Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 18

LIST OF FIND

INITIAL ASSESMENT A
PT. ABIMANYU SEKAR NUSA

NO. FINDINGS CATEGORY

Inconsistency of document numbering system and its


1 Minor
distribution was not effectively implemented

Retention period of documented information (Records)


2 Minor
was not effectively established
The communication / socialization of Quality Policy,
3 Quality Manual and Quality Objective were not Minor
conducted internally.

The organization did not maintain the customer focus /


4 Minor
satisfaction, i.e customer satisfaction survey

The responsible and authority of Management


Representative was not effectively established to having
5 Minor
unlimited access to top management for resolving
quality issue

Calibration / Verification of measuring equipment was


6 not in properly conducted at specified interval or prior Minor
to use againts measurement standard

The measuring equipment was not identified to


7 Minor
determine their status
The prevention of counterfeit part was not effectively
8 Minor
determinded and implemented.
The method to identify and control the Key
9 Chaeracteristics was not established yet, e.g baloon Minor
drawing

The method to control and monitor the process change


10 and its configuration management was not properly Minor
implemented

11 FAI process was not effectively implemented Minor

12 Contract Review was not effectively established in Minor


procedure
13 The technical data of customer requirements was not Minor
properly stated in PO to external provider.

The storage requirement of supporting equipment, e.g


14 jigs/fixtures, which defined for production was not Minor
defined

The internal audit planning was not accommodate its


15 scope & criteria and the audit evidence was not Minor
properly stated on its report

The methodology for prevention, detection, and


16 removal of foreign object and handling for hazardous Minor
material was not estbalised yet

17 Clause in Quality Manual still use the ISO9001:2008, it is Observation


recommeded to follow the AS9100D requirement

18 Personnel's Skill Matrix was in place, however it was not Observation


accommodate the up-skilling of aerospace requirement

19 Quality Policy is in Bahasa, it is recommeded to be Observation


bilingual, i.e English version

The statement of Continual Improvement was not


20 explicitly written in Quality Policy, it is recommended to Observation
add this wording in Quality Policy

The planning/schduling of Management Review has the


21 different format/template, it is recommeded to Observation
standardize its format/template

22 FMEA & RCA were in place, however it needed to be Observation


depth in analysis
Personnel job description was in place, however it is
23 recommended to identify personnel who will perform Observation
for aerospace part.
LIST OF FINDINGS
INITIAL ASSESMENT AC7004
PT. ABIMANYU SEKAR NUSANTARA

ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS CORRECTIVE ACTION PIC


DUE DATE
LIST OF FIND
INITIAL ASSESMENT
PT. ABIMANYU SEKAR NUS

NO. FINDINGS CATEGORY

2. General Information:
1 Procedure not evidenced to state scope of processes Observation
(process type)

3.1. Pre-Cleaning & Pre-Treatment Obeservation


2 Procedure eveidenced but Spec traceabilities not (High Risk to Minor)
eveidenced; PRD-IK-106 (IPA;981-100-020 Rev.?)

3.3. Prepared Surface Protection


3 No procedure evidenced to state it; Minor
ie. ENG-F-0024

3.4. Time requirements between surface preparation &


coating.
4 Obesrvation
QCPC not state clear enough (yet cust spec state
recommendation regarding time between requirements).

3.5. Time limit requiements between surface preparation


& coatings.
No procedure evidenced state the requirement.
5 Major
Note: Product Impact Risk; due to customer spec state
requirements of part protections while quieng above 8
hours to coatings.

3.5. Materials purchased from QPL.


6 Procedure not evidenced stated the reqs & PO not Major
evidenced. Note: Product Impact Risk

3.6. CoC of purchased materials (traceabilities)


7 Procedure not evidenced stated the reqs & PO also CoC Major
not evidenced. Note: Product Impact Risk

3.7. Procedure for Shelf Life Control.


8 Procedure not evidenced stated the reqs. Major
Note: Product Impact Risk

3.8. Shelf Life Control implementations.


9 Records not evidenced. Major
Note: Product Impact Risk

3.8.1. Material re-qualification/disposal.


10 Procedure not evidenced stated the reqs. Major
Note: Product Impact Risk
3.8.1. Material re-qualification/disposal records.
11 Procedure not evidenced stated the reqs. Major
Records not evidenced. Note: Product Impact Risk

