Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.1 Definition: As Per Negotiable Instrument Act 1881
1.1 Definition: As Per Negotiable Instrument Act 1881
INTRODUCTION
Remember how Amitabh Bachchan signed cheques for winning participants in
Kaun Banega Crorepati and left us fancying the idea of drawing handsome cheques
of our own someday?
Sure is a great thought, but simply acquiring a cheque does not mean acquisition of
money. All cheques are instruments of a systematic procedure. However, these
instruments turn out to be defective sometimes, thus causing lapses in money
transactions. Such a lapse is commonly referred to as a case of Cheque bounce.
1.1 Definition:
1.2 Meaning:
1|Page
There are three parties in Cheque Transaction – Drawer, Drawee and Payee.
Drawer (Maker of Cheque) – The person who issue the cheque or hold the
account with bank.
Drawee – The Person who is directed to make the payment against cheque. In
case of cheque, it is bank.
Payee – A person whose name is mentioned in the cheque or to whom the
drawee makes payment. If drawer has drawn the cheque in favor of self, then
drawer is payee.
There may be different types of Cheques depending on how the drawer has issued
the Cheque.
Here we will discuss about different types of cheque with their features in detail:
This type of Cheques are risky in nature for drawer. When the word “Bearer”
on the cheque is not crossed or cancelled, the cheque is called a bearer
cheque.
2|Page
Open / Bearer Cheques are payable to person specified in the instrument or
any person who possess it and present for payment over the counter.
In case of cheque is lost, person who find it can collect payment from
the bank.
b) Order Cheque
3|Page
The person who issue or write the cheque specify its as account payee by
simply making two parallel lines on top left or middle or right hand corner of
the cheque.
This type of cheque cannot be encashed over the counter. Considered as
safest type of cheque, it can only be credited to payee’s account whose name
is mentioned in the Cheque.
d) Anti-Dated Cheque
Cheque bearing the date earlier than the date of presentation for payment is
known as anti-dated cheque.
Note: All Types of Cheque are valid for three months from the date of issue
(or written on cheque).
f) Stale Cheque
A Cheque turns stale after three months of the date written on cheque. A Stale
Cheque cannot be honored by the bank.
4|Page
2. DISHONOR OF CHEQUE
Business transactions of people is increasing day by day and the stability of
maintaining bank balance has been fluctuating depending upon the financial needs of
the people. If a person issues a cheque to another, he/she may not be aware of the
current bank balance and thus the cheque may be dishonored. In such situations, the
drawer of the cheque is given a 30 days’ time for repaying the amount back to the
payee. But after that period, if the drawer is not willing to pay the amount, the payee
has an option to file a suit against the drawer for payment of the amount of the cheque
as well as an amount of interest as compensation for the default caused by the drawer.
Cheques are issued to maintain a more secured proof of payment. Even in today's
digital and technological age, cheques remain a reliable method of payment for many
people. However, sometimes people encounter problems with a cheque in their favor.
If cheque has been bounced, then one of the following could possibly be a reason.
Also remember these reasons while writing a cheque next time to avoid dishonour of
your cheque by bank in future.
5|Page
a) Insufficient Funds
While writing a cheque, one has to make sure that he have sufficient funds in
bank account.
b) Irregular Signature
Bank will not honour a cheque if the signature of the drawer on the cheque
don’t match the specimen signature available with the bank.
c) Alterations
Alterations on cheques are not allowed. Even if we sign the alteration to verify
it, the cheque will not be considered as valid and will not be honoured by the
bank.
d) Post-dated Cheque
Post-dated cheques are to be presented to the banks on a future date.
A cheque will be dishonored if it is presented to the bank before the date
mentioned on it.
e) Stale Cheque
If a cheque is presented to the bank for payment after three months from the
date mentioned on the cheque it is called stale cheque.
After expiry of that period, the cheque will be dishounoured and no payment
will be made by banks against that cheque.
g) Frozen Account
6|Page
If government or court has ordered that a person’s account has to be frozen, in
such case, the bank will dishonour all the cheques bearing that account
number.
7|Page
3. THE LAW
Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act as it is at present after coming into force of
The Negotiable Instruments (Amendment And Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2002:
3.1 Statement
a) the cheque has been, presented to the bank within a period of six months from
the date on which it is drawn or within the period of its validity, whichever is
earlier
b) the payee or the holder in due course. of the cheque as the case may be,
makes a demand for the payment of the said amount of money by giving a
notice, in writing, to the drawer of the cheque, within thirty days of the receipt of
information by him from the bank regarding the return of the cheque as unpaid;
and
c) the drawer of such cheque fails to make the payment of the said amount of
money to the payee or, as the case may be, to the holder in due course of the
cheque, within fifteen days of the receipt of the said notice.
