Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Deep Space Optical Terminals: Bachelor of Engineering in Electronics and Communication Engineering
Deep Space Optical Terminals: Bachelor of Engineering in Electronics and Communication Engineering
Bachelor of Engineering
in
Electronics and Communication Engineering
Submitted by
Parvathy R 1KG15EC056
Certificate
This is to certify that the project work entitled Deep Space Optical Terminals is a bona
fide work carried out by
PARVATHY R 1KG15EC056
Declaration
I,
PARVATHY R 1KG15EC056
the student of eight semester BE declare that the technical seminar entitled Deep Space
Optical Terminals is carried out at K.S. School of Engineering and Management as a
partial fulfilment of academic requirement for VIII Semester of BE in Electronics and
Communication Engineering under Visvesvaraya Technological University. The
content in the report are original and are free from plagiarism and other academic
dishonesty and are not submitted to any other University either partially or wholly
for the award of any other degree.
The successful completion of task would be incomplete without complementing those who made
it possible, whose guidance and encouragement made my efforts successful.
With deep sense of gratitude, I acknowledge the help and encouragement of our internal guide
Mr. Arun Kumar M Asst. Professor, Dept of ECE, KSSEM, Bangalore.
I would also like to express our deep sense of gratitude to Dr. Girish V Attimarad, Professor
and Head of the Department, Dept. of ECE, KSSEM, Bangalore, for his exemplary guidance,
valuable suggestions, expert advice and encouragements.
I take great pleasure in expressing our sincere thanks to Dr. K. Rama Narasimha,
Principal/Director, KSSEM, Bangalore, for his valuable support.
Last but not least, I take this opportunity in expressing my gratitude and respect to all those who
directly or indirectly helped and encouraged me.
Parvathy R
1KG15EC056
Abstract
1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 4
2 SYSTEM ENGINEERING ........................................................................................ 6
3 FLIGHT LASER TRANSCEIVER ........................................................................... 8
3.1 Functionalities of FLT ................................................................................................... 8
3.2 Assemblies in FLT .......................................................................................................... 8
4 GROUND LASER RECEIVER ............................................................................... 11
4.1 Architecture of the GLR ............................................................................................. 12
5 GROUND LASER TRANMSITTER ....................................................................... 14
6 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................... 15
List of Figures
1 INTRODUCTION
The Deep-space Optical Terminals (DOT) concept design’s intent is to retire the major
risks perceived for operational planetary lasercom and to demonstrate a communication system
that is scalable to multi-Gb/s data-rates and range of at least 5 AU from Earth. The tracking
concept assumes availability of an earth-emanated uplink laser beacon source. At ranges above
5 AU beaconless tracking will likely be employed.
There are many difference between assembly level technology requirements for an Earth-
orbiting lasercom system and one for deep space communications. Key differences include :
large point-ahead angles, round-trip light-times preventing closed loop beacon tracking,
simultaneous low Sun-Probe-Earth (SPE) and Sun-Earth-Probe (SEP) angles leading to signal-
to-noise ration conditions at both ends of the link. Additionally, operations under the photon-
starved regime, as a result of large interplanetary distances, requires highly efficient (high
bits/photon) modulation and strategies that result in requiring high peak-to-average power laser
transmitters that are as yet unproven in the space environment.
The Deep-space optical terminal system (DOT) consists of four major subsystems: The
Flight Laser Transceiver (FLT), The Ground Laser Transmitter, Ground Laser Receiver (GLR),
and The DOT Mission Operations center (MOC).
2 SYSTEM ENGINEERING
Assumptions were made for the platform disturbances, a key driver influencing the
design of the challenging laser beam pointing control assembly, based on disturbance power
spectral densities of past spacecraft. The assumed angular power spectral density (PSD) is 1E-
7 rad²/Hz at and below 0.1Hz ; 1E-15 rad²/Hz at 1kHz with a 20 dB/decade slope beyond 0.1Hz.
The RMS angular disturbance resulting from this assumed PSD is 140 μrad.
The function of downlink is to provide a variety of downlink data-rates, and to support
downlink temporal acquisition and ranging. The major signalling trades to achieve maximum
power efficiency (bits/photon), were: detection method; range of slot-widths; modulation; error-
correcting-code; and synchronization markers. Direct detection in conjunction with photon-
counting (DD-PC) data reception was regarded more efficient than other viable options for
DOT’s operating conditions. Pulse Position Modulation (PPM) was selected due to its near-
optimum power efficiency. The serially concatenated PPM (SCPPM) encoding was baseline for
the optical downlink, since SCPPM in combination with photon-counting direct-detection
receiver can achieve communications performance within 1dB of channel capacity.
Uplinks signalling primary functions are: transmitting high-rate uplink data; supporting a low-
rate command capability; providing a reference beacon; aiding synchronization; and supporting
ranging. Again, direct-direction along with photon counting is selected for its photon-efficiency
and the relatively high bandwidth capability. Given a detector array sensor with adequate field-
of-view to cover the range of point-ahead angles, a single sensor will be sufficient for
implementation of beam-pointing , high bandwidth communications, ranging and
synchronization. A Reed-Soloman code was selected for the uplink due to its low complexity
and efficiency.
