Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Placental CR H For Research Gate
Placental CR H For Research Gate
net/publication/235405483
CITATIONS READS
29 1,421
1 author:
Murray Thomson
The University of Sydney
48 PUBLICATIONS 618 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Murray Thomson on 04 June 2014.
and Childbirth
This is the pre-review version of the manuscript that was revised and published as
follows,
childbirth. Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry: Volume 69, Issue 3 (2013), Page 559-573
See http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13105-012-0227-2
Murray Thomson
The School of Biological Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006,
Australia
murray.thomson@sydney.edu.au
1
Abstract
In response to stress the hypothalamus releases cortiticotropin releasing hormone (CRH) that
travels to the anterior pituitary where it stimulates the release of adrenocorticotropic hormone
(ACTH). ACTH travels to the adrenal cortex where it stimulates the release of cortisol and
other steroids that liberate energy stores to cope with the stress. During pregnancy the
placenta synthesises CRH and releases it into the blood stream at increasing levels to reach
concentrations 1,000 to 10, 000 times of that found in the non-pregnant individual. Urocortins
which are CRH analogues are also secreted by the placenta. Desensitisation of the maternal
pituitary to CRH and resetting after birth may be a factor in post partum depression. Recently
CRH has been found to modulate glucose transporter (GLUT) proteins in placental tissue and
therefore there may be a link between CRH levels and foetal growth. Evidence suggests CRH
is involved in the timing of birth by modulating signalling systems that control the contractile
properties of the myometrium. In the placenta, cortisol stimulates CRH synthesis via
that may also be triggered by stressors such as hypoxia and infection indicating that
intrauterine stress could bring forward childbirth and cause low birth weight infants. Such
infants could suffer health issues into their adult life as a result of foetal programming. Future
2
Introduction
When physiological and psychological stress is processed in the cerebral hemispheres, the
hormone (CRH) into the hypophyseal portal system that transports blood to the anterior
pituitary. CRH activates the corticotropes of the anterior pituitary to synthesize and release
adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and β-endorphin into the blood stream [62]. Both
ACTH and β-endorphin are derived from the protein precursor proopiomelanocortin [22]. β-
endorphin interacts with opioid receptors to allow coping with pain and psychological stress.
ACTH travels to the cortex of the adrenals where it stimulates the synthesis and release
steroid hormones including cortisol [42, 98]. Cortisol exerts a range of physiological
fatty acids from adipose tissue and immune response modulation [8, 20, 72]. The
Research on the physiological roles of placental CRH and its analogues conducted over the
last thirty years has increased our understanding of the molecular and cellular events
modulated by these molecules that are relevant to the biology and psychology of the pregnant
woman and her offspring. During pregnancy the placenta also synthesises CRH and this
placental CRH may be modulating important aspects of physiology including the induction of
labour, glucose transport to the placental cells and the foetus and the psychological mood of
the mother. Recent evidence suggests that appropriate CRH modulation of pregnancy and
3
placental function is vital to prevent conditions such as premature birth and low birth weight
infants, conditions that can have serious health consequences for the rest of the infant’s life.
CRH and its related peptides are thought to have evolved from diuresis modulating proteins,
homologues of which are present in insects today [15]. CRH is a 41 amino acid peptide that
was first purified from sheep hypothalamus [6, 108]. It is now known that there are three
other related proteins that together with CRH form the CRH family of proteins, these are,
urocortin (also known as urotensin I) which has 45% homology to CRH, urocortin II (also
known as stresscopin-related peptide) with 55% homology and urocortin III (also known as
CRH receptors
There are two separate genes that produce the two major forms of CRH receptor. These are
named CRH-R1 and CRH-R2 and both proteins are seven transmembrane G-protein coupled
receptors [17, 73, 76]. Differential splicing of both the CRH-R1 and CRH-R2 genes produces
variants that have different biological roles. CRH-R1β is the largest of the R1 variants, it has
444 amino acids and forms the sequence from which other R1 variants are derived [38].
CRH-R1α has 29 less amino acids in its sequence, a difference that produces a higher affinity
for CRH [32]. In addition, c, d, e, f and h forms of CRH-R1 have been found. Furthermore,
human myometrium contains a CRH-R1β variant which, like CRH-R1d, lacks a 14 residue
sequence in the seventh membrane spanning region and this receptor has been designated
4
steroid hormones that increase in the blood during pregnancy suggesting that CRH-R1 β/d
may have special roles during pregnancy [45]. In humans there are three known splice
variants of CRH-2, these are differentiated with the suffixes, α, β and γ. CRH-R2α and CRH-
R2β are synthesised in the placenta whereas CRH-R2γ is only expressed in the limbic system
of the brain [38]. Different isoform combinations of CRH receptors found in different tissues,
suggests that the combination of CRH receptor isoforms is a way that CRH family peptides
In the 1980’s it was discovered that during pregnancy, concentrations of CRH in the plasma
increased to reach levels that were 1,000 – 10, 000 times that of non-pregnant women [13,
87]. The placenta was identified as the possible source of the extra hormone levels; CRH
immunoreactivity was discovered in fixed placental tissue and placental CRH was found to
cells [74, 82, 84, 87, 95]. Fragments of living placental tissue continuously superfused with
fresh medium were shown to secrete CRH at levels that would account for the plasma levels
of CRH at term [95] providing strong evidence that the placenta is the major source of CRH
during pregnancy [88]. In contrast to the massive rises in plasma CRH during pregnancy,
ACTH and cortisol levels in the plasma rise comparatively modestly and initially this was
puzzling as to why the much larger rise in CRH did not affect ACTH and cortisol levels more
profoundly. CRH-binding protein which is normally present in the plasma affords some
attenuation of CRH bioactivity but does not completely shield the corticotrope from placental
CRH, and desensitization of the maternal anterior pituitary to stimulation by placental CRH is
another factor that likely keeps peripheral ACTH and cortisol from rising to pathological
5
levels in the pregnant woman [55, 58, 67, 94, 98, 99]. The evidence that placental CRH
reaches and stimulates the anterior pituitary includes the following. Non-pregnant humans
increase release of ACTH after an injection of CRH and because non-pregnant people have
the same levels of circulating CRH binding protein as women in early pregnancy, the CRH-
BP clearly does not stop all CRH in the circulation from reaching the pituitary [21, 90, 114].
