Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research About The Impact of Fintech Internationally
Research About The Impact of Fintech Internationally
Research About The Impact of Fintech Internationally
We’ve mentioned the many transformational challenges for banks, from among others
the customer perspective, previously. They are joined by an increase of both usage of
FinTech products and consumer trust regarding the providers of such FinTech solutions
and services. No wonder that FinTech is among the hottest ‘terms’ in banking but also
in insurance and financial services overall.
FinTech – the bank and consumer level
FinTech, short for financial technology, is not just about innovative or so-
called disruptive startups, even if today they are really a key part of it. FinTech
is a broader category that is clearly shaping the future of financial services,
beyond the bank customer level.
Having said that, the 2016 edition of the World Retail Banking Report, an annual must-
read by the EFMA and Capgemini is clear about the impact of FinTech firms, among
others from a banking customer perspective.
Almost two-thirds of customers across the globe are already using FinTech
products or services.
81 percent of FinTechs offer faster services in the perception of customers.
Illustrating the underestimations of bankers: only 36 percent of bankers feel
the same.
A large majority of customers feel FinTechs are providing a good experience
(80 percent). Only 40 percent of bankers believes the same.
Some attititudes regarding FinTech according to The FinTech Revolution
infographic by the World Retail Banking Report 2016 – source and more formats
in press release
Note that in the context of the World Retail Banking Report 2016 we talk about
FinTechs as these disruptive newcomers, which in reality are a significant part of
FinTech overall as mentioned. The challenges are clear. Banks are not only confronted
with changing customer expectations as tackled earlier. They are not just challenged by
changing regulations, cost and risk issues and legacy IT and back-office challenges.
They are confronted with a myriad of changes and evolutions with FinTech and FinTech
firms becoming increasingly important.
And they do know it and adapt accordingly as you can, among others read, in our
analysis of the World Retail Banking Report 2016.
Analysis of the FinTech findings of the World Retail Banking Report 2016
Fortunately there are several excellent sources and there is a strong FinTech and
InsurTech (short for insurance technology, indeed) community on Twitter and
elsewhere in case you want to really remain fully up-to-date on all evolutions (just see
what happens when you use the hashtag #fintech nowadays).
What’s for sure is that, despite the reported underestimation from the World
Banking Report, things are changing fast.
The attention for FinTechhas reached a tipping point in 2016 and the banking industry
is clearly starting to take FinTech companies seriously, while they also invest more in
financial technology as such and in several cases have developed innovative services
themselves or started collaborations with FinTech providers and even started acquiring
and investing in FinTech startups or innovation hubs. However, they are not the only
ones. Also the moguls of the online world know what’s at stake.
In April 2016 the CFA Institute (the global association of investment professionals)
released the result of a survey (PDF opens) conducted among its members across the
globe.
The four financial services industry sectors that are expected to be impacted most by
robo-advisers or automated financial advice tools are asset management (obviously by
far with 54 percent), banking (16%), securities (12%) and insurance (8%).
Financial services sector most affected by automated finance tools or robo-
advisors – source Fintech Survey Report CFA Institute 2016 (PDF opens)
The relatively small growth in the perceived importance of robo-advisers
between 1 year and 5 years from now might be related with fears for
risks regarding, among others, technical mistakes (flaws in the artificial
intelligence algorithms driving financial advice algorithms), mis-selling of financial
advice and, remember that we are in the financial industry, obviously privacy and data
protection concerns.
Another explanation for this small growth, however, is related with divided
opinions on the impact of financial advice tools on market fraud / mis-selling
and quality of service.The latter is very important, certainly in an industry where
excellence of service is, well, the essential basis anyone expects nowadays. Also note
that opinions on the impact of robo-advisers on several financial service sectors are
quite different, depending on region.
The challenges for anyone looking at/working with/selling automated financial advice
tools are clear: make sure perceived risks are addressed and make sure that robo-
advisers lead to a clear and proven improvement of quality of service, customer
experience and satisfaction, costs and business growth. Why else use them anyway?
The thing is that, while the attention and initiatives regarding blockchain in
finance (and elsewhere) are booming, it is very hard to really understand,
especially in the longer run. Sure, everyone more or less knows Bitcoin and how
that works (blockhain technology enables it), but that is not what the financial industry
and others are looking at. While virtual currencies do matter (some banks and
institutions take initiatives), the real power is in how the underlying technology and
mechanisms, the blockchain distributed database with its ledger, can and will change
financial services. And the truth is that no one really knows for sure as we’re just at the
verge of a blockhain ‘revolution’ as some call it.
In the FinTech Survey Report 2016 from the CFA Institute, 23 percent of
respondents see marketplace/peer-to-peer lending as having the greatest
impact on the financial services industry in one year from now.
However, in five years from now that number drops significantly to 13 percent. Also
crowdfunding is dropping: from 15 percent to 11 percent. In other words: crowdfunding
and marketplace or peer-to-peer lending seem to be more or less important for the
shorter term and both will be far less important than blockchain technology while they
are still seen as more important in that short term.
