Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Membrane Bio
Membrane Bio
Advantages
Secondary clarifiers and tertiary filtration processes are eliminated, thereby reducing
plant footprint. In certain instances, footprint can be further reduced because other
process units such as digesters or UV disinfection can also be eliminated/ minimised
(dependent upon governing regulations)
Can be designed to prolong sludge age, hence lower sludge production
High effluent quality
High loading rate capability
Disadvantages
In Out
This level of filtration allows for high quality effluent to be drawn through the
membranes and eliminates the sedimentation and filtration processes typically used for
wastewater treatment. Because the need for sedimentation is eliminated, the biological process
can operate at a much higher mixed liquor concentration. This dramatically reduces the process
tankage required and allows many existing plants to be upgraded without adding new tanks. To
provide optimal aeration and scour around the membranes, the mixed liquor is typically kept in
the 1.0-1.2% solids range, which is 4 times that of a conventional plant.
Membrane
There are five types of membrane configuration which are currently in operation:
Hollow-fibre (HF) membrane module (Zenon, Canada) filtrating activated sludge under vacuum.
Pre-treatment
To avoid
unwanted
solids in the
waste
stream,
which enters
the
membrane
tank, fine
screening is
an essential
pre-
treatment step. This minimises an accumulation of solids and protects the membrane from
damaging debris and particles, extends the membrane life, reduces operating costs and
guarantees a higher sludge quality as well as a trouble free operation (GE 2011).
Cost Considerations
Although MBR capital and operational costs (membranes, oxygen utilisation, expert
design, etc.) exceed the costs of conventional process, it seems that the upgrade of
conventional process occurs even in cases when conventional treatment works well. This can be
related to increase of water prices and the need for water reuse as well as with more stringent
regulations on the effluent quality.
Most MBRs employ chemical maintenance cleaning on a weekly basis, which lasts 30–60
min, and recovery cleaning when filtration is no longer durable, which occurs once or twice a
year. A deposit that cannot be removed by available methods of cleaning is called “irrecoverable
fouling”. This fouling builds up over the years of operation and eventually determines the
membrane life-time. All O&M tasks have to be done by skilled workers.
Fouling
Modern systems ( KUBOTA systems) are maintained with chemicals, it is not necessary to
remove the membranes from the membrane tank. Organic fouling can be cleaned with as
sodium hypochlorite and inorganic fouling with oxalic acid.
Fouling occurs as a consequence of interactions between the membrane and the mixed liquor,
and is one of the principal limitations of the MBR process. Fouling of membranes in MBRs is a
very complex phenomenon with diverse interlinkages among its causes, and it is very difficult to
localise and define membrane fouling clearly. The main causes of membrane fouling are:
1) Adsorption of macromolecular
2) Growth of biofilms on the membrane surface
3) Precipitation of inorganic matter
4) Aging of the membrane
Health Aspects
Operation and maintenance of MBR systems is generally carried out by skilled labourers,
which should be sufficiently trained regarding any health risks. Sludge from the biological
system should be dewatered (e.g. mechanical dewatering or drying bed) and incinerated with
the ashes being stored in a controlled landfill.
At a glance
Performance High
Main weakness
High operation and capital costs (membranes).
Applicability
Membrane Bioreactor systems are widely used in municipal and industrial wastewater
treatment plants. Furthermore, MBRs are also suitable for landfill leachate treatment. It is a
high-tech system that needs expert design and professional operators.