CRH-BP levels decrease in the later stages of pregnancy thus further reducing the ability of
CRH-BP to attenuate placental CRH activity at this time [56]. Furthermore, infusing rats for
50 hours with CRH desensitises the pituitary to subsequent CRH stimulation [100], and
pituitary cells continuously perfused with medium desensitize within 60 minutes to prolonged
exposure to CRH [97]. The evidence shows therefore that placental CRH not only reaches the
Animal models are not readily available to study rising levels of CRH during pregnancy as
CRH appears to only be expressed in the placenta of higher primates and not in that of
rodents and lemurs [78]. In monkeys CRH reach peak levels mid gestation then decline to a
plateau level for the rest of the pregnancy until term [75], unlike humans and great apes
where levels rise exponentially throughout pregnancy to peak at labour. The mid-term peak
of CRH may have been lost somewhere between ancestral anthropoids and the evolution of
hominids [75]. Since the discovery of biologically active placental CRH many scientists have
been determining the roles of placental CRH on the physiology of the pregnant woman and
6
The upper section of the myometrium is in a state of non-contraction or quiescence for most
of pregnancy whereas the lower section is contracted before childbirth. At the time for labour,
the lower section of myometrium becomes relaxed whereas the upper region goes through a
transition to become highly contractile and thereby expel the foetus. The complex interplay
between endocrine signals, intracellular messenger systems and cellular components that
regulates this transition is poorly understood, but research performed over the last decade has
established some key points and implicated CRH in the process. At the time for labour the
oxytocins and prostaglandins [14, 36, 88]. A decrease in the level of polarisation in the
myocytes increases the chances of depolarization and contraction at the latter stages of
pregnancy and an increase in the amount of ion channels and gap junctions in the tissue at
this time allows the propagation of action potential driven contraction throughout the tissue
messenger systems so that contractile processes are triggered more frequently [12]. It has
been thought for some time that CRH plays a role in the transition of the myometrium and the
timing of birth. As supporting evidence, sharp increases in plasma CRH occurs sooner in
women that give birth before 41 weeks and the opposite is true for women who go into labour
after this time [88, 101]. In the first 27 weeks of pregnancy women showing signs of going
into preterm labour show normal levels of CRH in the circulation for that stage of pregnancy
but from weeks 28-36 in women with impending premature delivery, higher CRH levels for
that time in pregnancy indicate that labour will occur within a day [49, 85]. In post term
pregnancies, CRH levels in the plasma are significantly lower than normal while levels of
CRH-BP are elevated [25]. CRH mRNA is elevated in the blood and placenta of women
There is substantial evidence therefore, to show that placental CRH is involved in the timing
7
of birth, the challenge now is to fully determine the mechanisms through which CRH is
helping to bring on parturition and what roles the urocortins are playing. The factors that
could alter CRH expression, and therefore alter the timing of birth, are just beginning to be
understood and these may include epigenetic chromatin modification [1], stress and infection.
Timed changes in the way the myometrium expresses different CRH receptor types, and links
these to intracellular signalling systems may play a major role in the development of
contractility in the myometrium. In this way CRH could function to keep the upper
myometrium in a state of quiescence for most of the pregnancy and then at the last stage of
pregnancy when CRH receptors are switched to interact with contractile elements of the cell,
high levels of CRH may trigger parturition [32]. When it is time for the myometrium to be
contractile, calcium stimulates the interaction of mysosin and actin filaments in the smooth
muscle. This action is initiated by receptors such as the oxytocins receptor and the endothelin
receptor that transmit their signal through heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (G proteins).
From here the signal is transmitted to phospholipase C (PLC) that triggers the well known
diacylglycerol (DAG). DAG activates protein kinase C (PKC) that triggers the mitogen
activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade that acts to phosphorylate myosin light chain and
stimulating contraction [32, 44]. Furthermore, IP3 binds to the IP3 receptor (IP3R) in the
sarcoplasmic reticulum and allows calcium to exit the sarcoplasmic reticulum via the IP3R
channel domain. When calcium moves into the cytoplasm it can attach to calmodulin thereby
activating it and allowing calmodulin to bind to myosin light chain kinase (MLCK). The
regulatory light chain of mysosin is able to interact with actin after being phosphorylated by
8
MLCK which causes the smooth muscle cell to contract [2]. Waves of contraction are paused
For most of pregnancy, when the myometrium is in its quiescent phase the contractile
mechanisms are held in abeyance by a suite of molecular and cellular mechanisms including
the export of cellular calcium through the plasma membrane and compartmentalizing in the
sarcoplasmic reticulum. In this time CRH receptors inhibit PLC activation and other
molecules are coupled to G proteins, mainly to those which have a Gαs subunit. The Gαs
subunit in an active and GTP bound G protein triggers the classic cAMP pathway whereby
Gαs stimulates adenylate cyclise to convert ATP to cAMP that binds to PKA and activates it
phosphorylation site thus preventing PLC from phosphorylating the myosin light chain and
inhibiting myometrial contraction. If CRH receptors simply decoupled from this system
before labour it would be expected that CRH would be able to attenuate myometrial tissue
taken pre term, but would not be able to decrease contractions of myometrial tissue at term,
and instead may stimulate contraction of term myometrial tissue, but this is not the case.
