srsroe
Photius
PHOTIUS, fo'shi-us.
I Life. ‘Years of Retirement (@ 4). Amphilochia (@ 2).
Early Life (@ 1). Second Patriarchate (@ 5). Polemical Works (@ 3).
First Patriarchate (@ 2). TL. Writings. Other Writings (@ 4).
Decisive Break with Rome (@ 3). Bibliotheca (@ 1). Editions (@ 5).
Photius, twice patriarch Of Constantinople in the ninth century, enjoys an almost unparalleled
preeminence in both the Greek and the Russian Church of the present day. Though in his own
time he had enemies, and though circumstances clouded his fame at Rome and at the Byzantine
court, he took deep hold among his people from the first, and soon after his death his Church put
his name in her calendar of saints. To judge his character is not easy. He was not the tyrant that
his opponents represented him to be, though he could be hard and domineering. He was crafty,
double-tongued, and vain, but to be so lay in the character of his time and in the atmosphere of
the Constantinople in which he lived. He was a sort of universal genius@philologian,
philosopher, theologian, jurist, mathematician, man of science, orator, and poet; no original
thinker but of powerful memory, of iron industry, of good esthetic sense, of great dialectic skill,
far-seeing and clever in practical matters, of commanding will-power, a profound judge of men,
and true in friendship, though also always exacting the return. His piety in its way was real. To
him the Orthodox Church owes her understanding and appreciation of her distinction from the
Latin, Proud already of her inheritance, Photius intensified and confirmed her self-consciousness,
and gave her the pregnant catchwords which have never been forgotten.
1. Life
1. Early Life.
Photius was born at Constantinople, probably between 815 and 820, and died in the
Armenian monastery of Bordi Feb. 6, 897 or 898. He was of a family of quality, rigidly orthodox,
and friendly to images. His parents died early, "adored with the martyr’s crown,” this probably
meaning that, as friends of images, they were despoiled of their property and honors. It is known
that they, with Photius, were excommunicated by an iconoelastic synod, but Photius himself
appears never to have been in pecuniary straits. It is not possible to follow the course of his life
closely before he became patriarch. When hardly more than a boy he began to give public
lectures, first on grammar, then on philosophy and theology-an activity which was interrupted by
an embassy " to the Assyrians," mentioned without further explanation in the preface to the
Bibliotheca (see below, Il, @ 1); probably a visit to the court of the calif in Bagdad is meant.
After the death of the Emperor Theophilus in 842, the Empress Theodora became regent for her
young son, Michael III, called the Drunkard, assisted by her brother, Bardas, who from his
sister's counselor speedily developed into her rival. Learning was now held in higher esteem than
it had been by the preceding iconoclastic emperors, and Photius’ relations with the court became
very intimate. He was first secretary of state and captain of the bodyguard, and his brother
Sergius was married to Irene, 2 younger sister of Theodora and Bardas. Photius himself was
never married nor was he a monk. Bardas succeeded in entirely supplanting Theodora as regent,
probably in 857, and, to nullify her influence, which was feared by the young Michael as well as
by his uncle, it was proposed to immure her in a convent. The Patriarch Ignatius, however (see
IGNATIUS OF CONSTANTINOPLE), Was a partizan of Theodora and refused to lend himself to this
plan, so that, on Nov. 23, 858 (or, according to others, 857), Bardas deposed him and chose
Photius for his successor.
2 First Patriachate.
hitpsshwwu.ccel.orgs/schatfencyciencycOSinimi.xit him wrsrsroe
Photius
Photius undoubtedly belonged to a powerful party antagonistic to Ignatius, which included
Bardas and was led by a certain Gregorius Asbesta, He was not a cleric, but the elevation of a
layman to the patriarch's chair was not unprecedented. On five successive days (Dec. 20-24, 858)
Gregorius hurried the candidate through the five grades necessary for the assumption of the
patriarchate, and on Christmas Day he was enthroned. Ignatius, however, did not retire quietly, in
spite of-the efforts of Bardas and Photius to make him yield, and he had a large following, the
monks being especially hostile to Photius. The ill-treatment of Ignatius and his friends was
doubtless exaggerated, and, so far as it really occurred, was due to Bardas rather than to Photius.
