Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 20

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Division: Tarlac City Date of Review:
Rating Period: June 2018-March 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET (5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Educaton Content 1. Applied June 2018- Quality Showed Showed Showed
Services Knowledge and knowledge of March 2019 knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of
Pedagogy content within content and its content and its content and its
and across integration integration integration
curriculum within and within and within and
teaching areas across subjject across subjject across subjject
subject areas as subject areas as subject areas as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of
5

22.50%
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at
least 4 lessons least 3 lessons least 2lessons as
as using MOV 1 as using MOV 1 using MOV 1
and supported and supported and supported
by any 1 of the by any 1 of the by any 1 of the
other given other given other given
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV


distributed across 4 distributed across 3 were distributed
quarters quarters across 2 quarters

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Division: Tarlac City Date of Review:
Rating Period: June 2018-March 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Per KRA
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Per Outstanding Very Satisfactory
KRA QET (5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 2. Used a range June 2018- Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using
different teaching different teaching different teaching
Services of teaching March 2019 strategies that strategies that strategies that
strategies that promote reading, promote reading, promote reading,
enhance learner writing, and/or writing, and/or writing, and/or
achievement in numeracy shown in numeracy shown in numeracy shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
literacy and of 7 of 6 of 5
numeracy skills.

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2


learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered
lessons as evidently lessons as evidently lessons as evidently
shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other MOV of the other MOV of the other MOV
given given given

Timeliness
3. Applied a June 2018- Quality Uses different Uses different Uses different
range of March 2019 teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching
teaching that develop that develop strategies that
strategies to critical and critical and develop critical
creative thinking creative thinking and creative
develop critical and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS thinking and/or
and creative as shown in MOV as shown in MOV other HOTS as
thinking, as well 1 with a rating of 7 1 with a rating of 6 shown in MOV 1
as other higher- with a rating of 5
order thinking
skills.

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Division: Tarlac City Date of Review:
Rating Period: June 2018-March 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Per Outstanding Very Satisfactory
KRA QET (5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2
4 lessons as lessons as lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by
1 and supported 1 and supported MOV 1 and
by any 1 of the by any 1 of the supported by any
other given MOV other given MOV 1 of the other
given MOV

Timeliness
Timeliness

Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Managed June 2018 - Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom
classroom structure management management management
Services Environment to engage learners, March 2019
and Diversity of strategies that strategies that strategies that
individually or in
Learners groups, in meaningful engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
exploration, activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
discovery and hands- shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
on activities within a with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
range of physical
learning
environments.
22.50%

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Division: Tarlac City Date of Review:
Rating Period: June 2018-March 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Per Outstanding Very Satisfactory
KRA QET (5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2
4 lessons lessons supported lessons supported
supported by MOV by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
1 and any 1 of the 1 of the other 1 of the other
other acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
MOV

Timeliness

5. Managed June 2018 - Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher
learner behavior March 2019 management management management
constructively by strategies of strategies of strategies of
applying positive learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior
and non-violent that promote that promote that promote
discipline to positive and non- positive and non- positive and non-
ensure learning- violent discipline violent discipline violent discipline
focused as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV
environments. submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Division: Tarlac City Date of Review:
Rating Period: June 2018-March 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Per Outstanding Very Satisfactory
KRA QET (5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted at least Submitted at least
4 of the given 4 of the given 4 of the given
strategies as strategies as strategies as
observed in at observed in 3 observed in 2
least 4 lessons lessons lessons

Timeliness

6. Used June 2018 - Quality Applied Applied Applied


differentiated, March 2019 differentiated differentiated differentiated
developmentally teaching strategies to teaching strategies to teaching strategies
address learner address learner to address learner
appropriate diversity as shoen in diversity as shoen in diversity as shoen in
learning MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
experience to of 7 of 6 of 5
address learners'
gender, needs,
strenghts,
interests and
experiences.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
differentiated differentiated differentiated
teaching strategies in teaching strategies in teaching strategies in
at least 2 lessons as at least 2 lessons as at least 2 lessons as
evidenced by MOV 1 evidenced by MOV 1 evidenced by MOV 1
and supported by and supported by and supported by
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Division: Tarlac City Date of Review:
Rating Period: June 2018-March 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING
Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Per Outstanding Very Satisfactory
KRA QET (5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, June 2018 - Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and
Services and Planning managed and March 2019 implemented implemented implemented
implemented developmentally developmentally developmentall
developmentally sequenced sequenced y sequenced
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning process learning process learning process
learning process as shown in as shown in as shown in
to meet MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
curriculum rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
requirements
and varied
teaching
contexts.