Exposure of spontaneously contracting myometrial strips taken both at pre-term and at term,
to increasing doses of CRH administered over 2.5 hours has been shown to decrease the
frequency and strength of contractions [104]. It must be kept in mind that this in vitro system
does not completely recreate the situation in vivo where the myometrium is also exposed to
other hormones such as oxytocins and cortisol. At term CRH by itself may not be able to
increase contraction of the upper myometrium but may prime the tissue so that it becomes
9
contractile when stimulated by another hormone such as oxytocin or steroids and future
Indeed, when the time for labour approaches there is a rapid proliferation in oxytocin
receptors, which as mentioned leads to a rise in the phosphorylation of myosin light chain and
contraction of the smooth muscle cells [37]. This is one stage in what is a complex resetting
of interacting intracellular messenger systems that previously held contraction in check and it
possible that as the time for childbirth draws near, CRH receptors may have their coupling to
cellular signalling pathways altered so that they switch to playing a role in stimulating
contraction [99]. Urocortin II working through CRH-R2 been shown to stimulate the
phosphorylation of myosin light chain in myometrial strips taken from women undergoing
caesarean section at term before labour. The CRH-R2 appears to be triggering the following
PKC that phosphorylates MEK1 which is a mitogen activated protein kinase kinase
a MAPK. ERK1 then phosphorylates the myosin light chain resulting in heightened
contraction. ERK1 and PKC may also phosphorylate the small monomeric GTP-binding
protein RhoA which translocates to the plasma membrane after urocortin II stimulation of
CRH-R2 and once it reaches the plasma membrane RhoA can activate Rho kinase which may
Recent studies have provided evidence that interplay between CRH-Rs and the large-
conductance calcium-activated potassium channel BKCa may also play a role in the switch
from quiescence to contraction in the myometrium. BKCa is activated by voltage and calcium,
10
in early stages of pregnancy fluxes of calcium from the sarcoplasmic reticulum into the
cytoplasm activates BKCa which allows potassium to escape the cell thereby preventing the
calcium from depolarizing the cell and in this way quiescence is maintained [47]. In the
earlier stages of pregnancy and before labour, CRH increases the expression of BKCa via
CRH-R1 while dampening BKCa synthesis via CRH-R2. At the time of parturition this
relationship reverses and CRH-R1 attenuates BKCa expression while CRH-R2 increases BKCa
production [117]. So at the time for childbirth an increase in the relative levels of CRH-R1
could be responsible for the decreasing BKCa levels at the time of labour and this may help
increase the chances of depolarization and contraction. It is not known at this point, however,
whether CRH-R1 and/or CRH-R2 switch roles in controlling BKCa levels by decoupling from
their prelabour G proteins and reattaching to different G proteins and intracellular pathways
CRH-R2 before and approaching or during labour have not given consistent and unequivocal
results and the question remains as to whether R1 and R2 subtype ratio shift plays a role in
the myometrial transition at the time for birth. The human non pregnant myometrium
expresses the CRH receptor subtypes 1c and 2α but pre-labour the receptors 1α, 1β, 1c and
2α are present [31]. The CRH affinity of these receptors may also alter as the time for
parturition approaches and the coupling efficiency to adenylate cyclase to produce cAMP
may also reset [30]. Interactions between the CRH receptors and prostaglandins may also
play a role in the timing of childbirth, prostaglandin E2 stimulates cervical ripening and
11
accelerated by CRH and urocortin binding to CRH-R1 and not via CRH-R2 [26]. Whether
the falling levels of CRH-R1 and CRH-R2 in the cervix during pregnancy have effects on the
synthesis of prostaglandin E2 is unknown and future studies are needed to determine whether
changes in CRH-R1 to CRH-R2 ratios can affect cervical ripening via the modulation of
prostaglandin E2 [99]. As mentioned CRH receptors trigger the cAMP pathway and cAMP
determine in future studies whether CRH and related peptides have an effect on prostacyclin
(PGI2) as PGI2 stimulates the production of contractile proteins and the gap junction protein
connexion 43 in cultured myometrial cells, and increases the strength of oxytocins induced
More research is needed in the future to reliably determine how the profiles of CRH receptors
change in the myometrium during pregnancy and labour. Cong and co-workers used Western
blot to show that CRH-R1 but not CRH-R2 levels are lowered at the time of delivery in the
upper section of the myometrium whereas CRH-R1 and CRH-R2 levels remained constant in
the lower section [19] (see Figure 1). In contrast, Stevens and colleagues reported that CRH-
R1 mRNA increased in the myometrium at term and labour and this increase was due to
increased levels in the lower section of the uterus [91]. Jin and colleagues did not find any
difference in CRH-R1 and CRH-R2 mRNA and protein levels in the myometrium of
caesarean section biopsies taken from women in labour as compared to those not in labour,
the distribution of CRH-R1 subtypes were found to be different, however, with CRH-R1f
identified in all of the labour myometria samples while this molecule was only present in half
of the non labour myometria [43]. If it is possible for researchers in the future to take small
biopsy samples to be taken from both the upper and lower portions of the uterus at the time of
12
caesarean delivery in women in labour and not in labour a clearer understanding in the shift
As discussed there is evidence to show that the pregnant woman’s pituitary is desensitized to
adrenal axis during pregnancy. It has been known for some time that alterations of the
[4, 18, 69]. Patients suffering from depression show a reduction in the ACTH response to an
injection of CRH, a result that indicates that their pituitary is desensitized to CRH [29, 40,
94]. The desensitization of the pregnant woman’s pituitary to CRH may also cause a
psychological disruption. Around about one third of women experience mood disturbance
during pregnancy and /or after childbirth and this can range in severity from the common,
‘post-partum blues’ to more severe forms of depression and psychosis that are comparatively
rare and need psychiatric care [9, 11, 71]. In the late eighties it was proposed that alterations
mood disturbance encountered by some women before and after childbirth [96]. Common
endocrine phenomena observed in both endogenous depression and pregnancy are, increased
basal levels of cortisol in the plasma and urine but still showing a diurnal rhythm, a blunted
ability of the synthetic gluccocorticoid dexamethasone to reduce cortisol levels and a reduced
increase in plasma cortisol following an injection of CRH [21, 87]. A correlation was found
between cortisol concentrations in the plasma at week 38 and post-partum mood disorder [34,
