Professional Documents
Culture Documents
01 Opening Study Guide
01 Opening Study Guide
Chess Openings
...
Last
ananthhh
if u want to know about chess opening and chess skill plz download a free lucas chess game from
fischer free chess software.it will teach u chess skill very frindly manner and show u the
difference between your move and best move.again you can learn opening by watching chess
game of gm from website chessgame.com,thank u
transpo
First you have to choose an opening repertoire. Preferably 3 openings as White and 3 openings
as Black. There are several opening training software programs on the internet. Probably the 2
best are Chess Wizard(Bookup) and Chessbase. It will take you 2-3 years to build your opening
tree with the help of the computer and the software suggested above.
Also you will have to purchase books or cds that explain in words what the particular opening is
about. In other words, the ideas, plans, strategies of the particular opening.
You will have to analyze your games in order to determine your progress in knowing the correct
book moves of the opening that the game followed. And, of course where you went wrong in the
game, the book moves you commited to memory from having played the same moves in practice
with your Bookup software, but forgot during the game.
There is more, but I think the above is enough to get you started.
Good luck on your new chess adventure and have fun.
Bayraba
You can also use the openings explorer on this site to do the same thing. Yes, it takes years...
ananthhh
Apr 28, 2012#5
transpo
ananthhh wrote:
fredm73
mnag
Michael-G
I understand your frustration but you are looking the wrong way.
To understand the opening you have to understand it's result , the middle game.If you don't know
the number "2" you are not going to understand why "1+1 equals 2".And to understand middle
game you have to understand it's result , the endgame.That is why endgame is so damn important
and that is why opening is so damn unimportant for beginners.When you will be able to evaluate a
position correctly ,when you will be able to plan correctly , when you will be able to play
accurately at least the simple endgames then you will be ready to understand the meaning behind
3.Bb5 in Ruy Lopez and you will be ready to understand why a position is equal , slightly better or
slightly worst.Until then Ruy Lopez or Sicilian are completely useless for you.
Right now what you need is simple openings that will improve your understanding in chess and
will make learning complicated openings easier.You can't learn openings because you see
uncomprehensible lines leading to uncomprehensible positions.Even if you do learn them nothing
will happen , no improvement at all.
You need openings that you can play with almost no theory knowledge and will help you
understand some fundamental opening ideas and plans.Once you know well these you can move on
to more complicated openings.
You learn an opening by understanding it and you can understand it by understanding the
positions it produce.
p.s. Message me if you need more information.
ananthhh
nomorechesscom
Aug 21, 2012#11
[COMMENT DELETED]
Andre_Harding
Andre_Harding
Estragon
I use Chessbase too but I presume any database program has openings keys for sorting games, as
well as other filters. Let me add to Andre_Harding's comments.
It is useful when forming a database for learning an opening to ensure the quality of the
games. The easiest way to do this is to also filter for rating by setting a minimum for both
players. You will want to start with 50-100 games per opening (don't worry, you go over them
over a period of time) and so for a popular opening like the Nadjorf Sicilian you may have to set
the rating high, like 2500 or higher depending on the time span you are looking at (last ten years
recommended), to get to the desired number. For the Budapest or Albin, you might only have to
specify over 2200, say.
Then go over the games slow enough to see what is happening - no blitz speed - but not trying
any deep analysis. You just want to notice the similar features, the recurring ideas and patterns
and tactics which will happen. Maybe 15 minutes a game, so four in an hour, make it part of
your regimen. Then use what you have seen in your own games, review and compare.
This is not a crash course, it requires an effort over a period of time, but as you progress through
it you will have learned something you won't forget, as opposed to cramming memorized
variations you will forget easily.
Estragon
And you want to play over the games you've filtered as they come - don't skip the losses for the
side you want to play, or the draws. That way you see what works and what fails for both sides.
Also, play out each to the end. In this way, you are also seeing all the middlegame strategies and
even the typical endgames that arise, so you won't be left wondering what to do when the
opening ends.
Andre_Harding
transpo
Michael-G wrote:
I understand your frustration but you are looking the wrong way.
To understand the opening you have to understand it's result , the middle game.If you don't
know the number "2" you are not going to understand why "1+1 equals 2".And to understand
middle game you have to understand it's result , the endgame.That is why endgame is so damn
important and that is why opening is so damn unimportant for beginners.When you will be
able to evaluate a position correctly ,when you will be able to plan correctly , when you will
be able to play accurately at least the simple endgames then you will be ready to understand
the meaning behind 3.Bb5 in Ruy Lopez and you will be ready to understand why a position is
equal , slightly better or slightly worst.Until then Ruy Lopez or Sicilian are completely useless
for you.
Right now what you need is simple openings that will improve your understanding in chess and
will make learning complicated openings easier.You can't learn openings because you see
uncomprehensible lines leading to uncomprehensible positions.Even if you do learn them nothing
will happen , no improvement at all.
You need openings that you can play with almost no theory knowledge and will help you
understand some fundamental opening ideas and plans.Once you know well these you can move on
to more complicated openings.
You learn an opening by understanding it and you can understand it by understanding the
positions it produce.
p.s. Message me if you need more information.
Openings are not unimportant for beginners. Memorizing lists of moves without understanding
those moves is the problem.
If a beginner studies the opening PROPERLY (which implies studying the middlegames and
possibly endgames that arise from their openings, and improves positional evaluation) it will be a
huge help. Not to mention it will also improve tactics.
The problem, as I see it, is that most openings books do not teach the opening properly and the
reader gets more confused and doesn't know what they are doing (believe me, I have been
there!). That is why opening study gets a bad rap.
ibastrikov
Although you can't get around memorizing moves, it is always better to first familiarize yourself
with the general themes of the opening: the usual pawn structures, piece placements, and
plans. Then once you know the basic ideas, you should learn the correct lines and hopefully,
then, know why they are played.
1234
...
Last
Log InorJoin
Forums
Hot Topics
Unanswered
Most Recent
8/3/2014 - Mate in 2
Name a grandmaster
5 good clubs that YOU should join [if you will like this forum i'll make another one ;)]
Forum Legend
Following
New Comments
Locked Topic
Pinned Topic
Mark all topics as READ
HelpWhy Join?About Jobs Developers User Agreement Privacy Policy Community Policies Chess.com
© 2019