22.50%
Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2
4 developmentally- developmentally-
developmentally- sequenced sequenced
sequenced teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning process as learning process
learning process as evidently shown in as evidently
evidently shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1
MOV 1 and supported by any and supported by
supported by any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
1 of the other given MOV given MOV
given MOV

Timeliness

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Division: Tarlac City Date of Review:
Rating Period: June 2018-March 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Per Outstanding Very Satisfactory
KRA QET (5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
8. Participated in June 2018 - Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
collegial March 2019 participated in participated in participated in
discussions that LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meeti
use teacher and gs to discuss gs to discuss ngs to discuss
teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
learner feedback feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich
to enrich instruction as instruction as instruction as
teaching shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
practice. submitted submitted submitted
to enrich instruction as instruction as instruction as
teaching shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
practice. submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Participated in Participated in 3 Participated in 2


at least 4 LACs/FGDs/mee LACs/FGDs/mee
LACs/FGDs/mee tings as tings as
tings as evidently shown evidently shown
evidently shown in any 1 of the in any 1 of the
in any 1 of the given MOV given MOV
given MOV

Timeliness

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Division: Tarlac City Date of Review:
Rating Period: June 2018-March 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Per Outstanding Very Satisfactory
KRA QET (5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
9. Selected, June 2018 - Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and
developed, March 2019 used varied used varied used varied
organized and teaching and teaching and teaching and
used learning resources, learning resources, learning
including ICT, to including ICT, to resources,
appropriate address learning address learning including ICT, to
teaching and goals as shown in goals as shown in address learning
learning MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a goals as shown in
resources, rating of 7 rating of 6 MOV 1 with a
including ICT, to rating of 5
address learning
goals.

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied


varied teaching and teaching and learning teaching and
learning resources resources including learning resources
including ICT, as ICT, as evidently including ICT, as
evidently shown in shown in MOV 1 and evidently shown in
MOV 1 and supported by any 1 MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 of the acceptable supported by any 1
of the acceptable MOV of the acceptable
MOV MOV
of the acceptable MOV of the acceptable
MOV MOV

Timeliness

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Division: Tarlac City Date of Review:
Rating Period: June 2018-March 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Per Outstanding Very Satisfactory
KRA QET (5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Designed, June 2018 - Quality Designed, Designed, Designed,
Services and Reporting selected, March 2019 selected, selected, selected,
organized, and organized and organized and organized and
used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic,
formative and formative and formative and
formative and summative summative summative
summative assessment assessment assessment
assessment strategies strategies strategies
strategies consistent with consistent with consistent with
consistent with curriculum curriculum curriculum
curriculum requirements as requirements as requirements as
requirements. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

22.50%

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2


least 4 varied varied varied
assessment assessment assessment
tools as tools as tools as
evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown
in any 1 of the in any 1 of the in any 1 of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Division: Tarlac City Date of Review:
Rating Period: June 2018-March 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING
Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Per Outstanding Very Satisfactory
KRA QET (5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
11. Monitored June 2018 - Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
and evaluated March 2019 monitored and monitored and monitored and
learner progress evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner
and progress and progress and progress and
achievement using achievement using achievement
achievement learner attainment learner attainment using learner
using learners data as shown in data as shown in attainment data
attainment data. the MOV the MOV as shown in the
submitted submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a


combination of combination of combination of
at least 4 of the at least 3 of the at least 2 of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV


were distributed were distributed were distributed
across 4 across 3 across 2
quarters quarters quarters