86]. Women with post-partum depression have a significantly blunted ACTH response to
13
CRH injection, suggesting a pituitary desensitized by placental CRH and this phenomenon
Since the 1980’s evidence has accumulated to show a link between state of mind and an
pregnant women suffering from major depression had significantly higher levels of
pregnant women; cortisol levels measured in the evening were also elevated in the group with
major depression [65]. The question remains, did the higher levels of CRH cause a
hypothalamic-pituitary axis upset that contributed to the depression or did the stress of the
from the adrenal which stimulates CRH release from the placenta? The shorter pregnancy of
the depressed women was not significant but this may have been due to the small sample size
and an important question for future research is, do higher than normal CRH levels in
there was a significant correlation between severity of post partum blues and the extent of
CRH decrease in the six day period following childbirth [66]. After birth the pituitary may re-
sensitise to CRH and the hypothalamus may stop secreting higher amounts of CRH and other
hormones such as vasopressin that were previously needed to control the desensitized
pituitary, and this resetting of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis may be a causal factor in the
postpartum blues. The focus of most research on CRH-R agonists and their role in the
psychology of the pregnant woman has been on CRH, but because urocortins also interact
with CRH-Rs and are also implicated in mood control [81] it is high time for research to
focus more intently on the possible role of placental urocortins contributing to post partum
blues and other physiological roles in pregnancy. CRH-R blockers are under investigation as
14
possible therapeutics for psychological disturbances such as excess anxiety [28], whether
they could be used to counteract post-partum blues or other conditions caused by excess
It has been a long held popular belief that psychological stress in the mother could bring
about a premature birth. The idea has some plausibility, and it has been proposed that CRH
released from the mother’s hypothalamus in response to stress would trigger ACTH and
cortisol release and cortisol and this could accelerate CRH synthesis and release from the
placenta [57]. Whether this kind of event could increase placental CRH output and plasma
CRH levels to the extent, and for long enough to accelerate the myometrial transition and
pregnant woman’s pituitary by placental CRH may severely blunt the mother’s ability to
increase cortisol output in response to stress [87, 96-98]. The research performed to date does
not universally support the hypothesis that psychological stress increases CRH levels in the
plasma of the pregnant woman and increases the chances of pre-term birth. Himes and
Simhan found no association between perceived psychological stress and CRH and cortisol
levels in the plasma in women at 24 and 28 weeks of pregnancy and no effect of the
perceived stress on preterm delivery [39]. In a cohort of 282 women there was no correlation
between levels of anxiety and plasma CRH at 18-20 weeks of gestation, however a modest
correlation (p<0.05) was found at 28-30 weeks [59]. Kramer and colleagues found no
correlation between psychological stress levels and circulating CRH in a cohort of 635
women measured between 24 – 26 weeks gestation [51]. More work is needed therefore to
15
determine whether psychological stress in the last trimester of pregnancy can hasten
childbirth.
elevate placental CRH, more research is required to understand the cellular and molecular
effects of cortisol on the control CRH production in the placenta as the in vitro work done so
far has not fully modelled the situation in vivo. It was in the late eighties when it was
discovered that glucocorticoids stimulated CRH mRNA production in placental tissue using
hours with or without 1 µm of dexamethasone [77]. The control cell cultures that Robinson
and colleagues used to show glucocorticoid stimulation of placental CRH were bathed in a
static bath of DMEM that contains no cortisol [77], this is a different situation to the placenta
synthesizing CRH at the top of its abilities. Whether a small and transient rise in cortisol due
to psychological stress will have any effect on placental CRH release in vivo is unknown.
Pituitary cells that are superfused with a running stream of medium (as opposed to a static
bath in a culture dish) desensitize within an hour to CRH stimulation [97] and if placental
cells show a similar desensitization to continuous stimulation with cortisol, additional doses
of cortisol over background may have a very limited ability to further stimulate the CRH
gene in the placenta in vivo. The time is ripe for new studies on the response of placental
synthesis and release of CRH and urocortins in response to a range of cortisol levels using
tissue that has been acclimated or pre-exposed to cortsisol levels that model those observed at
various stages of pregnancy. If the placenta can respond to stress induced rises in cortisol
16
over background levels, and can produce higher levels of CRH it would lend weight to the
Additional work is needed to fully elucidate the molecular and cellular mechanism by which
glucocorticoids stimulate CRH synthesis in the placenta. Recent work has demonstrated the
involvement of nuclear transcription factor κB (NFκB) [111]. NFκB proteins are widely
expressed in animal cells and often mediate the signals from pro-inflammatory signal
molecules and are also important signal molecules in development. Mammals usually express
five NFκB proteins, NFκB1 (also known as p50), NFκB2 (p52), RelA (p65), RelB, c-Rel,
and these proteins can form a variety of homodimers and heterodimers which can travel to
the nucleus and stimulate the activation of various genes. In the cytosol, NFκBs can by bound
to an inhibitor, IκB, when IκB is phosphorylated by IκB kinase kinase (IKK) it is marked for
cellular destruction, thereby releasing NFκB which can travel to the nucleus and stimulate
gene transcription [109]. IKK is a complex comprising of IKKα, IKKβ and the regulatory
protein NFκB essential modulator (NEMO). In the classic or canonical pathway (see Figure
3), the sequence is triggered by Toll-like receptors that bind signal molecules such as
TNFα and lipopolysaccharides leading to the phosphorylation and activation of IKK but the
system can also be stimulated from within the cell by processes such as increased production
of NFκB proteins or via other kinases that phosphorylate and activate IKK. In the non
canonical pathway activated NFκB inducing kinase (NIK) phosphorylates IκB kinase alpha
(IKKα) which in turn phosphorylates the C-terminal portion of the NFκB2 precursor p100
and marks it for degradation to leave the N-terminal portion NFκB2 that can then dimerize
17
with RelB and travel to the nucleus to stimulate target genes. Immunoprecipitation of
placental tissue has revealed RelB and NFκB2 complexes with the CRH gene indicating that
these transcription factors can activate CRH transcription via the non canonical pathway.
