Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Formal Reflection
Formal Reflection
Courtney P. Whyte
After nearly 700 hours spent at Lakeland Regional Health, I have experienced a wide
variety of patients and care plans. Since the beginning of my clinical experience I have gone
from an individual who was nervous to go into a patients room alone, to someone who is taking
the lead in patient care and interacting with patients, their family members, and the physicians.
Being in the Emergency Department has allowed me to tune up a lot of my skills and has given
me so much confidence in myself and my ability to provide safe and competent care to my
patients. This paper will specifically look at one patient I cared for and what I learned from that
56 year old female presented to the E.R. via E.M.S from a SNF as a sepsis alert. Patient
was unresponsive on arrival and had a left gaze. Upon arrival, E.M.S. was unsuccessful in
starting an I.V., E.R. nursing staff started a 18 gauge in the left antecubital and a 20 in the right
forearm. Patient was taken to CT for a head scan, while coming out of the CT scan, her pressure
bottomed out and the patient coded. CPR was performed in CT, as well as a round of epi given,
patient stabilized and was transferred back to the E.R. The patient was then intubated and placed
on a ventilator. Due to her constant very low blood pressure, a sedative was not given. Three
minutes after returning to the E.R. the patient coded once again. CPR was performed and two
more rounds of epi were given. Patient regained a pulse and the physician began to place a
central line. While the doctor was placing a central line, four units of emergency release blood
were obtained and the level one rapid transfuser was being primed and ready to infuse due to her
hemoglobin being 4. While the doctor was placing a central line in her jugular, she lost a pulse
again. This round of compressions were completed by me, and she again regained a pulse. The
CLINICAL EXEMPLAR 3
patient was then rapidly transfused 4 units of O positive blood, and a liter of fluid. The patients
labs and ABG’s came back and her lactic acid came back at 14.9, and she was severely acidotic.
I then placed a 16 french gauge temperature foley, and her urine was clear, and yellow and the
patient had an internal temperature of 38.8 degrees Celsius. Shortly afterwards the patient was
then given 50 grams of albumin, and another two liters of fluids. The patient has a mechanical
heart valve, and was taking warfarin, her INR was 3. The patient was given vitamin K and
Kcentra to reverse the effects of the warfarin. The patient had a j-tube already in place, and when
hooked up to intermitted suction, massive amounts of frank blood was suctioned from the
stomach. This patient was a very critical patient who needed to be in the I.C.U. but was unable to
go due to not having a clean bed available. The I.C.U. doctor came down to the E.R. and
evaluated her and continued to give orders to keep her pressure up. The E.R. doctor had ordered
norepinephrine (Levophed) with the instructions to titrate it PRN, but to not exceed 15mcg per
minute. The patient was titrated up to 15 mcg per minute and her pressure was still critically low,
so the E.R. nurse called the I.C.U. doctor who gave the verbal order to titrate it up and to not
exceed 50 mcg per minute. With the patients’ blood pressure being so low and with the amount
of Levophed she was on, the nurse advocated that the patient get an arterial line placed for an
accurate constant reading. The ICU doctor agreed with the nurse, and came down to place the
arterial line. As he was preparing to place the arterial line, her pressure continued to trend down,
so he gave the verbal order to titrate the Levophed up to 100 mcg per minute. The patient was
not tolerating the arterial line procedure well so that doctor increased the Levophed to 150 mcg
per minute and requested another vasopressor. The patient was then placed on another
vasopressor called phenylephrine. Throughout her time in the ER she had multiple ABG’s
This patient was assigned to a different nurse, but I watched this patient come in on the
stretcher and by her appearance and sepsis alert I knew she wasn’t well. When I knew that there
was a major issue is when the nurses started to run to find blood, the rapid transfuser, and the
ultrasound machine.
Interpreting
With a core temperature of 38.8 degrees Celsius, respiratory rate of 34, constant need for
vasopressors, and a serum lactate level of 14.9 per the 2016 consensus definition of sepsis and
septic shock, this patient was in septic shock, (Thompson, Venkatesh, & Finfer, 2019). “Septic
resuscitation” (Perman, Goyal, & Gaieski, 2012). With the profuse amount of blood coming from
the J-tube, and the amount of black tarry stool with a positive occult stool test, it was suspected
that the patient had a GI bleed. With the copious amounts of blood coming from the multiple I.V.
lines and central line along with lab results the patient was also in disseminated intravascular
coagulation (D.I.C.).
Responding
With this being a critical patient it was important that the E.R. staff evaluate the patients
ABC’s, rapidly establish two large bore I.V.’s, perform surveillance lab work, perform fluid
resuscitation, obtain blood and urine cultures, and rapidly administer antimicrobials, (Perman et
al., 2012). It was found that administration of appropriate antimicrobial within one hour of
identified hypotension increased the patients survival rate to nearly 80%, (Perman et al., 2012).
The 2018 Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) introduced the “Hour-1 Bundle” which
be performed within the first hour of care, (Thompson et al., 2019). The E.R. staff followed that
protocol by administering fluids and blood, obtaining cultures before administration of blood
products, and administering norepinephrine, vancomycin and Zosyn all within the first hour in
the Emergency Department. The I.C.U. staff initiated the D.I.C. protocol.
Reflecting
This was a very difficult case, but helped expose me to caring for a critically ill patient as
well as exposure to certain protocols. I believe that the E.R. staff did everything in their ability to
help save this patient and followed protocol and advocated for this patient. When a patient codes
3 times, is in septic shock, in D.I.C, multiorgan failure and bleeding internally, I question if we
made the right decision, but legally we had to follow the requests of the healthcare proxy. I
wonder what her quality of life will be and if she would have wanted all those extensive
measures taken.
Conclusion
Throughout this program, but especially during preceptorship I gained the confidence to
effectively communicate with my patients, their family members, and members of their
interdisciplinary team. After exposure to many different patients I believe that my “nursing gut”
has formed, especially with certain patient presentations. Throughout this program and clinical
experience I improved my time management skills, critical thinking skills, and communication
skills.. Every shift I learned something new, and as I continue my career as a new graduate nurse
I feel like I will always be learning something new. I’m excited for this new journey and believe
that this program and clinical experience created a solid foundation for my success.
CLINICAL EXEMPLAR 6
References
Perman, S.M., Goyal, M., & Gaieski, D.F. (2012). Initial emergency department diagnosis and
management of adult patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Scandinavian Journal
7241-20-41
Thompson, K., Venkatesh, B., & Finfer, S. (2019). Sepsis and septic shock: current approaches to
https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.14199