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Division: Tarlac City Date of Review:
Rating Period: June 2018-March 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Per Outstanding Very Satisfactory
KRA QET (5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
12. June 2018 - Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Communicated March 2019 Showed prompt Showed prompt Showed prompt
3 promptly and and clear and clear and clear
clearly the communication of communication of communication of
the learners' the learners' the learners'
learners' needs, needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress
progress and and achievemnet and achievemnet and achievemnet
achievement to to key to key to key
key stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
stakeholders, including including including
including parents/guardians parents/guardians parents/guardians
parents/guardia as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
ns. MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
progress and and achievemnet and achievemnet and achievemnet
achievement to to key to key to key
key stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
stakeholders, including including including
including parents/guardians parents/guardians parents/guardians
parents/guardia as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
ns. MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a


combination of combination of combination of
at least 4 of the at least 3 of the at least 2 of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV


were distributed were distributed were distributed
across 4 across 3 across 2
quarters quarters quarters

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Division: Tarlac City Date of Review:
Rating Period: June 2018-March 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Per Outstanding Very Satisfactory
KRA QET (5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services various related performed various performed various performed various
works/activities related related related
that contribute work/activities to work/activities to work/activities to
the teaching- the teaching- the teaching-
to the teaching- learning process as learning process as learning process
learning process. shown in the MOV shown in the MOV as shown in the
submitted submitted MOV submitted

10%

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at


least 4 different least 3 different least 2 different
kinds of kinds of kinds of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness

Rater: Ratee:
REBECCA K. SOTTO, Ph.D. __________________________________
Principal III Teacher I
IEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I- III
ame of Rater: DR. REBECCA K. SOTTO
Principal III
ate of Review:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

ce Indicators Rating
Actual Score
Unsatisfactory Poor Results
Q E T Ave
(2) (1)
Showed knowledge No acceptable Showed
knowledge of
of content and its evidence was content and
integration within shown its integration
and across subjject within and
subject areas as across
subjject
shown in MOV 1 subject areas
with a rating of 4 as shown in
MOV 1 with a
rating of 7

5 4 3 4 0.3
Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted
the given MOV evidence was at least 3
shown lessons as
using MOV
1 and
supported
by any 1 of
the other
given MOV

Submitted MOV was No acceptable Submitted MOV


completed in only 1 were distributed
evidence was across 2
quarter shown quarters

IEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I- III

ame of Rater: DR. REBECCA K. SOTTO


Principal III
ate of Review:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

ce Indicators Rating
Actual Score
Results
Actual
Unsatisfactory Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(2) (1)
Facilitated using No acceptable
different teaching evidence was
strategies that promote shown
reading, writing, and/or
numeracy shown in
MOV 1 with a rating of 4

Submitted at least 1 No acceptable


learner-centered lessons evidence was
as evidently shown in shown
MOV 1 and supported
by any 1 of the other
MOV given

Uses different No acceptable


teaching strategies evidence was
that develop critical shown
and creative thinking
and/or other HOTS as
shown in MOV 1 with
a rating of 4

IEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I- III

ame of Rater: DR. REBECCA K. SOTTO


Principal III
ate of Review:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

ce Indicators Rating
Actual
Unsatisfactory Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(2) (1)
Submitted 1 lessons No acceptable
as evidenced by MOV evidence was
1 and supported by shown
any 1 of the other
given MOV
Used classroom No acceptable
management evidence was
strategies that shown
engage learners in
activities/tasks as
shown in MOV 1 with
a rating of 4

IEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I- III

ame of Rater: DR. REBECCA K. SOTTO


Principal III
ate of Review:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

ce Indicators Rating
Actual
Unsatisfactory Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(2) (1)
Submitted 1 lessons No acceptable
supported by MOV 1 evidence was
and any 1 of the shown
other acceptable
MOV

