2 diabetes.5-year prospective cohort study
type 2 DM who were recruited between August 2009 and June 2011.
regressions.The first incidence for each event was used for all
the RAMP-DM group and 43.6% in the usual care group.RAMP-DM led
respectively.55
41
World will have 300 million diabetics by 2025. The disease
42
This study was carried out to assess the influence of
Glucometer.57
43
patients.Mean capillary blood glucose levels were decreased in
blood glucose levels and quality of life scores were also found
24-48 hours after discharge from the hospital the calls were
44
knowledge and self care behavior were assessed in both group
temporary phenomenon.60
45
received structured practice questionnaire with their formal
diabetic patients.61
46
programmes.Further studies with a larger sample size are
required.62
diabetes.63
47
CHAPTER - III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
ETHICAL CONSIDERATION
48
RESEARCH APPROACH
process.64
RESEARCH APPROACH
selected because the aim of this research study was to find out
diabetes mellitus.
49
RESEARCH DESIGN
50
It helps to researcher in selection of subject,
collection.
choice.68
POPULATION
51
specify the group to which the result of the study can be
generalized.69
hospitals.
TARGET POPULATION
or all the elements that meet the criteria for inclusion of the
study.69
hospitals.
ACCESSIBLE POPULATION
52
In this study,Purposive Sampling technique is used.
SAMPLE SIZE
flexibility.69
SAMPLING CRITERIA
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
study.
53
data.The Questionnaire was given to the patient relatives to
The technique of Pre test and Post test design was used to
selected hospitals.
54
the objectives of the study the following data collection tools
DEVELOPMENT OF TOOL
of literature.
DESCRIPTION OF TOOLS
was prepared.
Scoring
55
The total knowledge score were categorized into-
Poor Below 25 % 0 – 5
Average 26 – 50 % 5 – 9
Good 51 – 75 % 9 – 13
Excellent Above 76 % 13 – 15
HEALTH TEACHING
5.Diebetes diet
VALIDITY
56
Community Health Nursing.Suggestions of the experts were
57
Based on the suggestion,a tool was modified.Few changes were
and validated tools were ready to ascertain the data from the
sample subjects.
RELIABILITY
the study,the final tool was made and then the reliability of the
imply validity.66
58
PILOT STUDY
OPD,Pimpri from 1sep 2017 to 7 sep 2017 the pre test was
administered on the 1st day after seven days,Post test was done.
seventh day.
59
The objective of study and obtained consent for
head of department.
60
PROCESS OF DATA COLLECTION:
after pretest.
Teaching.
following manner.
61
Demographic data was analyzed using frequency and
62
CHAPTER -IV
research questions.
hospitals”.
63
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
hypothesis tested”.69
Section I
demographic Variables.
Section II
Section III
mellitus.
Section IV
Variables.
64
SECION I
N=100
Demographic variable Freq Percentage
Age
a)31-41 year 36 36
b)41-50 years 39 39
c)51-60 year 22 22
d)Above 60 year 3 3
Gender
a)Male 57 57
b)Female 43 43
Education
a)Illiterate 29 29
b)Primary 55 55
c)Secondary 10 10
d)Graduation 5 5
e)Post graduation 1 1
65
N=100
Demographic variable Freq Percentage
Occupation
a)House work 41 41
b)Service 30 30
c)laborer 20 20
d)Retired 9 9
a)Ruppes 5000-Rs.15,000 30 30
b)Rupees 15,001-Rs.25,000 40 40
c)Rupees 25,001-Rs.35,000 20 20
d)Above Rs.35,001 10 10
3(3%)above 60 year.
were females.
3.In the above table states that 29(29%)of them were from
66
4.41(41%)of the were doing house work,30(30%)of them had
SECTION II
N=100
Pretest
Knowledge
Freq %
diabetes mellitus.
67
Pretest knowledge of patient relatives regarding diabetes mellitus
5%
Fig-2
Pie Diagram showing pretest knowledge of patient relatives
regarding diabetes mellitus.