3.9. Materials storage


12 Procedure not evidenced stated the reqs. Major
Records not evidenced. Note: Product Impact Risk

3.12. Prep Process Steps:


- Mixing Order; are not in order
13 - Agitation/shaking time & mixing time requirements are Major
exist yet procedures not evididenced state it.
Note: Product Impact Risk

3.15. Materials to Hardware traceabilites


14 Theres process are done pararells; found high risk Observation
traceability will be broken.

3.16. Spray equipments maintenances.


15 No procedures evidenced state the requirements and no Major
records. Note: Product Impact Risk

3.17. Air supplies maintenances.


16 No procedures evidenced state the requirements and no Major
records. Note: Product Impact Risk

17 3.18.1. Cleaning Procedures material compliance. Observation


PRD-IK-106 state 981-100-200

3.18.2. Test Piece Requirement.


18 Procedure not evidenced to state the reqs. Major
Note: Product Impact Risk

3.18.3. Parts subsequent process protections.


19 Procedure not evidenced to state the reqs. Major
Note: Product Impact Risk

3.19. Coating application areas control.


20 No procedures evidenced state the requirements and no Major
records. Note: Product Impact Risk
*Checksheet only control T & Hum

3.20.1. Masking prior cleaning procedures. Observation


21 Procedure should state no/any masking prior to cleaning (Risk to Major)
if no/any requirements stated.

3.20.2. Shop paper to show masking area & masking Observation


22 material to use. (Risk to Major)
Procedure should state mask requirements.

23 3.20.3. Masking material compatibility. Observation


Procedure should state mask requirements. (Risk to Major)
24 3.20.4. Fixture/Jig & masking design Observation
Procedure should state mask requirements. (Risk to Major)

25 3.20.5. Masking before thermal ops reqs. Observation


Procedure should state mask requirements. (Risk to Major)

3.21.3. Visual in-process check must be performed prior


26 to next ops. Major
No records evidenced/verified

27 3.21.4. Segregation area control. Obeservation


No official layout evidenced (High Risk to Minor)

3.22. records of drying times between coats and to final


28 cure. Major
TS not define to fill Time when coat applied.

29 4.1.2. Personel competency (Testings). Major


Training Program & Records & SM not evidenced

4.1.3. Instrument Calibrations


29 Cal cert not evidenced, cal control (label/sticker) also not Major
evidenced.

4.1.7. Specific thickness location check


30 Procedure not evidenced state reqs Major
Note: Product Impact Risk

4.1.8. Thickness method regarding parts shape & coat


31 material properties control. Major
Procedure not evidenced state reqs.

4.2.1. Adhesion test method specs / procedures


32 Procedure not evidenced state reqs Major
Note: Product Impact Risk

33 4.2.2. Personel competency (Testings). Major


Training Program & Records & SM not evidenced

4.2.5. Environtment & duration control.


34 Procedure not evidenced state reqs Major
Note: Product Impact Risk

4.2.6. Tape type reqs.


35 Procedure not evidenced state reqs Major
Note: Product Impact Risk

4.2.8. Test Reports.


36 Review/verification; TS. NC action not stated. Major
Note: Product Impact & Sistemic Risk

37 4.4.1. Testing specs compliance (Solvent test) Observation


Eng review with customer
38 4.4.2. Personel competency (Testings). Major
Training Program & Records & SM not evidenced

39 4.4.6. Testing specs compliance (Solvent test) Observation


Eng review with customer; Proc/IK testing

4.4.6.1. Testing step


40 Procedure not evidenced state reqs Major
Note: Product Impact Risk

4.4.7. Test procedure specify acc/rjct criteria.


41 Procedure not evidenced state reqs Major
Note: Product Impact Risk

4.4.8. NC response step.


42 NC procedures not yet clear (step. Disposition,etc) Major
Note: Product impact & sistemic Risk

All section 5 (19 Checklist) regarding Control of Curing


Oven for process above 120 C are:
43 -- No procedures state requirements Major
No records evindeced
- AMS2750 not recognized as requirements
Note: Product impact & sistemic Risk
LIST OF FINDINGS
INITIAL ASSESMENT AC7108
PT. ABIMANYU SEKAR NUSANTARA

ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS CORRECTIVE ACTION PIC

Prosedur aerospace Lupi

WI Pre-cleaning (PRD-IK-106) exclude IPA WI Pre cleaning (PRD-IK-106) include IPA Nailu
refer to spec No. (981-100-020) Issue 12 refer to spec No. (981-100-020) Issue 12

ENG-F-0024 exclude refer to procedure ENG-F-0024 include refer to procedure Nailu


spec No. (914-040-061) Issue 10 spec No. (914-040-061) Issue 10

QCPC yet stated the time period QCPC has stated the time period Nailu
between pre treatment and coating between pre treatment and coating

No procedure or work instruction time WI WETBLASTING (PRD-IK-107) has been


limit between surface preparation &
coating and activity if coating cannot be attach activity if coating cannot be Nailu
carried out wiyhin 8 hours
carried out within 8 hours

PO Request Yorin

PO Request Yorin

WI Material storage (PPC-IK-0021) Nailu

Checksheet temperature & humidity Nailu


storage of paint (ENG-F-0045)

WI Incoming Paint (ENG-IK-0013), WI


Treatment of Material Expired (ENG-IK- Nailu
0020)
Checksheet New LOT/Batch Inspection Nailu
(ENG-F-0023)

WI Material storage (PPC-IK-0021) Nailu

WI Mixing (ENG-IK-0018) Nailu

Separate of technique sheet mixing and Nailu


technique sheet other process

WI Cleaning Spray Gun & WI Cleaning Susana


Husky Pump

WI Air Supply Maintenance Dwi

PRD-IK-106 state 981-100-200 Nailu

Add test piece in technique sheet Nailu

WI Line Store / Material Handling Nailu

- Checksheet Control of Spray Booth Nailu


Area

WI maintenance jig Nailu

WI Loading Nailu

WI Loading Nailu
WI Loading Nailu

WI Loading Nailu

Checksheet Wetblasting Inspection


(QTC-F-0050), Checksheet Final Nailu
Inspcetion (QTC-F-0051)

Layout changes by actual Lupi

Technique sheet (ENG-F-0040) Nailu

Material Training Lupi

Schedule Calibration Lupi

Technique sheet (ENG-F-0040) & WI Nailu


Thickness

WI Operating of Thickness Dry Fim (ENG- Nailu


IK-0019)

WI Adhesion Test (ENG-IK-0020) Nailu

Material Training Lupi

TDS 3M, QTC-IK-0018 QC

WI Adhesion Test (ENG-IK-0020) Nailu

Report Trial Painting (ENG-F-0012) Nailu

Testing & report trial Nailu


Material Training Lupi

WI Butanone test (ENG-IK-0019) Nailu

WI Butanone test (ENG-IK-0019) Nailu

WI Butanone test (ENG-IK-0019) Nailu

WI Butanone test (ENG-IK-0019) Nailu

-Oven verification
'-Oven modification Lupi
'-Oven calibration
DUE DATE STATUS

20/12/2018 Open

19/10/2018 Close

13/11/2018 Close

13/11/208 Close

13/11/208 Close

20/12/2018 Open

20/12/2018 Open

19/10/2018 Close

19/10/2018 Close

15/10/2018 Close
15/10/2018 Close

19/10/2018 Close

19/10/2018 Close

19/10/2018 Close

20/12/2018 Open

20/12/2018 Open

19/10/2018 Close

19/10/2018 Open

19/12/2018 Open

19/12/2018 Open

19/12/2018 Open

19/12/2018 Open

19/10/2018 Open
19/10/2018 Open

19/10/2018 Open

19/10/2018 Open

20/12/2018 Open

20/12/2018 Open

20/12/2018 Open

18/01/2019 Open

20/12/2018 Open

19/10/2018 Close

19/10/2018 Close

20/12/2018 Open

20/12/2018 Open

19/10/2018 Close

19/10/2018 Open

20/12/2018 Open
20/12/2018 Open

19/10/2018 Close

19/10/2018 Close

19/10/2018 Close

19/10/2018 Open

18/01/2019 Open

You might also like