Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Food Chemistry 80 (2003) 119–123

www.elsevier.com/locate/foodchem

Analytical, Nutritional and Clinical Methods Section

Determination of heavy metals in fish samples of the middle Black


Sea (Turkey) by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry
Mustafa Tüzen*
Gaziosmanpaşa University, Faculty of Science and Arts, Chemistry Department, 60250 Tokat, Turkey

Received 5 February 2002; received in revised form 12 June 2002; accepted 12 June 2002

Abstract
The concentrations of heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Fe, Cu, Mn and Zn) in fish samples were determined using graphite furnace atomic
absorption spectrometry after dry ashing and wet ashing methods. Different matrix modifiers were used for the stabilization of the
analyte. Good accuracy was assured by the analysis of biological reference materials. Recoveries were quantitative for all elements
studied (595%). The relative standard deviations were less than 7% for all elements.
# 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Heavy metals; Digestion; Fish; Graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry

1. Introduction Decomposition of solid samples is an important step in


combined analytical methods. In most cases, when using
The heavy metal pollution of the marine environment highly sensitive measuring methods, such as flame AAS,
has long been recognized as a serious environmental graphite furnace AAS, ICP–OES, ICP–MS or inverse
concern (Balkas, Tugrel, & Salhogln, 1982; Tarıq, Jaf- voltammetry, the sample is measured in an aqueous solu-
far, & Moazzam, 1991). In the sea, pollutants are tion (Knapp, 1991). Combined analytical methods are
potentially accumulated in marine organisms and sedi- favoured for multi element analysis of environmental and
ments, and subsequently transferred to man through the biological samples at very high speed. Sequential and
food chain (Giordano et al., 1991). For these reasons, it is simultaneous determinations of the elements can be
important to determine the chemical quality of the marine made using the above analytical techniques. Determi-
organisms, particularly the contents of heavy metals, in nation of heavy metals (Pb and Cd) in fish has been
order to evaluate the possible risk, to human health, of fish performed with electrothermal AAS (detection limits of
consumption (Cid, Boia, Pombo, & Rebelo, 2001). Metals Pb: 6.4 ng/ml and Cd: 0.14 ng/ml) (Sures, Taraschewski,
such as iron, copper, zinc and manganese, are essential & Haug, 1995). The concentrations of Zn, Cd, Cu and
metals since they play an important role in biological sys- Pb in fish have been determined by using ICP–AES and
tems, whereas mercury, lead and cadmium are non-essen- FAAS (Zhuang, Wang, Yang, Zhu, & Yang, 1995).
tial metals, as they are toxic, even in traces (Schroeder, Heavy metal concentrations have been determined in
1973; Somer, 1974). The essential metals can also produce fish and biological samples using flame AAS with
toxic effects when the metal intake is excessively elevated. detection limits (as mg/l) Cd: 0.6, Cu: 3, Fe: 5, Mn: 3,
Levels of heavy metals in fish have been widely reported Pb: 20 and Zn: 2 (Karadede & Ünlü, 2000). Levels of
(Pujin, Djukic, Maletin, Obradovic, & Kostic, 1990; heavy metals in biological samples have been deter-
Sharif, Mustafa, Mirza, & Safiullah, 1991; Tarıq, Jaffar, & mined by flame AAS with detection limits (as mg/g) Cd:
Ashraf, 1991; Ubillus, Alegria, Barbera, Farre, & Lagerda, 0.03, Cu: 0.03, Zn: 0.07, Fe: 0.04 and Mn: 0.01 (Kress,
2000; Voegborlo, El-Methnani, & Abedin, 1999). Hornung, & Herut, 1998). Trace metals have been
determined in fish samples by electrothermal AAS with
* Tel.: +90-356-2521582; fax: +90-356-2521585. detection limits (as mg/l) Cd: 0.0788, Cu: 0.344, Ni:
E-mail address: mtuzen@gop.edu.tr, drtuzen@hotmail.com 1.825, Pb: 0.968 and Zn: 0.0127 (mg/ml by FAAS) (Cid
(M. Tüzen). et al., 2001). Detection limits of molybdenum have been
0308-8146/02/$ - see front matter # 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S0308-8146(02)00264-9
120 M. Tüzen / Food Chemistry 80 (2003) 119–123