Photius exerted himself to secure episcopal sees for his friends and accomplished Ignatius’
deposition, in apparently canonical form, by a synod in 859. Ignatius went to Rome and sought
aid from Pope Nicholas I. (q.v.). At first Photius ignored this move, but ultimately he sent a
particularly impressive legation to Nicholas with a notification of his enthronization which
completely concealed the real situation. A letter from the emperor went with it asking for
recognition of Photius and requesting that legates be sent to a council in Constantinople to settle
the few remaining problems connected with the iconoclastic disorders. At the same time Photius
‘wrote to the Eastern patriarchs concealing the facts even more than in his letter to the pope and
evidently wishing to secure recognition from them before the pope's legates should arrive in
Constantinople. The council (called "first-second"--prima-secunda) met in May, 861, and from
the very first the papal legates, Rodoald of Porto and Zacharias of Anagni, espoused Photius!
side. Ignatius was very summarily treated and his deposition was confirmed, although he
received more support from the assembled bishops than the emperor and Photius had expected.
Nicholas seems to have hoped that Photius would recognize the primacy of jurisdiction,
which he had assumed from the first. But Photius had no such intention, however much he may
have been willing to flatter. The pope proceeded slowly, but on Mar. 18, 862, he issued an
encyclical to the Eastern bishops in which he disavowed the acts of his legates at the council and
declared: " We do not consider Ignatius deposed nor do we recognize Photius as in episcopal
orders." He wrote to the emperor and to Photius to the same effect, and a year later (Apr., 863),
when it had become evident that writing accomplished nothing, he had his judgment confirmed
by a synod in Rome and threatened Photius and his adherents with excommunication. Meanwhile
Photius found unexpected support from certain Wester bishops who had fallen out with
Nicholas over the divorce of Lothair II. (see NICHOLAS I). He drew up a reply from the emperor
to the pope in which he adopted a very lofty tone, even addressing Nicholas as the emperor's
subject. The document is lost, though its tenor is evident from certain letters of Nicholas. The
pope answered with spirit, but he failed to measure public opinion in Constantinople. The new
Rome looked down with scorn on the old and its "barbarians' tongue," and Photius all his life
disdained to lean Latin (see below, II., @ 1). Constantinople regarded the connection of the
papacy with the Carolingian empire as a manifestation of revolt. There was a firm determination
to insist that the pope should at least respect ecclesiastical boundaries, and feeling on this point
was excited at the time by the case of the Bulgarians, who, converted by eastern missionaries and
placed under the jurisdiction of the ecumenical patriarch by the Council of Chaloedon, were
showing some disposition to go over to Rome (see BULGARIANS, CONVERSION OF THE).
Photius, apparently in 865, addressed a long letter to the newly converted Bulgarian Bogoris; but
the latter, doubtless for political reasons, turned to the pope, who sent two legates and a number
of priests, as well as a voluminous pastoral epistle to the prince. At the same time Nicholas sent
three messengers with no less than eight letters addressed to the emperor, Bardas, Photius, and all
concerned, even the senators of Constantinople, requiring the execution of his judgment. The
emperor, however, turned the pope's envoys back at the border, and the letters were not delivered