Section III
Analysis of data related to effect of on knowledge of
N=100
Pretest Posttest
Knowledge
Freq % Freq %
68
In pretest,95% of the patient relatives had poor knowl-
95% 99%
0% 5% 1% 0%
Fig-3
Bar Diagram showing pretest and posttest knowledge on health
teaching programme among patient relatives regarding diabetes
mellitus
69
Table 4:Paired t-test for effect of health teaching programme
N=100
Mean SD t Df p-value
70
Average knowledge score of health teaching programme in pretest
and posttest regarding diabetes mellitus among patient relatives
19.2
3.6
Pretest Posttest
Fig-4
71
Section IV
demographic variables.
tabulated below:
demographic variables.
N=100
Demographic variable Average Poor p-value
31-41 year
4 37
Age
41-50 year 1 34
0.299
51-60 year 2 35
Above60 year 0 24
Male 3 54
Gender 1.000
Female 2 41
72
N=100
Illiterate 4 25
Primary 1 54
Education
0.171
Secondary 0 10
Graduation 0 5
Post graduation 0 1
House work 1 40
Service 0 29
Occupation 0.491
Labour 1 18
Retired 4 43
Rs.5000-Rs.15000 2 40
Family
Rs.15,001-Rs.15,000 0 27
income in
rupees Rs.25,000 Rs.35,000 3 50 0.320
Above Rs.35,001 2 18
73
CHAPTER V
field.
SECTION I
(3%)above 60 year.
were females.
3.In the above table states that 29(29%)of them were from
74
5.30(30)%of them had monthly family income upto Rs.5000 Rs.
SECTION II
diabetes mellitus.
SECTION III
75
indicates that there is remarkable improvement in the knowledge
SECTION IV
demographic variables.
tabulated below:
variables.
Discussion
other studies.
76
Major findings of the other studies
77
the future. However, due to logistical and other reasons only
this topic.
Summary
The conceptual frame work used for this study was based
78
sampling technique is used.study Sample size was 100 patient’s
relatives.
hospitals.
79
Data Collection Tool sent for validation tool,Re-
sample subjects. The final tool was made and then the reliability
chosen for this study is one group pre test post test pre
and then Health Teaching was developed depicted x.A post test
80
participate.Purpose and importance of research study has
mellitus.
The technique of Pre test and Post test design was used to
81
Association between knowledge finding and demographic
Conclusion
Nursing Education
chart, flash cards, and hand out set, which would make it
Nursing Practice
83
Nursing Administration
care givers.
RECOMMENDATION
questionnaires.
84
APPENDIX ‘A’
REFERENCES
No.4,‘Pp’155,156.
14,no-(2)‘Pp,170,172,173,174.
24;1303-1304.
85
11.Gupta,Koirala(2009),‘Centers,for,Disease,Control Prevention.
Diabetes,related,healthconcern,2009.AccessedJuly31,Vol-9,No.3
‘Pp’9.10,11.
86
20.Yusuff KB,Obe O,Joseph By,(2008)self management practice
June 16;6;25.www.pubmed.com.
Dictionary,5th edition,‘Pp’no-26.
29.Sharma(2008),1stedition,New,Delhi,J.P.Brother,Med,Publisher
limited,‘Pp’34-35.
87
31.Altaf lal,(2004),‘Diabetes health center, diabetes foot
1.2007;
.2010;1:148-161.
Malaysia.2009;2(2):6.
88
39.Naeema Badruddin, Abdul Basit, M.Zafar Iqbal Hydrie and
4,Issue(May,Jun.2015),PP01-08
Delhi:863,866.
89
48.Herenda S,Tahirovic H,(2009),‘CK.Breast cancer before the
:1-59.
2000.173-184.
56.Mohammed,(2009),http://www.ukessays.com/essays/nursing/studi
es-related-to-knowledge of caregiver.
90
58.Petra Goodman(2010),Nursing research,vol,59,no-1,‘Pp’22-31
Orthopedic Nurses,vol-26,No(3),’Pp’:155-156.
‘Pp’33,34,25,36.
7,no-9,‘Pp’9.10,11.
homecare management,‘Pp’20,23
65.Sharma(2008),1stedition,New,Delhi,J.P.Brother,Med,Publisher
limited,‘Pp’34-35.