reported in geological samples and seawater, using com- were soaked in nitric acid for 15 min and rinsed with
bined analytical methods, as 0.75 mg/l for ICP–AES, 0.08 deionized water before use. The stock solutions of metals
mg/g for ICP–MS, 0.18 mg/ml for FAAS and 3 ng/l for (1000 mg/l) were obtained by dissolving appropriate salts
GFAAS, respectively (Santos, Korn, & Ferreira, 2001). of the corresponding metals (E. Merck) and further dilu-
Graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry ted prior to use. High purity Argon was used as inert gas.
(GFAAS) is one of the suitable methods for the deter-
mination of trace metals in food and biological samples 2.3. Sampling
because of its speed, minimum need for sample pre-
paration, the possibility of automation, good sensitivity The fish species were collected from random com-
and low detection limit (Acar, 2001; Acar, Kılıç, & mercial catches in the Middle Black Sea coasts in Sam-
Türker, 2000; Doner & Akman, 2000; Blust, Vander der sun (Turkey) between September 2000 and May 2001.
Linden, Verheyen, & Decleir, 1988; Huang et al., 2000; The samples were washed with distilled water, dried in
Lynch & Littlejohn, 1989). However, the determination filter paper, homogenized, packed in polyethylene bags
of heavy metals in fish samples by GFAAS is difficult and stored below 20  C until analysis. Five species of
because the influence of a complicated matrix greatly fish, namely Alosa caspia, Engraulis encrasicholus, Tra-
affects the analytical results. Therefore, different chemical churus trachurus, Sarda sarda, and Clupea sprattus were
modifiers are used for the stabilization of the analyte. included in the study.
In this study, an analytical method was developed for
the determination of Pb, Cd, Fe, Cu, Mn and Zn, in fish 2.4. Digestion procedures
samples, using graphite furnace atomic absorption
spectrometry. Two types of digestion procedures were applied.
Optimum digestion conditions are given below. The
samples were dried to constant weight at 110  C.
2. Materials and methods
2.4.1. Dry-ashing
2.1. Apparatus A sample (1 g) was placed in a high form porcelain
crucible. The furnace temperature was slowly increased
A Varian Model Spectr AA 220 atomic absorption from room temperature to 450  C in 1 h. The samples
spectrometer, equipped with a Varian GTA-110 gra- were ashed for about 4 h until a white or grey ash resi-
phite furnace, was used. Pyrolytic-coated graphite tubes due was obtained. The residue was dissolved in 5 ml of
with a platform were used and signals were measured as HNO3 (25% v/v) and the mixture, where necessary, was
peak areas. The instrument settings and furnace pro- heated slowly to dissolve the residue. The solution was
grammes for analysis of trace elements are described in transferred to a 25 ml volumetric flask and made up to
Table 1. volume (Vaidya & Rantala, 1996). A blank digest was
carried out in the same way. All metals were determined
2.2. Reagents against aqueous standards.

All reagents were of analytical reagent grade unless 2.4.2. Wet-ashing


otherwise stated. Double distilled water was used for the The samples were solubilized using high-pressure
preparation of solutions. All the plastic and glassware decomposition vessels, commonly known as a digestion

Table 1
Instrument settings and furnace programmes for analysis of trace elements by AAS

Working conditions Fe Cu Mn Zn Pb Cd

Wavelength (nm) 248.3 324.8 279.5 307.6 283.3 228.8


Slit width (nm) 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.7 0.5 0.7
Lamp current (mA) 7 4 5 5 5 4
Ar flow (ml/min) 250 250 250 250 250 250
(flow interrupted at atomization stage)
Injection volume (ml) 20 20 20 20 15 15
Heating programme temperature  C [ramp time (s), hold time (s)]
Drying 1 110(1, 20) 110(1, 20) 110(1, 20) 110(1, 20) 110(1, 20) 110(1, 20)
Drying 2 130(5, 30) 130(5, 30) 130(5, 30) 130(5,30) 130(5,30) 130(5,30)
Pyrolysis 1100(15,10) 1000(15,10) 1300(15,10) 1000(15,10) 900(15,10) 800(15,10)
Atomization 2200(0,5) 2100(0,5) 1900(0,5) 1800(0,5) 2000(0,5) 1900(0,5)
Cleaning 2600(1,2) 2600(1,2) 2400(1,2) 2400(1,2) 2500(1,2) 2400(1,2)
M. Tüzen / Food Chemistry 80 (2003) 119–123 121