by RNA interference blocking of RelB and NFκB2 [111]. It will be important to determine
whether cortisol stimulates NIK synthesis and whether NIK activates NFκB in human
placental tissue.
Glucose transfer
biological molecules including fats and proteins. Glucose is transported across plasma
membranes by either a passive facilitative process that allow passage of glucose to follow a
concentration gradient driven transport or an active transport process that utilizes sodium
gradients to drive the transport of glucose across a plasma membrane against its
concentration gradient. Active, sodium dependent transport of glucose only occurs in the
epithelium of the small intestine and the nephron proximal convoluted tubule and this process
utilizes the sodium glucose transport protein (SGLT) family of proteins. In other areas the
passive facilitative transport of glucose relies on the sugar transporter (GLUT) family of
proteins [118]. There are 13 proteins in the GLUT family named GLUT 1-12 and H+-coupled
myo-inositol transporter (HMIT) [113]. GLUT1 and GLUT3 are essential for the transport of
glucose from the maternal circulation through the placenta into the foetal circulation. In the
rabbit placenta GLUT1 is localized at the periphery of outer trophoblasts suggesting the role
of the transporter in the uptake of glucose from maternal blood to placenta unlike GLUT3
18
which is situated at the base of the inner trophoblast and in foetal blood vessels indicating its
GLUT1 and GLUT3 isoforms are present in villous syncytiotrophoblast and their expression
is regulated by CRH although the regulation between CRH-R1 and CRH-R2 is different.
CRH working through CRH-R1 up-regulates GLUT1 but down-regulates GLUT3, whereas
CRH-R2 down-regulates both GLUT1 and GLUT3 expression [27]. It will be important to
find out whether higher levels of CRH at the later stages of pregnancy are working mainly
through CRH-R1 receptors to increase GLUT1 expression and increase glucose transport to
the growing foetus and placenta. The rapid growth of the placenta towards term necessitates
the increased transport of glucose via GLUTs so the increased expression of GLUT1 and
GLUT3 is likely to be orchestrated via endocrine control including participation by CRH and
related peptides. Glucocorticoid receptors are expressed in the placenta and glucocorticoids
also play a role in the regulation of glucose concentrations in the placenta and foetus and
foetus and cause hypoglycaemia and has been implicated in low birth weight [10].
cultured human placental epithelial cells but decreases expression in cultured human
trophoblast cells [33, 48]. Further elucidation of the endocrine controls on GLUT expression
in the different cells of the placenta and how glucose supply to the placenta and foetus is
regulated by CRH-R agonists from the placenta is likely to be an area of intense interest in
19
A mismatch of glucose supply to the foetus and placenta in relation to the metabolic needs of
the tissues is thought to be one of the factors leading to intrauterine growth retardation and
low birth weight. Intrauterine growth retardation causes increases infant morbidity and
mortality and increases the chances of developing pathophysiologies including heart disease
hypertension and insulin intolerance later in life [7, 115]. Indeed, real time PCR studies have
shown that the CRH gene is translated in higher levels in postpartum placentae from
intrauterine growth restriction pregnancies [92, 105] and it will be vital to find out whether
inappropriately high levels of placental CRH can cause inappropriate GLUT expression and
disrupt healthy glucose transport in the placenta. It will be interesting to see how future
studies determine what mechanisms are used by the foetus and placenta to try and counteract
conditions that cause low birth weight. For example in conditions of hypoxia trophoblast
respond by increasing the expression of GLUT1, perhaps to allow more glucose to reach the
foetus to cope with the physiological stress [35]. Hypoxia also increases expression of
urocortins II and III but whether these trigger CRH-Rs to alter GLUT expression and
modulate glucose transport in the foetus and placenta is unknown at present [41].