Applied teacher No acceptable


management evidence was
strategies of learner shown
behavior that
promote positive and
non-violent discipline
as shown in MOV
submitted with a
rating of 4
IEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I- III

ame of Rater: DR. REBECCA K. SOTTO


Principal III
ate of Review:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

ce Indicators Rating
Actual
Unsatisfactory Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(2) (1)
Submitted at least 4 No acceptable
of the given evidence was
strategies as shown
observed in 1 lesson

Applied differentiated No acceptable


teaching strategies to evidence was
address learner diversity shown
as shoen in MOV 1 with
a rating of 4

Submitted 1 No acceptable
differentiated teaching evidence was
strategies in at least 2 shown
lessons as evidenced by
MOV 1 and supported
by any 1 of the other
acceptable MOV

IEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I- III

ame of Rater: DR. REBECCA K. SOTTO


Principal III
ate of Review:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


ce Indicators Rating
Actual
Unsatisfactory Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(2) (1)
Planned and No acceptable
implemented evidence was
developmentally shown
sequenced
teaching and
learning process as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4

Submitted 1 No acceptable
developmentally- evidence was
sequenced teaching shown
and learning process
as evidently shown in
MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 of
the other given MOV

IEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I- III

ame of Rater: DR. REBECCA K. SOTTO


Principal III
ate of Review:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

ce Indicators Rating
Actual
Unsatisfactory Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(2) (1)
Rarely participated in No acceptable
LACs/FGDs/meetings evidence was
to discuss shown
teacher/learner
feedback to enrich
instruction as shown
in the MOV
submitted
in the MOV
submitted

Participated in No acceptable
1LACs/FGDs/meeti evidence was
ngs as evidently shown
shown in any 1 of
the given MOV

IEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I- III

ame of Rater: DR. REBECCA K. SOTTO


Principal III
ate of Review:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

ce Indicators Rating
Actual
Unsatisfactory Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(2) (1)
Developed and used No acceptable
varied teaching and evidence was
learning resources, shown
including ICT, to
address learning
goals as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating
of 4

Submitted any varied No acceptable


teaching and learning
resources including ICT, evidence was
as evidently shown in shown
MOV 1 and supported
by any 1 of the
acceptable MOV
IEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I- III

ame of Rater: DR. REBECCA K. SOTTO


Principal III
ate of Review:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

ce Indicators Rating
Actual
Unsatisfactory Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(2) (1)
Designed, selected, No acceptable
organized and used evidence was
diagnostic, formative shown
and summative
assessment strategies
consistent with
curriculum
requirements as
shown in MOV 1 with
a rating of 4

Submitted 1 No acceptable
assessment tools evidence was
as evidently shown shown
in any 1 of the
acceptable MOV

IEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I- III

ame of Rater: DR. REBECCA K. SOTTO


Principal III
ate of Review:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


ce Indicators Rating
Actual
Unsatisfactory Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(2) (1)
Rarely monitored and No acceptable
evaluated learner evidence was
progress and shown
achievement using
learner attainment
data as shown in the
MOV submitted

Submitted 1 No acceptable
acceptable MOV evidence was
shown

Submitted MOV No acceptable


was completed in evidence was
only 1 quarter shown

IEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I- III

ame of Rater: DR. REBECCA K. SOTTO


Principal III
ate of Review:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

ce Indicators Rating
Actual
Unsatisfactory Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(2) (1)
Rarely Showed No acceptable
prompt and clear evidence was
communication of shown
the learners' needs,
progress and
achievemnet to key
stakeholders,
including
parents/guardians as
shown in the MOV
submitted
stakeholders,
including
parents/guardians as
shown in the MOV
submitted

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable


the given MOV evidence was
shown

Submitted MOV No acceptable


was completed in evidence was
only 1 quarter shown

IEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I- III

ame of Rater: DR. REBECCA K. SOTTO


Principal III
ate of Review:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

ce Indicators Rating
Actual
Unsatisfactory Poor Score
Results Q E T Ave
(2) (1)
Rarely performed No acceptable
various related evidence was
work/activities to the shown
teaching-learning
process as shown in
the MOV submitted

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable


the acceptable evidence was
MOV shown

Approving Authority:
TERESA D. MABABA, CESO V
Schools Division Superintendent

You might also like