bomb. A sample (1 g) was placed into Teflon container matter destruction, shortens the time needed for the
and 5 ml of concentrated HNO3 was added. The system analysis and offers the advantage of simple, fast organic
was heated to 130  C for 90 min and finally diluted to 25 matter destruction, minimum reagent volume, reduction
ml with deionized water. The sample solution was clear. of possible analyte losses by volatilization or retention
A blank digest was carried out in the same way. All and elimination of the environmental contamination
metals were determined against aqueous standards. risks (Silvestre, Lagarda, Farre, Martinez-Costa, &
Brines, 2000). An open beaker method for dry-ashing
2.5. Analytical procedure fish samples was found to be susceptible to contamina-
tion from external sources which could be prevented by
Determinations of all metal concentrations were car- carrying out the digestion in the closed system used in
ried out by graphite furnace AAS. During analyses, this study.
internal argon flow rate through the graphite tube was Detection limits, precision, and accuracy of analyses
250 ml/min; gas flow was interrupted during atomiza- were determined by repeated analyses of two biological
tion. Sample volume, ramp and hold times for the dry- reference material standards. The results from the ana-
ing, pyrolysis, atomization and cleaning temperatures lysis of SRM were all within the 95% confidence limit of
were optimized before analysis to obtain maximum the SRMs. Excellent recoveries for all metals were
absorbance and minimum background. The details are obtained compared to the certified values. The detection
given in Table 1. limits for the methods were found to be (mg/l), Cu:0.36,
Matrix modifiers added were 50 mg (NH4)2HPO4+3 Mn:0.23, Zn:0.25, Fe:0.42, Pb:0.98 and Cd:0.065 (n:10,
mg Mg(NO3)2 for Cd and Pb, 5 mg Pd+3 mg Mg(NO3)2 3s). The detection limits of the elements determined in
for Mn, Fe, Cu, and 5 mg Al2SO4 for Zn. this study were found to be 10 times and 100 times
In order to validate the method for accuracy and lower than those reported in other studies using flame
precision, certified reference materials (Oyster tissue and AAS (Karadede & Ünlü, 2000; Kress et al., 1998).
Mussel tissue) were analysed for each element. The It is desirable to use a higher pyrolysis temperature in
results are shown in Table 2. order to remove the matrix efficiently and a temperature
The detection limit is defined as the concentration of at least 1000  C should be aimed at for many analytes
corresponding to 3 times the standard deviation of 10 in food, biological and environmental samples (Bin &
blanks. Zhe-Ming, 1996; Lynch & Littlejohn, 1989; Zong, Par-
sons, & Slavin, 1996). The pyrolysis and atomization
temperatures of heavy metals were increased using dif-
3. Results and discussion ferent chemical modifiers. The maximum pyrolysis and
atomization temperatures obtained were 800 and
The concentrations of the heavy metals in fish species 1900  C for Cd; 900 and 2000  C for Pb; 1000 and
are given in Table 3. When the dry ashing method is 1800  C for Zn; 1300 and 1900  C for Mn; 1000 and
compared with wet-ashing method for testing metal 2100  C for Cu; 1100 and 2200  C for Fe. Most of the
concentrations, the t-test indicates that the differences matrix was removed before the atomization step and
are not significant at the 95% confidence level, but the less interference occurred during atomization. The
standard deviation of the dry-ashing method is higher method of standard additions was used to avoid the
than that of the wet-ashing method. In addition, the matrix effect.
recovery of heavy metals in the dry-ashing method is The fish species analysed are used for human con-
lower than that of the wet-ashing method. Dry-ashing is sumption. All metal concentrations were determined on
slow and time-consuming. Wet-ashing favours organic a dry weight basis. According to the results (Table 3),

Table 2
Observed and certified values of elemental concentrations, as mg/g dry weight, in standard reference materials (SRM)

Element NIES-6 Recovery (%) NBS-1566 Recovery (%)

Certified value Observed value Certified value Observed value

Cu 4.90.3 4.8 0.8 98 63.0 3.5 64.42.8 102


Fe 1588 160 12 101 195 34 20010 103
Mn 16.31.2 15.8 1.9 97 17.5 1.2 17.91.8 102
Zn 1066 105 8 99 852 14 86110 101
Cd 0.820.03 0.78 0.05 95 3.50 0.40 3.550.65 101
Pb 0.910.04 0.88 0.11 97 0.48 0.04 0.500.10 104

Each value is the average of five determinations. NIES-6: National Institute of Environmental Science, Japan; mussel tissue homogenate. NBS-
1566: National Bureau of Standards and Technology; oyster tissue.
122 M. Tüzen / Food Chemistry 80 (2003) 119–123

Table 3
Metal concentrations, as mg/g dry weight, in fish species (the number of determinations on each sample is 10)

