Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter
Chapter
CHAPTER 3
HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS ON CULVERTS
3.1. General
3.2. Culvert
A culvert is a conveyance conduit for surface water drainage beneath a
driveway, street, highway, railroad, canal, or other embankment. Culvert conveyance
capacity is a function of both inlet and discharge flow conditions.
The most critical aspect of culvert design is to determine stable and
predictable performance for all expected flow levels. The design of a culvert is
influenced by cost, hydraulic efficiency, purpose, and the topography at the proposed
culvert site.
The general purpose of culverts is to transmit water flowing in natural streams
or collected on the high side of the right-of-way from one side of the highway to the
other. Culverts are constructed from a variety of materials and available in many
different shapes and inlet configurations. Culverts selection factors include roadway
profiles, channel characteristics, design discharge, construction and maintenance costs
and estimates of service life [78Ano].
20
3.2.1. Materials
The selection of a culvert material may depend upon structural strength,
hydraulic roughness, durability, and corrosion and abrasion resistance. The three most
common culvert materials are concrete and nonreinforced, corrugated aluminum, and
corrugated steel. Culverts may also be lined with other materials to inhibit corrosion
and abrasion, or to reduce hydraulic resistance.
3.2.2. Types
Culverts are available in various cross-sectional shapes. The most commonly
used shapes are circular, box (or) rectangular, elliptical, pipe-arch, and arch as shown
Figure 3.1. The shape selection is based on the cost of construction, the limitation on
upstream water surface elevation, roadway embankment height, and hydraulic
performance.
Figure 3.1. Culvert Shapes (a) Circular, (b) Box, (c) Elliptical,
(d) Pipe Arch, (e) Metal Box and (f) Arch [04Lar]
21
3.2.3. Inlets
A multitude of different inlet configurations are utilized on culvert barrels.
These include both prefabricated and constructed-in-place installations. Commonly
used inlet configurations include projecting culvert barrels, cast-in-place concrete
headwalls, precast or prefabricated end sections, and culvert ends mitered to conform
to the fill slope. The typical inlet configurations are shown in Figure 3.2.
The hydraulic capacity of a culvert may be improved by appropriate inlet
selection. Since the natural channel is usually wider than the culvert barrel, the culvert
inlet edge represents a flow contraction and may be the primary flow control. The
provision of a more gradual flow transition will lessen the energy loss and thus create
a more hydraulically efficient inlet condition as shown in Figure 3.3. Beveled edges
are therefore more efficient than square edges. Side-tapered and slope-tapered inlets,
commonly referred to as improved inlets, further reduce the flow contraction.
Depressed inlets, such as slope-tapered inlets, increase the effective head on the flow
control section, thereby further increasing the culvert efficiency. Figures 3.4 and 3.5
depict a side-tapered and a slope-tapered inlet respectively.
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Figure 3.2. Four Standard Inlet Types: (a) Projecting Barrel, (b) Cast-in-place
Concrete (Headwall and wingwall), (c) Precast End Section, and
(d) End Mitered to the Slope [04Lar]
22
Elevation S
Elevation
Plan Plan
t
23
Channel
Cross
of Highway
Sections
Cross
Proposed Section
Culvert
3.3.2.4. Resistance
The hydraulic resistance coefficient of the natural channel must be evaluated
in order to calculate preproject flow conditions. This resistance coefficient is usually
taken to be the Manning’s n value. Various methods are available to evaluate
resistance coefficients for natural streams.
3.3.2.5. Tailwater
Culvert performance is likely to be affected by the downstream water surface
elevation or tailwater. Therefore, conditions which might promote high tailwater
elevations during flood events should be investigated. Downstream impoundments,
obstructions, channel constrictions, tidal effects, and junctions with other
watercourses should be investigated, based on field observations and maps, in order to
evaluate their impact on the resultant tailwater elevation. Lacking these conditions,
tailwater elevations should be based on water surface elevations in the natural
channel. These elevations can be accurately determined from water surface elevation
calculations or estimated using simplified approximations of water depth. For most
culvert installations, an approximation is sufficient [78Ano].
contour maps or the cross sectional areas can be used to compute storage. The
topographic information should extend from the channel bed upward to an elevation
equal to at least the design headwater elevation in the area upstream of the culvert.