Foetal programming occurs when an events such as stress and overexposure to hormones has
a lasting effect on the physiology and psychology of the foetus that persists postpartum and
axis hormones especially cortisol may have a bell shaped curve in relation to the effects on
the ongoing health of the infant. For example, exposure to cortisol is needed for healthy
foetal nervous system, heart and lung development, but in higher doses, higher levels of
cortisol exposure in the foetus can lead to an increases susceptibility to cardiovascular disease
20
later in life and chronically elevated levels of CRH can be neurotoxic to developing brain
cells [83]. It has been known for some time that glucocorticoid treatment during pregnancy
elevates the risk of a growth restricted foetus (perhaps by altering the physiology and
development of the placenta) and increases the likelihood of problems with the nervous,
endocrine and cardiovascular systems later in life [23, 60, 116]. Whether unusually elevated
endogenous glucocorticoids can have the same effect is not known. Furthermore, high levels
involved in the survival and development of neurones and this may contribute to the toxic
effect of cortisol on cultured rat hippocampus cells [63]. In rats, foetal growth retardation
GLUT3 expression, which may be a mechanism whereby the placenta tries to increase
glucose transport to stressed tissues [52]. The potential risks of overactive placental CRH and
gluccorticoid production mean that it is vital to find out whether stressors and infection can
In humans and several animal species there is evidence to suggest that hypothalamic-
pituitary-adrenal hormones that are elevated substantially over normal, signal to the foetus
that the maternal environment is becoming unsafe and the foetus responds by speeding up its
development and triggering endocrine controls that will cause the date of parturition to be
brought forward in time [83]. It is not known at this time, however, whether stress in
pregnant women can elevate cortisol significantly above background levels and for long
enough to increase expression of the placental CRH gene and accelerate the triggering of
comes at a cost to premature born babies, the consequences include low birth weight and
21
emotional resilience. As mentioned it will be important to understand how placental CRH-R
agonists control GLUT expression in the placenta and whether deficiencies in this system can
lead to interuterine growth restriction with consequent health implications such as type 2
diabetes, obesity, hypertension and atherosclerosis that can manifest at various times for the
It is well established that infection of the amniotic cavity can cause premature labour [79] but
the mechanism by which this occurs is not yet fully characterised. Microbial invasion of the
amniotic cavity can cause lesions in both the maternal and foetal portions of the placenta with
poor placental perfusion [50, 79, 80]. These phenomena may be linked to the production of
placental CRH-R agononists, placenta obtained from women who had premature rupture of
membranes with chorioamnionitis had higher levels of CRH, urocortin2 and CRH-R1 mRNA
than women with preterm labour or premature rupture of membranes without chorioamnioitis
indicating that infection of the uterus and fetal membranes can trigger the release of these
components of the stress response, a conclusion supported by the finding that exposing
A clear pathway by which intrauterine infection could stimulate placental CRH is apparent
(Figure 3). Lipopolysaccharide is a component of the gram (-) bacterial cell wall and has been
found to cause a rise in trophoblast CRH synthesis [106, 107]. Lipopolysaccharide induces
22
its’ action via a Toll like receptor (TLR) that activates myeloid differentiation primary
response gene product (MyD88) that causes a rise in the nuclear factor NF-kB migrating to
the nucleus which stimulates transcription of the CRH gene [106]. In numerous tissues
MyD88 acts as an adaptor protein that binds to the cytoplasmic side of the TLR and when
TRAF6 dissociate from the TLR, TRAF6 then forms a complex with TGF-beta activated
kinase-1 (TAK1), TAK1 binding protein-1 (TAB1) and TAB2. This complex is later joined
isoform A (Uev1A) which activate TAK1. TAK1 phosphorylates and activates the IKK
complex. The IKK complex phosphorylates IκB complexed with NF-κB causing the IκB to
be ubiquitylated and degraded in the proteasomes thus releasing NF-κB to travel into the
nucleus where it can activate target genes [93]. Future experiments are needed however to
determine whether MyD88 is exerting its effects on the placental CRH gene via this pathway.
The increased levels of CRH due to infection may help switch the uterus from quiescent to
contractive mode. Reduced oxygen levels to placental tissues caused by infection and
reduced placental perfusion may also trigger placental CRH-R agonist production as lowered
oxygen levels caused increases in Ucn2 and Ucn3 mRNA production in cultures of early first
term villous explants and term cultured placental cells [41]. There may be interplay between
placental CRH-R agonists and the immune system that are especially significant during
infection. Urocortin has been found to exert the following effects on cultured placental cells,
a) it attenuates the release of the inflammatory cytokine tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-
23
interleukin-10, both effects are mediated by CRH-R2 [102]. Urocortin may push the immune
status of the tissue from an inflammatory state (Th2) to an anti-inflammatory state (Th1) and
thereby serve to limit the inflammation of the uterine and placental tissues [102].
The finding that NFκB stimulates the CRH suggests that cellular pathways that interact with
the pro-inflammatory NFκB could change the timing of childbirth. For example, oxidised
pregnancy and have recently been found to increase the phosphorylation of NFκB and
translocation to the nucleus in cultured trophoblast [3]. In many cell types other than placenta
cellular stressors such as hypoxia are known to activate IKK leading to the activation of
NFκB [54, 61], it will be important to determine whether this mechanism is working in the
placenta as it would yield further evidence to suggest that when the uterine environment
becomes stressed, the response is to activate mechanisms that increase CRH production and
Conclusion
The possibility of reducing low birth weights, preventing foetal programming and helping
disruption is a powerful incentive to research groups around the globe to continue the push to
understand how placental urocortins and CRH regulate the physiology and psychology of the
pregnant woman and the physiology and health of her offspring. The possibility of using
outside the healthy range is one of the drivers for concentrated research focus in this field.
24
Figures
Figure 1. CRH-R1 expression in the upper segment (US) and lower segment (LS)
myometrium in non-pregnant (NP), term non-labour (TNL) and term labour (TL) women,
*P<0.05, **P<0.01. Reproduced from [19] under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License
25
Figure 2. CRH expression (normalized to hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase) in
placental tissue of intrauterine growth restricted (IUGR) neonates and in gestational age-
matched controls (GAMC) (n = 22 matched pairs). Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.
There is a significant difference in CRH gene expression between the two groups, *P < 0·05;
**P < 0·01; ***P < 0·001. Reproduced from [92] with permission.
26
TLR LPS
MyD88
IRAK-4
IRAK-1 Uev1A Ubc13
TRAF6 TRAF6
IκB TAB1 TAB2
NEMO TAK1
NF κB
IKKα IKKβ
NF κB
transcription
NF κB
Figure 3
Figure 3. Possible pathway used by LPS to stimulate CRH expression via MyD88 and the
canonical NFκB pathway. LPS interacts with TLR that can use adapter MyD88 to attract
complexes with TAB1, TAB2 and TAK1 which then add Uev1A and Ubc13 to the complex.
