Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textos Importantes Articulos
Textos Importantes Articulos
Textos Importantes Articulos
“Design methods and empirical expressions in codes for the calculation of the
punching resistance of reinforced concrete footings are based on the results of these
investigations”
Lugar: INTRODUCTION
“Since the beginning of the 20th century, only a few punching tests on footings have
been performed. Because the experimental study of a footing under realistic
boundary conditions is associated with considerable expenditure, most
researchers1-6 avoid using real soil in their experiments”
“The reinforcement ratio ranged between 0.62 and 1.03%. The square column
stubs were cast monolithically at the center of the slabs”
“1. All material and strength reduction factors incorporated in the code equations are
taken as unity.
2. The code equations are solved with mean values of the material strength.
Characteristic values are not considered.
3. The concrete strength is considered as short time strength. A reduction due to the
time-dependent behavior of concrete was not taken into account, as the loading time
period was not documented for most of the tests”
“The ACI predictions as a function of the shear slenderness are shown in Fig. 15(d).
The provisions tend to become less conservative for a/d less than 2.0. There are
only a few tests, however, on footings concerning a shear slenderness of practical
interest (a/d ≤ 2.0). The present tests confirm this tendency”
“2. The consistency of the sand (loose or dense) has no further influence on the
soil pressure distribution underneath the footing. A concentration of soil pressure in
the center of the footing was measured in all conducted tests. However, the
assumption of uniformly distributed soil pressure beneath the footings according to
the building codes ensures a safe design
4. For footings without shear reinforcement and a shear slenderness greater than
2.5, it is proposed to subtract the soil pressure within a perimeter of d from the
column face in context with the ACI punching provisions”
Lugar: CONCLUSIONS
Investigations on the punching behaviour of reinforced concrete footings
J. Heggera, M. Rickera, , B. Ulkeb, M. Zieglerb
“This redistribution is completed when the bearing capacity is achieved. At limit state,
the stress distribution is convex (Fig. 1(b)) according to the theory of Prandtl–
Buisman. For a convex stress distribution, the soil reaction underneath the punching
cone is greater than for a uniform one. This results in a more economic design”
“(3) In two small-scale tests as well as in tests from literature the experimental soil
bearing capacities exceed the calculated values according to current code
provisions. Thus, the soil pressure redistribution towards the centre seems not to
be completed when the calculated bearing capacity was reached.
(4) The assumption of an uniformly distributed soil pressure is safe for most practical
cases.
(5) The punching loads predicted by different codes tend to be conservative for
slender footings. Nevertheless, the codes tend to overestimate the punching
resistance for compact footings with small shear slenderness”
Lugar: CONCLUSIONS
“The column punching through the slab is most often related to floor structures, and
less often to foundation slabs under columns. Calculation models for these two
problems are often not separated. The deficit of experimental results for column
footings results in the use of floor slab models”
“It should be noted that the punching failure through a footing is brittle, and so the
failure of one column/support can lead to the progressive and unexpected failure of
neighbouring supports, as cracks and deformations remain small until just prior to
the actual failure”
Lugar: INTRODUCTION
“Generally, technical regulations do not distinguish between punching through floor
slabs and punching through foundation slabs”
Lugar: INTRODUCTION
“The ACI 318 regulation, with the control section proposed at the distance of 1.0d
from the edge of the column, gives much better results than the standard ACI
regulation. In fact, with this proposal, the results offered by ACI 318 are generally
quite good (Fs are in the range of 1,16 to 2,02), although it may broadly be stated
that it underestimates the influence of the compressive strength of concrete”
“None of the codes take into account the horizontally embedded length of column
reinforcement into the footing, which is placed just on the flexural reinforcement. In
predicting the punching shear resistance of footing properly, all of the codes should
take into account the horizontal leg of column reinforcement. Normally column
reinforcements are embedded horizontally into the footing at base level due to
development length. These legs of column reinforcement also resist the punching
shear force in column footing. It is seen that all of the existing codes underestimated
the punching shear capacity of RC column footing.”
Lugar: CONCLUSION
Aspectos fundamentals del concreto reforzado CUARTA EDICIÓN (LIBRO)
2 esta etapa, comprendida entre los puntos A y B, se alcanza la primera fluencia del refuerzo
horizontal de tensión y el agrietamiento se extiende por la losa. Simultáneamente pueden
presentarse grietas inclinadas que van del acero de tensión hacia la periferia de la superficie
cargada, formando una pirámide o cono truncado alrededor de esta superficie.
3 final de esta etapa se alcanza la resistencia (punto C) y se produce el colapso final por
penetración de la columna a través de la losa, con una superficie de falla en forma de
pirámide o cono truncado.