Channel
Shoulder
Elevation Elevation
Pavement
Elevation
SE
Proposed Upstream
Culvert Invert
Section A.A
c of Highway
Wingwall wingwall
(b)
Headwall
Bevel
Box Culvert
HW
dc TW
W.S.
Control Section W.S.
HW - Headwater
TW - Tailwater
W.S. - Water Surface
dc - Critical Depth
capacity. Upstream water surface elevation and inlet geometry are the major flow
controls. Inlet geometry includes barrel shape, cross-sectional area, and inlet edge.
Water Surface
H W.S.
HW
Control
TW Section
Downstream
A. Submerged
W.S.
HW H
B. Unsub-
HW - Headwater
merged TW - Tallwater dc (Control Section)
W.S. - Water Surface
H - Losses Through Culvert
To determine the headwater, inlet control and outlet control are considered.
Table 3.1 provides summary conditions likely to control the culvert headwater.
31
Throat
Section
Plan
Elevation
Face Section
Throat Section
0.083 D 1
0.042 D 1
D = Barrel Depth
HW
TW
M
K Q
for
HWi Q
K u 0.5 0.5
≤ 3.5 (3.1)
D AD AD
Q
2
HWi Q ≥4
c 0.5
Y 0.5S 2 for 0.5
(3.2)
D AD AD
Where,
Q = Discharge (ft3/s)
A = Cross-sectional area of culvert barrel (ft2)
S = Stream slope (ft/ft)
HWi = Headwater depth above inlet invert (ft)
K, M,c,Y = Constants varied according to inlet edge condition
Ku = Constant for inlet control = 1
Where,
Ke = Entrance loss coefficient
Ku = Constant for outlet control = 29
n = Manning ̍ roughness coefficient
L = Length of culvert barrel (ft)
R = Hydraulic radius of culvert barrel (ft)
A = Cross-sectional area of culvert barrel (ft2)
P = Perimeter of the barrel (ft)
35
q2
dc = Critical depth(ft)= 3 (3.6)
g
q = Unit discharge
D = Culvert barrel depth (ft)
Once the inlet control headwater, HWi and the outlet control headwater, HWo
are computed, the controlling headwater is determined by comparing HWi and HWo,
if HWi > HWo , the culvert is inlet control;
if HWo>HWi , the culvert is outlet control.
Tailwater depth can be computed by using the following equation.
TW=HWo-H (3.7)
Where,
TW = Tailwater depth (ft)
HWo = Outlet control headwater depth above outlet invert (ft)
H = Total losses (ft)
Where,
Qr = Overtopping flow rate (ft3/s),
Cd = Overtopping discharge coefficient = k t Cr,
Cr = The discharge coefficient and
Kt = The submergence factor (TW is higher than allowable HW)
L = Length of roadway crest, (ft),
HWr = The upstream depth, measured above the roadway crest, (ft)
The depth over the roadway can be computed by the following.
HWr= HWc – hc (3.9)
36
Where,
HWr = The depth over the roadway
HWc = Controlling headwater
hc = Design headwater depth
=shoulder elevation- stream bed elevation at culvert face
Cr
HWr(ft)
(a)
kt
Cr
HWr(ft)
ht/HWr
(b) (c)
Where,
Q = Discharge (ft3/s)
A = Cross sectional area of fluid in culvert
n = Manning ̍ roughness coefficient =0.012
R = Hydraulic radius
P = Wetted perimeter
S = Stream slope (ft/ft)
The outlet velocity can be computed by the following.
Q
Vo= (3.11)
Wd n
Where,
Q = Discharge (ft3/s)
W = Culvert width (ft)
dn = Normal depth (ft)
The downstream channel velocity can be determined by the following
equation.
Q
V= (3.12)
WTW
Where, Q = Discharge (ft3/s)
W = Culvert width (ft)
TW = Tailwater depth (ft)