Brother,Med,Publisher limited,‘Pp’34-35.
2001,page 108-117.
91
69.Polite and Hunger,‘2ndedition,The New,Delhi,J.P.Brother,Med
Publisher limited,‘Pp’44-45.
70.Agarwal,Shenoy.J,Spellmann.M.Low.(2012),‘NGOS’Knowledge
92
SECTION II
STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE
ANSWER KEY
NO ANS
1 A
2 A
3 B
4 A
5 B
6 B
7 A
8 D
9 A
10 D
11 A
12 D
13 C
14 C
15 C
93
APENDIX ‘B’
1. Mr.Suresh Ray(CHN)
Asst.Proffesor
2. Mrs.Minnimol Louis
Associate Professor
3. Mr.Hanumaan Bishnoi
Associate Professor
4. Mr.Vishal Naikre
Asst.Professor
5. Mr.Ramakant Gaikwad
Asst.Professor
6. Mrs.Romila devi
Lecturer
7. Dr.Hemant Deshpande
94
SR.NO. LIST OF EXPERTS
8. Mrs.Rupali salvi(CHN)
Asso,Proffesor
9. Mrs.Sadhna Adhyapak(MED-SURG)
Associate Proffesor
Lecturer
Lecturer
Lecturer
Lecturer
Professor
95
SR.NO. LIST OF EXPERTS
Lecturer
Statistician
96
APPENDIX ‘C’
Mrs.ASHWINI CHAVAN
Pimpri Pune-18
The Principal,
Respected madam,
Thanking you,
Yours sincerely,
(Mrs.Ahwini Chavan)
97
APPENDIX ‘D’
CONSENT FORM
CODE-: NO.
participate.
Date-: / /
Signature of participant
98
APPENDIX ‘E’
OPD. Code no
DESCRIPTION OF TOOL
PART I
weight,height,occupation etc.
PART II
Tool:-Questionnaire
selected hospitals.
Instruction
SECTION I
1)Age
a)31-41 year
b)41-50 years
c)51-60 year
d)Above 60 year
99
2)Gender
a)Male
b)Female
3)Education
a)Illiterate
b)Primary
c)Secondary
d)Graduation
e)Post graduation
4)Occupation
a)House work
b)Service
c)Labour
d)Retired
a)Ruppes 5000-Rs.15,000
b)Rupees 15,001-Rs.25,000
c)Rupees 25,001-Rs.35,000
d)Above Rs.35,001
100
APPENDIX ‘F’
Section II Code no
b)Backache
c)Weakness
d)Weight loss
b)Blood test
c)Sputum test
d)Stool test
101
5.The type of diabetes mellitus is
a)1
b)2
c)3
d)4
a)Weight loss
b)Insulin
c)Oral medication
d)Surgical treatment
a)Subcutaneous
b)Intramuscular
c)Intravenous
b)Sugar free
c)Liquid diet
102
9.Diet diabetes patient should take
b)Headache
c)Loss of appetite
d)Loss of weight
b)Diet control
103
13.Diabetic Patient should always have following things while
travelling.
a)Sugar
b)Drugs
c)Identification card
d)Food
b)Kidney
c)Liver
d)Pancreas
a)Physiotherapy
b)Doug therapy
c)Insulin therapy
104
APPENDIX ‘G’
(Mr.Ladhe P.H.)
Date: -
105
APPENDIX ‘H’
EDITOR LETTER
hospital”.
Date:
106
अनुमती
संशोधनात भाग घेण्यासाठी अनुमती पत्र.
मी.श्री.सौ.---------- खालील संधोधनात सहभागी होण्यास अनुमती दे त आहे . हे
एम. एस. सी नडसिंगची डवद्यार्थीनी असुनया सं दभाा त डदलेली माडहती गुप्त ठे वण्याची खात्री
डदली आहे .तरि कोणत्याही दबावा खालीन येता मीसं शोधनसास सहभागी होण्यास अनुमती
दे त आहे .
ममममममम
ममममम
मममममममममम मममममममममममम ममम
107
विभाग – अ
सुचना–कृपया प्रश्न काळजी पुवाक वाचा आडण अचूक उत्तिला √ अशी खुण किा.
