The US imposed tariffs on $34 billion worth of Chinese goods, and China retaliated with tariffs on $34 billion of US goods. This marks the beginning of a potential trade war between the two countries. More tariffs are expected from both sides in the coming weeks. A full-blown trade war could significantly damage the global economy according to IMF forecasts. The Indian economy may be negatively impacted through effects on the rupee, stock markets, duties, and manufacturing costs.
The US imposed tariffs on $34 billion worth of Chinese goods, and China retaliated with tariffs on $34 billion of US goods. This marks the beginning of a potential trade war between the two countries. More tariffs are expected from both sides in the coming weeks. A full-blown trade war could significantly damage the global economy according to IMF forecasts. The Indian economy may be negatively impacted through effects on the rupee, stock markets, duties, and manufacturing costs.
The US imposed tariffs on $34 billion worth of Chinese goods, and China retaliated with tariffs on $34 billion of US goods. This marks the beginning of a potential trade war between the two countries. More tariffs are expected from both sides in the coming weeks. A full-blown trade war could significantly damage the global economy according to IMF forecasts. The Indian economy may be negatively impacted through effects on the rupee, stock markets, duties, and manufacturing costs.
the Trump administration imposed sweeping tariffs on $34 billion
worth of Chinese goods, including flat-screen televisions, aircraft parts, and medical devices. The goods marked for tariffs will now face a punishing 25 percent border tax when they’re imported into the US. The point is to punish China by making Chinese products more expensive for American consumers and businesses to buy. If Chinese products suddenly become more expensive, they’ll buy those same products from somewhere else, and Chinese businesses will lose money. China immediately accused the US of starting “the largest trade war in economic history to date” and responded by imposing 25 percent tariffs on $34 billion worth of US goods, including soybeans, automobiles, and lobsters. The Trump administration initiated these tariffs after concluding an investigation into some of China’s most controversial trade practices. The US’s new trade barriers are designed to penalize China for doing things like forcing foreign businesses to hand over their most prized technology to Chinese companies — many of which are state-owned — in exchange for access to their market. This is only the beginning: More tariffs are coming. The US is expected to impose border taxes on an additional $16 billion worth of Chinese goods in two weeks. And Trump said on Thursday that, depending on how China responds to his tariffs, he’s considering hitting another$500 billion worth of Chinese goods. Both the US’s and China’s initial round of tariffs against each other are designed to sting deeply. The US is targeting high-tech Chinese goods to put economic pressure on Beijing’s “Made in China 2025” program — a Chinese government initiative to transform China into an advanced manufacturing powerhouse. And China has deliberately targeted big US agricultural exports like soybeans that come from states in the heart of Trump country, where neither the president nor his party want to see economic instability or job losses right before the 2018 midterm elections. So does this mean we’re officially in a trade war with China? It depends. Countries get into tiffs over trade all the time. To sort them out, they can go to the World Trade Organization and have them decide who’s right and who’s wrong; they can negotiate directly with each other to strike a deal; or they can just impose unilateral tariffs on each other’s goods. That last scenario is the one that has the potential to turn into a trade war. If two countries take one-off strikes at each other’s economies then it’s not a huge deal. But if the tit-for-tat continues, with each country putting more and more tariffs on one another, then you’ve got a trade war. IMPACT ON INDIA: As mentioned earlier, the effects of a trade war are unlikely to be restricted to merely these two countries. Due to this, India too could find some changing dynamics in its economy. The basic principles of economics, i.e., demand and supply, will once again come into play. The shortage of supply of a good, either finished material or raw material, will increase the final consumption price for the consumer. Moreover, the burden of increased tax from the duties will also be borne by the final user. The following are some ways the Indian economy may be affected: The value of the Rupee In the last one month, the value of the rupee has dropped to an all- time low, when in some occasions it was hovering around the mid 68s against the US dollar. This coincided with Donald Trump’s threat of imposing a fresh round of tariffs on exports worth $200 billion. This trend can be traced to the weakening of the US dollar, which automatically creates a negative impact on the trade deficit of India, causing a chain reaction of sorts. Indian stock markets Amid concerns over the global trade war, key indices in the Indian share market dropped due to the cautious approach of the investors. During this period, the BSE Sensex saw regular plunges in points. NSE Nifty’s performance too was along the same lines as it also saw significant drops. As of now, the Sensex is trading at about 37,521 (at the time of publication), which is still below the average. India-US duties As the United States of America imposed duties on steel and aluminium, India now has to pay approximately $241 million worth of tax to the US. India, on