As a consequence TAK1 is activated and phosphorylates and activates the IKK complex that
is comprised of NEMO, IKKα and IKKβ. IKKβ then phosphorylates IκB which marks IκB
for ubiquitylation and proteolysis in the proteosomes. The liberated NFκB then travels to the
27
References
1. Abou-Seif C, Shipman KL, Allars M, Norris MH, Chen YX, Smith R, Nicholson RC
(2012) Tissue specific epigenetic differences in CRH gene expression. Front Biosci
17:713-725
3. Aye ILMH, Waddell BJ, Mark PJ, Keelan JA (2012) Oxysterols exert
4. Baes CVW, Tofoli SMC, Martins CMS, Juruena MF (2012) Assessment of the
5. Bale TL, Vale WW (2004) CRF and CRF receptors: role in stress responsivity and
6. Bale TL, Chen A (2012) Minireview: CRF and Wylie Vale: a story of 41 amino acids
7. Barker DJP (2006) Adult consequences of fetal growth restriction. Clin Obstet
Gynecol 49:270-283
8. Bauer ME (2005) Stress, glucocorticoids and ageing of the immune system. Stress
8:69-83
28
10. Bloom SL, Sheffield JS, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ (2001) Antenatal dexamethasone
13. Campbell EA, Linton EA, Wolfe CDA, Scraggs PR, Jones MT, Lowry PJ (1987)
14. Challis JRG, Matthews SG, Gibb W, Lye SJ (2000) Endocrine and paracrine
16. Chen L, Sooranna SR, Lei K, Kandola M, Bennett PR, Liang Z, Grammatopoulos D,
17. Chen R, Lewis KA, Perrin MH, Vale WW (1993) Expression cloning of a human
19. Cong B, Zhang L, Gao L, Ni X (2009) Reduced expression of CRH receptor type 1 in
upper segment human myometrium during labour. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 7:43
20. Coufalik AH, Monder C (1981) Stimulation of gluconeogenesis by cortisol in fetal rat
29
21. DeBold CR, DeCherney GS, Jackson RV, Sheldon WR, Alexander AN, Island DP,
22. Dores RM, Baron AJ (2011) Evolution of POMC: origin, phylogeny, posttranslational
23. Drake AJ, Seckl JR (2011) Transmission of programming effects across generations.
24. Fetalvero KM, Zhang P, Shyu M, Young BT, Hwa J, Young RC, Martin KA (2008)
glucose transporters mediated by CRH receptor type 1 and type 2 in human placental
30
29. Gold PW, Loriaux DL, Roy A, Kling MA, Calabrese JR, Kellner CH, Nieman LK,
Post RM, Pickar D, Gallucci W, Avgerinos P, Paul S, Oldfield EH, Cutler GB,
1335
30. Grammatopoulos D, Stirrat GM, Williams SA, Hillhouse EW (1996) The biological
human myometrium is reduced at the end of pregnancy. J Clin Endocr Metab 81:745-
751
Metab 83:2539-2544
32. Grammatopoulos DK (2007) The role of CRH receptors and their agonists in
myometrial contractility and quiescence during pregnancy and labour. Front Biosci
12:561-571
33. Hahn T, Barth S, Graf R, Engelmann M, Beslagic D, Reul JMHM, Holsboer F, Dohr
34. Handley SL, Dunn TL, Waldron G, Baker JM (1980) Tryptophan, cortisol and
31
36. Hertelendy F, Zakar T (2004) Regulation of myometrial smooth muscle functions.
37. Hillhouse EW, Grammatopoulos DK (2002) Role of stress peptides during human
39. Himes KP, Simhan HN (2011) Plasma corticotropin-releasing hormone and cortisol
concentrations and perceived stress among pregnant women with preterm and term
41. Imperatore A, Rolfo A, Petraglia F, Challis JRG, Caniggia I (2010) Hypoxia and
17:833-843
42. Ishimoto H, Jaffe RB (2011) Development and function of the human fetal adrenal
human pregnant myometrial cells and regulates myosin light chain phosphorylation:
32
45. Karteris E, Markovic D, Chen J, Hillhouse EW, Grammatopoulos DK (2010)
GLUT3 in the rabbit placenta during successful pregnancy. J Vet Med Sci 73:1177-
1183
49. Korebrits C, Ramirez MM, Watson L, Brinkman E, Bocking AD, Challis JRG (1998)
The placental factor in spontaneous preterm labor with and without premature rupture
51. Kramer MS, Lydon J, Seguin L, Goulet L, Kahn SR, McNamara H, Genest J, Dassa
C, Chen MF, Sharma S, Meaney MJ, Thomson S, Van Uum S, Koren G, Dahhou M,
Lamoureux J, Platt RW (2009) Stress pathways to spontaneous preterm birth: the role
1326
33
52. Langdown ML, Sugden MC (2001) Enhanced placental GLUT1 and GLUT3
185:109-117
53. Lee M-J, Wang Z, Yee H, Ma Y, Swenson N, Yang L, Kadner SS, Baergen RN,
146:4619-4626
54. Ling J, Kumar R (2012) Crosstalk between NFκB and glucocorticoid signaling: A
55. Linton EA, Wolfe CDA, Behan DP, Lowry PJ (1988) A specific carrier substance for
human corticotrophin releasing factor in late gestational maternal plasma which could
56. Linton EA, Perkins AV, Woods RJ, Eben F, Wolfe CDA, Behan DP, Potter E, Vale
plasma levels decrease during the 3rd trimester of normal human pregnancy. J Clin
58. Magiakou MA, Mastorakos G, Rabin D, Dubbert B, Gold PW, Chrousos GP (1996)
period: implications for the increase in psychiatric manifestations at this time. J Clin
59. Mancuso RA, Schetter CD, Rini CM, Roesch SC, Hobel CJ (2004) Maternal prenatal
34
60. Mandl M, Ghaffari-Tabrizi N, Haas J, Nöhammer G, Desoye G (2006) Differential