ममम मम.
विभाग – अ
सुचना–कृपया प्रश्न काळजी पुवाक वाचा आडण अचूक उत्तिला √ अशी खुण किा.
ममम मम.
ममममम म.
मममममममममम
१.११
म.मम-मम मममम
म. मम-मम मममम
म.मम-मम मममम
म. मम मममम मम
१.११११
म. ममममम
म. मममममम
१.११११११
म.मममममममम
म.मममममममम
म.मममममम
म.मममम
म. मममममम
१.१११११११
म.मममममम ममम
म.ममममम
म.ममममम
म.ममममममम
108
१.ममममममममम ममममममम ममममममम
म.मम.मममम-ममममम मम.
म.मम.मम,ममम-मम.ममममम
म.मम.मम,ममम-मम.मम,ममम
म.ममममम मममम मम
ममम मम.
ममममम म.
109
१.१११११११११ १११११ १११ ११११११ १११११ ११११.
म.ममममम मममममममम मममम मममम
म.ममममम ममममम
म.मममममममम
म.ममम ममम मममम
110
१.११११११११ ११११११११११ १११११११ ११११११११ १११११
११११११११ ११११ ११११.
म.मममममममममम
म.मममममममममम
म.ममममममम
म.ममम मममममममम
111
PLANNED HEALTH TEACHING
PREVIOUS KNOWLEDGE OF THE GROUP: The group has some knowledge regarding Diabetes Mellitus .
GENERAL OBJECTIVES:
At the end of planned teaching, the group will have adequate knowledge on Diabetes Mellitus .
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES: At the end of planned teaching, the group will be able to
112
HEALTH TEACHING PLAN ON DIABETES MELLITUS
113
SR. TIME SPECIFIC CONTENT TEACHING/LEARNING A.V.AIDS EVALUATION
NO. OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVES
5. Infection with a specific virus or bacteria
6. Exposure to food-borne chemical toxins
7. Physical inactivity
8. Certain medicines
CLINICAL FEATURES
114
SR. TIME SPECIFIC CONTENT TEACHING/LEARNING A.V.AIDS EVALUATION
NO. OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVES
TREATMENT
The group
The goals of diabetes management are to reduce symptoms,
will be able to
6. 7min enumerate the promote well being, and prevent short term complication. What is the treatment Lecture The group will be
signs and able to understood
1.Nutritionl therapy diabetes mellitus
symptoms of treatment of
diabetes 2.Insulin(to decrease blood sugar level) Cum diabetes mellitus.
mellitus.
3.Diabetes drug
Discussion
4.Physical activity
5.Self monitoring blood glucose
6.Foot care
7.Yoga and regular exercises
8.Regular check-up
9.Countinuating of care
10.Wegiht control
11.Patient and family teaching
12.Follow up programme.
7. 6min The group DIET
will be able to The group will be
1.Diabetes patient should not eat much together What is the dietary
understand the able to understood
dietary but should 4-5 times a day. management diabetes Dietary
management management
2.Diet should be consumed at regular interval mellitus
diabetes
mellitus.
115
SR. TIME SPECIFIC CONTENT TEACHING/LEARNING A.V.AIDS EVALUATION
NO. OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVES
3.One should consume low calorie and sugar free
diet
4.Exchange of food items is permitted
5.A diabetes patient should never fast
6.Green leafy vegetables should be included in
the diet.
7.Obese person should take low fat diet.
8.Chocolates,cake,jam and bkery items should be
avoided.
9.Some fruits should be restricted
10.Apple And Tea without sugar is allowed
11.Alcohol should be restricted.
12.Some fruits are allowed but
banana,mango,chiku,and dired fruits should be
restricted.
116
SR. TIME SPECIFIC CONTENT TEACHING/LEARNING A.V.AIDS EVALUATION
NO. OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVES
SUMMERY
So,i delt with diabetes mellitus today.In that we saw the
definition,various type of diabetes mellitus,causes and clinical
fetures,treatment and dietary management.
CONCLUSION
The group came to know about the diabetes mellitus and its
types,causes,clinical features, treatment and dietary
management.
117