3. Decisive Break with Rome.
Photius now executed the master stroke which really separated East and West. As the pope
had attacked the validity of his ordination and position, so he called in question the pope's own
position, declaring the pontiff to be a patron of heresy. The encyclical to the patriarchs of the East
in which Photius made the charge and sought to prove it is rightly regarded as the magna charta
hitpsshwwu.ccel.orgs/schatfencyciencycOSinimi.xit him 2asrsroe
Photius
of the Orient in all its subsequent attitude and conduct toward the Occident. Leaving personal
matters quite out of account, and not hinting at the relations between Nicholas and himself,
Photius spoke only of the danger which threatened from Rome, making the sending of Roman-
priests to the Bulgarians his starting-point and ending with an attack on the Filioque (see
FILIOQUE CONTROVERSY), concerning which he wrote a minute theological discussion with
fourteen arguments against the doctrine of double procession. He wished to hold a synod in
Constantinople to counteract the work of the West, and it actually met in the summer of 867. The
acts are lost, but Photius secured the decrees which he wished, and he then allowed his personal
resentment to appear when he retaliated for his own excommunication by Nicholas with
anathematizing the pope. He seems even to have attempted to exalt the new Rome over the old
and to have thought of claiming the primacy for Constantinople
4. Years of Retirement
Photius’ triumph was short-lived. Bardas had been murdered in 866, and Basil the
Macedonian had succeeded him as joint ruler with Michael. In Sept., 867, Basil had Michael
murdered and became sole ruler. He thought it would strengthen his position if Ignatius were
restored. Accordingly, Photius was expelled from his palace a few days after Basil's accession,
and on the anniversary of his deposition, Nov. 23, 867, Ignatius was reenthroned, ten days after
the death of Nicholas I. Basil deemed a break with the West inopportune, and, after negotiating
for a year with Rome, he called a council (the Fourth Constantinople, Oct. 5, 869-Feb. 28, 870;
the eighth general council of the West) which brought about the full restitution of Ignatius, at the
same time officially deposing and condemning Photius. It was dominated by the Pope Adrian IL
(q-v.), but his triumph was more apparent than real. In the West this council is regarded as the
settlement of the controversy over images; but Photius could claim with reason that he had
finally allayed this strife by the council of 861; and when the papal legates at the counci
demanded recognition of the claims of Rome concerning the Bulgarians, the Orientals protested
in words which showed how the alliance of the pope with the West rather than with the East
burned in all Greek souls.
Photius lived at Stenos, on the European side of the Bosphorus, under strict surveillance and
de- prived of his books. Direct association with his friends was forbidden, but he was allowed to
correspond with them freely. His following among the clergy was so great that at first scarcely
twenty bishops appeared at the council which condemned him, and, in spite of the strenuous
exertions, of his enemies, only a little over 100 were present at the final session. Harsh measures
against his adherents made it easy for him to organize a sort of antihierarchy, and he well knew
how to hold his party together and to animate all with his own unyielding spirit, which steadily
refused to hear of compromise. Gregorius Asbesta and a whole company of influential
metropolitans stood by him faithfully. At the same time he carefully refrained from attacking the
emperor in all that he wrote, and the time came when he could move more freely. His requests
for favor to his friends were listened to, the emperor even consulted him on theological
questions, and finally (probably in 876) he was recalled to Constantinople as tutor to the princes
royal. It was evident that after the imminent death of Ignatius, Photius would again ascend his
throne,
5. Second Patriarchate.
Ignatius died Oct, 23, 878 (according to others, 877), and three days later Photius was
installed in his place. The relations between Photius and Basil were thenceforth of the best. Basil
asked Pope John VIII. (q.v.) to recognize the reinstated patriarch, and this time the pope, needi
imperial support for his schemes in Italy, showed a disposition to comply. He declared Photius’
first elevation illegal, however, criticized the second be cause it had taken place without his
knowledge, and stipulated that Photius should ask pardon be fore a synod. This was not at all to
Photius’ mind, and he accordingly contrived that a council should meet in Constantinople (the
"Synod of St. Sophia," Nov., 879--Jan. 26, 880, the eighth general council of the Fast), attended
by three times as many bishops as the council of 869. From this he obtained all that he desired,
hitpsshwwu.ccel.orgs/schatfencyciencycOSinimi.xit him a7