8|Page
Explanation - For the purposes of this section, “debt or other liability” means a
legally enforceable debt or other liability.
9|Page
4. CASE STUDY
Let’s view one anonymous case given below:
Case:
A Delhi court has imposed a fine of ₹25 lakh on a private firm and one of its partners
and asked them to pay it to another private company in a cheque bounce case.
Thereafter, the complainant issued a legal notice to it seeking payment of the due
amount, but the accused allegedly took no note of it. The supplier company then filed
a complaint in a Metropolitan Magistrate (MM) court under the Negotiable Instruments
Act.
The MM court convicted the accused and asked them to pay the complainant 25 lakh
as compensation.
The accused later challenged the MM court judgement in the court of Additional
Sessions Judge Sanjeev Kumar. Dismissing their appeal, the Judge modified the MM
court judgement.
The appellant was awarded six-month simple imprisonment. However, its partner was
not awarded any jail term.
10 | P a g e
“In the present case, no sentence has been imposed upon the appellants by the trial
court and, therefore, order of compensation which has been passed cannot be upheld
and, therefore, impugned order of sentence/compensation is modified to the effect
that order of paying compensation of ₹25,32,325 shall be treated as fine and said the
fine would be given jointly by appellants to respondent as compensation under Section
357 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, and in default of the payment of
compensation, the appellant [partner in the company] shall undergo simple
imprisonment for six months. Appellants are given three months’ time to pay
compensation to the respondent,” the Judge said.
11 | P a g e
5. FALSE CASE?
With around 20 lakh cases, the Indian Courts are overwhelmed with cheque
bounces cases filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
However, a large number of such cases are false cheque bounce cases to extort
money from someone, or out of personal grudges to malign someone’s image. With
large number of fraud cheque bounce case the question which has emerged over the
time is how to escape from cheque bounce case?
People who are accused in a fake cheque bounce case in India, unfortunately, end up
facing the legal implications of cheque bounce case and paying money as they lack
the relevant knowledge of the legal course to take if a false cheque bounce case is
filed against them.
12 | P a g e
c) Send a reply to legal notice:
If we have received a cheque bounce legal notice regarding a cheque bounce
case, the first thing one should do is hire a lawyer for cheque bounce case to send
a prompt reply to the cheque bounce notice.
A period of 30 days is given under the Negotiable Instruments Act to send a reply
to cheque bounce notice.
The cheque bounce lawyer will draft reply to 138 notice the person accusing us
of cheque dishonour. when a person has sent a false cheque bounce case notice,
sending them a legal reply usually makes them withdraw their fraud case.
Lastly, it is possible to avoid the unnecessary legal hassle of a false cheque bounce
case by consulting an experienced lawyer for cheque bounce case in India who can
guide you about the correct action to take at the right stage before it’s too late.
13 | P a g e
6. CONCLUSION
Dishonour of the cheque is one of the major issues faced by the parties while
transferring money through negotiable instruments. It will make the drawer liable
even though he was unaware of the insufficiency of the fund in his account within
a prescribed limit of time. But the law itself provides a reasonable time for them to
repay back the amount to the payee.
The default made after such a period has to be considered as a criminal act as
it involves an unlawful intention of not paying back the money to the deserving
party. Thus, the law makes it clear that the parties while signing a cheque have to
be aware of the amount of money in their concerned banks.
Bank Penalty
For most banks, the penalty charges for cheque outward return are close to Rs.
300, while charges for cheque inward return are about Rs. 100. The penalty
charges change from one bank to another and are different for different account
types. Premium accounts mostly have higher penalty charges. A bounced cheque
can dent the financial credit history of a drawee.
A CIBIL score is critical for your business since it can invariably affect your
equation with the investors or the banks when you approach them for your loan in
the future. Even a single bounce can impact your CIBIL score.
14 | P a g e
To conclude, Although the Negotiable Instrument Act provides for expeditious disposal
of trail, the cases in the lower courts move at a snail’s pace sometimes. A lot is desired
in this direction. May be High courts should monitor and issue directions to lower
courts for speedy disposal of cases to achieve the objective of the Act.
15 | P a g e