Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Modal Identification of Buildings From Ambient Vibration Test
Modal Identification of Buildings From Ambient Vibration Test
Background
Ambient vibration test (AVT) of existing buildings is both easier and more frequent ly conducted than other vibration
tests; e.g. force-induced vibration test or earthquake observation. To take the advantages of measuring operations, the AVT will be
hopefully applied for structural health monitoring to evaluate existing structural capability of structures (Fig.1). However there exists
difficulty of analyzing the structural response data by the traditional system identification technique based on input-output relation-
ships, because one cannot measure the exact structural inputs such as wind force or ground acceleration due to traffic vibration. To
avoid the difficulty of AVT, the author has developed a spectral analysis scheme based on the autoregressive moving-average (AR-
MA) model and its application of modal identification * 1.
Objectives
To improve modal identification accuracy even when the AVT data is contaminated by mechanical noises and local member
vibrations, the spectral scheme and modal identification technique shall be farther developed.
Principal Results
1. New algorithms of spectral analysis based on ARMAMA model
We propose a couple of linear difference models as autoregressive moving-average and moving average (ARMAMA) mod-
els and derive spectral analysis based on a pair of ARMAMA models:
Bx(z-1) Dx(z-1) By(z-1) Dy(z-1)
x (t)= e(t) + ex (t), y(t)= e(t) + ey (t)
Ax(z-1) Cx(z-1) Ay(z-1) Cy(z-1)
where x(t ) and y(t ) are the observable outputs; e(t ), ex(t ) and ey(t ) are the unobservable input of Gaussian white noise se-
quences with zero mean and unit variance, which are mutually independent; Ax(z -1 ), Ay(z -1 ), Cx(z -1 ) and Cy(z -1 ) are the AR opera-
tors;Bx(z -1 ), By(z -1), Dx(z -1) and Dy (z -1) are the MA operators; z -1 is the unit-delay operator. ARMAMA models are represented by
correlated and uncorrelated terms in each equation, therefore the correlated and uncorrelated components of two observable outputs
can be clearly separated in the spectral analysis. In this respect, the present ARMAMA model is superior to ARMA model proposed
before * 1.
Future Developments
The modal identification will be applied for damage detection of building foundations or structural members. The proposed
technique shall be widely employed for modal characteristics evaluation of various kinds of civil or mechanical structures, because it
is already demonstrated that the proposed method was effective in estimating modal characteristics of electric facilities under commer-
cial operations.
References
• K. Kanazawa, 2002, "Structural damage detection based on ambient vibration measurements (Part.II)― ARMAMA model for spec-
trum analysis ―", Abiko Research Laboratory Report No. U01031, CRIEPI(Japanese only).
• K. Kanazawa, 2002, "Structural damage detection based on ambient vibration measurements (Part.III)― Modal and Structural identi-
fication of multi-story building using ARMAMA model ―", Abiko Research Laboratory Report No. U01031, CRIEPI(Japanese on-
ly).
90
9. Preservation of electric facilities - Improvement of power facility maintenance and management
Proposed Technique
Comparison No
Safety
Yes Yes
Structural identification
Comparison Detail
Damage Location?
diagnosis
Fig.1 Scheme of the structural damage detection Fig.2 Overview of the Building
Ambient vibrations test (AVT) was carried out
on a 10-story steel framed reinforced concrete
building. Vibrometers are set on the center of
all floors.
Floor
Floor
Floor
Fig.3 The 1st modal vector of the building identified from the AVT records
Modal characteristics of the building were estimated from 12 sets of the AVT records on July 18 1996 and on August
10 1996. The mass distributions between the 5-th and 7-th floors of the building are different on each day. Fig.(a)
and Fig.(b) show results on mode shape and its curvature identified by the proposed technique. According to Fig.(b),
the curvatures of mode shapes can clearly be distinguished among the two kinds of records using ARMAMA model.
On the other hand, Fig.(c) shows results of the curvature of mode shape identified by conventional transfer function
based technique, where the basement floor response was treated as an input of the building. By the conventional
method, it is impossible to eliminate the differences of the mode curvatures due to the mass distribution change, so
that the mode estimates have erroneous variances.
91