Transmit/receive signal isolation at the flight terminal drives wavelength selection
considerations. High power 1500-nm lasers for uplink are unavailable commercially at this time,
but that is not the case for 1030 nm lasers. This supports the choice of 1550 nm for downlink
and 1050 nm for uplink to enhance transmit/receive wavelength isolation. The selection of
1. The optical assembly houses sub-assemblies for the transmit/receive telescope, aft optics,
acquisition/tracking/data sensors, and a point-ahead mirror sub-assembly.
2. To facilitates meeting the precision laser beam pointing requirements, a vibration-reduction
assembly called the low-frequency vibration-isolation platform (LVP) largely attenuates the
effect of the host spacecraft angular disturbances on the optical assembly. The LVP is
designed to mitigate the majority of the host-platform-induced angular disturbances, using a
hybrid of passive and active isolators, controlled by the processor sub-assembly.
3. The opto-electronic assembly houses the laser transmitter, modems, controllers, processors
and power converters. The sub-assemblies which generate heat are located away from the
optical assembly and do not need to be isolated from the optical assembly and do not need
to be isolated from the host platform vibrations. An umbilical cord containing soft copper
and fibreoptic cables connects the optoelectronic assembly to the optical assembly in a
fashion that does not interfere with LVP’s function.
1. High antenna gain obtained from large collecting area and highly efficient optics
The required GLR telescope aperture gain of 142 dB translates to 110 m² aperture
2. Operation during daytime at low SEP angles
3. Operation in the photon-starved regime due to reception of extremely faint signal from
deep space
This necessitates use of highly efficient detectors and use of efficient modulation
and error-correcting codes at the transmitter to maximize the bits per photon
4. Operation at high background to signal ration since the detected rate of background
photons may exceed the rate of signal photons by as much as 18 dB during lo SEP
operations. Efficient optical filtering helps in this regard.
The Detector assembly’s driving requirements are: array format with several hundred
elements, detection efficiency> 50%; data count rate< 0.33MHz; and timing jitter< 120ps. Array
of superconducting nanowire single photon detectors (SNSPDs) were baselined. The intensifier
photo-diode (IPD) meets nearly all requirements, but suffers from relatively low detection
efficiency of 30% at 1550 nm. The Electronics Assembly’s function is to process the
photodetector signal and determine the number of photons received in each temporal slot in each
region, synchronize to the downlink signal, estimate the rate if signal and background photons,
and control the acquisition and tracking of downlink. This assembly has to be able to process
Dept. of ECE, K.S. School of Engineering and Management Page 11
variable data-rates, PPM orders, code rates, slot widths, symbol repetitions, and background
photon rates.
1. The telescope assembly collects and concentrates the downlink coming from the FLT.
2. The AFT optic assembly takes the light from the telescope assembly and filters out the
background light. It also provides functions for beam monitoring and alignment.
3. The downlink light is coupled to the detector assembly, where the photons are converted
into an electronic signal. The detector assembly must distinguish between photons
striking different regions of the focal plane, in order to provide the tracking information
used to stabilize the optical line of sight.
4. The electronic signals from the detector assembly are sent to the element electronics,
which synchronizes to the downlink signalling format and estimates the signal and
background photo-count rate. It provides the control signals to the telescope assembly
and AFT optics assembly, which are used to acquire and track the downlink light.
5. The slot statistics (which may be represented as the number of photo-counts in each time
interval of the downlink signal structure) are sent from element electronics to station
electronics. The station electronics uses the synchronized slot statistics to decode the
information that was transmitted over the downlink; it then stores the resulting data for
eventual relay back to DOT MOC.
6. The station electronics also relays back to the DOT MOC the atmospheric conditions that
affect the link, such as sky radiance, atmospheric attenuation and turbulence. These
parameters are measured by an atmosphere monitoring assembly.
The Uplink Telescope’s options include: a single telescope, distributed telescopes and flat
mirror beam directors. The existing JPL 1m diameter could path OCTL telescope is selected
based on its capability to meet the required pointing, availability, cost and complexity.
The Uplink Laser’s key requirements include: 1030 nm wavelength, 0.5 nm line-width and
+/- 0.1nm wavelength tunability, 2 kW average and 370 kW of peak power with M²< 1.2beam
quality, pulse repetition rates in the 4 to 500kHz range 128 ns pulse-width, random polarization,
and 20 dB pulse extinction ratio. Today’s technology can meet these requirements.
6 CONCLUSION
Flight and ground terminals were conceptually designed to meet pre-set requirements.
This system enables downlink transmission. This system enables downlink transmission of over
0.25Gb/s from Mars close distance (0.42 AU) while estimated flight terminal mass and power
are comparable to the state-of-practise of existing Mars spacecraft telecommunication systems.
Currently, the highest risk items are the technology maturity of the flight isolation platform, the
flight laser, and the flight and the ground single photo-sensitive data detectors. These specific
technologies are now being addressed in a focused technology development program.
[3]. B. Moision and J. Hamkins, “Coded modulation for the deep space optical channel: serially
concatenated PPM,” JPL’s IPN Progress Report, vol. 42-161, 2005.
[7]. R. La Rue, G. Davis, D. Pudvay, K. Costello, and V. Aebi, “Photon Counting 1060 nm
Hybrid Photomultiplier with High Quantum Efficiency,” IEEE Electron Devices Lett. Vol. 20,
pp. 1126-128, 1999.
[8]. W. T. Roberts and M. Wright, “Deep-space Optical Terminals (DOT) Ground Laser
Transmitter (GLT) trades and conceptual point design,” JPL’s IPN Progress report, 42-183, Nov.
2010.