Peer-to-peer and marketplace lending visualized by Data & Society – source
FinTech: why now – and how do/will financial
service firms react?
Obviously, these four technologies/evolutions are far from the only ones as you could
read before. FinTech is a lot and it’s hot. In April, Accenture found that in the first
quarter of 2016 global investment in financial technology ventures reached 5.3 billion
USD – a whopping increase of 67 percent compared with the same period the year
before.
FinTech is gaining attention for many reasons. It’s not exactly as if several forms
of it are new (think digital and mobile payments, for instance). As mentioned there is
the increasing adoption and trust regarding FinTech from consumers, in the end the
ultimate disrupters. Second and as a consequence, there is a very active startup and
investment scene with FinTech hubs across the globe and incumbents and other firms
taking initiatives to react in various forms and shapes. Next there are the many third
platform innovation accelerators with technologies that enable newcomers to drive
business models and approaches which are clearly pleasing an increasing number of
‘mobile and digital first’ consumers in ways they are getting used to and offering
experiences and convenience that they didn’t see in finance for a long time. And of
course there is the changing consumer as such, combined with business solutions that
make lives of businesses offering or wanting to offer specific services or reengineering
processes, cheaper, faster and better too.
There are more reasons, some related with the specific financial service
challenges in certain emerging regions (think mobile banking which is
extremely hot in large parts of Africa). The main point, however, is that the
attention for FinTech, as well as the scene, is growing fast for a number of concurring
reasons, leading to a perfect storm and interesting reactions from banks and other
financial service providers. While in some areas we see banks partnering with eachother
to ‘fight off’ fintech start-ups or innovate themselves, others clearly chose the
collaboration path and partner with FinTech start-ups.
Accenture compares collaborative Fintech investments with competitive Fintech
investments – read more
The best solution obviously is contextual: there is no one-size-fits-all. But one
thing is for sure: you can’t be everything at the same time and in several areas
collaboration and/or integration will be key and a way for several startups in the
scene to survive those critical first years in an industry on fire.
Banks and financial institutions, on the other hand will have to chose and think about
both their core business and the partnerships/integrations they need to have in order to
not be left behind.
We won’t always follow the often used categorizations as that would make us
focus to much at the technologies and fintech firms, which is not our
purpose. Our goal is to tackle an increasing list of technologies which are used in
financial services in order to achieve a clear business goal, starting with those that de
facto respond most to current challenges, opportunities and evolutions, mainly from the
consumer and thus consumer/retail banking and insurance side (some links regarding
these challenges below this page). So we will indeed be covering things that might
sound less techhy than, for instance virtual currencies or robots sitting behind a bank’s
counter as happens here and there. Think about mobile wallets, personal finance tools,
digital payment systems and mobile banking platforms, to name a few.
On top of that we’ll tackle some key technologies which are essential outside of finance
too and focus how they are used in financial services, including cloud computing,
the IoT and artificial intelligence. Welcome to a hyper-connected world. After all, those
technologies are not just used by consumers but also by financial services firms and
obviously the real FinTech companies who built their solutions upon these and other
technologies.
The deep tech pockets of the financial services industry and the
wealthy fintech user base
Financial services IT spending will reach almost $480 billion
worldwide in 2016 with a five-year compound annual growth rate
(CAGR) of 4.2% (IDC)
Moreover, it’s safe to say that there will be more overlaps and collaborations
between traditional financial service providers and FinTech.
While banks are not exactly known – in general – for rapid innovation it’s interesting to
see which ones are moving fastest and taking initiatives to tap into the rather wealthy
user base of FinTech lovers and how they will do it.
If we look at retail banking, de facto the number one financial services segment where
FinTech players today are most active, we see that according to the beforementioned
Global Retail Banking Report 2016, 65 percent of responding retail bank executives see
FinTechs as partners, rather than competitors (28 percent).
Below is a list with the types of FinTech which are seen as new entrants most likely to
cause disruption to traditional financial services companies in the next 12 months,
according to the press release. The top 4 consists of online investment firms (26%),
challenger banks (24%), peer-to-peer lenders (16%), online traders (13%).
New FinTech entrants most likely to cause disruption to traditional financial
services firms in the UK – Robert Half research 2016 – source press release
If we look at the FinTech services which are embraced most we see that,
according to the EY FinTech Adoption Index (conducted end 2015) the most
used FinTech services respectively are money transfer/payment,
savings/investment, insurance (for instance, telematics, often in the context
of new pricing models) and borrowing.
The same report by EY, offers quite some insights into the adoption of FinTech among
consumers, the types of consumers which are more interested in which services, the
drivers of FinTech adoption and the reasons why consumers DON’T adopt FinTech
services yet.
In the press release EY sent out to announce the FinTech Adoption Index, the company
stated that 15.5% of digitally active consumers used at least two FinTech products
within the last six months and expects it to double by the approaching end of 2016.
Note: with FinTech products or services EY means service products which are not
developed by a bank or insurance firm but by an online firm, indeed FinTech as the
online startup and less startup scene.