Sample No.a Methodb Cd Pb Cu Fe Mn Zn

1 A 0.350.05 0.52 0.16 2.930.18 16.081.15 1.57 0.24 20.411.75


B 0.340.08 0.51 0.21 2.900.31 15.502.10 1.56 0.14 22.941.60

2 A 0.200.03 0.38 0.02 1.940.10 10.451.63 1.96 0.12 17.382.01


B 0.180.02 0.39 0.07 1.960.17 10.321.05 1.98 0.32 18.851.72

3 A 0.470.10 0.85 0.16 1.520.35 32.402.70 3.76 0.45 12.052.30


B 0.480.08 0.83 0.36 1.550.26 31.261.73 3.50 0.58 11.411.15

4 A 0.090.02 0.22 0.04 1.280.14 9.520.81 1.06 0.27 11.201.44


B 0.100.01 0.26 0.07 1.290.32 10.141.11 1.33 0.42 13.721.32

5 A 0.300.15 0.74 0.11 1.790.62 25.483.18 2.82 0.24 9.500.60


B 0.300.28 0.68 0.17 1.830.44 24.122.06 2.74 0.44 10.361.29
a
1, Alosa caspia; 2, Engraulis encrasicholus; 3, Trachurus trachurus; 4, Sarda sarda; 5, Clupea sprattus.
b
a, Dry ash; b, wet ash.

the metal contents in the samples studied depend on the materials were in the range of 95–104%. The relative
analyzed species. The concentration of cadmium varied standard deviations were less than 7%. The wet-diges-
from 0.09 to 0.48 mg/g; for lead it ranged from 0.22 to tion in closed vessels was the best. It was suitable for
0.85 mg/g. The lowest and highest values of these ele- routine analysis. It was found that the concentrations of
ments were found in Sarda sarda and Trachurus tra- heavy metals in the fish samples were below those of
churus species, respectively. Levels of the essential Public Health Regulation in Turkey (Anonymous,
metals in the fish samples were higher than those of the 1995).
non-essential metals. Among the six metals under study,
zinc showed the highest level of accumulation. A similar
situation was observed in studies (Cid et al., 2001). The References
concentration of zinc varied from 9.50 to 22.94 mg/g.
The lowest and highest values of this element were Acar, O. (2001). Determination of cadmium and lead in biological
observed in C. sprattus and A. caspia species, respec- samples by zeeman ETAAS using various chemical modifiers.
tively. The concentrations of copper, iron and manga- Talanta, 55(3), 613–622.
Acar, O., Kılıç, Z., & Türker, A. R. (2000). Determination of lead in
nese in the S. sarda species were lower than those found cookies by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry with
in other analysed fish species. The highest iron and various chemical modifiers. Food Chemistry, 71, 117–122.
manganese values were found in T. trachurus species. Anonymous. (1995). Official Gazzette, number 22223, p. 1361 (in
The fact that toxic metals are present in high con- Turkish).
centrations in marine organisms is of particular impor- Balkas, I. T., Tugrel, S., & Salhogln, I. (1982). Trace metal levels in
fish and crustacea from Northeastern Mediterranean coastal waters.
tance in relation to the FAO/WHO (1976) standards for Marine Environmental Research, 6, 281–289.
Pb and Cd as toxic metals. The maximum permissible Bin, H., & Zhe-Ming, N. (1996). Minimization of sulfate interference
doses for an adult are 3 mg Pb and 0.5 mg Cd per week, on lead atomization with palladium-strontium nitrate as chemical
but the recommended doses are only one-fifth of those modifier in electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry. Journal
of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 11, 165–168.
quantities.
Blust, R., Vander der Linden, A., Verheyen, E., & Decleir, W. (1988).
Results achieved for heavy metals in fish samples Evaluation of microwave heating digestion and graphite furnace
collected from the middle Black Sea, Turkey were in atomic absorption spectrometry with continuum source background
good agreement with other reported data from the lit- correction for the determination of iron, copper and cadmium in
erature. brine shrimp. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 3, 387–393.
Cid, B. P., Boia, C., Pombo, L., & Rebelo, E. (2001). Determination of
trace metals in fish species of the Ria de Aveiro (Portugal) by electro-
thermal atomic absorption spectrometry. Food Chemistry, 75, 93–100.
4. Conclusions Doner, G., & Akman, S. (2000). A comparision of sample preparation
procedures for the determination of iron and zinc in bulgur wheat
The proposed method was efficient for simple, rapid by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. Analytical let-
and reliable determination of some heavy metals in the ters, 33(15), 3333–3341.
FAO/WHO. (1976). List of maximum levels recommended for con-
fish species. The accuracy of the method was checked taminants by the Joint FAO/ WHO Codex Alimentarius Commis-
and confirmed by standard reference materials. The sion. Second Series. CAC/FAL, Rome, 3, 1–8.
recoveries of the heavy metals in standard reference Giordano, R., Arata, P., Ciaralli, L., Rinaldi, S., Giani, M., Cicero,
M. Tüzen / Food Chemistry 80 (2003) 119–123 123