Reproduction 132:159-167
Cycle 10:879-882
62. Myers B, McKlveen JM, Herman JP (2012) Neural regulation of the stress response:
64. Nugent BM, Tobet SA, Lara HE, Lucion AB, Wilson ME, Recabarren SE, Paredes
AH (2012) Hormonal programming across the lifespan. Horm Metab Res 44:577-86
pituitary-adrenal axis during the early puerperium may be related to the postpartum
67. Orth DN, Mount CD (1987) Specific high-affinity binding protein for human
143:411-417
35
69. Palazidou E (2012) The neurobiology of depression. Brit Med Bull 101:127-145
70. Pato MD, Adelstein RS (1980) Dephosphorylation of the 20,000-dalton light chain of
myosin by two different phosphatases from smooth muscle. J Biol Chem 255:6535-
6538
71. Pearlstein T (2008) Perinatal depression: treatment options and dilemmas. J Psychiat
Neurosci 33:302-318
72. Peckett AJ, Wright DC, Riddell MC (2011) The effects of glucocorticoids on adipose
and characterization of a cDNA expressed in heart. P Natl Acad Sci USA 92:2969-
2973
74. Petraglia F, Sawchenko PE, Rivier J, Vale W (1987) Evidence for local stimulation of
719
75. Power ML, Williams LE, Gibson SV, Schulkin J, Helfers J, Zorrilla EP (2010) Pattern
Primatol 72:1004-1012
77. Robinson BG, Emanuel RL, Frim DM, Majzoub JA (1988) Glucocorticoid stimulates
36
78. Robinson BG, Arbiser JL, Emanuel RL, Majzoub JA (1989) Species-specific
(2001) The role of infection in preterm labour and delivery. Paediatr Perinat
Epidemiol 15:41-56
42
81. Ryabinin AE, Tsoory MM, Kozicz T, Thiele TE, Neufeld-Cohen A, Chen A, Lowery-
Gionta EG, Giardino WJ, Kaur S (2012) Urocortins: CRF's siblings and their potential
83. Sandman CA, Davis EP, Buss C, Glynn LM (2011) Prenatal programming of human
85. Sibai B, Meis PJ, Klebanoff M, Dombrowski MP, Weiner SJ, Moawad AH, Northen
A, Iams JD, Varner MW, Caritis SN, O'Sullivan MJ, Miodovnik M, Leveno KJ,
Conway D, Wapner RJ, Carpenter M, Mercer B, Ramin SM, Thorp JM, Peaceman
AM, Gabbe S (2005) Plasma CRH measurement at 16 to 20 weeks' gestation does not
Gynecol 193:1181-1186
37
86. Smith R, Cubis J, Brinsmead M, Lewin T, Singh B, Owens P, Chan EC, Hall C, Adler
releasing hormone during pregnancy and the puerperium. J Psychosom Res 34:53-69
adrenal axis in pregnancy and the puerperium. Baillière Clinical Endoc 5:167-186
88. Smith R, Nicholson RC (2007) Corticotrophin releasing hormone and the timing of
89. Smith R, Maiti K (2012) The placenta, a transducer linking maternal nutrition to adult
90. Stalla GK, Hartwimmer J, von Werder K, Muller OA (1984) Ovine (o) and human (h)
91. Stevens MY, Challis JRG, Lye SJ (1998) Corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor
247
93. Takeda K, Akira S (2004) TLR signaling pathways. Semin Immunol 16:3-9
38
95. Thomson M, Chan EC, Falconer J, Madsen G, Smith R (1988) Secretion of
Endocrinol 2:87-100
96. Thomson M, Smith R (1989) The action of hypothalamic and placental corticotropin
98. Thomson M (1998) Does the CRH binding protein shield the anterior pituitary from
99. Thomson M (2008) The effects of placental corticotrophin releasing hormone on the
physiology and psychology of the pregnant woman. Curr Women Health Rev 4:270-
279
Picciolini E, Florio P, Reis FM, Linton EA, Petraglia F (2006) Maternal plasma
Endocrinol 154:281-285
Imperatore A, Petraglia F (2009) Urocortin increases IL-4 and IL-10 secretion and
39
103. Torricelli M, Novembri R, Bloise E, De Bonis M, Challis JR, Petraglia F (2011)
associated with preterm delivery and chorioamnionitis. J Clin Endocr Metab 96:534-
540
104. Tyson EK, Smith R, Read M (2009) Evidence that corticotropin-releasing hormone
150:5617-5625
105. Tzschoppe AA, Struwe E, Dörr HG, Goecke TW, Beckmann MW, Schild RL, Dötsch
106. Uh A, Nicholson RC, Gonzalez GV, Simmons CF, Gombart A, Smith R, Equils O
107. Uh A, Simmons CF, Bresee C, Khoury N, Gombart AF, Nicholson RC, Kocak H,
Equils O (2009) MyD88 and TRIF mediate the cyclic adenosine monophosphate
Science 213:1394-1397
40
Urocortin, a mammalian neuropeptide related to fish urotensin I and to corticotropin-
112. Weiser MJ, Osterlund C, Spencer RL (2011) Inhibitory effects of corticosterone in the
hormone secretion and gene expression in the PVN and anterior pituitary. J
Neuroendocrinol 23:1231-1240
113. Wood IS, Trayhurn P (2003) Glucose transporters (GLUT and SGLT): expanded
protein in blood may trigger clearance of the complex. J Clin Endocr Metab 78:73-76
regulation of maternal health and fetal development. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 26:4-
26
116. Wyrwoll CS, Kerrigan D, Holmes MC, Seckl JR, Drake AJ (2012) Altered placental
117. Xu C, Gao L, You X, Dai L, Li Y, Gu H, Slater DM, Olson DM, Ni X (2011) CRH
Endocrinology 152:4406-4417
118. Zhao FQ, Keating AF (2007) Functional properties and genomics of glucose
41
42