the other hand, as a counter-measure has proposed imposing duties on 30 different types of goods. This will ensure that the US has to pay about $238 million as duties to India. However, this will make life more difficult for the end consumers as everything that falls under the tariff scanner is expected to become more expensive. As far as the manufacturing industry is concerned, the additional duty imposed could have a detrimental impact, as the cost of production will go up due to the rise in the price of raw materials. Moreover, other things which may face an increase in price include foreign motorbikes with high engine capacity and food products like almonds, walnuts, pulses, etc. IMPACT ON GLOBAL ECONOMY: The International Monetary Fund on Tuesday cut its global economic growth forecasts for 2018 and 2019, saying that the US-China trade war was taking a toll and emerging markets were struggling with tighter liquidity and capital outflows. The new forecasts, released on the Indonesian resort island of Bali where the IMF and World Bank annual meetings are getting underway, show that a burst of strong growth, fuelled partly by US tax cuts and rising demand for imports, was starting to wane. The IMF said in an update to its World Economic Outlook it was now predicting 3.7 percent global growth in both 2018 and 2019, down from its July forecast of 3.9 percent growth for both years. The downgrade reflects a confluence of factors, including the introduction of import tariffs between the United States and China, weaker performances by eurozone countries, Britain and Japan, and rising interest rates that are pressuring some emerging markets with capital outflows, notably Argentina, Brazil, Turkey, South Africa, Indonesia and Mexico. "US growth will decline once parts of its fiscal stimulus go into reverse," IMF chief economist Maurice Obstfeld said in a statement. "Notwithstanding the present demand momentum, we have downgraded our 2019 US growth forecast owing to the recently enacted tariffs on a wide range of imports from China and China's retaliation." With much of the US-China tariff war's impact to be felt next year, the Fund cut its 2019 US growth forecast to 2.5 percent from 2.7 percent previously, while it cut China's 2019 growth forecast to 6.2 percent from 6.4 percent. It left 2018 growth forecasts for the two countries unchanged at 2.9 percent for the United States and 6.6 percent for China. Obstfeld said he was not concerned about the Chinese government's ability to defend its currency against further weakening but told a news conference that Beijing would face a "balancing act" between actions to shore up growth and ensuring financial stability. If China and the United States were to resolve their trade differences, it "would be a significant upside to the forecast." The eurozone's 2018 growth forecast was cut to 2.0 percent from 2.2 percent previously, with Germany particularly hard hit by a drop in manufacturing orders and trade volumes. Obstfeld said the IMF does not see a generalized pullback from emerging markets, nor contagion that will spill over to those emerging economies which have stronger economies and have thus far avoided major outflows, such as some in Asia and some oil and metals exporting countries. "But there is no denying that the susceptibility to large global shocks has risen," Obstfeld said. "Any sharp reversal for emerging markets would pose a significant threat to advanced economies." Brazil will see a 0.4 percentage-point drop in GDP growth to 1.4 percent for 2018 as a nationwide truckers strike paralyzed much of the economy. Iran, facing a new round of US sanctions next month, also saw its growth forecast cut, the IMF said. Some energy-rich emerging market countries have fared better due to higher oil prices, with Saudi Arabia and Russia receiving upgrades to growth forecasts. The IMF said the balance of risks was now tilted to the downside, with a higher likelihood that financial conditions will tighten further as interest rates normalize, hurting emerging markets further at a time when US-led demand growth will start to slow as some tax cuts expire. Trade tensions are expected to continue although Fund officials view US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement as a positive sign. "Where we are now is we've gotten some bad news. Our probability that we would attach to further bad news has gone up," Obstfeld said. TRADE WAR RISKS In a new simulation exercise to show trade war risks to the global economy, the IMF modelled the effect of an all-out US-China trade war, coupled with threatened global US automotive tariffs and retaliation from trading partners. The model also includes the effects of a reduction in business confidence that reduces investment and leads to a tightening of financial conditions. It found that global GDP output under this scenario would fall by more than 0.8 percent in 2020 and remain roughly 0.4 percent lower in the long-term compared to levels without the effects of a trade war. The repercussions for the United States and China would be particularly severe, with 2019 GDP losses of more than 0.9 percent in the United States and 1.6 percent in China in 2019. The exercise assumes that US President Donald Trump imposes tariffs on the remaining $267 billion worth of Chinese goods imports not already under punitive tariffs and China retaliates in kind. It also assumes that Trump imposes a 25 percent tariff on imported cars and auto parts. Adjustments would occur as domestic production displaces higher- priced imports, the model shows, but in the long run, the US GDP would still be 1.0 percent below a baseline without these tariffs, while China's GDP output would be one half percent below the baseline.