A. M., & Costantini, S. (1991). Heavy metals in mussels and fish Brines, J. (2000). Copper, iron and zinc determinations in human milk
from Italian coastal waters. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 22(1), 10–14. using FAAS with microwave digestion. Food Chemistry, 68, 95–99.
Huang, Y. L., Chuang, I. C., Pan, C. H., Hsiech, C., Shi, T. S., & Lin, Somer, E. (1974). Toxic potential of trace metals in foods. A review.
T. H. (2000). Determination of chromium in whole blood and urine Journal of Food Science, 39, 215–217.
by graphite furnace AAS. Atomic Spectroscopy, 21(1), 10–16. Sures, B., Taraschewski, H., & Haug, C. (1995). Determination of
Karadede, H., & Ünlü, E. (2000). Concentrations of some heavy trace metals (Cd, Pb) in fish by electrothermal atomic absorption
metals in water, sediment and fish species from the Atatürk Dam spectrometry after microwave digestion. Analytica Chimica Acta,
Lake (Euphrates), Turkey. Chemosphere, 41, 1371–1376. 311(2), 135–139.
Knapp, G. (1991). Mechanized techniques for sample decomposition Tarýq, J., Jaffar, M., & Ashraf, M. (1991). Levels of selected heavy
and element preconcentration. Microchimica Acta, 2, 445–455. metals in commercial fish from five freshwater lakes, Pakistan.
Kress, N., Hornung, H., & Herut, B. (1998). Concentrations of Hg, Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry, 33, 133–140.
Cd, Cu, Zn, Fe and Mn in deep sea benthic fauna from the South- Tarýq, J., Jaffar, M., & Moazzam, M. (1991). Concentration corre-
eastern Mediterranean Sea: a comparison study between fauna col- lations between major cations and heavy metals in fish from the
lected at a Pristine area and at two waste disposal sites. Marine Arabian Sea. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 22(11), 562–565.
Pollution Bulletin, 36(11), 911–921. Ubillus, F., Alegria, A., Barbera, R., Farre, R., & Lagerda, M. J.
Lynch, S., & Littlejohn, D. (1989). Palladium as a chemical modifier (2000). Methylmercury and inorganic mercury determination in fish
for the determination of lead in food slurries by electrothermal ato- by cold vapour generation atomic absorption spectrometry. Food
misation atomic absorption spectrometry. Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 71, 529–533.
Atomic Spectrometry, 4, 157–161. Vaidya, O. C., & Rantala, R. T. T. (1996). A comparative study of
Pujin, V., Djukic, N., Maletin, S., Obradovic, S., & Kostic, D. (1990). analytical methods: determination of heavy metals in mussels
Content of heavy metals in some fish species in the section of the (Mytilus edulis) from Eastern Canada. International Journal of
Danube flowing through Vojvodina. Water Science & Technology, Environmental & Analytical Chemistry, 63, 179–185.
22(5), 79–86. Voegborlo, R. B., El-Methnani, A. M., & Abedin, M. Z. (1999).
Santos, H. C. D., Korn, M. G. A., & Ferreira, S. L. C. (2001). Mercury, cadmium and lead content of canned tuna fish. Food
Enrichment and determination of molybdenum in geological sam- Chemistry, 67, 341–345.
ples and seawater by ICP-AES using calmagite and activated car- Zhuang, Z. X., Wang, X. O., Yang, C. L., Zhu, E., & Yang, P. Y.
bon. Analytica Chimica Acta, 426, 79–84. (1995). Chemometric analysis of coastal water pollution by exami-
Schroeder, H. A. (1973). The trace elements and nutrition. London: nation of marine organisms using atomic spectrometry. Micro-
Faber and Faber. chemical Journal, 51(1), 138–144.
Sharif, A. K. M., Mustafa, A. L., Mirza, A. H., & Safiullah, S. (1991). Zong, Y. Y., Parsons, P. J., & Slavin, W. (1996). Accurate and precise
Trace metals in tropical marine fish from the Bay of Bengal. Science measurements of lead in bone using electrothermal atomic absorp-
of the Total Environment, 107, 135–142. tion spectrometry with zeeman-effect background correction. Jour-
Silvestre, M. D., Lagarda, M. J., Farre, R., Martinez-Costa, C., & nal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 11, 25–30.

You might also like