Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NIA - Anu
NIA - Anu
In re:-
Rajneesh Roy …………..Complainant
Versus
INDEX
1. Memo of Parties 2
2. List of Witnesses 3
5. Affidavit 12
7. Vakalatnama
Dehradun.
Dated: 21.04.2019
(ANUPRIYA BANERJEE)
ADVOCATE
COUNSEL FOR THE COMPLAINANT
CH. NO. 310,
DISTRICT COURT LAWYERS’ CHAMBERS,
DEHRADUN - 248001
(M): +91-8840247870
IN THE COURT OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DISTRICT
COURT, DEHRADUN (UTTARAKHAND)
CRL. COMPLAINT CASE NO. _____ OF 2019
In re:-
Rajneesh Roy …………..Complainant
Versus
MEMO OF PARTIES
Vs.
………Accused
Dehradun.
Dated: 21.04.2019
(ANUPRIYA BANERJEE)
ADVOCATE
COUNSEL FOR THE COMPLAINANT
CH. NO. 310,
DISTRICT COURT LAWYERS’ CHAMBERS,
DEHRADUN - 248001
(M): +91-8840247870
IN THE COURT OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DISTRICT
COURT, DEHRADUN (UTTARAKHAND)
CRL. COMPLAINT CASE NO. _____ OF 2019
In re:-
Rajneesh Roy
…………..Complainant
Versus
Shikhar Mishra
.………Accused
LIST OF WITNESSES
Dehradun.
Dated: 21.04.2019
(ANUPRIYA BANERJEE)
ADVOCATE
COUNSEL FOR THE COMPLAINANT
CH. NO. 310,
DISTRICT COURT LAWYERS’ CHAMBERS,
DEHRADUN - 248001
(M): +91-8840247870
IN THE COURT OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DISTRICT
COURT, DEHRADUN (UTTARAKHAND)
CRL. COMPLAINT CASE NO. _____ OF 2019
In re:-
Rajneesh Roy
…………..Complainant
Versus
Shikhar Mishra
.………Accused
the said legal notice. The said legal notice has been served
sum of the complainant for his wrongful gain and for the
9. That the parties to the complaint reside and work for gain
hence this Hon’ble Court has got the jurisdiction to try and
11. Prayer –
try and punish the above named accused under Section 138/142 of the
interest of justice.
Dehradun
Dated: 21.04.2019
Complainant
Through
(ANUPRIYA BANERJEE)
ADVOCATE
COUNSEL FOR THE COMPLAINANT
IN THE COURT OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DISTRICT
COURT, DEHRADUN (UTTARAKHAND)
CRL. COMPLAINT CASE NO. _____ OF 2019
In re:-
Rajneesh Roy …………..Complainant
Versus
Affidavit of Shikhar Mishra, aged about 23 years, S/o Mr. Tushar Roy,
declare as under:-
2. That there is good friendly term between the family of the accused
3. That in the month of June, 2018, the accused had approached the
considering the past relations with the accused and his family, the
said loan amount to the deponent shortly. The copy of the Pass
Book of the complainant, showing the Bank Transfer to the
4. That later on, in order to discharge the said loan liability, the
amount the accused had signed, issued and handed over a cheque
and while handing over the said cheque, the acused had assured
that the said cheque is good for payment and would be honoured
Ex.CW-1/’2’.
its due date, but it was to the utter shock and surprise to the
deponent that the said cheque returned by your banker with the
Ex.CW-1/’3’.
and apprised him about the fate of the said cheque and demanded
the said cheque amount in cash, but the accused with malafide
him to pay the said cheque amount in cash within 15 days from
the date of receipt of the said legal notice. The said legal notice
has been served upon the accused on __.__.2019, but despite the
service of the same, the accused did not bother to reply or comply
with the terms of the said legal notice, till date. The Legal Notice
Report is Ex.CW-1/’6’.
8. That now the accused has illegally retained the legitimate sum of
the deponent for his wrongful gain and for the wrongful loss to the
deponent and even, the cheque, which the accused has issued in
dishonoured and the accused was well aware about the status of
and defraud the same, as such, the accused has committed the
9. That the complaint filed by the deponent is true and correct and
the same has been duly signed by the deponent and he is entitled
for the relief as prayed for in the complaint and the accused be
amended up to date).
10. That I am deposing truly and the above statement of mine is true
and correct.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
Verified at Dehradun on this ___ day of April, 2019, that the contents
DEPONENT
IN THE COURT OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DISTRICT
COURT, DEHRADUN (UTTARAKHAND)
CRL. COMPLAINT CASE NO. _____ OF 2019
In re:-
Rajneesh Roy …………..Complainant
Versus
AFFIDAVIT
I, Rajneesh Roy, aged about 23 years, S/o Mr. Tushar Roy, R/o Kandoli
affirm as under :-
2. That I have not filed any similar complaint against the accused
upon the accused vide Speed Post dated __.__.2018 and sent
the same at the last known correct address of the accused i.e.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
Verified at Dehradun on this ____ day of April, 2019, that the contents
DEPONENT