Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ma 2
Ma 2
Effects and Correlation of Gender, Academic Performance, Reported Preparation Time and
Beth Littman
Abstract
This study examines how gender, academic performance, and reported preparation time relate to
each other, and how they affect an individual’s confidence in performance on a project. For this
study, a survey was sent to the entire student body (apx. 400 students ) of a grades 9-12 high
school in Columbus, Ohio. A total of 116 students responded, and this study looked at a random
sampling of 99 results. Results suggest that girls had slightly higher academic performance and a
slightly lower confidence level and satisfaction with grades received. Additionally, research
shows that females spend more time preparing for projects than males. However, no research
was conducted comparing specific academic subjects with academic performance, and research
involving motivation and the effect on previously mentioned topics. Further research should
should address influence of motivation, and specific academic subjects, gender, and academic
performance.
Table of Contents
Abstract 1
Table of Contents 2
Introduction 3
Research 4
References 6
Appendix 8
Effects and Correlation of Gender, Academic Performance
3
Introduction
It is often assumed that females have higher academic performance than males. However, there
is little focus on confidence level, and even less focus on correlation between genders, academic
performance and confidence level. Ghazvini & Khajehpour (2011) conducted a study evaluating
and mathematics. They found there are differences in the cognitive-motivation of boys and girls,
but there are no differences between genders in external locus of control, or the blaming of
outside forces for events in life. They also concluded that girls have higher academic
Additionally, Pintrich & Groot (1990) conducted a study looking at the relationships between
motivation, self-regulated learning, and classroom academic performance. They found that
students who believed they were capable were more likely to report use of cognitive strategies;
such as rehearsal, elaboration, and organizational strategies and other methods used to solve
problems; and to persist more often at difficult or uninteresting academic task. They also found
that self-regulation was the best predictor of academic performance. All of this led to a question
of how gender, academic performance, and reported preparation time affect confidence level of
performance on a project.
Effects and Correlation of Gender, Academic Performance
4
Research
Methods
The common assumption that girls have a lower confidence level but higher academic
performance intrigued me. Instead of limiting the data to one gender, I decided to include both
genders, to compare confidence level, academic performance, and preparation level, between
males and females. A survey is the best way to get a data sample from an entire audience in a
short amount of time. I chose to survey an audience that thoroughly shows a good sample of
academic performance, and therefore sent a survey (see Appendix A) to the entire student body
of one grades 9-12 high school in Columbus, Ohio. Survey questions asked students about their
grades in their first four classes periods, rating their current grade from 0%-60%, 60%-75%,
75%-90%, and 90%+; the amount of time they prepared on their most recent project or paper;
their confidence level on that project/paper on a scale of 1-10; and if they felt the grade they
responses, with a make-up of 60 females and 39 males, conclusions were drawn. Responses were
compared between females and males, to determine overall results (See Appendix B) . Overall,
of the 60 females who each reported 4 class grades (240 class grades total), 69% were a 90% or
higher; and of the 39 males who each reported 4 class grades (156 grades total), 63% of the
grades were over a 90%. Out of the 396 total grades, 67% were a 90% or higher, and 88% of the
total grades were an 75% or higher. The overall (considering both genders) median reported
hours spent preparing for a project or paper was 2-3 hours. Split by gender, 53% of females spent
3 hours or more, while 38% of males spent 3 hours or more. The average confidence level for
Effects and Correlation of Gender, Academic Performance
5
females was 7.63 out of 10, and for males, 7.74 out of 10. The overall confidence level was
7.685. 18.33% of females were not satisfied with their grade, and 17.95% of males were not
satisfied with their grade. Overall, 18.18% of students were dissatisfied with their grade.
The data was surprisingly similar between genders. The data that had the biggest differential
between genders was the preparation time, and confidence level had the smallest differential
between genders. For class periods 1-3, a higher percentage of females had a grade of 90% or
higher in their class. However, a higher percentage of males had a 90% or higher in their 4th
period class. The survey did not ask students what subject corresponded with each class period,
The biggest correlation of gender was preparation time, but data does not seem extremely
correlated to preparation time and gender. Those who prepared 3-4 hours, regardless of gender,
were slightly less satisfied than those that prepared 2-3 hours and 5-6 hours. The focus of
specific subject areas is reported by Ghazvini & Khajehpour (2011), who concluded that females
have higher academic performance in literature while males have higher academic performance
in mathematics. Additionally, Pomerantz, Altermatt, & Saxon (2002) found that females
Overall, the data suggests that gender has only a slight effect on academic performance
and confidence level. However, there is little focus on confidence level, and even less focus on
correlation between genders, academic performance and confidence level. If the study was to be
reconducted, it would need to focus on academic performance in specific subject areas, and a
differential of individual and group projects. Additionally, if the study was to be conducted
again, researching motivation may also be valuable, as shown by Pintrich and Groot.
Effects and Correlation of Gender, Academic Performance
7
References
Ghazvini, S. D., & Khajehpour, M. (2011). Gender differences in factors affecting academic
1040-1045. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.236
O'Dea, R., & Nakagawa, S. (2018, October 04). Study of 1.6 million grades shows little gender
difference in maths and science at school. Retrieved October 22, 2018, retrieved from
https://theconversation.com/study-of-1-6-million-grades-shows-little-gender-difference-
in-maths-and-science-at-school-101242
Parker, J. D., Creque, R. E., Barnhart, D. L., Harris, J. I., Majeski, S. A., Wood, L. M., . . .
doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.01.002
Pintrich, P. R., & Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of
doi:10.1037//0022-0663.82.1.33
Pomerantz, E. M., Altermatt, E. R., & Saxon, J. L. (2002). Making the grade but feeling
Appendix
Appendix A
Effects and Correlation of Gender, Academic Performance
9
Effects and Correlation of Gender, Academic Performance
10
Appendix B
Effects and Correlation of Gender, Academic Performance
11
Effects and Correlation of Gender, Academic Performance
12
Effects and Correlation of Gender, Academic Performance
13
Effects and Correlation of Gender, Academic Performance
14
Effects and Correlation of Gender, Academic Performance
15
Effects and Correlation of Gender, Academic Performance
16